If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   FedEx class action lawsuit produces this gem: "FedEx knows that black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test (for promotion)"   (cnn.com) divider line 601
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

26407 clicks; posted to Main » on 29 Sep 2005 at 12:34 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



601 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2005-09-29 10:08:20 AM
that's impressive. I hope they have something more than just that if they hope to win this thing
 
2005-09-29 10:17:31 AM
Because, you know, racial equality is ALL ABOUT making special allowance for select groups. When you want to be considered equal and no different in any way, you NEED to demand that everything be geared your way.

idiotic.
 
2005-09-29 10:29:37 AM
on the other hand the article didn't specify what kind of test was given. It's possible that some tests could be incidentally racist.
 
2005-09-29 10:33:55 AM
You mean like using chemical tests to determine melanin ratios, snowburnt? Yeah, that's pretty racist...and tanist.
 
2005-09-29 10:35:49 AM
stevarooni: You mean like using chemical tests to determine melanin ratios, snowburnt? Yeah, that's pretty racist...and tanist.

they use that test to see if they are moles from UPS.
 
2005-09-29 11:07:40 AM
as a former FedEx hub employee, I can tell you that there are just as many, if not more, minorities in middle management and the rank-and-file as whites. The only place where whites have a majority is in upper management, and that's because most of them are company founders or early hires.
 
2005-09-29 11:08:06 AM
I think this just shows that the LAST thing most of these people want is true equality.

True equality would scare the hell out of most of the people calling for it.
 
2005-09-29 11:30:50 AM
The test's racism was apparent when they asked their employees to name all of the characters from Friends and some hits by Phil Collins.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2005-09-29 11:49:49 AM
The Civil Rights Quota Act of 1990 allows using statistical evidence to prove racial discrimination.
 
2005-09-29 11:53:26 AM
Time for my favourite quote:
"Political correctness is gay."
 
2005-09-29 11:57:28 AM
ZAZ, are you serious?

What if your company is just you (let's say your asian) and you are looking to hire, and you decide to hire another guy who is of another ethnicity, let's say black.

Does that mean all white, east Indian, native Americans, can sue you for discrimination? You know since your company has 0% of each.

Holy shiat, I'm never moving to the USA again. You guys are CRAZY!!!
 
2005-09-29 12:05:38 PM
plizak: Does that mean all white, east Indian, native Americans, can sue you for discrimination? You know since your company has 0% of each.

I'm pretty sure the company has to have a certain number of employees (more than a handful) before those laws take effect. The larger companies I've worked for have taken affirmative action policies much more seriously than the small companies.
 
2005-09-29 12:08:32 PM
Got to love it when some people fail in the workplace. If they are a minority, they go to a law office and sue. A real person would try harder or go work elsewhere.
 
2005-09-29 12:09:54 PM
Under the 1990 Act, statistical analysis can be admissible to show discrimination, but it takes much more to prove discrimination.

The sentence in the headline is likely part of an argument about criteria bias and not disparate impact anyways.
 
2005-09-29 12:16:14 PM
Needs to buy more FedEx stock.... support.
 
2005-09-29 12:38:51 PM
What can brown do for FedEx? Apparantly nothing.
 
2005-09-29 12:39:47 PM
FedEx hates Brown people.
 
2005-09-29 12:39:56 PM
The test's racism was apparent when they asked their employees to name all of the characters from Friends and some hits by Phil Collins

im white and i cant even do that. i dont even think i could identify phil collins
 
2005-09-29 12:41:27 PM
2005-09-29 12:08:32 PM Crosshair
"A real person would try harder or go work elsewhere."

Or just biatch that the boss has it in for them.
 
2005-09-29 12:41:41 PM


See the arrow between the "E" and the "x"? It's pretty sweet.
 
2005-09-29 12:42:15 PM
Well duh. What can brown do for you is the UPS slogan.
 
nfw
2005-09-29 12:42:29 PM
Well, maybe Fedex wants to be successful, as opposed to, say, public schools.
 
2005-09-29 12:42:54 PM
i'm just glad tiger woods has a well-paying job because he would obviously fail the promotion test extra-failey what with all those kooky minorities mixed up in him
 
2005-09-29 12:43:26 PM
Smells like New Orleans.
 
2005-09-29 12:43:39 PM
Unless the test is based on some kind of phrenology or skin pigmentation, I can't possibly see how it would be racist. Knowledge and problem-solving skills are not race-based.
 
2005-09-29 12:44:08 PM
I think maybe we should be asking the schools why they're discriminating against minorities. Because no job application I've ever seen had anything on it that could be construed as racist.
 
2005-09-29 12:44:13 PM
Yeah, but they do one hell of a good job.
 
2005-09-29 12:44:27 PM
im white and i cant even do that. i dont even think i could identify phil collins

Just look for a balding douchebag.
 
2005-09-29 12:44:54 PM
OK let's see... Ross Rachel Chandler Joey Monica Phoebe Gunther Sususudio In The Air Tonight!!! I Win!!! I'm White!!!
 
2005-09-29 12:45:18 PM
I have a friend who's a supervisor at UPS. He suggested some basic testing of math skills for recruits. He was told that to start such testing was "racist."

Our country is burning it at both ends, both right and left.
 
2005-09-29 12:45:23 PM
I think, for white football players, a first down should only have to be a net gain of 7 yards. Ten is just too hard for honkies.
 
2005-09-29 12:45:34 PM
do we still do the omarion thing?
 
2005-09-29 12:45:39 PM
Oh, for f*cks sake....

I'm oft accused of being a liberal, but this is just retarted. That doesn't necessarily mean that the test is biased! It could just mean a lot of X number of people are underqualified within the company. If they don't have anything more substantial, then screw 'em.

*Dislikes all *real* racism. This includes towards whites. Thinks AA should be class/income based, and thinks that PC-ness needs to die a horrible, horrible death...*
 
2005-09-29 12:46:04 PM
nfw
Zing.
 
2005-09-29 12:46:08 PM
FedEx is actually one of the better companies in the country when it comes to discrimination.

Maybe they also give people jobs as handlers and sorters who probably wouldn't normally get them, therefore they fail at a higher rate for further promotion? But that would just be too easy.
 
2005-09-29 12:47:04 PM
Crosshair

Got to love it when some people fail in the workplace. If they are a minority, they go to a law office and sue. A real person would try harder or go work elsewhere.

Are you suggesting that minorities aren't real people?
 
2005-09-29 12:47:05 PM
They need to change the test so more stupid people can pass it.
 
2005-09-29 12:47:11 PM
Victell
What can brown do for FedEx? Apparantly nothing.


Absolutely, positively hilarious
 
2005-09-29 12:47:36 PM
So let me get this straight. They are saying you should promote someone who fails a test over someone who passes a test? And this is called EQUAL rights?

If you can't pass a test, go get some more education and then retake the test.
 
2005-09-29 12:47:40 PM
George Bush doesn't care about Fed Ex.

Wait...Fed Ex doesn't care about George Bush.

No, I know...Fed Bush doesn't care about Ex-Blacks.

I dunno. I give up.
 
2005-09-29 12:47:57 PM
This isn't racism, this is retarded.
 
2005-09-29 12:48:10 PM
When does it become legal to hang white people?

Or better yet, a federal law requiring white women to mate with more ethnically diverse men in an attempt to solve the problem of the white man.

And put the christians in camps!
 
2005-09-29 12:48:33 PM
I thought the test's purpose was to keep the idiots out of the company. Seems to be working so what is the problem?
 
2005-09-29 12:49:23 PM
FedEx Test Question #14:

You have accidentally opened a box full of cocaine shipped from Columbia. You:

A) Immediately contact authorities and inform them you have found illegal narcotics.
B) Call up your friends and tell them to get the baking soda ready, you're having a partay tonight!
C) Call up your brother Pancho and tell him you accidentally opened up the package addressed to him.
 
2005-09-29 12:49:44 PM
ComicBookGuy

"...Our country is burning it at both ends, both right and left."

Sadly, I agree.
 
2005-09-29 12:49:50 PM
That whole article makes my head tired. the whole test was just one question.

Q. Do you look good in a purple suit?

If answered yes, no promotion. If No, promotion, raise, and a $25 gift card to the GAP.
 
2005-09-29 12:50:12 PM
Memo To All:

Incidents of alleged racism can be proven by auditing the HR records of companies.
 
2005-09-29 12:50:17 PM
*sighs*

*shakes head*

*blames irresponsible parents and the UCLA again*
 
2005-09-29 12:50:20 PM
Didn't even have to look to know this case was brought in California.

Oakland....Because San Francisco sucks.
 
2005-09-29 12:50:37 PM
I got a package the other day through fed ex. The dude, white if it matters, delivered it to the wrong house. It was addressed correctly. I called the toll free number when my tracker said it had been delivered but wasn't at my house. They told me he had delivered it to 303 my street. We are 330. So I walked up the road to retrieve my package. when I got home I looked at the address and sure enough it was correct, so I called back to complain. I'm sure he got wrote up because he showed up at my house around 5 that evening and asked to see the package. When he saw the correct address he blamed the mix up on the scanner reading it incorrectly. I'm still a little mad about it.
 
2005-09-29 12:50:59 PM
Victell

You funny bastard.

As for the test, I say that whites should start failing more so that we can sue for money. Make for easy gains.
 
2005-09-29 12:51:07 PM
I work for UPS.

So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies.

Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know how to park in the worst place possible.

But trust me.... You don't.

I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you dont even know how to drive a large brown van like an A-hole.

This is how bad info gets passed around.

If you dont know about the topic....Dont make yourself sound like you do.

Cuz some Farkers belive anything they hear.

/obligatory
 
2005-09-29 12:51:10 PM
Ok, so I'm white, but if I recall correctly the phrase ..."unless it is beneficial to them" was not mart of MLK's "I had a dream..."
 
2005-09-29 12:51:35 PM

//hates FedEx because most of my packages don't show up. I find it amusing that UPS, USPS, the plumber, HVAC guy, and pizza guy have no problems finding my address but FedEx always makes notes in the computer they can't find it. One time they said they left a package at my back door. (I don't know how that is possible since I have a condo.)
 
2005-09-29 12:51:51 PM
ateksuni
*blames irresponsible parents and the UCLA again*


Perhaps you mean the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)?
 
2005-09-29 12:52:22 PM
Felgraf

You sound like a right wing, Christian, fundie when you speak like that. Give me 20 "I hate white Europeans," and a $250 offering to the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition for remission of your sins.

/sarcasm at 110% sir!
 
2005-09-29 12:52:41 PM
This exact same thing is going on right now within the Denver Fire department. They claim that the written test is rascist because minorities often end up with more "street knowledge"! Haha! They are even trying to go so far as to allow a felony conviction in your past because right now that automatically disqualifies you. And we just know all those minorities all have felony convictions right?
 
2005-09-29 12:52:47 PM
So far only one white employee has passed the "make fire" test.

 
2005-09-29 12:52:55 PM
bbcrackmonkey


Unless the test is based on some kind of phrenology or skin pigmentation, I can't possibly see how it would be racist. Knowledge and problem-solving skills are not race-based.


I don't know about that. I remember reading something a long-ass time ago (it was around the time I was getting ready for the SAT, so forgive the vagueness) that argued that th SAT was racially biased b/c of the questions.

For example, the SAT asked something about snow and skiing, and the report argued that skiing is something that is done mosty by upper-middle to upper class people, also mostly white.

What do you think of that? Could it be something like that that is being argued? And is that a fair example of how questions and knowldge-testing can, indeed, be racially biased?

(Presumably knowledge tests could also be gender biased, and in fact, that is one of my main problems wiith IQ testing. Knowledge isn't really fungible, but I guess that's slightlly offf topic now)
 
2005-09-29 12:52:59 PM
Any job should have a basic skills requirement, whether that's "I have a college degree" or "I can complete a workplace administered test of basic math and laguage comprehension skills" or whatever else.

To require this is not racist. To argue that it is, is to undermine the strength of the entire system, as that system is only as strong as the bottom level, which supports all levels above.

That UPS supervisor mentioned above, re: trying to suggest maths tests for new employees..... if I were him, I would have had to quit. That would drive me insane....
 
2005-09-29 12:53:10 PM
How insulting would it be if you were a certain race and someone giving you a test said: "Well, since folks that are your race have a hard time passing this test, it's been reworked to make it easier for you to pass."

In other words, you're not smart enough to do this yourself - so we've rigged it so you can pass without trying as hard.
 
2005-09-29 12:53:53 PM
Sample questions from the test:

How do you pronounce "ask"?
1. Ask
2. Axe

What is your favorite sitcom
1. Friends
2. Martin
3. Sienfeld
4. The Cosby Show

Why do you want to be management?
1. To excell my career and take care of my family.
2. So I can order white people around.
3. So I can order minorities around.

What kind of cigarettes do you smoke?
1. Camel lights
2. Kool
3. Marlboro
4. Newport

What is your favorite food?
1. Sushi
2. Fried chicken
3. Steak
4. Collared greens


I dunno... It seems pretty racially fair to me.
 
2005-09-29 12:54:18 PM
I hate to be an ass, but I'm gonna...

If the whites and the minorities all took the SAME TEST, and the minorities failed at a higher ratio that only proves one thing: the test is not fixed. It's quite possible for a minority to pass the exam, they just have to know that they're doing. That's how you measure knowledge, with a test. So more minorites failed than the whites, maybe this means that the minorities that failed are stupid...as are the whites that failed.

This doesn't smack of racism, rather retardism, as wilbo26 correctly pointed out.

Now, if they're given DIFFERENT exams...that's bad juju.
 
2005-09-29 12:54:43 PM
2005-09-29 10:29:37 AM snowburnt

on the other hand the article didn't specify what kind of test was given. It's possible that some tests could be incidentally racist.


The first question was: "You're on the green on the 5th fairway. You're 100 yards from the hole, which club do you use?"

Second question: "Who won the Winston Cup in NASCAR last year?"
 
2005-09-29 12:54:51 PM
Crosshair: Got to love it when some people fail in the workplace. If they are a minority, they go to a law office and sue. A real person would try harder or go work elsewhere.


And I think this is the core of the problem. I am all for EQUAL opportunity. That means that if you are a minority, you have EQUAL opportunity for advancement, raises, layoffs, and terminations. Using quotas is a flawed policy. It began well, but when minorities realize that they don't have to try as hard, or work as hard, etc., they can use the quota system to keep their jobs, even get promotions, all for doing shiat. I work in a large company. I am fortunate enough that everyone working around me seems to be competent and devoted to their job, regardless of race. As a result, there are few or no racial problems in my project. I have work in other areas with minorities who have a chip on their shoulder because they are forced to work under a white person. They do everything they can to keep from doing their job, yet they don't get axed. It is pathetic. And I have absolutely no respect for those people. They don't want equality, they want welfare at the workplace.

There is still racism in the workplace, and there would be some discrimination in some companies against minorities without EEO policies, but the policies have resulted in a simple role reversal, where it is harder for non-minorities to get hired or promoted over their minority co-workers. The policies our out-dated and need to be revised.
 
2005-09-29 12:55:36 PM
steve20832: //hates FedEx because most of my packages don't show up. I find it amusing that UPS, USPS, the plumber, HVAC guy, and pizza guy have no problems finding my address but FedEx always makes notes in the computer they can't find it. One time they said they left a package at my back door. (I don't know how that is possible since I have a condo.)

This has happened to me several times as well, I got a package delivered that weighed 30lbs they said they delivered it but I didnt get it they said check the bushes as it might have blown away...
 
2005-09-29 12:55:45 PM
If they cant pass the farking test, then they're too stupid for promotion. Why is this so hard to understand?

/You aren't entitled to anything
 
2005-09-29 12:55:46 PM
Well, it would have been the ACLU, but "the UCLA" will just get me laughed at for being a moran, I won't have people burning various images in effigy on my lawn.

Good catch, I was wondering if anyone would notice. ;)
 
2005-09-29 12:55:47 PM
So_it_goes

Oh, I get it now. It's a bit. A schtick. A routine.

/ That's gold, Jerry. Gold!
 
2005-09-29 12:55:55 PM
Amy78 - He was probably dyxlexic.
 
2005-09-29 12:56:32 PM
jason103

you're not smart enough to do this yourself - so we've rigged it so you can pass without trying as hard.

You've hit it right on. This type of paternalism is the most offensive kind of racism (not including race related violence, of course).
 
cot
2005-09-29 12:56:36 PM
TheHipcat: Q. Do you look good in a purple suit?

I think the backup question was "Do you look good with a shaved head?"
 
2005-09-29 12:56:38 PM
I had a negro deliver a package to me the other day from fedex. They dont seem very racist to me.
 
2005-09-29 12:56:56 PM
eldezod: For example, the SAT asked something about snow and skiing, and the report argued that skiing is something that is done mosty by upper-middle to upper class people, also mostly white.



So then the SATs are biased against those of us (of any ethnicity) that don't ski?
 
2005-09-29 12:57:11 PM
If the whites and the minorities all took the SAME TEST, and the minorities failed at a higher ratio that only proves one thing: the test is not fixed. It's quite possible for a minority to pass the exam, they just have to know that they're doing. That's how you measure knowledge, with a test. So more minorites failed than the whites, maybe this means that the minorities that failed are stupid...as are the whites that failed.

Or it means the minorities went to worse schools, or they came from a culture that has systematically rejected intelligence in favor of glorifying violence, crime, and machismo.
 
2005-09-29 12:57:12 PM
ok... to be fair, the FedEx test is OBVIOUSLY too white. The following therefore should be a suitable replacement:


Little Johnny has an AK-47 with a 30 round clip. He usually misses 6 out of every 10 shots and he uses 13 rounds per drive-by shooting. How many drive-by shootings can Little Johnny attempt before he has to reload?

Jose has 2 ounces of cocaine. If he sells an 8 ball to Antonio for $320 and 2 grams to Juan for $85 per gram, what is the street value of the rest of his hold?

Rufus pimps 3 hos. If the price is $85 per trick, how many tricks per day must each ho turn to support Rufus's $800 per day crack habit?

Jerome wants to cut the pound of cocaine he bought for $40,000>to make 20% profit. How many ounces will he need?

Willie gets $200 for a stolen BMW, $150 for stealing a Corvette, and $100 for a 4x4. If he steals 1 BMW, 2 Corvettes and 3 4x4's, how many more corvettes must he have to steal to have $900?

Raoul got 6 years for murder. He also got $10,000 for the hit. If his common-law wife spends $100 per month, how much money will be left when he gets out?
Extra credit bonus: how much more time will he get for killing the ho that spent his money?


If an average can of spray paint covers 22 square feet and the average letter is 3 square feet, how many letters can be sprayed with 3 eight ounce cans of spray paint with 20% paint free?

Hector knocked up 3 girls in the gang. There are 27 girls in his gang. What is the exact percentage of girls Hector knocked up?

Bernie is a lookout for the gang. Bernie has a Boa Constrictor that eats 3 small rats per week at a cost of $5 per rat. If Bernie makes $700 a week as a lookout, how many weeks can he feed the Boa on one week's income?

Billy steals Joe's skateboard. As Billy skates away at 35 mph, Joe loads his .357 Magnum. If it takes Joe 20 seconds to load his magnum, how far away will Billy be when he gets whacked?
 
cot
2005-09-29 12:57:57 PM
andrew_0812: They do everything they can to keep from doing their job, yet they don't get axed

What don't they get axed? To work harder?
 
2005-09-29 12:58:01 PM
Abox: Or just biatch that the boss has it in for them.


Too true, minorities definately are not the only grumps who biach about having to do any work. But (except in the true corporate world, where "Wallies" can hang about for years doing nothing) they usually get fired pretty quick.
 
2005-09-29 12:58:11 PM
hmm there are 3 times the amount of hispanic workers than white workers, yet hispanics fail twice as much as whites.

wouldn't you think they'd fail 3 times as much?

If 90% of the people taking the test are hispanic, 90% of the peole who fail should also be hispanic.

If 75% of the population is black, 75% of the prisoners should be black too.

when will people learn this?
 
2005-09-29 12:58:19 PM
The theory goes like this: Since intelligence, by standard measures, is not perfectly equally distributed across all the races, intelligence is not something you can use as criteria for hiring or promoting.

That is, if you have a test, that not all races perform equally well on and the test is intended to be used as criteria to find out who is better qualified for a job, then the test is racist.

That is because the dictionary definition of racism is "the belief that one race is better than another".

So if a test proves that one race, is better than another, than the test is racist.

That's why when hiring you can't ever use standardized tests. That's when firing the best thing to do is never give a reason. In the 60s they had all these tests they used to give people to see if they'd be good at certain engineering disciplines, etc and the company would train people if they did well on the test. Today, with the ridiculousness explained above, people have to rely on phonied up resumes and all kinds of interview games to figure out if people are qualified for a given job.
 
2005-09-29 12:58:35 PM
Blame the ACLU? What farking sense does that make?
 
2005-09-29 12:58:39 PM
if those mexicans don't like it, they can always get into landscaping.
 
2005-09-29 12:58:50 PM
My fav bit o racism takes place with every job application you fill out.

It's a farkin form, courtesy of our beloved Imperial Government (gubamint), asking what your specific "race" is....oh yeah, it always laced with these ridiculous and specious apologies, in the form of "oh btw, filling out this form is totally VOLUNTARY and propective employers are FORBIDDEN to hold it aainst you if you choose not to "answer". Uh-huh, like I'm going to risk raising the oh-so-sennnnsitiiive hackles of some politcally-correct wacko in the HR department?

It is a RACIST tool and we all know it. Thank you, my gubamint.
 
2005-09-29 12:59:02 PM
Around here, you get equality of opportunity.

Equality of results is your responsibility.

At least, this is the way it SHOULD be.
 
2005-09-29 12:59:18 PM
FedEx Promotion Test

Question #1 of 1

Are you white?

Yes ___
No _X_

-------------------------------------------
Sorry, but that is the wrong anwser. FAILED
 
2005-09-29 01:00:58 PM
A lot of people call me horrible names for being an Objectivist; but I gotta tell ya, this what Ayn Rand was on about all those years ago. Let's just keep lowering the bar. It'll drag us all down eventually. Worse than sad - absolutely disgusting.
 
2005-09-29 01:01:00 PM
A 100 yard long green? You clearly aren't white. If I'm 100 yards from the hole I'd go with my 5 iron. There is only one approriate club for the green.
 
2005-09-29 01:01:24 PM
Equality is a biatch, isn't it?
 
2005-09-29 01:01:55 PM
Never realized it was racist to expect employees to be qulified for a position prior to promoting them into it.
 
2005-09-29 01:02:01 PM
All they need to do is change the language of their tests into Ebonics and Mexonics.

Problem solved.
 
2005-09-29 01:02:13 PM
Can I assume other farkers thought of Griggs vs. Duke Power Company?
 
2005-09-29 01:02:20 PM
So everyone involved in the lawsuit would be less intellegent than The King of Queens? 'cause he drives a truck.
 
2005-09-29 01:02:41 PM
altinos: Are you suggesting that minorities aren't real people?


The ones who exibit this behavior? Abso-friggin-lutely. They are called "leeches."
 
2005-09-29 01:03:07 PM
I bet 10 dollars that the people filing the lawsuit:

Aren't Oriental
Aren't Indian
Aren't Pakistani
Aren't Middle Eastern
And I'll even bet they aren't Hispanic
 
2005-09-29 01:03:12 PM
I think for a suit to be brought for discrimination, they must hire/promote less than 80% of the candidates in a protected class than for white people.

So if 100 white people apply and the company hires 20 and 100 minorities apply, they must hire at least 16 or it is grounds for a lawsuit.

Once a lawsuit is filed, it is up to the company to prove there was no discrimination, they now have the burden of proof.

/Read this yesterday for an HR class
//More like skimmed over it
 
2005-09-29 01:03:24 PM
By the time this thing gets to court I hope they realize that WHITE is a minority.
 
2005-09-29 01:03:42 PM
What happened to individual responsibility? If you can't pass a test, you don't deserve a higher pay or promotions.
 
2005-09-29 01:03:48 PM
"So everyone involved in the lawsuit would be less intellegent than The King of Queens? 'cause he drives a truck."

Ya, but his wife has nice boobies. I'd give her a special delivery any day.
 
2005-09-29 01:03:57 PM
eldezod
For example, the SAT asked something about snow and skiing, and the report argued that skiing is something that is done mosty by upper-middle to upper class people, also mostly white.

If there are any questions like that on the SAT, it would probably involve distances or something mathematical where the actual skiiing is incidental. Anyway, isn't assuming that black people don't know anything about skiing as bad as assuming that they all eat chicken and watermelon?
 
2005-09-29 01:04:06 PM
bdub77

There is no 'u' in Colombia!!!
 
2005-09-29 01:04:39 PM
"Aren't Oriental
Aren't Indian
Aren't Pakistani
Aren't Middle Eastern
And I'll even bet they aren't Hispanic"

Eskimos?
 
2005-09-29 01:05:05 PM
Q3. During your break you are most likely to:

A. Relax with the newspaper.
B. Play Basketball.
c. Fry up some beef burritos on a trash barrel.
 
2005-09-29 01:05:17 PM
100 yards and you use a 5 iron. You must hit like a puss. i would use a pw or a 9, most likely the PW.
 
2005-09-29 01:05:38 PM
jmvbxx
There is no 'u' in Colombia!!!
You fail the test.
 
2005-09-29 01:06:24 PM
So if my wife gets one of her hot friends to try to seduce me as a "test" and I fail, can I tell her that she should have used one of her uglier friends?

/either way, I'll only have half of my stuff
//literally, half of a TV, half of an amp, half of a car...
///she'd figure out how to cut the chainsaw in half
////love ya, honey.
 
2005-09-29 01:06:33 PM
trueaustinite
I think, for white football players, a first down should only have to be a net gain of 7 yards. Ten is just too hard for honkies.

Wow, I didn't realize Jimmy the Greek was a farker!
 
2005-09-29 01:06:49 PM
It's their right to file suit, and I wouldn't argue against that right.

That said, on the surface, the case is weak, and lacking substantial development, I would hope that a reasonable jury of peers would not find for the plaintiffs, and that a judge holds the plaintiffs responsible for court costs and fedex's legal bills.

Firefly
 
2005-09-29 01:06:58 PM
Yeah. I don't have a very strong long game. I'm better when I do hit the greens.
 
2005-09-29 01:07:33 PM
"If there are any questions like that on the SAT, it would probably involve distances or something mathematical where the actual skiiing is incidental. Anyway, isn't assuming that black people don't know anything about skiing as bad as assuming that they all eat chicken and watermelon?"

How about an SAT question like...

Leroy Jones buys da watermelon fer fibe dollahs. He cut it up into 20 pieces, n sellz em fer a dollah each. How much should his homie Darrel Washington sell his stash o crack fo?
 
2005-09-29 01:07:49 PM
isnt it still discrimination if you give special treatment to a specific group of people (those that AREN'T white)? as a white person, i am insulted.
 
2005-09-29 01:08:12 PM
Its all about course management, just ask Bagger, he quit Fedex due to lack of advancement.
 
2005-09-29 01:08:24 PM
Amy78: I got a package the other day through fed ex. The dude, white if it matters, delivered it to the wrong house.


You think that is bad, I ordered a package earlier this year, and it was delivered to the wrong house. They said they didn't order anything, so Fed Ex sent it back. I had the company resend it (verifying my address in the process), and it got left on the poarch at the wrong house AGAIN. We finally got it. The company had put an address that didn't exist on our street. So they were partially to blame, but why they just picked a house at random to leave it is beyond me. I don't know what race he was, but I am pretty sure he has two butt holes now. And yes, he delivered it both times, and yes, to two different houses. One on the other side of town.
 
2005-09-29 01:08:31 PM
cot

brilliant
 
2005-09-29 01:08:32 PM
I like the Fed Ex driver because he's a drug dealer and he don't even know it.
 
2005-09-29 01:08:42 PM
Thank G-d we don't have this problem in Canada. We are not allowed to keep track of employees by race. Certainly racism exists in Canada but for the most part it's a non-issue.

We can't be discriminated against for anything (race, sex, sexuality, marital status, age, religion, etc). Not like in the US.
 
2005-09-29 01:09:11 PM
ah right on cue the Fedex man makes a pickup at my work, gotta love um.
 
2005-09-29 01:09:16 PM
When I open my business, I just won't hire minorities. That way I don't have to worry about them suing me when they don't get promoted.



Wait...
 
2005-09-29 01:10:07 PM
Welcome to the world of standardized testing.

Yes, standardized tests discriminate against races that are generally considered impoverished.

Yes, these tests involve mostly material that is considered by most to indicate 'objective intelligence.'

So either blacks and hispanics are inherently stupid, so fark em.

Or else 400 years of indoctrinating people to believe that black people are violent, simple-minded, oversexed brutes in order to justify their systematic enslavement and oppression, in addition to raping their women, eliminating all family ties and selling their children, outlawing their literacy, lynching the ones who whistle or look at you funny, and then assassinating or arresting every last one of their effective political leaders, had something to do with it.

I choose to believe the latter. Because I'm a crazy liberal.
 
2005-09-29 01:10:26 PM
What dream world are you living in jmvbxx?
 
2005-09-29 01:10:35 PM
A 100 yard long green? You clearly aren't white. If I'm 100 yards from the hole I'd go with my 5 iron. There is only one approriate club for the green.

I'm lazy so I just play the whole course with my driver.
 
2005-09-29 01:11:12 PM
Maybe they just had a crayon stuck up their nose this whole time?

 
2005-09-29 01:11:13 PM
I don't understand a thing So_it_goes said.
 
2005-09-29 01:11:30 PM
FedEx Promotion Test
--------------------------

(Please select the most appropriate answer)

(1) Can you dance?
--Yes
--No

(2) Would you say your athleticism is a result of genetic breeding?
--Yes
--No

(3) Tupac's death, a conspiracy?
--Yes
--No

Answer Key: If you answered 'Yes' to any of the questions, THEN YOU FAILED.
 
2005-09-29 01:11:36 PM
Decipher the following:

"Who moma that is?"

A. Your cel phone is ringing.

B. Is that your mother?

C. Don't know.
 
2005-09-29 01:11:50 PM
How hard can this test be?

1. Finish this sentence: When picking up heavy packages, its best to lift with your_____ not with your_____.

a.(head, feet)
b.(legs, back)
c.(heart, balls)

2. A customer sends a package on Monday, and wants the package delivered overnight. When should the package arrive at the destination?

a. The same day (Monday)
b. The next day (Tuesday)
c. None of the above

3. In your delivery truck, the radio station is normally tuned to:

a. Hard Rock
b. Rush Limbaugh
c. Urban / Rap
 
2005-09-29 01:11:52 PM
Because everything is better in Canada! Damn you canadians are becoming as pompous as the fans in New England.
 
2005-09-29 01:12:18 PM
"Aren't Oriental
Aren't Indian
Aren't Pakistani
Aren't Middle Eastern
And I'll even bet they aren't Hispanic"


That is a point. You don't hear a lot of those people biatching about discrimination and in most cases they've been in the US for the least amount of time.
 
2005-09-29 01:12:26 PM
Just get me my farking package on time, you wetback.

/hispanic
//lightnen up, people!
 
2005-09-29 01:12:28 PM
Hey FedEx? Guess what?

 
2005-09-29 01:12:32 PM
Proof against racial equality > proof against God. Yet one is regarded as some sacred American tenet, the other derided by academics. Curious.
 
2005-09-29 01:13:36 PM
This stuff always reminds me of a story one of my senior residents (he's African-American) told me.

He saw a black patient in the ER, and the patient said, "Boy, I'm glad you're my doctor."

"What do you mean, sir?"

"Well, with the way the educational system is, clearly you must be a smart man for having gotten this far!"

"Actually, sir, haven't you heard about Affirmative action? I don't know anything, they HAD to give me a spot!"

/In truth, he's a pretty smart guy, but the look on that guy's face was worth it.
 
2005-09-29 01:14:08 PM
Most of the people on here, surprisngly, don't get it. I've had some exposure to this issue in another context. My step-mother works for ETS (Educational Testing Services... they develop the SAT). They are masters of testing intelligence, while being sensitive to cultural differences. They run a lot of statistics and notice when a specific ethnic group is doing poorly on a specific question, and then hunt down the reason. If it's cultural related, and not scholastic aptitude related, they have to reformulate.

Example:

Blue is to sky as ______ is to lemon.

A. Blue
C. Yellow
D. Green
E. Flavor


If you chose C, congrats, you probably grew up in America. If, however, you came from South or Central America, you likely would have picked D. Green, since lemons grow green in your tropical environment.


There are questions that can be culturally biased and do not accurately test the person due to cultural issues, and these MUST be changed to create an equal area of opportunity that isn't slanted torward a particular ethnic/cultural background.



/I want real equality, and yes, that means if one race is failing out of proportion, we need to take a look at the test, because it's quite possible it is slanted against them. NOT doing so would be favoritism.
 
2005-09-29 01:14:23 PM
Can tests be racist? Can facts be racist? Doesn't racism require opinion? For example:

If I say that The Rennaissance didn't happen in Africa; it happened in Europe, would that be racist? Or would I just be racist for pointing it out?

If I say that The Enlightenment didn't happen in Africa; it happened in Europe, would that be racist? Or would I just be racist for pointing it out?

If I say that Industrial Revolution didn't happen in Africa; it happened in America, would that be racist? Or would I just be racist for pointing it out?

The greatest AIDS epidemic in history so far, yep, that happened in Africa. I bet I'm racist for pointing it out.

The greatest program of systemic slaughter of a race in history: The Holocaust (European). Am I racist for pointing that out?

the greatest Religious-based terrorization of innocents in history: Got to be either The crusades or The Inquisition.

Is it possible for people of a certain culture to be viewed as fine when viewed as individuls, but the opinion held that their culture is somehow a disadvantage to their development? Or is it a function of their habitat? Or both?

Dammit, I wanna know!
 
2005-09-29 01:14:41 PM
Not all of us Farkin A, there is enough racisim to go around up here, and just as much affermative action and political correctness. Where I live the tensions are highest between Natives and the Whities, but thats another story. And the Red Sox can suck it.
 
cot
2005-09-29 01:14:50 PM
Tallgordon: I choose to believe the latter. Because I'm a crazy liberal.

Your two options are not totally exclusive. One could argue that if these tests are reasonably objective, then on average, yes, blacks and hispanics are stupid. It's not inherent, but they just aren't as well educated and are therefore not suited for some jobs.

Do you go ahead and give them jobs they aren't qualified for anyways? That makes no sense. The problem needs to be remedied earlier on, when the kids are in school. Part of that responsibility goes to the government to do what they can to be sure the resources are available, but a lot of the responsibility is the parents'. The kids have grown up in a culture of oppression that is now transitioning into one of entitlement. If instead they worked towards one of achievement, maybe the next generation of kids wouldn't need dumbed down requirements to get into good schools or get promoted, etc.
 
2005-09-29 01:14:57 PM
B answer deleted and... apparently when I rewrote it I continued with C. Good show uidzero. Ty.
 
2005-09-29 01:15:25 PM
cot: What don't they get axed? To work harder?

HAHAHAHA!!! Thanks for making me spit up my drink.

/can I axe you a question?
//finna kick your ass
///ebonics is for another thread...
 
2005-09-29 01:15:49 PM
to think logically is a racist tactic!

/neo-liberal
//liberterian, myself.
///not racist
 
2005-09-29 01:16:31 PM
WTF would they need a question about lemons on a FEDEx test?
 
2005-09-29 01:17:06 PM
Infarct great story. Honestly, I can imagine a black doctor might have to have a pretty good sense of humor or a thick skin.
 
2005-09-29 01:17:12 PM
Yeah, make FedEx give unqualified minorities preference in hiring/promotion. That's a great idea--We really could use another United States Postal Service.
 
2005-09-29 01:17:14 PM
TheSignPost: That UPS supervisor mentioned above, re: trying to suggest maths tests for new employees..... if I were him, I would have had to quit. That would drive me insane....

He needed/needs his job. Unless he had another one lined up.

Oh, and another thing about the guy who is a UPS supervisor: he was up for a scholarship at a prestigious prep school, but was among the last cut from the running. He found out, later, that certain "minorities" w/inferior test scores and grades got scholarships. And the "funny" thing is: he's partly Cherokee, so he could have clamed "minority" status, as well. He didn't think it was relevant.
 
2005-09-29 01:17:36 PM
Farkin A

WTF would they need a question about lemons on a FEDEx test?

Or you could miss the point entirely..... Either way.
 
2005-09-29 01:17:58 PM
Please, please don't mess with FedEx (or UPS) Those companies are like the closest thing to real magic that I know of. You go click, clickity, click on your computer and about 20 hours later (well 40 now that I live in Hawaii) a friendly guy in a white (or brown) truck pulls up and passes me my latest gee-gaw.

I have to practically beg people "DO NOT USE THE POSTAL SERVICE!!!!" those clowns ALWAYS leave a yellow slip in my mailbox saying I wasn't home and never so much as honk their horn. Then I have to drive to the post office the next day and stand in a freakin' line behind people who will show up with unpackaged crap and 8 party checks. Grrrrrr.

The UPS and FedEx guys I know on a first name basis and will call my cellphone if I'm not there, just in case I'm close by.
 
2005-09-29 01:19:12 PM
I had to take a personality test once for a job and one of the questions was (T or F) I like tall women.

Being a short but straight woman, I couldn't figure out what in the world the correct answer for me ought to be. Couldn't skip it.

I have tall female friends so I finally said T.

But I don't LIKE tall women, really. I just sort of tolerate them, and am happiest when they are sitting and picking up the check.
 
2005-09-29 01:19:23 PM
"I hate the way they portray us at the courier. They see a black family, they say, "no promotion." They see a white family, they say, "you're hired." And, you know, it's been a long time because most of the people are black. And even for me to complain about it, I would be a hypocrite because I've tried to turn away from the news because it's too hard to watch. I've even been shopping before studying for the test, so now I'm calling my lawyer right now to see what is the biggest amount I can get, and just to imagine if I was down there, and those are my people down there. So anybody out there that wants to join this class action-- with the way America is set up to help the poor, the black people, the less well-off, this is the only way. I mean, UPS is doing everything they can. We already realize a lot of people that could work are on the couch right now, drinking another beer -- and they've given them permission to go down and fire us! George Bush doesn't like black people."
 
2005-09-29 01:19:50 PM
Question 5:

You and three of your G's are on someone else's turf.There's a posse of eight homies, just sittin' in front of their crib.They decide they wanta throw down . . .
They have six baseball bats and two chains. You have three brass knuckles and two sawed-off pool cues (y'know, "Jimmy Sticks"). . . Now what I want to know is what is the ratio of metal weapons to wooden ones, and how much will it cost to ship the wooden weapons next day to Philly?
 
2005-09-29 01:20:13 PM


Kill whitey!
 
2005-09-29 01:20:39 PM
I'll make this real BASIC:

10 Blacks and hispanics are poor
20 they go to poor schools
30 they don't get an equal education
40 they don't do as well on tests
50 they don't get promoted
60 GOTO 10

I bet poor whites don't do as well on the test either
 
2005-09-29 01:21:43 PM
Racism exists everywhere and for the most part, we all have some bigotry. It is part of being human to group and pre-judge. It takes strength to look beyond personal bias.

Personally, I think Fedex might be guilty in that they did not identify the problem beforehand. We all know that minorities aren't as smart as white people.
 
2005-09-29 01:22:04 PM
eldezod: For example, the SAT asked something about snow and skiing, and the report argued that skiing is something that is done mosty by upper-middle to upper class people, also mostly white.


That is just retarded. I have never gone skiing, but I would have no problem answering a question about it. On the SAT it would either mean something like:

You are skiing down a 30 degree slope a 32 mph, if you reach the bottom in 3 minutes, what color is your jumpsuit?

or it would mean simply knowing what type of word ski or skiing is.

I find it very hard to believe that a test question could be truly racially deterministic simply because of something like that.
 
cot
2005-09-29 01:22:14 PM
The Icelander: I bet poor whites don't do as well on the test either

I wouldn't go so far as to absolve them of any responsibility whatsoever for their situation. That mindset is part of the reason they're there.
 
2005-09-29 01:22:14 PM
Who wants to join my class action law suit against the government? Their low-income eligibility for welfare benefits deliberately discriminates against white folk.
 
2005-09-29 01:22:28 PM
Actually, I don't believe that Asians are considered minorities by the ACLU or government. Can anyone verify?
 
2005-09-29 01:22:33 PM
It's interesting that a Canadian only has to say something good a-boot their own country and people jump up and accuse us of being pompous.

This is not the case at all. I was simply stating the law in Canada. This is neither better nor worse than the US. Just different!

And to be clear, I am not saying that social discrimination doesn't exist in Canada. I am saying that the law does not allow it in any form, unlike in the US. That's it, that's all.

There is no need to make more out of it.
 
2005-09-29 01:23:04 PM
Tallgordon

The key is, that's 400 years. Most of the black men today don't have the problem of being a slave, or not being able to read, or do simple math, or managing a cell phone plan, or car payments, or watching TV where you can learn about 'white' things like skiing. I understand that racism still exists, but it doesn't keep you from passing a damn test. Tell our black valedictorian that all us white people are holding him back. Nothing stopped him from listening in class and doing his homework.

White, black, latin, spanish, I don't give a crap. If you come near me wearing your hat sideways, pants below your ass, and don't speak with proper enunciation I will call you whatever stupid racist term I feel like silently as I smile. You've earned it.

Judge a man by the content of his character. If that character is stupid and doesn't understand what working hard and working smart get you, then let us all judge you accordingly.

You give liberals a bad name.

I haven't done CRAP to hold back any race of people, so don't hold me back when I go for a test because some latino scored just below me, but he's latin, so we'll give him a few more points for free to meet a quota. Blame Univision for enforcing redciulous stereotypes of spanish culture. Go argue with BET that their rap about rape, murder, drugs, etc. somehow HELPS people. Stop living in the past, the current problems are different.
 
j z
2005-09-29 01:23:08 PM
Give minorities extra points like they do on civil service exams. Maybe throw in 40 acres and a mule too.
 
2005-09-29 01:23:11 PM
Tallgordon: Welcome to the world of standardized testing.

Yes, standardized tests discriminate against races that are generally considered impoverished.

Yes, these tests involve mostly material that is considered by most to indicate 'objective intelligence.'

So either blacks and hispanics are inherently stupid, so fark em.

Or else 400 years of indoctrinating people to believe that black people are violent, simple-minded, oversexed brutes in order to justify their systematic enslavement and oppression, in addition to raping their women, eliminating all family ties and selling their children, outlawing their literacy, lynching the ones who whistle or look at you funny, and then assassinating or arresting every last one of their effective political leaders, had something to do with it.

I choose to believe the latter. Because I'm a crazy liberal.


I remember a few years a go a Harvard student was murdered. Ten years earlier, she was fresh off the boat from Vietnam and couldn't speak a lick of English. Yet she'd worked hard enough to make it to Harvard w/out being a legacy or having a rich parent.

Why is it, pray tell, that this story has been repeated (w/some variation) so many times? Frequently, they go to the same inner city schools as other "minorities," yet academically thrive? Why is that?
 
2005-09-29 01:23:18 PM
man if you are using a 5 iron from 100 yards out, you are not playing golf very often or very well, or else you are a 9 year-old kid.
100 yards= wedge, (and I am a short knocker)
pro= 56 degree wedge
 
2005-09-29 01:23:22 PM
2005-09-29 01:14:23 PM HAMMERTOE

Can tests be racist? Can facts be racist? Doesn't racism require opinion? For example:


If I say that Industrial Revolution didn't happen in Africa; it happened in America, would that be racist? Or would I just be racist for pointing it out?


Actually, you would be wrong - Europe/UK were industrialized way before the US. The US just caught up faster.

The greatest program of systemic slaughter of a race in history: The Holocaust (European). Am I racist for pointing that out?

Depends on how you measure. Maybe not considering other genocides on earth that predates the 20th century.


the greatest Religious-based terrorization of innocents in history: Got to be either The crusades or The Inquisition.


Again, depends on how you measure. The first jihad was nasty at times (one could aruge the first crusade was a reaction to it).
 
2005-09-29 01:23:26 PM
If they gave a test with dumbed down questions, then they really can be sued for giving a different test to different nationalities. Actually, they would have to work on a quota system of hiring percentages, or even better (the idea I like) have classes so people could pass the test. Yes it costs more, but less than a class action lawsuit and does a lot of brand pride. I have gone through quite a few of the lawsuits so I have a little intelligence behind it. But you can not give a different test to different people, because you will be sued and rightly so.
 
2005-09-29 01:23:53 PM
"well that depends on if he has to pick up his ho."
"now that's what we call, a variable"

Bueller? Bueller?
 
2005-09-29 01:23:54 PM
ginko in coolaid - 'nuf said.
 
2005-09-29 01:24:09 PM
2005-09-29 12:47:40 PM Doktor Merkwrdiglieben

George Bush doesn't care about Fed Ex.
Wait...Fed Ex doesn't care about George Bush.
No, I know...Fed Bush doesn't care about Ex-Blacks.


Fed Bush hates Michael Jackson?
 
2005-09-29 01:24:10 PM
Soo...just stopping in...has anyone said anything offensive yet?
 
2005-09-29 01:24:24 PM
Our agency was having trouble getting "people" so they decided it best to change the passing mark from 80% to 60%. Wow! That really helped. Now we have to disqualify them later in the hiring process when they can't pass the reading proficiency test (or the criminal background checks).

I am glad that we do have some outstanding statistics for demographic representation though. Our city has a 3% African American populus, but 17% of our staff is African American. We have 10X the Asian demographic on our staff as the local population. We have about the same Hispanic demograhic as the documented population. Documented is a key word in that sentence. Our Caucasian staff is below the local demographic. I guess we are as diverse as we can be, given the tough hiring standards we set for ourselves.
 
cot
2005-09-29 01:24:26 PM
plcow: Actually, I don't believe that Asians are considered minorities by the ACLU or government. Can anyone verify?

They're certainly minorities, but they aren't underrepresented minorities. Putting down that you're asian on a college app isnt going to get you in.
 
2005-09-29 01:24:26 PM
The Icelander Your argument leaves out PERSONAL RESPONSABILITY!!! I went to one of the poorest high schools in my state and I am sitting here doing research as a research chemist. My parents made no bones about the fact that I was going to college. I worked my butt off and learned above and beyoind what I was taught. And here I am.
 
2005-09-29 01:24:26 PM
"FedEx knows that black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test," Finberg said.

Lawyers like this should be shot as an example to the rest. hello!? The lawyer for the class action suit concedes that the minorities he represents can't pass a damn test!

Yeesh.
 
2005-09-29 01:24:28 PM
uidzero
No the point is this is about a FedEx test so until you do get a copy of the test and give examples of how it is biased against certain groups then your whole commentary is worthless.
 
2005-09-29 01:24:45 PM
syberpud:
The first question was: "You're on the green on the 5th fairway. You're 100 yards from the hole, which club do you use?"

Second question: "Who won the Winston Cup in NASCAR last year?"


Holy crap, I couldn't answer either of these if I tried. Does that mean I'm a minority now? If so when do I get my new penis and/or dancing skills?
 
2005-09-29 01:24:51 PM
Maybe they are just too stupid to take a test, and it has nothing to do with who their mother farked.
 
2005-09-29 01:24:51 PM

trueaustinite

I think, for white football players, a first down should only have to be a net gain of 7 yards. Ten is just too hard for honkies.


Farking awesome.
 
2005-09-29 01:26:27 PM
The Icelander: I'll make this real BASIC:

10 Blacks and hispanics are poor
20 they go to poor schools
30 they don't get an equal education
40 they don't do as well on tests
50 they don't get promoted
60 GOTO 10




Could you make it Visual Basic? I'm more of an object oriented person....
 
2005-09-29 01:26:27 PM
This kind of stuff is a real shame. A large portion of racism in this country is reflexive. If we had true equality, it would admittedly piss off the worst kind of racists, but a lot of the casual, subliminal racism that pervades many people's thoughts (often to their own horror) would go away.

Example: the anti-black sentiment that is stirring up in many of the whites in this thread.
 
cot
2005-09-29 01:26:33 PM
AxiomJackson: Holy crap, I couldn't answer either of these if I tried. Does that mean I'm a minority now?

It just means you're middle class. They need a good middle class white question to go along with those two rich/white trash ones.
 
2005-09-29 01:27:05 PM
Was it a drug test?

/ two tickets please
// going down
 
2005-09-29 01:27:45 PM
how exactly would thy change the test such that whites would not exceed over minorities. They are generally better educated so they are going to win every test no matter how you change it.
 
cot
2005-09-29 01:28:28 PM
random256: Was it a drug test?


If they tested for crack but not meth, I'd consider that racist.
 
2005-09-29 01:28:38 PM
They are generally better educated so they are going to win every test no matter how you change it.

So what's the solution? Promote the ill educated ones?
 
2005-09-29 01:28:52 PM
Sidi: Or it means the minorities went to worse schools, or they came from a culture that has systematically rejected intelligence in favor of glorifying violence, crime, and machismo.


with the same result that was mentioned before. That doesn't mean that they should be allowed to perform a job that they are not qualified for. I would feel sorry for anyone who actually didn't have the mental capacity to pass the test, but if you just never cared enough to learn anything, or thought that learning from "the man" was insulting, then I have no sympathy. Go to burger king, with the stupid white crackers who did the same.
 
2005-09-29 01:29:04 PM
cot
It's not inherent, but they just aren't as well educated and are therefore not suited for some jobs. ... Do you go ahead and give them jobs they aren't qualified for anyways?

There is logical fallacy in your answer, as well. This is, after all, FedEx. Not rocket science. My concern is that performance on the test will be weighed more heavily than other characteristics of a job applicant.

Unfortunately, I know very little about what FedEx's test actually tests and how important those skills are for the job. From what I know from my friend who works at UPS, doing the job is much more about dilligence and being able to work hard constantly and much less about booksmarts. A driver must be able to read, follow maps, scan packages, follow instructions. Whether a paper test can objectively measure those things is up for debate. I happen to think that a lot of those skills are better demonstrated through on-the-job performance than through a standardized test. If applicants demonstrate that they can scan and sort packages reliably, and work hard for 8 hours, and has a clean driving record, those factors are much more important to me than performance on a paper test

/now, if they're discriminated against because they have NO driving record, that's another matter altogether.
 
2005-09-29 01:29:13 PM
Fedex LOST my $1500 video camera. Oh they found it...at an abondoned warehouse in Dallas...6 months later. When the packaged arrived it looked like a brown paper bag, held together with about 35 rerouting stickers.

I bought a $500 guitar and they left it on my front steps when i wasn't home...in july and I live in Houston, Texas. So that's a useless warped guitar now and of course they refuse to honor the whole insurance thing.

It's been almost 2 weeks now and i'm still waiting on them to deliver my video card that i bought from woot.com.

Racist or not, their service blows.
 
2005-09-29 01:29:26 PM
Personal responsibility is great when it's some poor guy who can't get a job because he can't read good. "He should have taught himself to read."

But if it's a Senate majority leader who is investigated for insider trading, or it's the CEO of a company who sold defective products that killed people, it's just business as usual or a Liberal plot.

Personal responsibility is what Republicans throw out so they don't have to feel guilt for cutting school budgets and social security. There's something called "social responsiblity" that they completely ignore, because it involves thinking about other people.
 
2005-09-29 01:29:37 PM
This is the kinda shiat that adds fuel to the fire of the people who are racist.
 
2005-09-29 01:29:43 PM
HockeyGod you're logic is flawed. The statements "hispanics fail twice as much as whites" and "twice as many hispanics fail than whites" are not the same. (Given equal abilitles) All 'races' should have the same failing percentage!
 
2005-09-29 01:29:48 PM
plcow: Actually, I don't believe that Asians are considered minorities by the ACLU or government. Can anyone verify?

Asians are certainly a minority as are mexicans. Don't believe me and you haven't seen the class action lawsuits (they are many)
 
2005-09-29 01:29:52 PM
Farkin A

No the point is this is about a FedEx test so until you do get a copy of the test and give examples of how it is biased against certain groups then your whole commentary is worthless.

OK, I'll grab you by your nose and lead you there. The example is from the ETS group, who make the SATs. IE: The masters of standardized FAIR testing. They encounter situations when one particular ethnic background is doing worse than another AND IT'S NOT RELATED TO INTELLIGENCE OR APTITUDE. The example I gave was a real SAT test question that had to be revised because people with a latin background we're doing poorly on it. It's an EXAMPLE so you can understand how it is possible that FedEx might need to revise their questions. It's an analogy.

Get it yet? If not, don't worry about it, you probably just can't understand.
 
2005-09-29 01:29:53 PM
Things like this bring out the closet idiots, I see. And the "I'm not racist" folk. FIne.


The purpose of civil rights legislation is to try to even the playing field systematically. (Those of y'all yapping about "I was poor/disadvantaged/stupid" - stop it.) From the hospitals you were born in to the neighborhoods you live, a system is in place that led you there.

I'm not saying this is right - on its face, it seems to have no merit. But this may be the only way to attack work conditions that keep minority folk from getting up the ladder.

"Not everything is about race. But everything is racial."
-someone I dont remember
 
2005-09-29 01:29:59 PM
I like fark.

That comment about coming from a society that glorifies anything other than education is what hits it on the head. I bet if I go adopt 2 niglets right now, they end up doing well on that test (if they choose to take it) 20 years from now.

Has nothing to do with race
catch 22
 
2005-09-29 01:30:10 PM
"FedEx knows that black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test," Finberg said.

Just how race related can this friggin test be?

I'd be would be embarassed to take a handout.
 
2005-09-29 01:30:41 PM
I'm all for hiring by quota like at my old job. A great secretary goes and her replacement can't type, doesn't know how to use a computer and files a complaint for everything.
 
2005-09-29 01:30:51 PM
cot: What don't they get axed? To work harder?


I thought about including that joke, but decided not to. :)
 
2005-09-29 01:31:09 PM
Amy78: when I got home I looked at the address and sure enough it was correct, so I called back to complain.

I hope you are surrounded by people who go out of your way to make your life shiatty because of innocent mistakes.
 
2005-09-29 01:31:18 PM
Again, I don't have a very strong long game. I've only been playing a couple years and I gladly trade a strong swing for control. I use the larger club but swing gently to put the ball where I need it. If I used the 9 and swung my hardest I'd fade out of bounds.
 
2005-09-29 01:31:29 PM
Comicbookguy

I remember a few years a go a Harvard student was murdered. Ten years earlier, she was fresh off the boat from Vietnam and couldn't speak a lick of English. Yet she'd worked hard enough to make it to Harvard w/out being a legacy or having a rich parent.

Why is it, pray tell, that this story has been repeated (w/some variation) so many times? Frequently, they go to the same inner city schools as other "minorities," yet academically thrive? Why is that?


Because people think Asians are smart. God, give me a hard one.
 
2005-09-29 01:31:47 PM
Paddlenround- Racism exists everywhere and for the most part, we all have some bigotry. It is part of being human to group and pre-judge. It takes strength to look beyond personal bias.


Well put. I agree totally.
 
2005-09-29 01:31:49 PM
steve20832: One time they said they left a package at my back door.

Nevermind...too easy.
 
2005-09-29 01:32:30 PM
Well, if Fedex treats minorities like crap, what about UPS? They treat everyone like crap! DHL anyone?
 
2005-09-29 01:34:32 PM
I'm all for hiring by quota like at my old job. A great secretary goes and her replacement can't type, doesn't know how to use a computer and files a complaint for everything.

We got lucky - our token hire is fairly good at her job. At first it was pretty rocky. She was thin skinned, twitchy, didn't know procedure and took everything as a personal insult. After a while tho, she got the basics down and realized that not all the white people in the world were out to get her, they just wanted to get their job done and go home for the day.

So it worked out for everyone in the end.
 
2005-09-29 01:34:35 PM
Walljasper: It is a RACIST tool and we all know it. Thank you, my gubamint.


Yes, but in which way do you mean? This question is probably responsible for hiring more incompetent minorities than discriminating against them. If they need to fill a quota, they will grab a minority over a non-minority for a particular position.

I agree it shouldn't be there.
 
2005-09-29 01:34:42 PM
Well alot of things are Possible. Maybe the whole test asked normal unbiased questions and certain people just arent smart enough to answer them. As long as you admit that Possibility then maybe i can accept that you are as smart as you trying to make yourself seem.
 
2005-09-29 01:35:07 PM
cot:
It just means you're middle class. They need a good middle class white question to go along with those two rich/white trash ones.

Sweet, so being a perpetually broke college student with a $16,000 a year job puts me in middle class?
Whoo Hoo! I have arrived!

/just dosn't think long left turns are exciting
//also thinks chasing a ball with a club == boring
///three slashes for running
 
2005-09-29 01:35:34 PM
Espertron

Ahhh...combining racial humor, legal humor, AND a pop-culture reference! Brilliantly done.

/golf clap
 
2005-09-29 01:36:12 PM
The first question was: "You're on the green on the 5th fairway. You're 100 yards from the hole, which club do you use?"
Second question: "Who won the Winston Cup in NASCAR last year?"


I just realized that those a BOTH trick questions. Damn, I'm white.
 
2005-09-29 01:36:30 PM
i think that professional sports should also follow some sort of equal employment program.

every NBA teams needs to have a least three white guys on the team, even if they aren't fast, can't dunk, and can't jump at all.

also every NFL needs to have white guys in their secondary (john lynch not included)
 
2005-09-29 01:36:57 PM
DHL SUCKS

They left my computer outside in the rain when it said clearly on the box that I had to sign for it.

UPS

Consistant, haven't done me wrong.

FedEx

Pissing me off right now. I have to go pick up a package because it says they can't find my address. However, two other FedEx packages from the same vendor this month made it. Still, way better than DHL and on par with UPS.
 
2005-09-29 01:37:54 PM
Weaver95

I'm all for hiring by quota like at my old job. A great secretary goes and her replacement can't type, doesn't know how to use a computer and files a complaint for everything.

We got lucky - our token hire is fairly good at her job. At first it was pretty rocky. She was thin skinned, twitchy, didn't know procedure and took everything as a personal insult. After a while tho, she got the basics down and realized that not all the white people in the world were out to get her, they just wanted to get their job done and go home for the day.


I think it's likely you won't care, but I find you to be a disguting human being in the darkest sense of the word. Your life is vulgar. Good day.
 
2005-09-29 01:38:07 PM
I am a European-American. I once took a sample, general- knowledge, multiple-choice test that was designed to read like it had been written for black people, by black people. It had questions like "What is a chitlin?" and "Where would you find 'cornrows'?" I actually did okay. But all my honky classmates failed. It opened my eyes. Some tests are culturally skewed, whether intentional or no. I wouldn't call them racist unless the skewing was intentional.

I think the point is that most test designers don't even realize their questions contain a great deal more than just basic competency. There are questions that are hard to answer if you're not part of the dominant culture. If you are a black kid who grew up in the inner city, you have to master two cultures to succeed in life: your own, and the white one. It's sort of the equivalent of getting a job with the Canadian government. You must have basic fluency in French and English. If people are too lazy to make the effort, it's not because they're black. It's because they're lazy. Yet this provides racists with more fodder, because they can just point and say black=lazy, and since the end result is the same, they think they're right.

Laziness and ignorance are human traits, not racial ones.
 
2005-09-29 01:38:17 PM
weet, so being a perpetually broke college student with a $16,000 a year job puts me in middle class?

Sarcasm aside, what IS the cutoff for middle class these days?
 
2005-09-29 01:39:08 PM
SretiCentV

I bet if I go adopt 2 niglets right now, they end up doing well on that test (if they choose to take it) 20 years from now.


yeah, you sound like just the guy to effectively instruct our youth.
 
2005-09-29 01:39:08 PM
jmvbxx, language isn't protected. Just have to say you don't understand the person.
 
2005-09-29 01:39:16 PM
Tallgordon

"Or else 400 years of indoctrinating people to believe that black people are violent, simple-minded, oversexed brutes in order to justify their systematic enslavement and oppression, in addition to raping their women, eliminating all family ties and selling their children, outlawing their literacy, lynching the ones who whistle or look at you funny, and then assassinating or arresting every last one of their effective political leaders, had something to do with it.
I choose to believe the latter. Because I'm a crazy liberal."

Not to pick a fight, but what does that have to do with someone passing or failing an objective test today? What more can be done to help blacks (the rest of the minorities, including hispanics, asians, and east indians seem to be doing fine) Do you really think that it is too much to expect blacks to pass these tests, or it is better for them to make the tests eaiser to "everyone" can pass them?
 
2005-09-29 01:39:38 PM
2005-09-29 01:01:00 PM dasc


A 100 yard long green? You clearly aren't white. If I'm 100 yards from the hole I'd go with my 5 iron. There is only one approriate club for the green.

And you are either 90yrs old or cant play worth a shiat.
 
2005-09-29 01:39:46 PM
syberpud:
The first question was: "You're on the green on the 5th fairway. You're 100 yards from the hole, which club do you use?"

LOL trick question. You can't be on the green and on the fairway at the same time. Also, you can't be on the green and 100 yards from the hole at the same time.

/but I would use my wedge

 
2005-09-29 01:40:11 PM
Paddlenround:Personally, I think Fedex might be guilty in that they did not identify the problem beforehand. We all know that minorities aren't as smart as white people.

HA HA HA!

/kill whitey
//kidding
///kill whitey
////kidding
 
2005-09-29 01:40:26 PM
I think it's likely you won't care, but I find you to be a disguting human being in the darkest sense of the word. Your life is vulgar. Good day.

You're right - I don't care.
 
2005-09-29 01:40:48 PM
peaceful warrior - point taken. however, there is a difference between not knowing what a chitlin is and not knowing what the square root of 81 is.
 
2005-09-29 01:41:36 PM
jmvbxx: Thank G-d we don't have this problem in Canada. We are not allowed to keep track of employees by race. Certainly racism exists in Canada but for the most part it's a non-issue.


I think that would be the case here if we would just get rid of all of the tracking, and EEO policies.
 
cot
2005-09-29 01:42:06 PM
AxiomJackson: Sweet, so being a perpetually broke college student with a $16,000 a year job puts me in middle class?

You're in college, aren't you?
 
2005-09-29 01:42:31 PM
Equality isn't fair!
 
2005-09-29 01:42:47 PM
Have you all ever considered the possbility, right or wrong, that blacks just aren't as smart as other races? I am not saying that is the case, but let's cut through the sh*t here. a question framed in the context o0f skiing, if mathematically solvable is not racist, just because it mentions skiing (although better choices should have been made). a test is not culturally biased or racist because one race scores lower on it than another. That is just stupid.
 
2005-09-29 01:42:58 PM
Tallgordon: Comicbookguy

I remember a few years a go a Harvard student was murdered. Ten years earlier, she was fresh off the boat from Vietnam and couldn't speak a lick of English. Yet she'd worked hard enough to make it to Harvard w/out being a legacy or having a rich parent.

Why is it, pray tell, that this story has been repeated (w/some variation) so many times? Frequently, they go to the same inner city schools as other "minorities," yet academically thrive? Why is that?

Because people think Asians are smart. God, give me a hard one.


I knew from your Boobies it was a waste of time talking to you, and my post wasn't really directed at you. Perhaps I should have said so, explicitly. Of course, that would presume you'd understand my caveat, which presumes a lot.

A lot
 
2005-09-29 01:43:22 PM
peepee mcpoop: peaceful warrior - point taken. however, there is a difference between not knowing what a chitlin is and not knowing what the square root of 81 is.

I doubt very highly that that would be a question on a drivers test. I think it would be more questions on driving ability and timing questions. These are questions which may take race into account.
 
2005-09-29 01:43:33 PM
ComicBookGuy

I remember a few years a go a Harvard student was murdered. Ten years earlier, she was fresh off the boat from Vietnam and couldn't speak a lick of English. Yet she'd worked hard enough to make it to Harvard w/out being a legacy or having a rich parent.

Why is it, pray tell, that this story has been repeated (w/some variation) so many times? Frequently, they go to the same inner city schools as other "minorities," yet academically thrive? Why is that?


That's the easiest question I've gotten all day. These Asian kids study their asses off, and they couldn't give two shiats about questions with a 'racial slant' to them.

Why don't all minorities study hard? Blame the parents, the culture, blame everything and everyone, but these kids just don't like to study.
 
2005-09-29 01:43:41 PM
I think that would be the case here if we would just get rid of all of the tracking, and EEO policies.

Good luck getting that to happen tho.
 
2005-09-29 01:44:05 PM
The Icelander First of all, it's 'read well'. But that's probably racist to point that out.

The fact is that, ultimately, there is one and only one person who is responsible for me and my status in life. ME. Therefore, I must take PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for myself. The choices I make are mine. I chose to study in school, not go out every night and party or to sit at home and watch TV or play video games. The government never enters into the equation!

By equating a lack of personal responsibility to racism, the effect of real racism is minimized and trivialized. By having the government force their responsibility upon us, we lose self-reliance and pride.

And finally, this is not a political issue (and your assumption as to my political leanings was incorrect.)
 
2005-09-29 01:44:51 PM
President Bush does not care about black people!

Wait what were we talking about?
 
2005-09-29 01:45:12 PM
fangless: FedEx

Pissing me off right now. I have to go pick up a package because it says they can't find my address. However, two other FedEx packages from the same vendor this month made it. Still, way better than DHL and on par with UPS.



i'm guessing the two packages you received were assigned to a driver who could pass the required examination and the one that wasn't delivered was assigned to a driver who goy his job because of affirmative action.
 
2005-09-29 01:46:24 PM
too-old:

peepee mcpoop: peaceful warrior - point taken. however, there is a difference between not knowing what a chitlin is and not knowing what the square root of 81 is.

I doubt very highly that that would be a question on a drivers test. I think it would be more questions on driving ability and timing questions. These are questions which may take race into account.



can you give me an example of how a question on a driver's test could be written to favor a white person or vice versa for a black person?
 
cot
2005-09-29 01:46:28 PM
Weaver95: You're right - I don't care.

Again, you won't care, but he's not the only one.
 
2005-09-29 01:46:37 PM
Doktor Merkwrdiglieben
You sound as if you come from german heritage.
 
2005-09-29 01:47:06 PM
NAACP needs a enema with a firehouse.

You know with all the braincloggingness happing.
 
2005-09-29 01:47:10 PM
So if we were all made in God's image, and evolution is a lie, how come there are different races?
 
2005-09-29 01:47:30 PM
Sidi

Honestly, I can imagine a black doctor might have to have a pretty good sense of humor or a thick skin.

Oh, a thick black skin, I suppose? Racist.



/just kidding, don't flame me...
 
2005-09-29 01:47:45 PM
peacefulwarrior,

I'm sure it is possible to write cultural questions that more whites will answer correctly than Blacks, but I've yet to see one.

Could you give us an example of one of these questions found to be racist?

Not one of your own, one that is currently being asked.
 
2005-09-29 01:47:53 PM
cot:
You're in college, aren't you?

Good point. You know after a good 30+ hour work-week and a 14 hour class schedual, I really should take time out to think about all those poor unfortunate lower class people. You know, while I'm boiling my daily ration of Ramen noodles.
 
2005-09-29 01:47:53 PM
Again, you won't care, but he's not the only one.

I call 'em like I see 'em. Not my problem if you or someone else dosen't like it.
 
2005-09-29 01:48:12 PM
Hey, has anyone in this thread played the race card yet?
 
2005-09-29 01:48:35 PM
we can reap what we sow. in 20 years blacks and whites will be equal once again as we struggle side by side to learn CHINESE.
 
2005-09-29 01:48:44 PM
This is like saying the NFL and NBA are racist organizations. That it discriminates against White, Hispanic, and Asian individuals. That they should test one fair qualities that dont have anything to do with athletic ability.

TOTALLY DUMBASS
 
2005-09-29 01:48:46 PM
too-old Actually, Scots-Irish. Doktor Merkwoerdiglieben is a direct German translation of Dr. Strangelove. It comes from the movie.
 
2005-09-29 01:49:19 PM
So if we were all made in God's image, and evolution is a lie, how come there are different races?

Well...according to Louis Farrikhan, white people were made by the devil.
 
2005-09-29 01:49:29 PM
peacefulwarrior

I think the point is that most test designers don't even realize their questions contain a great deal more than just basic competency. There are questions that are hard to answer if you're not part of the dominant culture. If you are a black kid who grew up in the inner city, you have to master two cultures to succeed in life: your own, and the white one.


My dear peacefulwarrior:

You are a retard.

Kind regards,
--fark

// Indian and Chinese kids routinely score 750+ on SAT's.
// (Some even get 800's on SAT's) -- SAT's taken in
// their own country. (those SAT's are the genuine
// college board/ets SAT's).
 
2005-09-29 01:49:31 PM
dasc:
A 100 yard long green? You clearly aren't white. If I'm 100 yards from the hole I'd go with my 5 iron. There is only one approriate club for the green.

Actually, according the the PGA rules I read last week, the entire playing area from tee to cup is considered the green. The short grass surrounding the hole is called the putting green.
 
2005-09-29 01:50:31 PM
Man, there are some pissed off people in this thread. And nobody seemed to agree with my Griggs v. Duke Power reference.

/disappointed
 
2005-09-29 01:50:53 PM
firefly212, you have just single handedly destroyed the KKK.

congrats.
 
2005-09-29 01:50:56 PM
Everybody is completely equal in every single way.
 
2005-09-29 01:51:27 PM
uidzero: /I want real equality, and yes, that means if one race is failing out of proportion, we need to take a look at the test, because it's quite possible it is slanted against them. NOT doing so would be favoritism.


I will agree that the test should be looked at, and this type of thing considered. But a defacto cry of racism because one group is failing out of proportion is not the way to go. There are other reasons that a group might fail.

And when looking at the test and determining if certain questions need to be changed or omitted, the MOST important thing to consider is, "Does changing or omitting this question lower the standandards of the test, and might it allow an unquallified person into this job?" If the answer is "Yes," then the question needs to be left as is. Proportions of ethnicity are not as important as maintaining the standards of proficiency for the job. If it is a simple logic question like the one you used, no problem changing it. If it is something that the applicant NEEDS to know for the job, but a disproportinate number of minorities do not have the requried knowledge, maybe some sort of training program should be offered for applicants.
 
2005-09-29 01:51:41 PM
All they have to do is analyze the test questions against the race of the test takers. Throw out the questions where the races score differently.

If there are any questions left, use those and ditch the rest.

/Asian
//Race quotas keep Asians out because we score better
///But since I'm Filipino I check "Hispanic" when it's convenient
 
2005-09-29 01:52:53 PM
Lovely. I notice that Arizona is right on the list. Maybe they'll want to change the test to make it only available in Spanish, that way only the Hispanics will be able to get the Fed Ex jobs. That ought to clear things right up!

/Am sick of going to McDonalds, Joanne Fabrics, Albertsons, etc., and not being able to find anyone who speaksa de English.
 
2005-09-29 01:53:20 PM
I want real equality, and yes, that means if one race is failing out of proportion, we need to take a look at the test, because it's quite possible it is slanted against them. NOT doing so would be favoritism.

I think I'd be worried if someone like uidzero thought I was a great guy.

'Logic' like that makes my brain hurt.
 
2005-09-29 01:54:09 PM
Minorities praise ignorance and look down on "geeks" or intelligent people.

Of course they fail these tests. Typically (not all) minorities don't have the skills to excel acedemically because its "not cool" to them.
 
2005-09-29 01:54:14 PM
Felgraf: Dislikes all *real* racism.

Hear hear!
 
2005-09-29 01:54:23 PM
what about the following question on a driver' test, would it possibly favor white people?

when playing polo, how many horses are used?
 
2005-09-29 01:54:36 PM
peepee mcpoop: can you give me an example of how a question on a driver's test could be written to favor a white person or vice versa for a black person?

Just a basic truck driving test. Impoverished may not be able to do it as they were not trained, but with training could be very astute.
 
2005-09-29 01:54:40 PM
George Bush doesn't care about FedEx.
 
2005-09-29 01:54:53 PM
Sidi: Or it means the minorities went to worse schools, or they came from a culture that has systematically rejected intelligence in favor of glorifying violence, crime, and machismo.

And who created and continues to buy into this "culture"? That "the man's" fault?
 
2005-09-29 01:55:55 PM
hey UIDZERO,

i thought that your Boobies was a perfect example. don't worry about Farkin A. no one could be that retarted and still be able to use a computer, he just a troll.

peace!
 
2005-09-29 01:56:36 PM
And who created and continues to buy into this "culture"? That "the man's" fault?

No, I think that was pretty much their own invention. Or are you really suggesting that 50 cent was created by the white man to destroy black culture....?
 
2005-09-29 01:56:36 PM
nytmare: I don't understand a thing So_it_goes said.

That's because yesterday he worked for Tom Delay. He's new at UPS so give him a break.
 
2005-09-29 01:57:05 PM
For example, the SAT asked something about snow and skiing, and the report argued that skiing is something that is done mosty by upper-middle to upper class people, also mostly white.

that is so stupid. im white and know nothing about skiing. its not racial, if anything its based on class. the fact that most wealthy people are white shouldnt have anything to do with it.
 
2005-09-29 01:57:08 PM
cheese 'n rice: I remember a few years a go a Harvard student was murdered. Ten years earlier, she was fresh off the boat from Vietnam and couldn't speak a lick of English. Yet she'd worked hard enough to make it to Harvard w/out being a legacy or having a rich parent.

Why is it, pray tell, that this story has been repeated (w/some variation) so many times? Frequently, they go to the same inner city schools as other "minorities," yet academically thrive? Why is that?

That's the easiest question I've gotten all day. These Asian kids study their asses off, and they couldn't give two shiats about questions with a 'racial slant' to them.

Why don't all minorities study hard? Blame the parents, the culture, blame everything and everyone, but these kids just don't like to study.


Concerning that Harvard student: What impressed me most was that she had to play catch up, BIG TIME, to get where she was.

Too bad about the stabbing, though.
 
2005-09-29 01:57:23 PM
DanceswithSlugs

Thanks for not picking a fight.

What I think that 400 years of oppression has to do with passing a test today is two things.

The first I think is easy to see: widespread poverty and breakdown of the family. While it is true that people can rise out of poverty and succeed, I don't think anyone will argue that parents' wealth and education are a huge factor in determining how a child will end up. How your family speaks, what kind of reading habits they have, what kind of expectations they have, what kind of connections they have, what school district they live in, will influence your future immensely. Even if a poor family has a brilliant child, they may not encourage the child to go to a good college and reach their full potential.

The second thing is much harder to prove, and that is the psychological impact of racism. I think it's very clear from observing popular culture or just observing this thread that there is a widespread expectation that black people will fail, that they are more prone to criminal activity. I have only ever seen one scientific study done to test this theory. In it, two groups of black people were given a standardized test. The first group was asked before the test began to identify their race. The second group was not. The second group scored 6% higher than the first. The implication was that even that small reminder of a person's race was enough to make them score less on a test.

I don't know what the effects of the psychological pressure of racism are, but I do know that the pressure itself is huge. Racism is everywhere. I believe that these two things account for the difference in standardized test scores. I also believe that the should be counterbalanced through affirmative action.
 
2005-09-29 01:57:31 PM
Mirrorz: Racist or not, their service blows.

It's because you're a goddamn inbred Texan son of a biatch.
 
2005-09-29 01:58:18 PM
Many hovel living, dirt poor Indians and Chinese score quite well on SAT's (750+). None of them have even visited
the US, they take SAT's in their own coutries and do astonishingly well.

I'm looking for a explanation of that one, from the tests==racist folks....

waiting....crickets chirping....waiting....
 
2005-09-29 01:58:35 PM
I guess we have come to a time in American history, that our forefathers never envisioned.
We now have to "dumb-down" tests in order to appease specific groups...how sad. Though some may argue (rightfully) this happened long ago.
If you wore a paper hat between the ages of 15 and 18...It's OK
Anytime after that is "suspect".
Don't expect your color,ethnicity,heritage,whatever, to get you further.
Do it yourself!
Get an education...Use the gift's that whatever higher power you believe in gave you, and excel at whatever your chosen field is!!!

OR>Find a slimeball attorney (redundant?) and sue innocent people.

"Welcome to Wendys...Did you want to try our NEW fingerless Chili"?
 
2005-09-29 01:59:27 PM
"FedEx knows that black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test," Finberg said.

No racism intended, but has anybody checked into why hispanics and blacks fail at the higher rate? I don't believe the answer is to dumb down the test, but to push people to excel. I for one would have more respect for somebody that actually worked to succeed as opposed to being the recipient of a "gimme".

Look at our public schools - we've dumbed down everything so much that a half retarded dog could get a diploma. I weep for our future.
 
2005-09-29 01:59:35 PM
Doktor Merkwrdiglieben: Scots-Irish. Doktor Merkwoerdiglieben is a direct German translation of Dr. Strangelove. It comes from the movie.


it must be hard for you to stay sober (just pointing out stereo types are stupid)

By the way I am a whitey, but I find that if your weakest link can be improved, then you are that much stronger. In the end it costs less to train an existing good employee, then to hire in and train someone.
 
2005-09-29 01:59:58 PM
We hear a lot about "culturally-biased" tests and I really can't imagine what that means in practise. Can someone PLEASE give me an example of a test question which a black or brown American person couldn't answer but a white American could? Just one.
 
2005-09-29 02:00:25 PM
I see not so many Black and Hispanic Airline Pilots.
I think they should change the test because of that.

It also is a necessity for teachers to be literate.
That's discrimenatory.
As long as they can count to 12 on two hands, and wave Hi I think that's sufficient.

/No chicken little the sky isnt falling, its just the pilots hired under the new hiring practies!
//Nope not retarded, thats my English teacher!
///Well guess there is a stupid cold. Stoopid it seems is contagious, cause a lot of people have it.
 
2005-09-29 02:00:33 PM
What everyone seems to be forgetting is that while tests are not inherently biased, the fact remains that whites did better on the tests. I personally can't accept that minorities are just naturally stupid. So then you are left with the fact that the probable reason that the minorities can't pass a test is that they came from poor areas where small property taxes lead to poor schools and poor test-taking skills which leads to bad jobs which leads to more poverty. The problem isn't FedEx, it's just that we're not doing enough to get people out of this cycle.

/rant over.
 
2005-09-29 02:00:49 PM
Do the math.

80% of your applicants are Black and/or Hispanic that take the test.
20% of the remaining are white.

If 60% of the applicants fail the test.

The majority are Black and/or Hispanic!

/sue everyone that has skin!
//Dragons rejoice! Burnination commence.
 
2005-09-29 02:00:53 PM
Comicbookguy

Of course, that would presume you'd understand my caveat, which presumes a lot.

A lot


Dude, I understand where your caveat. I just dropped a daisy-cutter on that biatch.

KAPOW!
 
2005-09-29 02:01:23 PM
As long as the test discriminates against the Irish, I am for it. Oh yeah, and anyone practicing the Aztec religion.
 
2005-09-29 02:01:33 PM
My experience with shippers has been opposite most of you.

UPS- package tracking is pure fiction. If something is sent UPS Ground, then even if it shows up early (in this case, it made it to the local facility 2 days ahead of schedule), they will sit on it just so it doesn't arrive earlier. I couldn't even go and pick it up myself. Last time I got a box, they left a fully functional rifle (I have an 03 FFL) sitting in a truck over a weekend. A delivery truck, not a semi.

FedEx- Everything shows up on time, with good tracking. I love FedEx.

DHL- not much experience with them, but their habit of using USPS for local deliveries makes the package tracking a little touchy. Not bad- better than UPS.

USPS- If they would provide package tracking that is as good as FedEx, I would never ship any other way. Reliable, they make Saturday deliveries, and reasonably priced. As it is, FedEx is better for larger items.
 
2005-09-29 02:01:52 PM
Harrison Bergeron unavailible for comment

"If you could just take a few out when you came home from work", said Hazel. "I mean you don't compete with anybody around here. You just set around."


"If I tried to get away with it," said George, "then other peopled get away with it and pretty soon we'd be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else. You wouldn't like that, would you?"
 
2005-09-29 02:02:15 PM
what ever happened to setting high standards that were difficult or challenging to meet? not letting everyone in doesn't equal racism, it might just equal capitalism and survival of the fittes.

oh, screw that nonsense. let's let everyone with a C-average into Yale.
 
2005-09-29 02:02:29 PM
One final thought...If wealth is a factor in education and test taking, then explain why Paris Hilton could never pass the FedEx exam with a crib sheet.
 
2005-09-29 02:02:43 PM
Agreeing that the tests are racist without citing examples is like believing George Bush doesn't care about black people on impulse alone.

I imagine the Fedex questions ask things that pertain to the job, not questions about arguile(sp) sweaters or fried chicken.
 
cot
2005-09-29 02:03:15 PM
Weaver95: I want real equality, and yes, that means if one race is failing out of proportion, we need to take a look at the test, because it's quite possible it is slanted against them. NOT doing so would be favoritism.


'Logic' like that makes my brain hurt.


He didn't say you should change the test, he said you should LOOK at it because it's POSSIBLE it's slanted. Is just consdering that possibility too much for you to acknowledge?

I'll be the first to admit that there are other problems, and even that I doubt that this sort of effect is the dominant one, but I don't see why it hurts to evaluate it.
 
2005-09-29 02:03:22 PM
Oh yeah, and anyone practicing the Aztec religion.

Check out the following wikipedia entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Muerte

Not quite the aztec death worship, but not a bad substitute either.
 
2005-09-29 02:03:40 PM
too-old
For what it's worth, I rather got the impression you were heading down the stereotype path yourself when you inquired as to whether the good Doktor was of German heritage. I'm sure you weren't. I'm sure it was just a question were heritage had nothing to do with the point you were hoping to make. Just checking.

I'll be leaving now. This thread sucks.
 
2005-09-29 02:03:57 PM
Andrew_0812 thinks:
"And I think this is the core of the problem. I am all for EQUAL opportunity. That means that if you are a minority, you have EQUAL opportunity for advancement, raises, layoffs, and terminations. Using quotas is a flawed policy. It began well, but when minorities realize that they don't have to try as hard, or work as hard, etc., they can use the quota system to keep their jobs, even get promotions, all for doing shiat. I work in a large company. I am fortunate enough that everyone working around me seems to be competent and devoted to their job, regardless of race. As a result, there are few or no racial problems in my project. I have work in other areas with minorities who have a chip on their shoulder because they are forced to work under a white person. They do everything they can to keep from doing their job, yet they don't get axed. It is pathetic. And I have absolutely no respect for those people. They don't want equality, they want welfare at the workplace."
==========================================================

Instead of hiding behind that "I think all people should be equal" garbage why don't people with your beliefs just stand up and say what you really mean? In my opinion, you only say it to proactively debunk anyone who would suggest that your position is racist. See, immediately after saying all people should be equal, you go into stories of all of the shiftless, unmotivated Negros that you've come across in your career. YOU EVEN SUGGESTED THAT "MINORITIES" (I guess that means all non-White people)STOPPED TRYING TO ADVANCE BECAUSE THEY KNEW THEY WOULD ALWAYS HAVE A JOB DUE TO QUOTAS! That is a VERY ignorant and racist. Looking at your post I would think that you had NEVER encountered a White person with these same characteristics. It appears to me that it does not concern you that there may be White people in your company who under-perform. But those ni&&ers have to go. It goes back to what I always say: White people veiw one another as individuals and veiw everyone else as - everyone else. If three Black people are goofing off in the stock room where you work, you subconsiously attribute those flaws to MOST Black people. If three White people are goofing off no one EVER suggest that it has something to do with White people as a whole. The Blacks who do "what they are supposed to do" are treated as the exception to the rule. It used to really frustrate me, but I came to realize the opinion of people such as yourself is so logically flawed and factually incorrect that you were doing more harm to your cause than good. See, quotas and Affirmative Action was conceived because of closet bigots. It was created to offset the disadvantages encoutered by Blacks when we cross people such as yourself, who hold fast to preconceived notions of Black people and who happen to be in positions of power. The original hope was, these Black people would finally get the opportunity to showcase their skills and hopefully the White man in power would realize race is not a determining factor in finding the best employees. Affirmative action has absolutely NOTHING to do with forcing companies to hire under-qualified Black people or to retain Blacks with poor work habits. It only serves as a way to get Tamika Johnson's resume out of the shredder and into the pile.
Just say what you mean. You don't think Blacks are as intelligent, competent, or motivated as White people. Yeah, it's a racist stance but I would at least respect you for being man or woman enough to say it.
 
2005-09-29 02:04:00 PM
 
cot
2005-09-29 02:04:13 PM
peepee mcpoop: oh, screw that nonsense. let's let everyone with a C-average into Yale.

Yeah, as it is now, you at least have to be well connected to get in with that sort of grade average.
 
2005-09-29 02:04:29 PM
No one should state an opinion on this until they've read this and can see the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments made therein. It may be provable that ethnic group A is several IQ points lower or higher on average than ethnic group B, even accounting for socio-economic factors. Cultural factors are harder to determine, however, and I don't think the book really addressed this well or even at all. How do you measure anti-learning attitudes in a community? That's what's really holding back a lot of areas. In no way does this say anything definite about individuals. But it's a good read.

 
2005-09-29 02:04:42 PM
Looter Guy + Fedex = Insensitive, yet funny and witty topical Photoshop.
 
2005-09-29 02:04:59 PM
ComicBookGuy: Why is it, pray tell, that this story has been repeated (w/some variation) so many times? Frequently, they go to the same inner city schools as other "minorities," yet academically thrive? Why is that?


Exactly, because they CHOOSE to. I understand that people have difficult upbringings, and that some people are given hand-outs where other people have to work their arses off for everything they get. But ultimately it is YOUR choice where you go with your life, and the attitude that you have every day. That attitude, and the feeling that you are owed anything in this world, is at the core of many of these so-called racism lawsuits. Not true raceism, mind you. Just this pedantic bickering about not being given what you deserve.
 
2005-09-29 02:05:02 PM
Ain't day a bit racist?
 
2005-09-29 02:05:30 PM
Tallgordon:

Even if a poor family has a brilliant child, they may not encourage the child to go to a good college and reach their full potential.


So how is this the fault of the white person who is being passed over because affirmative action?
 
2005-09-29 02:05:36 PM
How about:
1) Leroy has twelve crack rocks. He sells four for $20 each, three for $22 dollars each and five for $18 each. Can he now afford the fly-ass rims?
 
2005-09-29 02:05:38 PM
Ghent Bent

I personally can't accept that minorities are just naturally stupid.

Whatever gave you the idea that minorities are stupid:
Asians, Indians, Russians, Jews, Slavs, Vietnamese, Koreans
etc are all minorities in the USA. They all do well on
standardized tests.


So then you are left with the fact that the probable reason that the minorities can't pass a test is that they came from poor areas


But poor people in India score 750+ on SAT's. They are
certainly poorer than most 'minorities' in the USA.

Do you even know how retarded you sound ?
 
2005-09-29 02:05:50 PM
cot - see our current president for reference.
 
2005-09-29 02:06:01 PM
And red-heads. Nobody wants their deliveries made by a red-head. So, no Irish, no Aztecs, and no red-heads. But, if it discriminates against people who are unqualified, then I have a problem with that. Qualifications for the job should have nothing to do with it. Damn questions about criminal background, and ability to read instructions. Its stuff like that that keeps the German people down.
 
cot
2005-09-29 02:06:03 PM
AxiomJackson: Good point. You know after a good 30+ hour work-week and a 14 hour class schedual, I really should take time out to think about all those poor unfortunate lower class people. You know, while I'm boiling my daily ration of Ramen noodles.


Oh, cry me a farking river. Unless you picked a really stupid major, you're going to finish and get a job getting paid reasonably well. You're just paying your dues. I paid my way through school working in retail, delivering pizzas, working security, and whatever else came along.
 
2005-09-29 02:06:24 PM

RTFA


FedEx's statistical analysis shows that minorities receive higher evaluations on average than whites in many job categories, and showed that minorities received higher wages than whites in many jobs.


And yet they don't get promoted. Sounds like the test doesn't work. End of story.
 
2005-09-29 02:07:16 PM
More Vonnegut goodness...

The television program was suddenly interrupted for a news bulletin. It wasnt clear at first as to what the bulletin was about, since the announcer, like all announcers, had a serious speech impediment. For about half a minute, and in a state of high excitement, the announcer tried to say, "Ladies and gentlemen, "


He finally gave up, handed the bulletin to a ballerina to read.


"Thats all right," Hazel said of the announcer, "he tried. Thats the big thing. He tried to do the best he could with what God gave him. He should get a nice raise for trying so hard."
 
2005-09-29 02:07:30 PM
peepee mcpoop: when playing polo, how many horses are used?

That is an illegal question based on that it has no bearing on your job.
You obviously have no idea what the heck you are talking about.
 
2005-09-29 02:07:42 PM
pstudent12

Over 750 SAT is good?
Wow, uhhhh OK.

I was under the impression on the old SAT's that under 1K was substandard, and anything under that meant no way to a good school.

/Anyone????
//What is the average....curious.
///Anyone knows this offhand?
 
2005-09-29 02:08:48 PM
Tallgordon: I also believe that the should be counterbalanced through affirmative action.

No problem w/that, for me. As long as it is done on the basis of class and not MORE racism.

Some underprivilaged white kid in Appalachia can be just as screwed as some underprivilaged black kid in Harlem.
 
2005-09-29 02:09:17 PM
gonna be gettin some goodies for the house o' pain!
 
2005-09-29 02:10:06 PM
jayday:

I was under the impression on the old SAT's that under 1K was substandard, and anything under that meant no way to a good school.

They change the numbers every so often to make 1000 the average. I heard they recently made it a 3 part test like the GRE, so technically I think the average is supposed to be 1500.
 
2005-09-29 02:10:20 PM
jayday,

I believe he meant per section. Y'know, there's 2 of them.
 
fj
2005-09-29 02:10:33 PM
BillCosby
Sorry bill,
just because someone does extremely well at sorting packages doesn't mean they will do well at the next level up where sorting packages is not even part of the job. The tests are to find who will excel at the next position, not the one they're currently in.
 
2005-09-29 02:10:34 PM
peepee mcpoop Can you give me an example of how a question on a driver's test could be written to favor a white person or vice versa for a black person?

You are driving down the highway when a police car pulls up behind you and turns on his lights...

/Satan is my motor...
=Smidge=
 
2005-09-29 02:12:17 PM
Hey, where the hell is Weaver to claim that this thread violates the FARQ, because it is hate speech? I thought he'd be all over this..

Or maybe it's just when people are badmouthing HIS race/religion/sex/values.


I love TFer double standards.
 
2005-09-29 02:12:36 PM
Thank G-d we don't have this problem in Canada. We are not allowed to keep track of employees by race.

This is false. Where did you get that idea? Have you ever applied for a government job?
 
2005-09-29 02:12:36 PM
Hammertoe
"If I say that Industrial Revolution didn't happen in Africa; it happened in America, would that be racist? Or would I just be racist for pointing it out?"

No, but you would be wrong. The industrial revolution originated in England.
 
2005-09-29 02:13:15 PM
Jayday opined:

Over 750 SAT is good?
Wow, uhhhh OK.
I was under the impression on the old SAT's that under 1K was substandard, and anything under that meant no way to a good school.


Jayday,

That was broken down by Math and Verbal (English).

That's 750+ on MATH and 750+ on VERBAL. Independently. So
I am talking a total score of 1500 or more.

Astonishing and totally, utterly demolishes any sort
of cultural, bias, economic or other arguments about
standardized tests like the SAT's.
 
2005-09-29 02:13:23 PM
too-old - peepee mcpoop: when playing polo, how many horses are used?

That is an illegal question based on that it has no bearing on your job.
You obviously have no idea what the heck you are talking about.


i don't know how to explain this, but i'll try. it was a joke, i realize that you the typical drivers test doesn't have more than like 4 or 5 questions about polo on it.
 
cot
2005-09-29 02:13:36 PM
Ekupes: I love TFer double standards.


He's like the anti-ACLU.
 
2005-09-29 02:13:47 PM
This is a true story.

I worked for a Federal law enforcement agency in the 1980s. We were under pressure to hire more minorities.

I have worked with outstanding agents of all colors. I've also worked with complete morons of all colors. I do, however, have a problem of lowering standards to make a quota.

We were interviewing a prospective candidate for the Special Agent position. My boss asked some stock questions, the first being "name a current event that's caught your attention recently."

The gentleman replied, "Well, there was that dude that got shot last week."

"Who?" we asked.

He thought a moment and said "the dude with the pointy hat."

We looked at him and asked him to go on, and after a moment of deep thought stated "you know, the guy with all the Catholics around him."

"The Pope??" we asked.

"Yeah, that's him." He said.

We disqualified him. Our HQ told us to reconsider. My boss said NFW.
 
2005-09-29 02:14:09 PM
Can you give me an example of how a question on a driver's test could be written to favor a white person or vice versa for a black person?

Q) A black and a Puerto Rican are in an automobile. Who's driving?

A) The police.
 
2005-09-29 02:14:16 PM
Can you give me an example of how a question on a driver's test could be written to favor a white person or vice versa for a black person?

A police car turns on its lights in attempt to pull you over. Do you:

a) Pull over to the right side of the road, and place hands at 10 and 2;
b) Make a run for it like Luke and Bo; or
c) Pull over, hide the crack under the seat and pull the 9 from the glove box and start shooting,; or
d) Hand the Malt liquor to your homey in the back, and tell your Ho she is taking the wheel, and then switch seats at 65 mph, then pull over and let the biatch get the ticket.

How'd I do?
 
2005-09-29 02:14:36 PM
Ekupes: Hey, where the hell is Weaver to claim that this thread violates the FARQ, because it is hate speech? I thought he'd be all over this..

I do not believe that there are any serious comments about hate speech here, just a difference of opinion. Some people have not been able to see where racism exist in every day life as they were not "shown" how to see racism
 
2005-09-29 02:14:58 PM
Second question: "Who won the Winston Cup in NASCAR last year?

Trick Question! Last Year was the first year that it was called the Nextel Cup!

However, I didn't realize that the golf question was a trick question, and I like old Motown music. Does that mean I'm only half white? Or does the fact that I know anything about NASCAR override everything else, and make me whiter than white?
 
2005-09-29 02:15:55 PM
fj:

Sorry bill,
just because someone does extremely well at sorting packages doesn't mean they will do well at the next level up where sorting packages is not even part of the job. The tests are to find who will excel at the next position, not the one they're currently in.


It is also very easy to manipulate a test so that it is racially biased. If minorities excel at their job but the test consisently says that they don't deserve to be promoted, then there's probably something wrong with the test. Unless you honestly believe that white people are someone more fit for upper and middle management.
 
2005-09-29 02:17:07 PM
go to your nearest library and count number of asians and number of blacks.

libraries are racist.
 
2005-09-29 02:17:12 PM
BillCosby is a honkey hater!!!

/This cracker shall now wait to have the book thrown at him.
//A book? Its the hard thing with paper inside that has scribbley stuff written on it.
///No those are called words, books dont just have pictures.
////Joking.....pretty sure Cosby is white to.
 
2005-09-29 02:17:46 PM
As someone who currently works for FedEx, I have first-hand experience with their testing. I can tell you that I have never seen racism exhibited in any form whatsoever. In fact, the only racial tension I've ever seen comes from a single black courier who seems to fancy himself as the next Malcolm-X. The other black guys just tell him to shut the hell up. :)

With regard to testing, it is difficult to see how the criteria tested could be affected by race, sex, or other non-intellect metrics. For example, a pre-test required before a courier position can even be *offered* includes a mock map of city streets. About ten points are identified on the map, along with one-way streets and other obstacles. The test requires that the would-be courier identify the optimal route (minimising left-turns, finishing close to the return point, etc.) and fill in the stop-order. It's a simple test that requires basic map reading and critical thinking skills; people still fail it. In courier training, FedEx procedures are taught (it's an incredibly procedure-based company) and then a three-hour test is administered that essentially requires the candidate to complete a mock "shift" by going through a workbook that includes procedures, problem packages, international rules, and the like. All that is required to pass that test is to listen and remember.

Finally, evaluations at the company are done based on computer reports (such as stops-per-hour, routing accuracy, efficiency, etc.) that are completely out of the control of the evaluator. Scores in different categories have weights, and the total weighted scores combine to create an overall score that determines what percentage of the annual dollar raise you get (i.e. 70% overall score means a $.70 raise for that year).

I honestly don't see how racism is possible in evaluations and promotions, since it's entirely based on computer scores and seniority.

Just a few facts for your consumption.
 
2005-09-29 02:17:54 PM
Fedex LOST my $1500 video camera. Oh they found it...at an abondoned warehouse in Dallas...6 months later. When the packaged arrived it looked like a brown paper bag, held together with about 35 rerouting stickers.

I bought a $500 guitar and they left it on my front steps when i wasn't home...in july and I live in Houston, Texas. So that's a useless warped guitar now and of course they refuse to honor the whole insurance thing.

It's been almost 2 weeks now and i'm still waiting on them to deliver my video card that i bought from woot.com.

Racist or not, their service blows.


or you're a fool that keeps on going back.. How can you blame them for leaving your guitar out in the heat? I'd say 99% of the time the driver doesn't know what's in the package.. his job is to deliever it, which he accomplished.. maybe you should blame yourself for not being at home to recieve it?
 
Ant
2005-09-29 02:18:08 PM
eldezod: For example, the SAT asked something about snow and skiing, and the report argued that skiing is something that is done mosty by upper-middle to upper class people, also mostly white.

That's not racial bias, that's a class bias. I'm white, and I don't know the first thing about skiing. I guess I could claim discrimination too, eh?
 
2005-09-29 02:18:14 PM
BrotherAlpha

It is also very easy to manipulate a test so that it is racially biased.

If it so easy to make racist, you wouldn't have a problem giving an example.
 
2005-09-29 02:19:09 PM
Hammertoe
"The greatest program of systemic slaughter of a race in history: The Holocaust (European). Am I racist for pointing that out?"

Uh, sorry to contradict you again but there were many genocides before the Nazi-Jewish one. And one of the biggest was the American-European genocide of the native Americans including spanish treatment of the Central Americans). A lot more than 6 million were killed then.
 
2005-09-29 02:19:22 PM
fj:

just because someone does extremely well at sorting packages doesn't mean they will do well at the next level up where sorting packages is not even part of the job. The tests are to find who will excel at the next position, not the one they're currently in.

Given all the available information that my conlcusion is the only one available.
 
2005-09-29 02:19:26 PM
kherik: I hope you are surrounded by people who go out of your way to make your life shiatty because of innocent mistakes.


I hope the next time you have something very important shipped to you, it gets delivered to the redneck down the street, who uses it as a hockey puck. It was a valid reason for her to complain. If Fed Ex fired the guy, it probably wasn't his first mistake. If it was his first, he probably just got notified of his err and told not to let it happen again. If he frequently misplaced packages, and no one called to complain abou it, Fed Ex would not know, but customers would start to hate Fed Ex, and not trust their deliveries. Trust me, Fed Ex would rather know that a mistake has been made.
 
2005-09-29 02:20:11 PM
BillCosby: Given all the available information that my conlcusion is the only one available.

that's not a sentence.

Given all the information available, my conlcusion is the only one available.
 
2005-09-29 02:20:13 PM
James Finberg, an attorney representing the class:
Twice the number of minorities fail promotional tests than do whites, Finberg added.

"FedEx knows that black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test," Finberg said.


And the class' lawyer loses....

/edumacations is teh winnar
 
2005-09-29 02:21:16 PM
Enlightenment v0.9

Just a few facts for your consumption.

Why on earth would we need facts? The tests are racist!
 
2005-09-29 02:21:41 PM
Guns don't kill people, dangerous minorities do.
 
2005-09-29 02:21:59 PM
Let me ask you people this(if it hasn't been already):

At the upper and lower 1% of scores on a standarized test, there are mostly white people(upper) and minorities(lower).

Does this mean the test is racist?
 
2005-09-29 02:22:16 PM
What a bunch of crap.

Study for the test you retards! Stupid people and articles like this are entertainment though... Just like watching people at the mall. "Train wreck coming...check it out."
 
2005-09-29 02:22:21 PM
What do you call 100 white guys chasing a black guy and a guy from Fiji?

The PGA tour.

/Go V.J. !!
 
2005-09-29 02:22:52 PM
too-old:

Some people have not been able to see where racism exist in every day life as they were not "shown" how to see racism

Hand in two resumes, identical in every way except for the name. One resume has a white sounding name, for instance, John. The other has a black sounding name, Jamal. The white sounding name will get a call-back 50% more often.

That is racism inherent in the system and until that is fixed afirmative action is absolutely necessary for minorities to have a fighting chance.
 
2005-09-29 02:23:45 PM
Gash Uh, sorry to contradict you again but there were many genocides before the Nazi-Jewish one. And one of the biggest was the American-European genocide of the native Americans including spanish treatment of the Central Americans). A lot more than 6 million were killed then.

Uh, first yes, there were many other examples. Second, the genocide of the native Americans was unintentional as a whole. Third, the point was totally missed by you.

Is it racist to point out facts? That is the point. Obviously, it is not. Fact - overall blacks do poorly on standardized tests in America. They also do poorly, as a whole, on non-standardized tests. Same with poor people. Same with stupid people.

Fact - Some people discriminate on basis of race.

But, correlation does not equal causation. And neither do unrelated facts. Example - Some poor people are black,ergo, all black people are poor test takers, ergo, any company that tests its employees is racist.
 
2005-09-29 02:23:54 PM
I used to work at a big college in Ontario. And, okay, don't beat me, because I know this sounds racist. And I truly don't mean it that way.

We had very few black students. Way less than the proportion of blacks in the population in the country, province, and city. So we were trying to recruit more. Since in Ontario we at the colleges did not have access to information about race, there was a different sort of policy.

When it came to the last tier of slots for students, once all the straight A shoo-ins had already been accepted, and the last places were for sort of borderline candidates, the sole process of determining which students would make the final cut and which wouldn't was decided solely on how black the name sounded.

Tyrone, Jermaine, Odell. Vondella? Nelson! They'd make the cut even if they really probably shouldn't have. A comparable Russ, Mike, Wendy? A Goldberg? Not a chance.

Problem was, blacks weren't getting into college. It wasn't the college's fault - they *wanted* more blacks. But fewer blacks were applying and those that did were doing more poorly on the standardized tests. So if you went solely by academics, almost no blacks were getting in.

Frankly, if I were black, I'd be insulted as hell. A policy like that would be telling me that I'm not good enough to make it on my own. That because I'm black, I need extra help.

You know, if I were black.
 
2005-09-29 02:24:17 PM
Thanks all yeah 1500 out of 1600 is a damn good score(1600 being old cap not sure about the new SAT).

School I went to(120 grad class) only had 2 people scoring over 1500 so that's pretty impressive score I'd say. Well beyond good.
 
fj
2005-09-29 02:25:40 PM
BrotherAlpha
Or maybe Jamal's parents shouldn't try to give Jamal such an odd name.
/same goes for all the stupid new age white names
 
2005-09-29 02:25:45 PM
quattelly : I had...


Brilliant
 
2005-09-29 02:25:48 PM
Given all the information available, my conlcusion is the only one available.

what is a "conlcusion"

/sorry, just being a jerk
 
2005-09-29 02:26:27 PM
dasc: If I'm 100 yards from the hole I'd go with my 5 iron. There is only one approriate club for the green.


good lord, a 5 iron??? If I wanted to hit it onto the next hole, I'd use a 5. at 100 yds, I'm pulling a P or an A wedge.
 
2005-09-29 02:26:41 PM
aaaaaaaagggggggggghhhhhhhh
 
2005-09-29 02:27:00 PM
My experiences:

Fedex: Never early but on-time an reliable. I hate them though, because their depot is about a 20 minute drive away.

UPS: Often early with ground shipments, especially from the same coast. Very reliable - same as Fedex. I like them better because their depot is on my way to work.
 
2005-09-29 02:27:13 PM
BrotherAlpha: That is racism inherent in the system and until that is fixed afirmative action is absolutely necessary for minorities to have a fighting chance.

I agree and I think that my previous statements back that up
 
2005-09-29 02:27:20 PM
Frankly, if I were black, I'd be insulted as hell. A policy like that would be telling me that I'm not good enough to make it on my own. That because I'm black, I need extra help.


And what if you were to pick a doctor and knew that a black doctor didn't need to score as high in Medical school? I'd do my best to pick the white doctor since you know he had a higher minimum to make it then some minority.
 
2005-09-29 02:27:56 PM
Farkin A: 100 yards and you use a 5 iron. You must hit like a puss. i would use a pw or a 9, most likely the PW.


we did not count on the possibility that he is a she, you know.
 
2005-09-29 02:28:53 PM
seeing as fedex's entire business is based on things like coordination, timeliness, and precise execution....i think it is completely logical that if people can't pass a specific test, regardless of race, then...too farking bad. go get a job somewhere else with lower standards.
 
2005-09-29 02:29:33 PM
fj: Or maybe Jamal's parents shouldn't try to give Jamal such an odd name.
/same goes for all the stupid new age white names


what the heck is wrong with Jamal?
 
2005-09-29 02:29:58 PM
"Let me put it this way...He spelled 'Yale' with a '6'"
 
2005-09-29 02:30:31 PM
ericjohnson0

Jose has 2 ounces of cocaine. If he sells an 8 ball to Antonio for $320 and 2 grams to Juan for $85 per gram, what is the street value of the rest of his hold?

I think you're leaving out some valuable information here. Why is Antonio paying 7.5% more than Juan when the normal practice is to give a discount to the customer in exchange for purchasing a larger quantity? Are Jose and Juan related? Did Antonio do something in the past to fark Jose over and there is still a grudge?
 
2005-09-29 02:31:50 PM
firefly212: So if we were all made in God's image, and evolution is a lie, how come there are different races?


Get a genetics book.
 
2005-09-29 02:31:56 PM
blindpreacher: And what if you were to pick a doctor and knew that a black doctor didn't need to score as high in Medical school? I'd do my best to pick the white doctor since you know he had a higher minimum to make it then some minority.

Then you would pick a doctor with an middle eastern name, and a banker with a Jewish name and on and on
 
2005-09-29 02:33:45 PM
Really, what proof is there of racial equality? On the contrary, there are mountains of evidence against it. You people are worse than the "Intelligent Design" idiots.
 
2005-09-29 02:34:48 PM
Look at the Nation of Islam. White people are way underrepresented in that organization.

Wait, I can come up with other examples of statistically proving that one group is more representative than another.

-women can be found in women's bathrooms more often than men
-bald black people look cooler than white people who are bald
-Fewer whites eat sushiathan Japanese
-There are fewere mormon quarterback/attorneys than baptist quarterback/attorneys
-Zima, tasted awful but was marketed well, is underrepresented in the alcoholic beverages market

Obviously someone needs to contact a lawyer right now. There is millions to be made on this.
 
2005-09-29 02:35:41 PM
blindpreacher:

And what if you were to pick a doctor and knew that a black doctor didn't need to score as high in Medical school? I'd do my best to pick the white doctor since you know he had a higher minimum to make it then some minority.

What if the black doctors are the most highly recommended and have the most successful practices. Then someone gives you a list of all the "best doctors", and the black ones were strangely absent. Would you suspect the list of being in err?
 
2005-09-29 02:36:27 PM
cot: cry me a river, you're just paying your dues

Is it me, or was that a self-defeating statement?
 
2005-09-29 02:37:44 PM
Guys--aptitude tests have been remade and rewritten and reevaluated for all of my 40 years and often the tests are evaluated by black groups--this is the dirty little secret behind these discrimination claims. Test scores for blacks and to a lesser extent, Latinos, never change. Man if I hear one more time the cliche about SAT questions about yachts I am going to hurl. Those biases (as if most white people know a damn thing about yachts)were gone by the early SIXTIES and yet people STILL quote this excuse as to why blacks fail. Do your homework.

Tests DO discriminate, that's what they are for, to discriminate bad employees or students from good ones. They do NOT, however, discriminate on racial terms. Asians tend to score higher than anybody, by the way.

Be careful what you ask for. If we continue to throw away standards and testing we will become the Third World. When did we get to a point where we thought being able to rationally evaluate people is wrong?
 
fj
2005-09-29 02:38:11 PM
too old
Actually, Jamal's not too bad. It's usually the names like Shaniqua and Miquiesha that get resumes tossed in the pail, along with Sky, Winter, Deja and the other children of LSD.
 
2005-09-29 02:38:14 PM
I'm going to sue the NBA for not having enough short people. Those damn heightists.
 
2005-09-29 02:38:20 PM
cot
Oh, cry me a farking river. Unless you picked a really stupid major, you're going to finish and get a job getting paid reasonably well. You're just paying your dues. I paid my way through school working in retail, delivering pizzas, working security, and whatever else came along..

Ding! Ding! Correct! As I'm "just paying" my "dues" doing all of these things, then how exactly do I qualify as middle class at the moment? Possible future status dosn't effect my current situation. Are we basing class on a more (no pun intended) classical definition? Or by good old american "you must make this much a year to ride" values?
/not being snarky just trying to make a point
 
2005-09-29 02:40:19 PM
You're on the green on the 5th fairway. You're 100 yards from the hole...


 
2005-09-29 02:41:41 PM
jayday: 1600 being old cap not sure about the new SAT

It's still the cap, unless there's a "new new" SAT. But in the old days, if you missed one question, you couldn't get a perfect score. Today, both ends of the curve float, so as long as you're in the 99.x percentile (maybe lower, I don't know), you are given a 1600. Some folks that got 1500 on the old SAT might get a 1600 on the new one, with the same number of questions answered correctly and incorrectly.
 
2005-09-29 02:41:50 PM
It's the age-old conundrum: are poor people poor because they're stupid, or are they stupid because they're poor?

But the problem is that the question is of a statistical nature, and generalizations made on the basis of group identity are useless in judging individuals.

Whenever someone asks me "if you're so smart, why aren't you rich?", I just reply "If you're so rich, why aren't you smart?"
 
2005-09-29 02:44:07 PM
The number of people who assume that fair treatment will result in equality is simply staggering.

This is only surpassed by the number of people that assume that inequality is the result of unfair treatment.
 
2005-09-29 02:44:08 PM
AxiomJackson

Ding! Ding! Correct! As I'm "just paying" my "dues" doing all of these things, then how exactly do I qualify as middle class at the moment? Possible future status dosn't effect my current situation.


Actually, you're upper-class right now. See, most of the rest of us working stiffs yearn to be back in school getting high and watching Springer, so we actually look up to you and envy you...just like we do towards those in the upper-classes monetarily. You're not paying your dues right now; that starts on day one of your first job after graduation.
 
2005-09-29 02:44:17 PM
Barnstomer:
What do you call 100 white guys chasing a black guy and a guy from Fiji?

The PGA tour.

New monitor. Address to follow. And you also win.
/guess I'm a racist for laughing at that joke.
 
2005-09-29 02:45:39 PM
Wow, this thread needs more sly, unfunny "sample questions" about chicken and greens. we get it folks...not funny


I work for FedEx.. im a service manager candidate which means that sometimes I handle packages, sometimes I manage an area, depending on what they need/volume. I can tell you that there are token minority managers in place at our hub that dont seem ever to move up or move out. they remian rooted in their position and have been that was as long as I've worked where I work. They'll never be fired, thus they are not accountable for poor performance and are rarely rewarded for good performance. Most of the senior management is white for reasons mentioned earlier. I takes 10 years or so to become that level and most people there from the beginning who are still there, are white.

in essence, this lawsuit is BS. also included in the lawsuit is a complaint about the hiring test to become a package handler, which is sucessfully lifing a 50 lb box the size of a shoebox. it has handles. its not that hard.
 
2005-09-29 02:46:41 PM
"FedEx knows that black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test," Finberg said.

Please explain to me why an efficiency test needs to be dumbed down if a certain portion of the employee base can't pass it? The test is there to promote the best, not the dumbest. Having been a station manager for the now absorbed Airborne Express, I'm real familiar with how some employees find creative ways to goof off and how others avoid responsibility.

One Black employee, in training, seemed to be just fine as he was shown the ropes of being a driver. However, when it came time to give him a route, he wanted the one, already taken, that was close to his home. (I mean, come on now! The reasons were glaringly obvious!) We didn't give out routes on request. We he was denied it, he quit in a huff and left threatening to file a discrimination lawsuit.

One subcontractor (our areas were subcontracted to make the company more money by not being Union) flatly refused to hire Blacks. He said they caused more problems than they were worth.

In the main office was an excellent supervisor, aiming for a promotion into the higher levels of the company itself, but, little did he know, he would never get it because he liked to talk too much about employees -- and he wasn't Black.

Getting a promotion into supervisory ranks in a courier company means you pretty well give up your home life. I was technically on duty 24/7 and worked 12 to 13 hour days and got to handle all of the shiat that came down from the always critical main office. Plus I had to handle assorted employees who gave me krap and found creative ways to get out of work or who deliberately screwed things up. (One guy, planning on quitting, in his last few weeks, used to not check in some freight on his truck or he'd grab a piece of freight from another route and not record it. So, all hell would break loose as the home office, knowing it was shipped to us, demanded it be found. The guy would secretly, the next day, place the freight back in the proper truck and record in and deliver his own 'missing' freight, which caused problems all the way back up the line.)

BTW, as salaried employees, we didn't get overtime. (I later, after leaving, discovered that we were supposed to.)

One subcontractor made us pay for damage to the vans that couldn't be proven to be caused by anyone else. (Like a dent in the door caused by some driver rolling freight through, who, naturally, wouldn't admit it.) So, I got to handle the biatching about that. Plus, any time a driver goofed up, I got the krap.

I was actually glad, when a new subcontractor took over, that I was reduced to assistant manager as he provided his own station manager. The HE got the krap.

You have to be qualified to achieve various promotions. You can't promote someone who is going to goof off, foul up, not understand all of the assorted and often complex rules or show favoritism.

I mean, would you want a surgeon doing a kidney transplant on you who had gotten his position through affirmative action and not by meeting the standards? That's akin to lowering the standards in schools and churning out graduates who can barely read, can barely speak English and have a problem pointing out Washington, DC on a map.

(I had to reluctantly turn down this absolutely HOT girl who applied for a driver job because she couldn't read a map -- even though I gave her tons of hints on how to do so. She even managed to steam up my supervisor, who came down for the interviews. BTW, she was WHITE!)

In another job, as manager, I was offered double pay if I could meet certain standards and while I ran my butt off, it was just impossible for me to do it. Hey! That's life.

Every job has it's standards, needed to run efficiently and maximize profits, which is why the company is in business the first place.
 
2005-09-29 02:47:29 PM
steve20832:

Weirdest thing i've ever had, kinda similarish.

Working at an electronic store. DSL connection was to be installed by the telephone company. After the appointed day, no one had come in to install it, so I called the DSL service provider. They said that the installer had installed a jack "next to the stove". Note that we were not an appliance/electronics store, just an electronics store. No stoves anywhere. Turned out it was installed on the other side of the shopping mall.
 
2005-09-29 02:47:50 PM
going to college isn't "paying your dues". your only getting ready to pay your dues at that point.

college was fun and not that hard, the real world is hard.
 
2005-09-29 02:48:32 PM
This thread is amusing because of how hard libs are trying to spin this. give it up already
 
2005-09-29 02:48:47 PM
Civil_War2_Time [TotalFark]:
"Actually, you're upper-class right now."

Sounds good to me. Now where's my yacht?
 
2005-09-29 02:49:48 PM
firefly212: So if we were all made in God's image, and evolution is a lie, how come there are different races?

God didn't make us in his image. We made God in our image.
 
2005-09-29 02:50:39 PM
ateksuni:

*sighs*

*shakes head*

*blames irresponsible parents and the UCLA again*


So do us Sooner fans.
 
2005-09-29 02:50:50 PM
I'm not racist, I have a colour TV.
 
2005-09-29 02:51:03 PM
This is why someone I know who runs a VERY profitable Heavy Equipment business will NOT hire anything but white people. He's a privately owned company and says it's to protect him from the liability of a lawsuit. See, most mechanics are lazy bags of crap who always think they should be paid more than they are. As a result there is high turnover rates in that business, lots of malingering, etc. That means fat, unshaven white people do those things as much as black people, but when black people get fired for it, it's "racist". In view of the political climate, he just figures it's cheaper to avoid the inevitable discrimination lawsuits by selective hiring practices. Since his business is an industrial complex dividing the suburbs from the ghetto (which used to be suburbs before, well, you know...) he turns down about 10 - 20 walkup job requests per month. The guy doesn't burn crosses or anything on the weekends, but he's just too busy to put up with having to deal with racism allegations when it comes to firing people from a profession where they get fired all the time. He already has to deal with workman's comp BS all the time.

He actually has one old (>60) hispanic dude working for him - pays him 55% of the labor rate, as many hours as he wants. That guy is bulletproof, super competent, and probably the coolest mechanic I've ever met, and he knows the score. It used to be an interesting conversation topic on rides to jobsites with him.

If I ever had my own business, you can bet your ass I'd keep it private and would only hire people like me* to prevent crap like this lawsuit from happening. I think you could use the mountain of evidence in past judgements to justify this as a legitimate and reasonable form of asset and business protection.

And boycott me please. I'll need all the free advertising I can get.

*yes, that means what you think it does.
 
2005-09-29 02:51:05 PM
Sounds good to me. Now where's my yacht?

Toys-r-Us. It requires six "D" batteries, and some assembly is required.
 
2005-09-29 02:53:03 PM
So..yesterday was about empowering strippers, today is about equality for shippers..

Whats that mean for tomorrow?

/What can brown do for you..apparently nothing! Funny!
//Plays some cards, but not that race one
///Ex USPS employee, was once in a bar reading 'An American Tragedy, by Dreiser, guy walks in, sees my mailman uniform, and the book..says..'whats that? The Postal Service MANUAL?' Had to deck him..hey, I WAS Postal!
 
2005-09-29 02:53:54 PM
FLMountainMan
Really, what proof is there of racial equality? On the contrary, there are mountains of evidence against it. You people are worse than the "Intelligent Design" idiots.


Mountains of evidence? Please, for the rest of us down here at base-camp, please elaborate.
 
2005-09-29 02:54:02 PM
"Exactly, because they CHOOSE to. I understand that people have difficult upbringings, and that some people are given hand-outs where other people have to work their arses off for everything they get. But ultimately it is YOUR choice where you go with your life, and the attitude that you have every day. That attitude, and the feeling that you are owed anything in this world, is at the core of many of these so-called racism lawsuits. Not true raceism, mind you. Just this pedantic bickering about not being given what you deserve."
=======================================================

When you've never had anything taken away from you; when you've never experienced real discrimination it is so easy to look at the world through rose colored glasses. I guess because YOU don't burn crosses or show overt racism to the Blacks you encounter daily it means racism is a figment of their imagination. Because YOU don't see it, it doesn't exist? The lawsuits, the Reperations discussions, the quotas are ALL intended to get Blacks on equal ground with Whites. Do you beleive that 97% of upper management in corporate America is comprised of White males because they are smater than everyone else including White women? White people get jobs and advancements based on who they know and that is THE EPITOMY OF CORPORATE WELFARE (see: FEMA Director Mike Brown) It is common knowledge that most careers are not driven by what you know, but WHO you know. It is also common knowledge that people tend to gravitate to people who resemble them. So, if I am up for a position and my main competitor is a White man who reminds the employer of his son-in-law who do you think has the advantage? I have less than a three percent chance for me to possibly get the same advantage because that is the percentage of corporations chaired by Blacks. George W. Bush was a 'C' student (so you know that means a failing student because no one who got A's and B's calls himself a 'C' student). George W. Bush was admitted to YALE because his father was an alum. It was only a couple of generations ago that Blacks were not allowed to attend Yale, Harvard, or many other institutions. So, while your parents and grandparents networked with one another in the college environment and established relationships with universities, my grandparents did the only work that the law, Jim Crow, and racist employers allowed them to do. In essence, Whites have been given a head start. It's easy to think you can be anything when you've never had to sit in class hungry or if you never had to leave school to sell drugs so that your family can have food for the week. We are not all equal and there need to be systems in place to address that inequality.
 
2005-09-29 02:54:48 PM
pstudent:

I completely agree that the tests are not inherently biased, hence the (likely top notch) Indian students scoring so well. But the fact remains that Black and Hispanic Americans score poorly on SATs and the like compared to White Americans. It seems to me that the inferior education as a result of living in poorer areas is a main cause for this. But, I won't deny that there is a cultural factor as well.

What I would love to see more than anything is white leaders to do a better job recognizing that blacks and hispanics are at a disdvantage due to economic conditions and a poverty cycle, and for black and hispanic leaders to do a better job encouraging young people to work hard and get an education.

Both voices are missing.
 
2005-09-29 02:54:56 PM
Civil_War2_Time [TotalFark]:
Toys-r-Us. It requires six "D" batteries, and some assembly is required.

Great! Will you help me push my car to Toys-r-Us so I can pick it up?

/living the highlife
//didn't even know it
///previously paid 4 years of dues
 
cot
2005-09-29 02:56:03 PM
plizak: I'm not racist, I have a colour TV.

If you're a republican I bet you turn the brightness all the way up.

If you're a democrat I bet you turn the contrast all the way down.
 
2005-09-29 02:56:21 PM
My question is. How stupid do you have to be to fail a test to work at Fed Ex? Your just delivering letters and packages for christies sake. I guess that right hand turn at Sickamore and Putz is a little difficult for you to comprehend.
 
2005-09-29 02:56:47 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND:
well well. I believe you should try reading what I said and not jumping to a stereotypical conclusion of your own. The topic of my post was people that I have observed hiding behind EEO procedures, and the effect that it has on the quality of a workplace environment as well as how it effects people who aren't protected by the EEO policies. I was not talking about white people who display similar attitudes. If you will read some of my other posts in this thread, you will note that I said that white people can be similarly disposed towards doing nothing at their job. However, I doubt that any of them could successfully hide behind EEO policies or company race quotas. All that they can hide behind is coorporate bloating, and keeping thier head down so that they aren't noticed.

In your histerical ranting about me being such a racist, you attributed many things to my world view that do not belong. First, I am not a racist. At all. A racist creates stereotypes about people solely due to their ethnicity. I don't do that. I don't even have to think about it. I do form stereotypes about people that I come in contact with. Everyone does. You formed an immediate stereotype about me. My stereotypes are based on socio-economics as well as race and attitude. I work side by side with people of many ethnicities, and that distinction never occurs to me while I am working with them. We are all simliar, have similar talents, etc. However if I see someone wearing gang colors, or wearing a certain style of dress on the street, I form stereotypes about them. They may be inacurate, and I am always willing to change my mind if I get to know someone better. For example, I have formed some stereotypes about you, as well. If you had actually taken the time and effor to let the words that I wrote soak into your little brain, you would see that I agree that the purpose of Affermative Action and the EEO was a noble attempt at true equality. I know what the intent was, and I agree with that vision. But it is undeniable that these policies are being abused in the workplace, and are responsible for promoting and hiring underqualified individuals, sometimes at the expense of not hiring a better qualified person. You are probably also one of those people who think that a black person cannot be racist.
 
2005-09-29 02:56:55 PM
Similar to Atreyou40's story, I know someone who owns an electronics retail store. Never again will she hire East Indians. She had 2 of them working for her, one got caught stealing from the cash register and the other got caught lieing about needing a night off (and was seen at a University party by other employees). Never had problems like that with the black, native Indian or even Newfie employees (in Canada, obviously).
 
2005-09-29 02:58:02 PM
firefly212: So if we were all made in God's image, and evolution is a lie, how come there are different races?

MWeather God didn't make us in his image. We made God in our image.

Ha! You are both wrong. God has eyes like a fly. Lots of different lenses. Therefore, God's image is fractured like the thousands of images a fly sees. So, we are all fractured images of God. Some are more distorted than others.

/Don't ask why we didn't get fly eyes. God moves in mysterious ways.
 
2005-09-29 02:58:56 PM
Great! Will you help me push my car to Toys-r-Us so I can pick it up?

I gotta bum knee from playing too much golf. Sorry, but you'll have to use that platinum college card to buy a new one. Interest rates won't ever come back to haunt you, I swear.
 
2005-09-29 03:02:08 PM
"badgerb - My question is. How stupid do you have to be to fail a test to work at Fed Ex? Your just delivering letters and packages for christies sake. I guess that right hand turn at Sickamore and Putz is a little difficult for you to comprehend."


have you taken a look at the average american? you shouldn't be so suprised.
 
2005-09-29 03:02:09 PM
If the test is unfair, change it. If it is fair but is failed more often by blacks, latinos, people of color, minorities, chicanos, African-Americans, Asians (ha ha), Pacific Islanders, Native Americans, Indians... tough. Like people tell me when I biatch about losing a golf match - "play better."
 
2005-09-29 03:03:24 PM
What branch of Fed Ex is this. I've had to take this test and I've seen many fail it. To my surprise, all the people that failed were not of a specific race. Also all of those who failed it got to retake it and passed it later on. As far as getting paid more or less, everyone comes in at a fixed rate and promotions are largely based on seniority.
 
2005-09-29 03:04:26 PM
Civil_War2_Time [TotalFark]
"...but you'll have to use that platinum college card..."

Darn. I would, but I must have lost it under the past due bills and piles of empty Ramen noodle packages. Can I borrow yours?

/most fun on Fark ever
 
2005-09-29 03:08:22 PM
Pray for Omarion - he has back problems and NEEDS that desk job...
 
2005-09-29 03:08:42 PM
I don't know about FedEx, but in the company I work for, there are tons of people in middle management who don't deserve the job and aren't capable. Though there are certainly several who did deserve it and do their jobs very well and they resent the "Quota Americans," because they worked hard for their jobs and the QAs just got handed their job.
 
2005-09-29 03:08:49 PM
My balls are racist. And my hand is the ghey.
 
2005-09-29 03:09:57 PM
In light of PCness I suggest we come up with some new rules to balance things out for whites:


1. All baskets made in the NBA by whites shall be counted as 3 points.

2. From now on, any marathon runner from Africa must wear ten pound ankle bracelets to make the race fair.

3. Any RAP or HIP HOP group with more than 3 members must have at least one White, Asian, or Hispanic for every 3 members.

4. UPN will give one white person a show for every two balck comedies.

5. All mexican eateries must employ 2 white cooks for every 3 mexican cooks. - the same goes for Chinese and soul food eateries.

6. All asian kids in any level of school must not be allowed to study for more than 1 hour a day and must take tests blindfolded.

7. All hot hispanic and asian women shall be made ugly.

8. black comedians will have to work in %50 more unfunny jokes into their sets.
 
2005-09-29 03:10:08 PM
The Icelander: I'll make this real BASIC:

10 Blacks and hispanics are poor
20 they go to poor schools
30 they don't get an equal education
40 they don't do as well on tests
50 they don't get promoted
60 GOTO 10


I'd support this argument, only it fails at number 2 -- they go to poor schools. Studies have been done that students in poor schools can fair just as well as students in schools where the general populace is affluent. The big factors in this "poor education" schematic are these: 1) little parent involvement, 2) low quality teachers. Get the parents involved, kick out the teachers and hire ones that are highly trained and actually CARE, and you'll have smart poor kids who can compete.

/Education major at UMD
//NCLB works when people follow it and stop complaining about it. Most teachers are just lazy.
 
2005-09-29 03:11:11 PM
The black-white gap in intelligence is about 1 standard deviation. (In other words, 86% of blacks fall below the white mean on IQ tests.) The unsettled question is not whether the gap exists or what its size is, but what portion is genetic. Lahn's papers this month in Science on microcephalin and ASPM make a substantially genetic explanation far more likely.

The problem for employers is that any test where intelligence is advantageous shows that same 1 standard deviation gap. Then they get sued, despite having perfectly fair competence-based tests.

So what employers do instead is promote incompetents because of their race. Gotta love it.
 
cot
2005-09-29 03:11:13 PM
AxiomJackson: As I'm "just paying" my "dues" doing all of these things, then how exactly do I qualify as middle class at the moment? Possible future status dosn't effect my current situation.

I'll start feeling sorry for you when you're a 40 year old single mother who has been working the same dead end job for years and barely has enough energy after coming home to take care of your kids, much less thing about going to college or, say, posting on fark.

Somehow complaining about being a ramen eating college student just doesn't get me all weepy eyed.
 
2005-09-29 03:13:22 PM
I can't believe no one has said this yet:

"There's no crying in shipping!"

 
2005-09-29 03:14:20 PM
2005-09-29 01:01:00 PM dasc

A 100 yard long green? You clearly aren't white. If I'm 100 yards from the hole I'd go with my 5 iron. There is only one approriate club for the green.


5 iron? Sounds like a pitching wedge to me.
 
cot
2005-09-29 03:14:46 PM
Thras: The black-white gap in intelligence is about 1 standard deviation. (In other words, 86% of blacks fall below the white mean on IQ tests.) The unsettled question is not whether the gap exists or what its size is

I'll believe that when I see some substantial unbiased research showing it. I'm not going to say that there's no genetic difference, even though it's spectacularly politically incorrect to even entertain that notion. It's just that from personal experience I can't possibly imagine the difference being that large - the differences we see seem to be dominated by cultural and social effects.

You're essentially calling a large portion of the black population retarded by "white" standards.
 
2005-09-29 03:15:38 PM
02:38:11 PM fj:Actually, Jamal's not too bad. It's usually the names like Shaniqua and Miquiesha that get resumes tossed in the pail, along with Sky, Winter, Deja and the other children of LSD.

How would "Condoleezza" have fared?
 
2005-09-29 03:15:39 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND: I never said that the systems weren't needed. I said that they were abused. I would love to see a society where we didn't need these systems, but I do know that REAL racism is still out there. And don't presume that you know anything about me or what I had or did not have handed to me. You presume too much. My parents or grandparents never did any "networking" for me. I was the first person in my family to go to colledge, and I did it on my own merit. I am where I am today because I CHOSE to succeed.

I prefaced my previous statement by saying that I know that people have difficult upbringings and may have to work much harder to succeed than others who have things handed to them. I think you must have overlooked that part. But the fact is you still decide whether you are going to do what it takes to succeed or not.

I love my father, but no one could consider him a success in business or anything else. He has a habit of blaming just about any one he can for any predicimant that he is in. Or blaming his health, his mom, anything. I learned a valuable lesson from watching him. Ultimately, you have to take responsibility for your own life. I do not depend on ANYONE for where I am or what I receive. I know that I have had it easier than some people, but I have also certainly had it harder than some.

I know many success stories where people of all races have determined that they were going to be successful and made it happen. They got out of the ghettos, the gangs, or the orphanages and damnit they succeeded. I also know many who were raised with silver spoons in their mouths, and had everything handed them on silver platters. They are losers. They have learned to rely on others for everything, and have no skills to do anything useful in this world.
 
cot
2005-09-29 03:16:50 PM
gruntmints: Get the parents involved


You know, we force kids to go to school. Can we force parents to be involved as well?

Force parents to go to "parents night" or whatever, let the district levy fines or community service if they don't go.

Seems heavy handed but some parents are just so damn shiatty that it seems like us paying for their kids education and them sabotaging it by not giving a shiat is a pretty big waste of money.
 
2005-09-29 03:17:12 PM
cot:
I'll start feeling sorry for you when you're a 40 year old single mother who has been working the same dead end job for years and barely has enough energy after coming home to take care of your kids, much less thing about going to college or, say, posting on fark.

Ahhh and there it is. You see, I never asked for your pity. I was simply making the point that I am far from what is considered "middle class".

Oh and 40 year old single mothers don't make me "weepy eyed".

Just horny.

/kidding!
//unless their hot
 
2005-09-29 03:17:50 PM
The Icelander: I'll make this real BASIC:

10 Blacks and hispanics are poor
20 they go to poor schools
30 they don't get an equal education
40 they don't do as well on tests
50 they don't get promoted
60 GOTO 10

The other thing is, you must have better scores to get in college if you are white or asian. Smart black and hispanic people don't have to work as delivery guys, they can get better education.
 
2005-09-29 03:17:58 PM
Maybe blacks and hispanics should change so they pass the test instead. You know, become smarter and/or more responsible.

Sounds like a better solution than lowering every bar to the lowest common denominator.


/didn't RTFA
//didn't read the thread
///white, so can't sue my way into managment
 
2005-09-29 03:18:11 PM
fj
"Sorry bill,
just because someone does extremely well at sorting packages doesn't mean they will do well at the next level up where sorting packages is not even part of the job. The tests are to find who will excel at the next position, not the one they're currently in."
====================================================

What you said is not at all relevent to his point. The article said "on average Blacksoutperformed Whites in many catergories". So, the question is why are Blacks who outperformed their White counterparts being passed over for promotions? If it's not racism then someone come up with the logical answer.
 
2005-09-29 03:18:34 PM
Darn. I would, but I must have lost it under the past due bills and piles of empty Ramen noodle packages. Can I borrow yours?

You can use those ramen noodle packages to trip on, since they burn in psychadelic colors...hint, hint. As for my Platinum card, I cut it up when I became a "cutter". And by "cutter", I mean that I cut them all up over 10 years ago, and haven't had one since.
 
cot
2005-09-29 03:19:05 PM
AxiomJackson: Ahhh and there it is. You see, I never asked for your pity. I was simply making the point that I am far from what is considered "middle class".

The line between "middle class" and "will be joining the middle class imminently" is so thin as to be irrelevant imo. Compare and contrast with the "poor for the rest of my life" class.
 
2005-09-29 03:19:45 PM
badgerb

My question is. How stupid do you have to be to fail a test to work at Fed Ex? Your just delivering letters and packages for christies sake. I guess that right hand turn at Sickamore and Putz is a little difficult for you to comprehend.

Weather delayed the flight from Oakland by 30 minutes. Ice on the ground caused the AM couriers to proceed more slowly. The upshot is that trucks are short and you leave 20 minutes behind schedule. You have your usual 25 "regulars" schedules for pickups, an additional 12 "on-calls", and three undelivered packages that didn't make it out for AM delivery. Scanning your on-calls, you determine the optimal route to pick them up, bearing in mind the deliveries that must also be attempted. Three on-calls and a delivery later, three additional on-calls have come in. You again mentally plan your route. A message comes over the comm unit telling you that one of the delivery customers *really* needs his package and can you attempt it ASAP; another mental adjustment. Pounding through the stops, two more on-calls come in while an adjacent courier sends a message telling you that he can grab an outlying stop on your route. Another mental adjustment. How're you looking for time? The windows for the regular stops start to open, now you're juggling regular stops with pick-ups and you still have one delivery left to make. A bunch of your regulars have a 1600-1700 window..can you make it with the remaining oncalls? Which stops can be deferred until later? What's the optimal route looking like? Another adjacent route desperately needs help on a pickup, can you help? How's the time? You have 8 minutes to get to a stop through rush-hour traffic, but there's an accident along your ideal route? How do you get around it? How long will that take? Are you going to complete all stops within the window? How many minutes behind are you overall? The station is asking if you have a package onboard for a customer that's irate and waiting for it. Did you remember that last delivery? It's getting late, and you have absolutely no choice about what time you have to return to the station? Did you get everything done? Did you manage to route all of the packages, or do you need to process more back at the station?

It ain't rocket-science out there, but we're not exactly the USPS either. (no offense to the mail guys)
 
cot
2005-09-29 03:19:49 PM
AxiomJackson: Oh and 40 year old single mothers don't make me "weepy eyed".

Just horny.


well, at least you know they put out
 
2005-09-29 03:22:03 PM
AxiomJackson- makes you horny? Maybe so but remember there is a good reason why she is 40 and single.

/kidding
 
2005-09-29 03:23:17 PM
2005-09-29 02:56:21 PM badgerb

Apparently, you don't have to be stupid... just black or hispanic...

Wait a minute....?
 
2005-09-29 03:23:57 PM
cot
"The line between "middle class" and "will be joining the middle class imminently" is so thin as to be irrelevant imo. Compare and contrast with the "poor for the rest of my life" class."

Well sir, we'll have to agree to disagree. But rest assured, I appreciate your point of view.

"well, at least you know they put out"

Ha!
 
2005-09-29 03:25:11 PM
Charlie: "You shifty ni&&ga, they said you was hung."
Bart: "And they was right!"

/off topic
//my posts have been too serious so far.
///every discussion on race needs a Blazing Saddles quote.
 
2005-09-29 03:25:25 PM
I would hope that a large corporation like Fed-Ex would have a top notch HR department, but who knows. This article was too damned vague to make a decision either way. I don't have to worry about this sort of thing, because I work in a small office and we generally hire from the inside up. If the administrative assistant is good at his/her job they get the promotion.

I will say this as I have worked for a company that gave certification exams to cardiovascular technicians, you have to have a really good psychomatrician to analyze why people are getting a certain question wrong or whether the question should be thrown out. It really should have nothing to do with race. If 75% of the people answered a certain question wrong or if they all answered the same way and wrong, then there is something wrong with that particular question and it shouldn't be used in the overall grading of the test and should be taken off of the exam the next time it is given. That being said, if they are open ended questions it is a different matter, but as large an organization as Fed-Ex is I doubt they have the time to read open-ended questions from hundreds of applicants, but I could be wrong.
 
Ant
2005-09-29 03:27:43 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND: In essence, Whites have been given a head start. It's easy to think you can be anything when you've never had to sit in class hungry

It's crap like this that pisses me off. I'm white, and I know exactly what it feels like to be poor. What head start was I given?
 
2005-09-29 03:29:21 PM
Bored24
"...makes you horny? Maybe so but remember there is a good reason why she is 40 and single."

Good point sir, a good reason to keep a paper bag at the ready.
 
2005-09-29 03:30:45 PM
Fark Fed-Ex anyway. When I check overnight I mean overnight. Not two days or three days, overnight. When I need a contract signed and back in my hands and you don't deliver it I lose money and you lose my business. The worst part is they don't have internal auditing of their packages. If they don't deliver something on time, YOU have to call them on it to get a refund. Then they try to blame it on the weather b/c if the weather is bad in Memphis, TN your shiat ain't gonna arrive on time. Memphis is their main hub, even if your stuff is being shipped right across the street it goes through Memphis first. Fed-Ex was always a case study in everyone of my graduate and pre-grad classes, but if they don't step it up it won't be their success that makes them a case study.
 
2005-09-29 03:31:40 PM
That's right yall keep listening to Uncle Jesse's and Big Al's sack of bullshiat!!!
Could the select few stop playing the victim and stop using the race card???
Excuses are like assholes, everyone has one and are usually full of shiat

/not racist
//never owned slaves
///family is 1/4 Italian Sicilian, so according to Dennis Hopper... I am part black!!

 
2005-09-29 03:33:08 PM
Entrance tests are racists. So we apply affirmative action to "diversify" our campuses. But we don't want them to get bad grades, so now we have out-of-control grade inflation. And now in the workforce they aren't getting promoted, so we have to fix THAT, too.

I can't understand how we can have all these laws pertaining to race, but no legal definition of race. If you can't define it, how can you legislate it? If I say I'm African-American, who can say I'm not?
 
2005-09-29 03:35:57 PM

/just can't resist this one
//fans the flames...
///runs like hell
 
2005-09-29 03:37:16 PM
ateksuni
*blames irresponsible parents and the UCLA again*

igotnothing
Perhaps you mean the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)?

Or he may just be trying to pin the blame on Asian students.

/In some countries, UCLA is a clothing brand.
 
2005-09-29 03:37:22 PM
There is only one race on this planet, it's the human race. Anything else is merely cosmetic because we killed everything that was competing with us already. It doesn't matter what color someones skin is, or what shape their lips, eyes or the hairs on their head may be. They're still just human. If they are unqualified for the position they shouldn't be hired and at the place where I work they wont be, ever, because the boss is a bit of a stickler about performance and he tends to check that standards are being followed at random intervals. He has been known to personally fire people based on their job performance.
 
2005-09-29 03:37:58 PM
AxiomJackson: Oh and 40 year old single mothers don't make me "weepy eyed".
Just horny.

cot: well, at least you know they put out.


No, no, no, your forgetting about adoption.

Think instead Abortion Clinic.

..........What?
 
2005-09-29 03:38:37 PM
fj
"Sorry bill,
just because someone does extremely well at sorting packages doesn't mean they will do well at the next level up where sorting packages is not even part of the job. The tests are to find who will excel at the next position, not the one they're currently in."
====================================================

What you said is not at all relevent to his point. The article said "on average Blacksoutperformed Whites in many catergories". So, the question is why are Blacks who outperformed their White counterparts being passed over for promotions? If it's not racism then someone come up with the logical answer.


because they did not pass the test to see if they would excell at the NEXT level ????
 
2005-09-29 03:39:25 PM
AxiomJackson- I was thinking more head case than brown bag it but that is applicable too in a lot of cases.
 
2005-09-29 03:40:32 PM
CommonSenseSurrenders: Could you make it Visual Basic? I'm more of an object oriented person....

Public Function PromoteMe(objPerson As Object) As Boolean
On Error GoTo Log_Error

If objPerson.Properties.Color = vbBlack Then
PromoteMe = False
Else
PromoteMe = True
End If

Exit Function
Log_Error:
logerror Err, "Not Qualified For Promotion"
End Function

/waiting for inevitable strike of the syntax nazis
//my spacing disappears...
 
2005-09-29 03:42:07 PM
If I say I'm African-American, who can say I'm not?

Teresa Heinz is afican-american. Is Ernie Els?

Is Madonna an American-Brit?
 
2005-09-29 03:43:07 PM
Atreyou40
"This is why someone I know who runs a VERY profitable Heavy Equipment business will NOT hire anything but white people. He's a privately owned company and says it's to protect him from the liability of a lawsuit."
========================================================

No it's not!! He doesn't hire Black people because he's a farking bigot! Man, I tell you the reasons that folks come up with never cease to amaze. If he's so worried about litigation why doesn't he stop ALL hot coffee from being prepared on the premesis? Does he allow people to mop the floors? You know nothing brings in the free checks like a good old 'slip and fall'. Just come out of the closet and stop being a punk about it.
 
2005-09-29 03:43:50 PM
enlightenmentv0.9:
Weather delayed the flight from Oakland by 30 minutes. Ice on the ground caused the AM couriers to proceed more slowly. The upshot is that trucks are short and you leave 20 minutes behind schedule. You have your usual 25 "regulars" schedules for pickups, an additional 12 "on-calls", and three undelivered packages that didn't make it out for AM delivery. Scanning your on-calls, you determine the optimal route to pick them up, bearing in mind the deliveries that must also be attempted. Three on-calls and a delivery later, three additional on-calls have come in. You again mentally plan your route. A message comes over the comm unit telling you that one of the delivery customers *really* needs his package and can you attempt it ASAP; another mental adjustment. Pounding through the stops, two more on-calls come in while an adjacent courier sends a message telling you that he can grab an outlying stop on your route. Another mental adjustment. How're you looking for time? The windows for the regular stops start to open, now you're juggling regular stops with pick-ups and you still have one delivery left to make. A bunch of your regulars have a 1600-1700 window..can you make it with the remaining oncalls? Which stops can be deferred until later? What's the optimal route looking like? Another adjacent route desperately needs help on a pickup, can you help? How's the time? You have 8 minutes to get to a stop through rush-hour traffic, but there's an accident along your ideal route? How do you get around it? How long will that take? Are you going to complete all stops within the window? How many minutes behind are you overall? The station is asking if you have a package onboard for a customer that's irate and waiting for it. Did you remember that last delivery? It's getting late, and you have absolutely no choice about what time you have to return to the station? Did you get everything done? Did you manage to route all of the packages, or do you need to process more back at the station?

It ain't rocket-science out there, but we're not exactly the USPS either. (no offense to the mail guys)


Sounds like your just a delivery guy to me.
And your right. It ain't rocket science.
Getting the timing right on McD fries sounds more complicated to me.
/been a courier
//knows how easy it is.
///also how low paid it is
////no reason to think it's hard.
/////that's why it is a low paying job
/////still asks the question how stupid can a person be if they fail a Fed Ex test.
 
2005-09-29 03:44:03 PM
Death-Speak

If there were some kinda bizarro IT comedy awards, that would win hands down...black, white, or brown.
 
2005-09-29 03:46:33 PM
cot

I'll believe that when I see some substantial unbiased research showing it.

70% of blacks fail the ASVAB. SAT numbers are online. Culture-fair tests like Raven's progressive matricies show exactly the same result. Now, go investigate! You will find the 1 standard deviation gap to exist exactly as I claim. On the other hand, your ignorance made a great shield in your last comment -- you might want to keep it.

I'm not going to say that there's no genetic difference, even though it's spectacularly politically incorrect to even entertain that notion.

That is one of the saddest statements I have ever seen. "If truth isn't PC, it shouldn't be entertained"?

It's just that from personal experience I can't possibly imagine the difference being that large - the differences we see seem to be dominated by cultural and social effects.

The personal experience of most middle and upper-class whites is very limited when it comes to the underclass of any race. 1/3rd of black males spend time in prison. Is that true of 1/3rd of the black males you know? I doubt it. I'd be surprised if all your friends weren't lily white. (Before you ask, that is certainly not the case with me.)

You're essentially calling a large portion of the black population retarded by "white" standards.

Functionally, yes. Them's the breaks. But while a sub-75 IQ in whites generally indicates organic impairment, with a sub-75 IQ in a black, that is not often the case. So it would be very wrong to refer to 20 percent of the black population as "retarded." Standards for retardation diagnosis should therefore always be population standards, not functional standards.
 
2005-09-29 03:49:10 PM
uidzero:

Blue is to sky as ______ is to lemon.

A. Blue
C. Yellow
D. Green
E. Flavor

If you chose C, congrats, you probably grew up in America. If, however, you came from South or Central America, you likely would have picked D. Green, since lemons grow green in your tropical environment.


Where do I come from if I chose B?
 
2005-09-29 03:49:36 PM
Death-Speak

Syntax?
Syntax is the least of your worrys.

Your biggest problem is you doesnt right good.


/Fun with sintax
 
2005-09-29 03:49:44 PM
Let's clarify "minority".
Popular interpretation: a lesser (viz., not majority) segment of population, who do not get a fair deal due to prejudice, and therefore properly deserve an advantage.
However: Viet Namese, Indians (not "native Americans"), Pakistanis, Koreans, Jews and Chinese are not (repeat, NOT) minorities despite their very small percentage make-up of the population (far less than black or hispanic), and have no set-asides, no quotas, no affirmative action programs, no bi-lingual education demands, no reparations demands, no ESL programs, no lower standards for hiring, scholarship, promotion, housing etc.
Why?
Because they are not failures, i.e, they contribute more tax money than they receive, have a very low rate of criminal behavior, high percentage of registered voters, stable marriages, extremely high percentage of legitimate births, high rate of literacy - all produced without anyone's help.
Conclusion: the current definition of minority is intended to, and does, include only large political groups shamelessly pandering to fear of the race card ("gay-basher", "male-supremecist", etc.) to obtain un-deserved benefits far in excess of any alleged mistreatment. How can a group encompassing 51% of the population (women) be a minority, when Viet Namese (much below 1%) aren't?
It's simple.
"Minority" in the context of equal rights, civil rights, etc. = loser, a member of a group that, despite the expenditure of (in some cases) tens of billions of dollars of public money, are in the same squalid condition as previously, and still complaining that it's not enough.
 
2005-09-29 03:50:28 PM
badgerb: /////still asks the question how stupid can a person be if they fail a Fed Ex test.


LOL!
 
2005-09-29 03:50:28 PM
HappyDaddy

If the test is unfair, change it. If it is fair but is failed more often by blacks, latinos, people of color, minorities, chicanos, African-Americans, Asians (ha ha), Pacific Islanders, Native Americans, Indians... tough. Like people tell me when I biatch about losing a golf match - "play better."


Please tell me how to tell if the test is racially unfair, other than measuring the differential performance of racial groups.

This is the central problem with claming racism in "objective" tests. Is the test biased, or are certain minorities, for whatever reason, really less competent on average than Caucasians, without getting into the cause of it?

How can you tell?
 
2005-09-29 03:50:53 PM
As a shop owner (Police supply) I have to comment here...
First off, I've found UPS,FedEx,and USPS all to provide great service, at least to my store.
Over the years I've gotten to know all my drivers, and chit-chatted with them...

UPS- white male...about mid 30's... married...one child...H/S Educ...started as a "loader" part time as a soph... worked his way up to driver...happy where he is in life... not the brightest guy I've ever met, but professional and personable.

USPS....white male... early 40's... married... 2 children...H/S Educ...Ex-Marine...kept the haircut and attitude...not scary/nor disgrunteled...but
I'd keep my distance from him. ( probably a nice guy before PI )
(Parris island)

FedEx...black male...mid 30's...married one child...H/S-Air Force-UAL
"furloughed" after 9/11...2nd seater (co-pilot) on 737's...one of the smartest men I have ever met.
Born into "nothing" ( by his own account)...saw the military as a way out and WORKED his ass off!
I love this guy ( as only one man can love another) , we have the greatest banter everytime he is here.

You only get out of life, what you put in. Don't expect a handout, unless you SUE!
 
2005-09-29 03:51:36 PM
Ekupes - I love TFer double standards.

That's a bit much.
 
2005-09-29 03:52:50 PM
feepness

Where do I come from if I chose B?


Utopia.

/let's see who gets it
 
2005-09-29 03:52:59 PM
feepness:
Where do I come from if I chose B?

Buahahahahahah!
 
2005-09-29 03:53:25 PM
Newsflash: Differences between groups on any measure -- IQ, the SAT, ACT, speed of completing this morning's Sudoku, whatever -- are never sufficient prima facie evidence of test bias. The groups have to have significantly different variances on those measures to begin making that point.
 
2005-09-29 03:54:18 PM
Legit question here.

If Tiger Woods took that test, under race, would he check the Asian box, or the Black box?

/whole big thingy full of worms
//Its from da ghetto....not sure what that thingy is.....*ewwww*
 
2005-09-29 03:54:42 PM
FedEx...black male...mid 30's...married one child...H/S-Air Force-UAL

He's a former Air Force pilot and now he's driving a FedEx truck? There's got to be more to the story.
 
2005-09-29 03:55:41 PM
"It's crap like this that pisses me off. I'm white, and I know exactly what it feels like to be poor. What head start was I given?"
=======================================================

Sucks to be sterotyped doesn't it? What if many of the people who you came across everyday thought you were a criminal or a slacker? Now, multiply what you're feeling by 1 million times and welcome to our world.
 
2005-09-29 03:55:43 PM
indenture
If I say I'm African-American, who can say I'm not?

Well, for starters, are you attractive and successful?
 
2005-09-29 03:56:00 PM
/threadjack
What is the similarities between an illegal and a cueball (Billards)?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The harder you hit them the more english you get outta them...

//end threadjack
 
2005-09-29 03:59:10 PM
BrotherAlpha: Hand in two resumes, identical in every way except for the name. One resume has a white sounding name, for instance, John. The other has a black sounding name, Jamal. The white sounding name will get a call-back 50% more often.

And yet if a white person insinuates that the names Jamal and Laquisha sound black, they'd be labled racist for doing so.

Why are there "black" names anyway? And, now that they're so prevalent, aren't you advertising the chip on your shoulder by giving your child one, even as you admit it will handicap them?
 
2005-09-29 03:59:35 PM
I don't understand what the fuss is about this. All that's going to happen is that Fedex will have to show their documentation that the test is based on a job analysis, has high reliability and validity, and show the same for their training programs. If they can do that (and they should be able to), then the lawsuit will be dismissed. If they are unable to do that, then more power to the people bringing the lawsuit against the company.
 
2005-09-29 04:00:31 PM
Thank you GIS!


/ticket plz
 
2005-09-29 04:02:07 PM
Diana Moon Glampers cares about equality!
 
2005-09-29 04:02:22 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND: No it's not!! He doesn't hire Black people because he's a farking bigot! Man, I tell you the reasons that folks come up with never cease to amaze. If he's so worried about litigation why doesn't he stop ALL hot coffee from being prepared on the premesis? Does he allow people to mop the floors? You know nothing brings in the free checks like a good old 'slip and fall'. Just come out of the closet and stop being a punk about it.


Is there anyone that you don't think is racist in this thread besides yourself?

I am not saying that this guy is really not racist, I don't know him, but the argument makes since logically. Throwing strawmen up like spilt coffee or wet floors is not relavent. If we take the guy at face value, the only lawsuits that he is worried about are lawsuits from disgruntled ex-employees.

Don't you think that all of the sue happy morons who play the race card at a drop of the hat is going to have some reprocussions? I would think that this kind of Bullshiat would piss you off even more than me. If people are constantly playing the race card where it doesn't apply, that really slants the opinion that people have for ANYONE that uses it. And there are multitudes of valid reasons for it to be used. People crying racism left and right simply undermine what the system is supposed to accomplish in the first place. Jessie Jackson doesn't help the cause in the court of public opinion much anymore either. It has all gotten too cliche.
 
2005-09-29 04:08:03 PM
Kepora_Gebora - cos proving your innocence is where it's at?
 
2005-09-29 04:09:51 PM
2005-09-29 03:43:07 PM DROxINxTHExWIND

Dude, have you ever been in a shop with a bunch of malingering mechanics once they figure out how Workman's comp works? Back problems galore... He hates that fight as well since an employer is responsible for both his premiums and a percentage of the benefit paid to the "injured". Interesting you bring up coffee... because he never prepared coffee in the shop for precisely that reason. You made your own coffee, and if you burned yourself, it's your own damn fault. I suppose if we're being a hundred percent honest, we are all biggoted to some point. But, the fact remains, when I worked for him, we went through at least 1 mechanic a month, for a myriad of reasons, most of them being the "working class hero" mentality that paralyzes the ignorant to the point of self-righteous sluggishness. The fact that they were white, and the dynamics of the industry makes them easily terminable. But everyone knows, if you fire a black person under the same circumstances, you will be sued. It's a fact of life, and the courts, with all the recent judgements against coke, pepsi, Wal-mart, and pretty much every corporation in America knows it.

You want some of that money that he's got? Fire up a heavy equipment business of your own, and hire only qualified black people. I won't sue you, I promise, in fact, I'll give you $20 start up capital, and would consider serious investment capital (maybe $40) if you could avoid getting sued for "discrimination" in the first year of operation. See how many black employees you go through before you get sued for racial discrimination. Keep in mind that the repair business is an ultra-high turnover business anyway. Don't be shy - put your money where your mouth is. The SBA has special loans for "minorities" (that term will mean "non-white" in 10 years, not "minority") that don't require business plans or anything other than a little melanin. It's a benefit white people don't receive, and when we're 20% of the population instead of the 45% and shrinking (I'm not 100%sure about the numbers, maybe the world is still lily white, that % maybe just San Antonio) we are now, I doubt we'll see a change in these policies.
 
2005-09-29 04:10:21 PM
The Icelander: There's something called "social responsiblity" that they completely ignore, because it involves thinking about other people.

"Social responsibility" It sounds so much nicer than just saying, "looting".
 
2005-09-29 04:10:56 PM
Gavino
If they've followed the legal procedures for making their training program and promotions test, they have nothing to worry about and would know it. If they haven't, then they should be called on it.
 
2005-09-29 04:12:03 PM
Race is not the issue. The issue is that the test attempts to test a "body of knowledge" that is required for the new position. If you are in a lower position, you may not be aware of things, and therefore, if you have not attempted to educate yourself, and become an integral member of the corporation, you may not be able to pass the test. My not passing the test, you are showing:

A) Your inability to learn new things
B) Your inability to motivate yourself to learn new things
C) You are not the future of the company
D) All of the above.

The corporation does not exist to take care of those who cannot take care of themselves. It's goal is to make a profit, and in the case of FedEx, to ship the most amount of packages, any distance, at any time, and still arrive with the prescribed delivery period with no accidents, delays or loss of product.

I'm not in shipping, but if you can't understand that mission, you have no business working at FedEx.
 
2005-09-29 04:12:53 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND: Sucks to be sterotyped doesn't it? What if many of the people who you came across everyday thought you were a criminal or a slacker? Now, multiply what you're feeling by 1 million times and welcome to our world.

You poor thing. You poor, poor, thing.
 
2005-09-29 04:14:13 PM
You know what's funny? I am the only black person at my job. People expect failure from me and view me differently. I have to work twice as hard and overdue simple things just to make sure the the people here understand that I am as smart as they are. With that being said, it is insulting to "dumb down" as test. However, I would agree that maybe the test needs to be re-evaluated, not "dumbed down." I don't want or need an excuse to pass a test, but tests, depending on where they are given and how they are given can be setting a person up for failure. For instance, in the north, a can of Coke is called Pop, here in Florida, we call it a soda. The venacular can be different where you are. Culture can be different wherever you are. The black people in California don't necessarily have the exact same culture as the black here in Florida. If I had to take a driving test in Boston on a snowy day, I would fail because I know nothing about driving in the snow or driving with chains on the tire or anything else involved with snow. Standardized tests can be problems. Find out why minorities are failing them.

I still believe in affirmative action though. Being the only black person at my job of an office of over 30 people gives me the urge to carry a chip on my shoulder.
 
2005-09-29 04:20:39 PM


"What can brown do for you?"
 
2005-09-29 04:21:10 PM
I remember when the ERA crowd was fond of saying:
"A woman has to work twice as hard and be twice as smart as a man to make the same money? Fortunately, that's not hard."

That's the attitude that everyone should have in today's work environment. If you are part of a minority and feel that racism is working against you, believe in yourself and work harder. If you are a white male and feel that affirmative action is working against you, believe in yourself and work hard.

The rules and the stereotypes don't get the work done, the workers do. And setting an example is the best way to change other people's beliefs and attitudes toweards your group.

/rant
 
2005-09-29 04:23:27 PM
swdavus
Your examples was about people living in different locations.
Is it rasist to ask from, lets say, NYC cab driver to know the geography of the city, if he comes from Haiti?
 
2005-09-29 04:27:36 PM
People are afraid of the word racism because it brings about connotations of white men in white bed sheets parading around lynching people and burning crosses. I think racism is an issue that is slightly swept under the rug so to speak. While I don't think that things that happened before I or many of the people here were born should be repaid I do believe that people should open their eyes a little more. Sometimes I can't believe the things I hear out of peoples mouth when they don't think that a certain race is around or that anyone will be affected by it. I'm sure it goes both ways, but it's not right. If you're really a "stand-up" kind of person then you would say the same thing to someone's face as you would behind their back. It's pure cowardice and that works both ways as well.

There is nothing we can do about the past, but we can change the future. Everyone deserves the same education regardless of how much money their mommy or daddy makes. It is unfair to not properly educate a child because of their parents and it's downright disgusting. I wouldn't wish the effects that Katrina have had on anyone, but maybe it's a blessing in disguise. I think it has brought poverty to the forefront and forced the upper-class who may not understand what poverty is to recognize it. I believe the only way to help people is to help them help themselves and in that aspect I believe that education is a way to help people help themselves. I am done thread jacking now, thank you for your time.
 
2005-09-29 04:29:06 PM
2005-09-29 04:14:13 PM swdavus
The venacular can be different where you are. Culture can be different wherever you are. The black people in California don't necessarily have the exact same culture as the black here in Florida.

I doubt the tests are written in slang terms. I'm sure they use basic English and that should'nt vary too much from coast to coast.
 
2005-09-29 04:33:17 PM
andrew_0812

...kinda like when the left has legit criticism of Bush, it gets drown in the bullshiat

/end of thread jack
 
2005-09-29 04:35:23 PM
What's all this mumbo-jumbo about, the headline itself said all that needs to be said.

"FedEx knows that black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test," Finberg said.

You don't change it because minorities fail, minorities need to know their jobs better. Period. The end.
 
2005-09-29 04:41:38 PM
Andrew_0821
"I have work in other areas with minorities who have a chip on their shoulder because they are forced to work under a white person. They do everything they can to keep from doing their job, yet they don't get axed. It is pathetic. And I have absolutely no respect for those people. They don't want equality, they want welfare at the workplace"
========================================================

So, is it that only these Black people want welfare in the workplace? I know that many of us are at work right now Farking on the companies clock. Is that a form of corporate welfare given to YOU? Or, is it that you are only outraged by the Black people who 'do everything they can to keep from doing their job'? I need to know where the line is drawn. If it is your contention that there are many Whites who have the same disregard for their job then please explain to me why the topic of race is even entered into the discussion. If you all think that race is NOT a factor in how intelligent or motivated a person is, then why aren't ou focusing on laziness in the workplace and not just lazy Negros in the workplace? You may sit down at the same table as Donnell during lunch, but your preconceived notions about Black people DO make you a bigot. Your father's lack of drive and the poor people you knew hav absolutely no bearing on why I made the statement I made. It has to do with the comments that came from your computer to my eyes. Such as:

"... when minorities realize that they don't have to try as hard, or work as hard, etc., they can use the quota system to keep their jobs, even get promotions, all for doing shiat."

That is a broad brush you're painting us all with. And it sounds like you've made your mind up about the attitude of ALL minorities. Why do you focus on the people who have the least amount of control over the situation? Why is it that a "lazy" Black person receives this level of criticism? Is it because the government has given them assistance? Why aren't you crusading against people who file false workman's comp claims or people who defraud insurance companies? Do you honestly think that abolishing quotas will put us all on level footing? We can legislate whether Blacks deserve an opportunity or a bump in a test score, but once affirmative action is taken away, who's going to stop the people at Yale from admitting the under-qualified grandson of an Alum? Who's going to stop Atreyou40's boss from closing the door in a qualified Black man's face? You said yourself that you believe racism still exist, so how can you justifiably call for an end to something which levels the field? Because a few people abuse it?? There are some who abuse alcohol, does that mean none of us should be allowed to partake?
 
2005-09-29 04:42:19 PM
INDENTURE,
Yes...He's a responsible father/husband!
You find that unusual?
He was..."furloughed" as were 80% of airline employees after that.
Go to your local "Hooters", ( I'll bet you'l find a "waitress" who was an "attendent" in '01...pre 9/11)
You do what you need to do, be it for yourself, or family.
That not a concept where you live?
 
2005-09-29 04:42:43 PM
swdavus: If I had to take a driving test in Boston on a snowy day, I would fail because I know nothing about driving in the snow or driving with chains on the tire or anything else involved with snow.

Then your ass doesn't need to be drivin in Boston.
 
2005-09-29 04:47:30 PM
Walliser: Then your ass doesn't need to be drivin in Boston.

No, make the test easier so that you have people driving in the snow, without knowing how to drive in the snow. Don't you know anything about social engineering?

It's all the snow's fault that some people can't drive in it. It's because the snow is white, that's why!
 
2005-09-29 04:49:10 PM
indenture: He's a former Air Force pilot and now he's driving a FedEx truck? There's got to be more to the story.

I know a doctor that quit to deliver packages for UPS. Why? He just likes driving around and getting to see all sorts of people everyday that aren't bleeding or otherwise ill. Same reason I enjoyed FedEx, although I never was a doctor.
 
2005-09-29 04:51:00 PM
Equality, okay no problem. Just keep lowing the bar until all pass the test. Village idiots deserve equal pay right. nuff said.
 
2005-09-29 04:52:11 PM
I read somewhere that different races actually score different statistically on IQ tests. It goes something like:

Asians>whites>blacks>hispanics

Of course, I think the statistical difference between the groups was only a 10% difference and that doesn't mean that all asians are smarter than all whites, etc, just that they are on average. It's probably the same case with this test. It's not that the test is racially biased, it's that intelligence is, statistically, anyway. I know that sounds racist, but it's only racist if you believe that statistics of the group defines each individual.
 
2005-09-29 05:02:38 PM
Standardized tests probably don't correlate too much with actual job performance, expect at the very bottom of the scale and perhaps at the very top. But a driving test, or some other sort of practical test, would also be imperfect. So you're left with the situation all employers are: you need a limited number of people and have the luxury of more applicants than you need. You have to make cuts somehow.

So in that sense, the plaintiffs probably have a point-- it's usually hard to see a real connection between performance on this test and performance on the job.

On the other hand it's not enough for the plaintiffs to show that blacks and hispanics fail the test at a higher rate. The law requires equal opportunity but not equal outcomes, so the plaintiffs have to prove discrimination. Statistics may be admissible but they're far from enough.
 
2005-09-29 05:03:20 PM
Andrew_0812 -
"I am not saying that this guy is really not racist, I don't know him, but the argument makes since logically. Throwing strawmen up like spilt coffee or wet floors is not relavent. If we take the guy at face value, the only lawsuits that he is worried about are lawsuits from disgruntled ex-employees.

Don't you think that all of the sue happy morons who play the race card at a drop of the hat is going to have some reprocussions? I would think that this kind of Bullshiat would piss you off even more than me. If people are constantly playing the race card where it doesn't apply, that really slants the opinion that people have for ANYONE that uses it. And there are multitudes of valid reasons for it to be used. People crying racism left and right simply undermine what the system is supposed to accomplish in the first place. Jessie Jackson doesn't help the cause in the court of public opinion much anymore either. It has all gotten too cliche."
======================================================

Jesus! If you can honestly take the case of a guy who doesn't hire people TOTALLY BASED ON THEIR RACE and somehow flip it so that it is now the Black person's fault that they are discriminated against, you are probably beyond hope. If calling out an OVERT racist is "playing the race card" then how can people EVER ge into an honest debate about race?

How can the bosses argument makes sense logically, but it is illogical for me bring up hot coffee or wet floors? WE LIVE IN A LITIGEOUS SOCIETY People sue each other for EVERYTHING! Is it your position that the majority of lawsuits are filed by Black people?? If not, then what you're saying is bullshiat.
 
2005-09-29 05:04:24 PM
Poor logic, Misinformation, and Racism:



Crosshair

If they are a minority, they go to a law office and sue. A real person would try harder or go work elsewhere.
Minorities are not real people?

Abox
[responding to Crosshair] Or just biatch that the boss has it in for them.
Still not real people apparently.

andrew_0812
but the policies have resulted in a simple role reversal, where it is harder for non-minorities to get hired or promoted over their minority co-workers.
I find this claim ridiculous when by and large management is still very predominantly white (and male for that matter) and minorities are still way over-represented among the poor in society. I liked much of the rest of your post though.

Sidi
Or it means the minorities went to worse schools, or they came from a culture that has systematically rejected intelligence in favor of glorifying violence, crime, and machismo.
A good Weeners, and there may be some truth to the second for some of them, but it's too much of a generalization to pass without comment. Why are machismo, crime and violence glorified? I think you'll find those 'qualities' mostly glorified (as a significant percentage of the population, you'll always have freaks) by people who have a damned shiatty lot in life.

jmvbxx
Thank G-d we don't have this problem in Canada. We are not allowed to keep track of employees by race. Certainly racism exists in Canada but for the most part it's a non-issue.

We can't be discriminated against for anything (race, sex, sexuality, marital status, age, religion, etc). Not like in the US.

That's right, Canadians aren't racist 'except for those damned ....'
I can't tell you how many times I've heard people say that up here ("I'm not racist but those east indians ....") or whatever other group the person happens not to like. I agree I've found racism less prevalent by far in Canada than in the US, but that doesn't mean it's a non-issue. It was so cheap to hire programmers who were foreigners compared to Canadians (educated in Canada, even more if elsewhere) just because of supply and demand.

Espertron
(2) Would you say your athleticism is a result of genetic breeding?
--Yes
--No

Do you really think that genetics are really at the heart of their athleticism? Or is it single-minded determination, reinforced by the fact that for many of them, it's the only way out of the ghetto? I know the rationale behind this: that only the strongest survived the brutal conditions to come over here, but I believe it's a false rationale. It's not athleticism that would have allowed one to survive, it was strength of mind. The old man who survived 17 days in NO on a gallon of water, was that mental toughness or physical? I gotta go with mental. Also, the extreme physical hardships of coming over were only one generation, and while slavery was brutal and more demeaning than I can imagine, in the United States the slave population maintained itself, so I wouldn't say that it bred out weakness (as opposed to Brazil where the rule was much harsher and the slave population did not maintain itself iirc).

HAMMERTOE
Can tests be racist? Can facts be racist? Doesn't racism require opinion? For example:

If I say that The Rennaissance didn't happen in Africa; it happened in Europe, would that be racist? Or would I just be racist for pointing it out?
[etc]

To state facts is not racist, to ignore the great tradition of empire in Africa and some of their accomplishments, and only teach about the difficulties Africa has had for the last 500 years or so probably is.

Paddlenround
We all know that minorities aren't as smart as white people.
I'm hoping that was sarcasm...

andrew_0812
I find it very hard to believe that a test question could be truly racially deterministic simply because of something like that.
I understood that such problems could occur before, but I have recently been teaching an esl student (reasonably good english, very good student) for the SAT, we came to one question in the math section. The question mentioned an erector set, and was written in such a way that if you misinterpreted what an erector set was it was easy to misread the question and come up with the wrong answer (which they did have on there). He did not know what an erector set was, and so missed the question. I had multiple examples of small things like that which can mess a student up.

cot
The Icelander: I bet poor whites don't do as well on the test either

I wouldn't go so far as to absolve them of any responsibility whatsoever for their situation. That mindset is part of the reason they're there.


Yes, because poor people really want to be poor, their mindset is at fault. Are you serious?


fangless
I haven't done CRAP to hold back any race of people
I'm certain you personally haven't done anything to hold back a race of people or any people for that matter, but for you not to recognize that the actions of a lot of other people have allowed you and me to benefit while harming others is ridiculous. For the record, I'm not for affirmative action for minorities, I'm for affirmative action for poor people. Lots of them have been screwed in some way or another by the system or by someone else, let's help all of them ESPECIALLY the children, let's give them a real education.

ComicBookGuy
I remember a few years a go a Harvard student was murdered. Ten years earlier, she was fresh off the boat from Vietnam and couldn't speak a lick of English. Yet she'd worked hard enough to make it to Harvard w/out being a legacy or having a rich parent.

Why is it, pray tell, that this story has been repeated (w/some variation) so many times? Frequently, they go to the same inner city schools as other "minorities," yet academically thrive? Why is that?


And how many of them don't thrive? You're always going to have the "talented tenth" (as DuBois called them) who can beat almost anything you want to throw at them. Look at Frederick Douglass, he had been a slave, had the Supreme Court rule he wasn't free, still managed to get free, had his own newspaper, was quite influential in his own right. Does that mean Blacks had equal opportunities back then? Are you just going to only look at those people and say "good enough" or do you think the rest of the people deserve some recognition that they didn't have a fair shake?


Doktor Merkwrdiglieben
The Icelander Your argument leaves out PERSONAL RESPONSABILITY!!! I went to one of the poorest high schools in my state and I am sitting here doing research as a research chemist. My parents made no bones about the fact that I was going to college. I worked my butt off and learned above and beyoind what I was taught. And here I am.
One of your key statements there is that your parents absolutely believed in you and that the system would allow you to succeed (my parents did much the same), many minorities do not believe that, and do not believe that the system will allow them to succeed. Changing that perception is a very large key.

SretiCentV
That comment about coming from a society that glorifies anything other than education is what hits it on the head. I bet if I go adopt 2 niglets right now, they end up doing well on that test (if they choose to take it) 20 years from now.

Has nothing to do with race
catch 22

Since you called them 'niglets' without any sense that it was sarcastic, I'm betting you'd have one hell of a hard time raising them well. People who don't raise adopted children with the same love and affection as they would their own children inevitably have a very very very hard time. And that's added onto that even when they do treath them with the same love and affection it can be hard.

Weaver95
We got lucky - our token hire is fairly good at her job.
I've seen enough of your posts to know that you're unlikely to get anything of this, but what the hell. Yes, you're so lucky that someone from a minority is good at their job, cuz you know, that's unusual. Bahh

peacefulwarrior
I wouldn't call them racist unless the skewing was intentional.
It doesn't have to be intentionally done to be racist (though what it actually is, is culturalist). It would change what I'd do with the person creating the questions, unintentional = some training in cultural differences, intentional = the boot.

Wizzywig
Have you all ever considered the possbility, right or wrong, that blacks just aren't as smart as other races? I am not saying that is the case, but let's cut through the sh*t here. a question framed in the context o0f skiing, if mathematically solvable is not racist, just because it mentions skiing (although better choices should have been made). a test is not culturally biased or racist because one race scores lower on it than another. That is just stupid.
So many ways to attack this. Are you really trying to say that shiatty schools, uneducated parents, malnutrition, and cultural issues are not nearly as important as their inherited intelligence? I know you were just asking the question, but ignoring the obvious, makes me... question your intelligence actually (I kid, I figure you're a product of a poorly diversified environment that didn't promote critical thinking).
People have such issues understanding and solving word problems anyway, that adding even more confusion by talking about something of which they know almost nothing would almost certainly cause students who were borderline to just give up and not even try.

cheese 'n rice
That's the easiest question I've gotten all day. These Asian kids study their asses off, and they couldn't give two shiats about questions with a 'racial slant' to them.
Given recent experience teaching Asian students to take a standardized test, let me tell you that culturally biased questions piss them off to no end, it's just that they move past that and try to learn the cultural stuff since the asinine shiat is on the tests.

pstudent12
But poor people in India score 750+ on SAT's. They are
certainly poorer than most 'minorities' in the USA.

I'm certain the average poor person in India scores really high on the SAT. Or maye, only the really bright ones take it? And I'm wondering if it's the poor ones? I mean the SAT costs money, who pays for this? Citations?

BrotherAlpha
Hand in two resumes, identical in every way except for the name. One resume has a white sounding name, for instance, John. The other has a black sounding name, Jamal. The white sounding name will get a call-back 50% more often.
I would be very very interested in the source for that.
jayday
Thanks all yeah 1500 out of 1600 is a damn good score(1600 being old cap not sure about the new SAT).

School I went to(120 grad class) only had 2 people scoring over 1500 so that's pretty impressive score I'd say. Well beyond good.

New test has 3 sections, each worth 800 pts. There's a math section which supposedly includes some trig, but really there's nothing that "requires" trig; a reading section (which includes "fill in the blank" which is almost wholely a vocab test); and a writing section which includes a 25 minute essay and some grammar stuffs. There are no more analogies.
Atreyou40
If I ever had my own business, you can bet your ass I'd keep it private and would only hire people like me* to prevent crap like this lawsuit from happening.
I'm speechless, or I wish I was (all of you probably wish I was typeless if you've made it this far). Unfortunately this is too blatantly, sadly racist to even comment on. Btw, you don't need to be burning crosses to be racist.

gruntmints
I'd support this argument, only it fails at number 2 -- they go to poor schools. Studies have been done that students in poor schools can fair just as well as students in schools where the general populace is affluent. The big factors in this "poor education" schematic are these: 1) little parent involvement, 2) low quality teachers. Get the parents involved, kick out the teachers and hire ones that are highly trained and actually CARE, and you'll have smart poor kids who can compete.

/Education major at UMD
//NCLB works when people follow it and stop complaining about it. Most teachers are just lazy.


First year education major I hope, enough knowledge to be dangerous, but not actually educated yet?
Your point is that "students can" perform well in poor schools, of course they can, it's looking at statistical averages I'm interested in. For your future enlightenment, teaching students who are good academically is easy as pie, they'll succeed even if you suck soooo bad. On the other hand, teaching poor academic students is very very difficult. Make sure you get some of the poor academic when you get into your placements.

I agree that we need better teachers, training is less important than you think though, experience matters a bit.

You obviously don't get the reality of what NCLB means to the in-class teacher, you're looking at it from an academic point of view.

----------------------------------------------------------
This was fun, I got my ranting at idiocy (yes, "at" not "of") out of my system for the day and now can concentrate on my daily life. I should do this every morning, I'd probably be more productive.
 
2005-09-29 05:07:15 PM
Memo To All:

Get a Life.

P.S: You programmers, no matter how high you rank your technical abilities, will ALWAYS get replaced by a cheaper indian (not the native-american kind but Gandhi-indian) consultant. Not because they are smarter, they are simply cheaper.
 
2005-09-29 05:07:49 PM
He just likes driving around and getting to see all sorts of people everyday that aren't bleeding or otherwise ill.

He obviously doesn't drive with me. :)
 
2005-09-29 05:11:14 PM
DROX
There's a rule among whites...an unspoken rule. This rule pertains to work...not friendships, not relationships...work.

The rule is this. You get a few shots to get it right. If you fark it up after that, you're done. We don't care about education. We don't care about upbringing. We don't care about much of anything...but getting it right. If you aren't getting it right, you get ostracized. You may not be discluded from a social group (friends or family, IOW)...but you're labeled as a dumbass who can't get it right from that point forward.

Inasmuch as it relates to blacks, we OFTEN have to maintain a completely different set of rules so that we aren't accused of being racist. But, it's in the maintaining of the 2 sets of rules that we have a catch-22. Why have 2 sets of rules anyway...right? Still, either we maintain the 2 sets of rules or we are judged racist.
 
2005-09-29 05:14:33 PM
I used to think African-Americans were people who were born in Africa, but, later moved to America. That makes sense.

But, the African-Americans ive witnessed have never been to Africa, will never go to Africa, and may not be able to find it using a map. (or GoogleEarth)
 
2005-09-29 05:15:51 PM
> I personally can't accept that minorities are just naturally stupid.

This is a noble sentiment. In the past, we've laid the blame for poor performance on genetics. As a society, we've become uncomfortable with that, and that's probably a good thing. In the absence of this explanation, we've blamed society (ie: "lower taxes, poorer schools"). However, this is a weak explanation because holding economic conditions constant, whites and other minorities still outperform blacks. So where can we look for an explanation for the discrepancy in ability? Thomas Sowell, a black professor at Stanford, wrote a book called "Cultural Capital"; in it, he described the qualities of various minority cultures, and compared them to the level of success enjoyed by that minority community. Cultures that rewarded academic excellence and discipline had markedly different results than those with a strain of anti-intellectualism and a culture of victimhood. It may not be the answer, but it's a starting point...
 
2005-09-29 05:25:33 PM
DROX
Also, the 'it' in "getting it right" changes....all the time. Today, "it" might be where to stack boxes in the warehouse. Tomorrow, "it" might mean whether or not you wore a company shirt on company shirt day or not. Next week, "it" might mean getting to work on time. After that, "it" might pertain to being shown 5 times where to find a script for a piece of code we've inserted into a given fix a million times before....or never before.

"IT" essentially means complying with generally acceptable rules of behavior/performance/life, as we (collectively, not individually) judge them.
 
2005-09-29 05:28:11 PM
poor choice:

10 Blacks and hispanics are poor
20 they go to poor schools
30 they don't get an equal education
40 they don't do as well on tests
50 they don't get promoted
60 GOTO 10



One thing missing there: if the standard is lowered so that more get promoted, so that more blacks & hispanics get promoted, so their kids can go to better schools/etc, you need to raise the bar again to compensate for the new, improved standard. However, where's the incentive to do that? You're assuming the human race is well intentioned enough to adjust the standard back up again, but I'm actually pessimistic enough to doubt that would actually ever happen.

I don't recall who said it, but someone above said TRUE equality would scare the pants off of everyone who is actually calling for their own vision of "equality".

Double standards just don't work.

// Lucky enough to be in a tech environment where I work with enough blacks/hispanics daily who I recognize would cream me intelligence-wise.
 
2005-09-29 05:29:07 PM
Dialectic
I suck at life
P.S: You programmers, no matter how high you rank your technical abilities, will ALWAYS get replaced by a cheaper indian (not the native-american kind but Gandhi-indian) consultant. Not because they are smarter, they are simply cheaper.


Dude, programmer is not the same thing as consultant. Don't be so stupid, if you want to sound arrogant.
 
2005-09-29 05:30:05 PM
SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) -- A federal judge

I don't know where to start.
 
2005-09-29 05:32:01 PM
I haven't RTWholeFT, but I did RTFA, and I wonder if anyone has mentioned that promotion criteria include performance reviews and whether an employee has been disciplined. Both of those could fairly be argued to involve SUBJECTIVITY, which is one of those areas where race preferences / race discrimination can certainly take hold.

It's not as if there is just a Goddamned arithmetic quiz involved and the plaintiffs are arguing that minorities should pass with 50% instead of 70% or whatever.
 
2005-09-29 05:38:54 PM
Well, it's been fun and enlightening... in the sense that I can now rest assured that there are, and always will be, ignorant assholes. And sadly, some of you don't even know it. I'll say a little prayer for you tonight.
 
2005-09-29 05:40:16 PM
2005-09-29 05:14:33 PM LouisvilleMale33
I used to think African-Americans were people who were born in Africa, but, later moved to America. That makes sense.

But, the African-Americans ive witnessed have never been to Africa, will never go to Africa, and may not be able to find it using a map. (or GoogleEarth)


My family came from Germany, but I was born here and I call myself an American, not a German-American. I think when any American puts too much emphasis on their ethnicity it causes separation. I'm not saying you should completely abandon your heritage and customs, but if you want to be equal, don't try so hard to constantly separate yourself either.
 
2005-09-29 05:49:25 PM
kherik


Amy78: when I got home I looked at the address and sure enough it was correct, so I called back to complain.

I hope you are surrounded by people who go out of your way to make your life shiatty because of innocent mistakes.


If she were then someone would have told her the the correct form of the verb to write she should have used is 'written' not wrote. But being from Kentucky we figured she was stupid white trash and just gave up because it would take more effort to explain it than it was worth.
 
2005-09-29 05:50:41 PM
LuLu Columbia

My family came from Germany, but I was born here and I call myself an American, not a German-American.

and most people here would call you "white". they'd call someone with dark skin "black" or "african american".

so there's a bit of a difference.
 
2005-09-29 05:54:19 PM


I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.



Everybody is equal...except for, well...us
 
2005-09-29 05:59:32 PM
de-de-deeeehhhh
 
2005-09-29 06:06:28 PM
I hope most blacks dont accept jesse jackson as their leader because that might be the beginning of the problem.
 
2005-09-29 06:16:28 PM
What is this "level the playing field" garbage? This is America. I'm white and nobody's leveling anything for me.I used to be a flaming liberal but after 40 years of hearing blacks using the excuse of racism in my great grandfather's generation for black failure I started to realize what a giant fraud it all is.

Look. Every nation on this planet that is owned and run by blacks has fallen flat on its face. Every. Single. One. Haiti. All of Sub-Saharan Africa. You name it. They all have the lowest education levels (if any education exists at all), the highest violent crime rates, genocide,political chaos, economic collapse. Sad but true.


I get so tired of reading posts by American blacks implying that American whites need to look at themselves, or their tests, or their policies--come on. Take a look at yourselves. It's like dealing with children.
 
2005-09-29 06:16:40 PM

FedEx's statistical analysis shows that minorities receive higher evaluations on average than whites in many job categories, and showed that minorities received higher wages than whites in many jobs.


They are so oppressed.
 
2005-09-29 06:26:37 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND: So, is it that only these Black people want welfare in the workplace?

Definately not, and I never intended to say that it was. I was specifically referring to on particular form of "welfare in the workplace." Rant all you will, you cannot say that lazy white workers will try to hide under Affermitive Action or get promoted despite a lack of qualifications due to quotas. That in no way says that they won't get promoted because uncle Jack is the VP or because they have pictures of the CEO farking a 13 year old. I wasn't trying to cover all the bases here. The topic IS EEO in this thread.

I know that many of us are at work right now Farking on the companies clock. Is that a form of corporate welfare given to YOU? Or, is it that you are only outraged by the Black people who 'do everything they can to keep from doing their job'?

I am not outraged at all. It is you who appears to be outraged an hell bent on making me out to be a bigot. Suit yourself. I am not worried about this type of thing effecting my job or my career ladder. I am a competent, highly skilled employee, as are all those who work with me, regardless of race. I would be extremely surprised to find incompetent workers that made it to this level of the company due to Affermative Action.

I need to know where the line is drawn. If it is your contention that there are many Whites who have the same disregard for their job then please explain to me why the topic of race is even entered into the discussion. If you all think that race is NOT a factor in how intelligent or motivated a person is, then why aren't ou focusing on laziness in the workplace and not just lazy Negros in the workplace?

Lets see if you can follow me here. This is a topic entitled "FedEx knows that blacks and Hispanics fail at much higher rate, but yet has not changed the test (for promotion)." This thread is about RACE, not LASINESS, or INCOMPETENCE. I have not begun to tell you the things that I find revolting in the workplace or the people around me. This is not the place for it. I was commenting on one aspect of the problem, wich IS Affermitive Action, or rather those who abuse it.

You may sit down at the same table as Donnell during lunch, but your preconceived notions about Black people DO make you a bigot.

If I had preconceived notions about Black people, that would make me a bigot. I do not. I have stated that repeatedly, get it through your skull, past your racist anger at whitey, and think about the sentence. People develop stereotypes based on personal interaction, I am no different. I see ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE between myself and my fellow co-workers of different races. I see a huge difference between them and the punk gangstas at the mall. I also see a big difference between them and Billy Bo Noteeth at the Trailer Park. I am not saying that everyone that lives in a Trailer Park is trash, or that all black teens at the mall are punks. But you would have to be an idiot to realize that you can't make an educated guess on a persons attitude, background, and many other things at a glance. Judging by your posts, maybe you are an idiot. I don't know.

Your father's lack of drive and the poor people you knew hav absolutely no bearing on why I made the statement I made. It has to do with the comments that came from your computer to my eyes. Such as:

"... when minorities realize that they don't have to try as hard, or work as hard, etc., they can use the quota system to keep their jobs, even get promotions, all for doing shiat."

That is a broad brush you're painting us all with. And it sounds like you've made your mind up about the attitude of ALL minorities.


If you would care to put that statement in context, you would understand that I am in no way referring to ALL minorities. I have already said that I have no racial stereotypes against all members of a race, only certain subsets in each race. Get over it, I am not talking about all of you, just the people who are exibiting the attitutde of some people toward doing work.

Why do you focus on the people who have the least amount of control over the situation? Why is it that a "lazy" Black person receives this level of criticism? Is it because the government has given them assistance? Why aren't you crusading against people who file false workman's comp claims or people who defraud insurance companies?

First of all, I am not crusading against anything, I was simply stating an opinion. I definately have opinions against people who abuse workman's comp, insurance fraud, welfare, unemployment, and many other things. But again that is not the topic of this thread. At no time was I attempting to say that Black people are lazier than white people, only that they have the ability to hide behind Affermitive Action Policies to keep their jobs.

Do you honestly think that abolishing quotas will put us all on level footing?

No, I don't. I said that it would be great if we could abolish quotas, Afermative Action, and EEO. The fact is that there is racism out there, and some level of policy is needed. I have stated that I agree with the vision and goals of these policies, but I detest the abuse of these systems, and how it adversely effects competent workers.

We can legislate whether Blacks deserve an opportunity or a bump in a test score, but once affirmative action is taken away, who's going to stop the people at Yale from admitting the under-qualified grandson of an Alum?

That is why I agree that it is needed, just changed. And don't ask me how, I don't know. I just know that we have substituted one form of racial discrimination for another. And it has done nothing to change the REAL racism in America. If anything, abuse of these systems, as well as the reputation for being overly litigious has only helped to bolster the feeling of racism in many places, such as Atreyou40's friend.

Who's going to stop Atreyou40's boss from closing the door in a qualified Black man's face?

Nothing, but nothing is stopping him from doing that anyway. And I think he should be free to do so. This is America after all. I also have no problem with someone only hiring minorities if that is what they want. If the company is private, who the hell cares how you run it? As long as you don't infringe on your employees' rights, it is your business. If you don't treat them well, they will leave. Public companies are a different story.

You said yourself that you believe racism still exist, so how can you justifiably call for an end to something which levels the field? Because a few people abuse it?? There are some who abuse alcohol, does that mean none of us should be allowed to partake?

I never said that it should be abolished. I never even said that it should be changed until now. In one post I made a statement saying it would be nice if we could abolish it, meaning if it were not needed and racism were no longer a problem. Of course racism exists, I think you have illustrated that very well for us. People who abuse these social systems are quite different from someone who abuses alchohol or drugs. They affect us all, and our tax dollars. As long as an alchoholic or addict does it at home, he only affects himself and his family. If he harms someone else because of the abuse, he is held legaly liable. It is a different situation.

Please try to follow what I am saying. Maybe the third time is the charm for you. If you still insist on thinking of me as a bigot, feel free. I don't care. Evidently you are too wrapped up in your anger and hate to actually read what I am writing instead of what you want to see.
 
2005-09-29 06:26:46 PM
"to ignore the great tradition of empire in Africa and some of their accomplishments"

Perhaps you would care to list them? I believe this text box contains enough space.
Please: before you begin, omit those of Hamitic (Egypt) or Semitic (Carthage) origin.
Short list?
 
2005-09-29 06:27:50 PM
Racism has to be the most misused word in the English language. Yes, even more misused than irony.

There is no such thing as racism. There's classism, nationalism, jingoism, etc. But, they all boil down to elitism. The definition for race, as it stands now, is being perverted for the purposes of obfuscation.

You can't hate another human for being human, without hating yourself.
 
2005-09-29 06:30:12 PM
Are we talking about African empires or European empires within Africa?
 
2005-09-29 06:32:34 PM
I work at the FedEx hub in Nashville. You people make the baseless assumption that the test is written. Where does it say that? People shouldn't talk about things they know nothing about. It makes you come off as asses. Oh, wait... that's what they say about assuming. I imagine the people are flat out unqualified. My boss fired this Mexican guy once because he sucked, was slow, and he cashed someone else's check.
 
2005-09-29 06:32:54 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND: Jesus! If you can honestly take the case of a guy who doesn't hire people TOTALLY BASED ON THEIR RACE and somehow flip it so that it is now the Black person's fault that they are discriminated against, you are probably beyond hope. If calling out an OVERT racist is "playing the race card" then how can people EVER ge into an honest debate about race?

How can the bosses argument makes sense logically, but it is illogical for me bring up hot coffee or wet floors? WE LIVE IN A LITIGEOUS SOCIETY People sue each other for EVERYTHING! Is it your position that the majority of lawsuits are filed by Black people?? If not, then what you're saying is bullshiat.



The argument makes sense in the context with which it was provided. The job is high turnover and the employer wants to avoid being sued for race discrimination. Is he doing the right thing? No. He is definately discriminating based on race. Does that alone make him racist? Maybe so.

Let me submit this possible scenario:

I am the guy, and I hire mechanics. I hire black mechanics and white. I fire the incompetent ones. The white ones biatch and move on, but I get alot of black mechanics suing me for discrimination. I have to fight it in court, spend my money, and perhaps I lose a few settlements. Even though the decision was NEVER based on race. I have a wife and kids at home that I need to feed. I would very quickly make the decision not to hire black people if doing it usually results in a loss of money. If you are going to try to come between me and my family, screw you. I will be a racist. I wasn't at the beginning, but the abuse of the system has made me one.


I don't know if that is this guys case or not. But I do see how the abuse of the system can have this sort of an effect.
 
2005-09-29 06:35:25 PM
BrotherAlpha

It is also very easy to manipulate a test so that it is racially biased.

Chester Fields:

If it so easy to make racist, you wouldn't have a problem giving an example.

When you give word problems if all the names were Hispanic then it would cause WASPs to get a lower score. If you were to use a boxing ring as your concrete example in the word problem, those that have never seen the sport would suffer.

Then there's the whole stereotype risk, and if you've never even heard about that, then it's best you leave the discussion to those who are more knowledgeable.
 
2005-09-29 06:36:24 PM
I would very quickly make the decision not to hire black people if doing it usually results in a loss of money.

That selection method can cost you money too.
 
2005-09-29 06:37:29 PM
fj: Or maybe Jamal's parents shouldn't try to give Jamal such an odd name.

So your response to racist farkwads is to give in and try to be just like them?

Here's a hint, there's nothing odd about the name Jamal if you actually embrace multiculturalism.
 
2005-09-29 06:39:37 PM
MediaAreAllHacks: I find this claim ridiculous when by and large management is still very predominantly white (and male for that matter) and minorities are still way over-represented among the poor in society. I liked much of the rest of your post though.


I don't have any staticsts, so maybe you are right about the management level, but at lower levels, and gaining admittence to educational institutions, the problem is evident. Just read some of the previous examples.

I understood that such problems could occur before, but I have recently been teaching an esl student (reasonably good english, very good student) for the SAT, we came to one question in the math section. The question mentioned an erector set, and was written in such a way that if you misinterpreted what an erector set was it was easy to misread the question and come up with the wrong answer (which they did have on there). He did not know what an erector set was, and so missed the question. I had multiple examples of small things like that which can mess a student up.

I can see how that sort of thing can happen, just as I understood uidzero's post earlier about the lemon. Hopefully this type of question wouldn't be on a topical exam for a job, such as what we are discussing here. Definatly there is the chance for misunderstanding on a standardized test. Hell when I took the GRE there were are few topics that I was in the dark about. But the way that those tests are structured means that not understanding a question will have minimal effect on your overall score. This should also be the case in any test where this sort of misunderstand can occur and is not critical to the job being sought. The one thing that cannot be done, though, is to lower the standards for the position to let unqualified people in. Give training couses, or show them where to get training, but don't lower the standards.
 
2005-09-29 06:39:37 PM
I say point the finger away from fedex and back at the gov, the parents, and the schools.

Katrina really hilighted this problem of the american poor and the fact that many of them are black. And they are not considered to be very important - I think that's the problem itself.
 
2005-09-29 06:43:15 PM
BrotherAlpha
Hand in two resumes, identical in every way except for the name. One resume has a white sounding name, for instance, John. The other has a black sounding name, Jamal. The white sounding name will get a call-back 50% more often.

MediaAreAllHacks:
I would be very very interested in the source for that.

No prob. Will ONE LINK be enough? Cause I really should get back to work.

If you need more, just Google 'resume black name white name' and you should get tons of hits.
 
2005-09-29 06:47:18 PM
 
2005-09-29 06:47:37 PM
mrsirjojo:

Why are there "black" names anyway?

Name that have original in African languages. Most names would have an ethnic origin. For instance, Christopher and Kristov have different ethnic origins even though they have the same root. So do Jon, Johan and John.

And, now that they're so prevalent, aren't you advertising the chip on your shoulder by giving your child one, even as you admit it will handicap them?

There's no reason that the name should be a handicap, nor should it reflect a particular mental state of the parents. The fact that you think it does is a big farking clue that you are racist.
 
2005-09-29 06:58:21 PM
Brother Alpha, the test are not biased. If so, then how the fark can immigrants fresh off the boat routinely beat the pants off black people on standardized tests? People have been trying to find bias for over forty years. There is NO evidence for racial equality. You hang on the concept of racial equality like it's some Holy Grail. Races are different. Intelligence has been shown to be at least 80% genetic. Why is it so hard to believe that certain ethnic groups might not be the sharpest tools in the book? You are just as bad as the Christians you probably routinely mock. You believe in something that there is no proof for and much proof against.
If the test question says "Julio had three tacos and Jamaal had four chitlin's. Each cost forty cents apiece..." instead of "Madison had three sandwiches and Matt had four hot dogs" I'd still be able to solve the word problem. Wake up, man. You just sound shrill.

/So do I. Excuse the rant
 
2005-09-29 06:58:41 PM
James Finberg, an attorney representing the class, said FedEx normally promotes from within, yet three times the number of package handlers and loaders are minorities compared to drivers, who earn more. Twice the number of minorities fail promotional tests than do whites, Finberg added.

Bull-farking-shiat, I work at a station in Calgary for Fedex and I can tell you exactly what each of those position makes.

Package Handler makes $11.37 starting
Ramp Handler makes $15.82 starting
Data Entry makes $10.50 starting
Couriers makes $15.82 starting.

No shiat, Couriers and Ramp Handlers makes more than package handler. Why? Cuz there's alot more ways to fark up compared to Package Handler. As for Data Entry, there's probably even more ways to fark up, I attribute lower pay grade due to the fact that the girls in Data Entry are biatches.

That's not even a valid reason to sue people, hell, even Fedex's explaination of the differences in the pay grade makes a whole lot sense. The test question isn't even a major factor.

/Pay grade is in Canadian
//Grade isn't the same compared to bigger stations in Canada
 
2005-09-29 07:07:40 PM
So Very Sadly these people will likely win. Precedence has been set in good ole Alabama. Long before the federal government wanted to test School Teachers competence the state of Alabama did. Guess what happened.... Black Teachers were failing the test at three times the rate of White teachers. I took that to mean there were a much higher percentage of Black Teachers attempting to educate our children than Whites that had no business teaching. The court system disagreed. The test was racially biased. I Googled "Teacher Testing Alabama" and Quickly found this:

In 1987, the first issue of FairTest's newsletter, the Examiner reported on a legal victory won by four black teachers in their lawsuit against the state of Alabama.

Their suit charged that the state's teacher-certification exam discriminated against blacks, violating their 14th Amendment protections and federal civil rights laws. In an out-of-court settlement, subsequently upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals, the State Board of Education in Alabama agreed to develop new tests and not to use the test as the sole criterion for certification. The state also agreed to pay the plaintiffs $500,000.

If the courts would agree with this when the education of our children is at stake I have no reason to think they would rule differently when all that is at stake is the promotion of a FedEx employee


FedEx is screwed
 
2005-09-29 07:08:49 PM
mindbomb33
SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) -- A federal judge

I don't know where to start.


OK, see where it says "SAN"? Now, work your way to the left, there you go...
 
2005-09-29 07:09:47 PM
Alot of 'racism' can be attributed to 'appearanceism.' If you knowingly dress like a gang-banger and/or speak jibberish, I don't give a shiat about being predisposed to judge you; white, black, yellow, pink- if you wear a du-rag under a slanted baseball cap, rediculously oversized clothing, and walk around like you're concealing a shotgun in your pants (I think it's called the 'pimp limp,' but I'm a dorky white guy so what the hell do I know?), I'm NOT going to give you the benefit of the doubt.

You're damned right I'm an appearanceist.
 
2005-09-29 07:13:27 PM
The problem isn't FedEx's test being racist, the problem is that the distribution of quality education is racist. In other wards, schools in mostly "minority" occupied areas tend to suck.

/Attended a Detroit public school and has seen this personally
 
2005-09-29 07:31:43 PM
First year education major I hope, enough knowledge to be dangerous, but not actually educated yet?
Your point is that "students can" perform well in poor schools, of course they can, it's looking at statistical averages I'm interested in. For your future enlightenment, teaching students who are good academically is easy as pie, they'll succeed even if you suck soooo bad. On the other hand, teaching poor academic students is very very difficult. Make sure you get some of the poor academic when you get into your placements.

I agree that we need better teachers, training is less important than you think though, experience matters a bit.

You obviously don't get the reality of what NCLB means to the in-class teacher, you're looking at it from an academic point of view.
----------

Ok, shortness

1) 4th year education major
2) product of "poor" education and "affluent" area education, substantial time in both
3) In case you dont know, teacher education INVOLVES gaining in-class experience, with a requirement that you already have experience in order to even be accepted into the program (so a first year education major essentially doesnt exist at UMD)
4) Statistical averages are based on test scores, yes, but they discount all the aformentioned factors, which do include parent involvement (parent involvement is mostly parent encouragement in the child's education), and teacher certification. Believe it or not, experience goes hand in hand with training. You put a person through 4-5 years of school and include training with that, you're more likely to have a better educator than someone who just picks up and starts teaching with no background in classroom instruction and pedagogy. Also, you have to take into account desire; a person who WANTS to teach regardless of pay etc.etc.etc., is going to do a much better job than someone who has no desire to be in the classroom and is therefore only concerned with school 8-5. You get a teacher who cares about school in an 5-8 manner, you'll get someone who puts effort into their work and therefore sees fruit.
5) I'd ask you to go spend time in a poor area of schools yourself. I HAVE experience working with those kids and being of being one myself. Biggest factor, coming from real life experience? PARENT INVOLVEMENT.
6) Teaching students who are good academically is easy as pie? of course it is, they're good academically, so that statement is moot. Teaching students who are rich is easy as pie? Perhaps, but I assure you their parents are more likely to take part in their education. Anecdotal evidence, I come from the MD county with the highest population of black students (prince georges). Every school is below par, except 1: Eleanor Roosevelt. Why? It's the school where A) most of the white and asian students in the county attend and B) These same students have, yes, here it comes, parents who are more involved in their education. Seems like people don't realize the impact a little parent invovlement has on a child's education. And there are different levels: there's the parent that's at school every other day (intrusive), and the parent that simply forms a relationship with the teachers and makes sure the kid is doing the work. Either way, the student will excel.

So yes, I know the deal. I'm down with all that jazz. I even encourage classmates doing placements to go to the poor schools because I tell them it will be good experience for them.
 
2005-09-29 07:32:20 PM
p_tato

The problem isn't FedEx's test being racist, the problem is that the distribution of quality education is racist. In other wards, schools in mostly "minority" occupied areas tend to suck.

/Attended a Detroit public school and has seen this personally


Umm, that would be because detroit sucks.

/still waiting for the U.S. to put a big wall around detroit, and leave it alone for twenty years, then come back and pave over it.
 
cot
2005-09-29 07:39:37 PM
MediaAreAllHacks: cot
The Icelander: I bet poor whites don't do as well on the test either

I wouldn't go so far as to absolve them of any responsibility whatsoever for their situation. That mindset is part of the reason they're there.

Yes, because poor people really want to be poor, their mindset is at fault. Are you serious?



You seriously have a lot of free time to read through this whole mess and respond, so I'll go ahead and leave some more for you to fret over.

YES I am serious. Did I say it's 100% of their fault? No. Did I say it's more than 0% their fault? YES.

Take some responsibility for your life, you coward. I think a good mindset to take is that of the serenity prayer - change what you can. Even though most people have things in their lives that affect them that they cannot change, changing just the ones you can will have a drastic effect.

Pretending that you're utterly helpless to improve your life due to whatever injustices may or may not be being purpetrated against you is a self fulfilling prophecy.
 
daz
2005-09-29 07:40:25 PM
They're not COLLARD greens, they're COLORED greens. Everyone knows that. We don't call them COLLARD people, that'd just be rude.

/one of the funniest lines from The Office.
 
2005-09-29 07:42:13 PM
The schools might suck in the inner cities because the good teachers might not want to work in schools where they feel like they might get shot everyday.
 
Ant
2005-09-29 07:46:53 PM
DROxINxTHExWIND: What if many of the people who you came across everyday thought you were a criminal or a slacker?

Already happened. All my friends' moms thought I was a drug dealer in HS.
 
cot
2005-09-29 07:47:30 PM
Thras: I'll believe that when I see some substantial unbiased research showing it.

70% of blacks fail the ASVAB. SAT numbers are online. ... You will find the 1 standard deviation gap to exist exactly as I claim.


That proves nothing - those tests don't even TRY to test the raw aptitude of the people so are heavily influenced by level/quality of education. Next.

"I'm not going to say that there's no genetic difference, even though it's spectacularly politically incorrect to even entertain that notion."

That is one of the saddest statements I have ever seen. "If truth isn't PC, it shouldn't be entertained"?


Wow, maybe you should work on your reading comprehension. I clearly said that I would not claim there's no genetic difference between the average intelligence of different races IN SPITE OF the un-pc nature of it. Next.

It's just that from personal experience I can't possibly imagine the difference being that large - the differences we see seem to be dominated by cultural and social effects.

The personal experience of most middle and upper-class whites is very limited when it comes to the underclass of any race. 1/3rd of black males spend time in prison. Is that true of 1/3rd of the black males you know? I doubt it. I'd be surprised if all your friends weren't lily white. (Before you ask, that is certainly not the case with me.)


Well, sorry, but you're wrong. I wouldn't make any assumptions based on my own personal experience if it were the case. I've known my fair share of people who've been to prison for violent crimes, white and black. Yay me.

You're essentially calling a large portion of the black population retarded by "white" standards.

Functionally, yes. Them's the breaks.


This only makes it clear that you have a difficult time separating out the effects of culture and education vs. inherent mental capacity. Spend some time around grade school dropout white trash and you'd probably come to the same conclusion about whites.
 
2005-09-29 07:50:09 PM
You know the people suing aren't Asian. Then again, I doubt many Asians work for FedEx as drivers and handlers.

p_tato

The problem isn't FedEx's test being racist, the problem is that the distribution of quality education is racist. In other wards, schools in mostly "minority" occupied areas tend to suck.

/Attended a Detroit public school and has seen this personally


Of course, poor whites have to learn about intelligent design now, so things are evening up
 
2005-09-29 07:58:03 PM
COT, I applaud you! I completely agree with you on these matters. And, being a black guy who's family went from poor to middle class through hard hard work, and as a person who is working himself through college while many of the people he graduated with didnt even go to college, i must say that it is certainly a choice in many cases whether or not people want to be poor.
 
cot
2005-09-29 08:38:03 PM
gruntmints: COT, I applaud you! I completely agree with you on these matters. And, being a black guy who's family went from poor to middle class through hard hard work, and as a person who is working himself through college while many of the people he graduated with didnt even go to college, i must say that it is certainly a choice in many cases whether or not people want to be poor.

Wow, so you aren't all helpless! :)

Like most issues, people seem to go all black and white (ugh) on this. Either blacks have no problems but their own and it's all their fault, or else they're helpless in a world that won't let them succeed in any way.

Believe anything in between and both sides seem to hate you just as much as they hate each other.
 
2005-09-29 08:40:26 PM
gruntmints, well said man.
 
2005-09-29 08:46:22 PM
cot

those tests don't even TRY to test the raw aptitude of the people so are heavily influenced by level/quality of education.

Evidence? The last study I saw (from the 80s) showed that the ASVAB correlated .8 with direct measures of intelligence. SATs are highly correlated with intelligence. And Raven's are the ideal IQ test. But I'm sure that you weren't just talking out of your ass with the above. I know that you aren't the sort of person who would say something just because he wished it were true. So produce some support for your position.

*snip of various silliness that ducks the arguments*

This only makes it clear that you have a difficult time separating out the effects of culture and education vs. inherent mental capacity. Spend some time around grade school dropout white trash and you'd probably come to the same conclusion about whites.


The IQ gap first shows up at 18 months (as early as can be measured with reaction-time tests). Yeah, I'm sure it's culture. And the use of IQ for identifying mental retardation was certainly not invented by me.
 
2005-09-29 08:51:41 PM
Browsed the thread, got depressed over the general state of human society, and some of the crap you guys come out with...

Let me break it down.

1) Minorities are born, either from immigrants (mostly poor) or pre-existing minorities who are poor (explained further down).
2) Minorities can only afford housing in crappy areas. All the minorities buy housing in these areas, creating a minority area. Because it's an area of poverty, crime and poor-education are rife.
3) People growing up in these areas are more likely to turn to crime (making the minority areas even worse places to live in, so it's a cycle), and to not be able to score well on a test (due to the poor education), making them unable to get high-payed employment.
4) These people try to get a job at somewhere like FedEx, don't score well on the test, and newbs cry ZOMG RACISMCOPTER.

It's not racism, it's called having a society that doesn't like poor people. Unless you want to convert to Socialism or Communism or something, really, stop whining about it. Because life just isn't fair. With the current system, there's always going to be stupidly rich people (Paris Hilton springs to mind) and poor people in bad situations in ghettos and crap. Too bad. You're stuck with the lot you're born with. It's life.

And giving this kind of 'advantage' to people in this situation isn't going to help at all, it's just going to lead to a society where we have people in jobs they're not qualified for just because we feel sorry for them because they grew up in a crappy area and are poor. Yeah, smart.
 
2005-09-29 09:06:34 PM
My college (a tough tech school) really lowered the bar for blacks to get accepted back in the 1980's.

As a result, more than 50% of them failed many years. That's not right.
 
2005-09-29 09:13:17 PM
MediaAreAllHacks - Wow, you must have a lot of free time.
 
2005-09-29 09:18:19 PM
Obvious answer:

Maybe it isn't the test, but the fact that blacks and hispanics are just stupidier, lazier, and worse at working in general.

/ducks
 
2005-09-29 09:20:51 PM
cot
YES I am serious. Did I say it's 100% of their fault? No. Did I say it's more than 0% their fault? YES.

Take some responsibility for your life, you coward. I think a good mindset to take is that of the serenity prayer - change what you can. Even though most people have things in their lives that affect them that they cannot change, changing just the ones you can will have a drastic effect.

Pretending that you're utterly helpless to improve your life due to whatever injustices may or may not be being purpetrated against you is a self fulfilling prophecy.


You're making assumptions. I agree in individual cases you can talk about personal responsibility (and we should talk about it more often, for people of all classes). However, to paint it on the group, suggesting that they take less responsibility, as a whole, than those, as a whole, who are better off than they are is ridiculous. What you are doing is trying to tell them that they have to be better than people who were monetarily lucky about who their parents were. I know with my level of drive I'd be lucky to have escaped if I'd been born in a ghetto. I'm relatively successful by society's definition (more than by my own), but that has as much to do with luck as anything else. I believe I have average to above-average drive, certainly not below average.

And yes, I do have way too much time at the moment; hopefully on Monday that will change :)
 
cot
2005-09-29 09:21:22 PM
Thras:

Evidence? The last study I saw (from the 80s) showed that the ASVAB correlated .8 with direct measures of intelligence. SATs are highly correlated with intelligence. And Raven's are the ideal IQ test.

IQ tests aren't even "direct measures of intelligence" so I'm not exactly sure what you're referring to here. A lot of what is tested in an IQ test are reasoning skills which can be cultivated or left to atrophy.

The IQ gap first shows up at 18 months (as early as can be measured with reaction-time tests). Yeah, I'm sure it's culture.

Then use the earlier data to try to prove your point. Pointing to the difference at an early age as qualitative proof of the effect (which I already admitted may exist at some level) and then pointing to adult data as quantitative proof of the size of the discrepancy is a major leap in logic.

I don't buy your claim of the magnitude of the discrepancy based on my own observations and common sense. You're going to have a hard time convincing me with studies like the ones you're referring to. It's virtually impossible to separate the nurture aspect of intelligence from the inherent abilities goverened by genetics.
 
2005-09-29 09:25:52 PM
Conker thanks for that rather breath-takingly vaccuous post. People of all races are poor--in fact poor whites outnumber poor blacks three to one, and yet whatever the income level of the blacks, whites or Asians, blacks still score lowest. Even blacks from upper middle class homes.

Poverty doesn't have a damned thing to do with it and never has.

"Society doesn't like poor people." Yeah babe. That's why we are constantly fretting about how to improve their lot in life.
 
cot
2005-09-29 09:30:47 PM
Oh, and if you really believe IQ tests are the be-all end-all test of innate intelligence, how do you explain things like the Flynn effect?

IQ scores seem to be rising around the world, at different levels in different populations. How would that be possible on such a short time scale if it was controlled strictly by genetic factors?

It's pretty naive to believe that a test of something so abstract as intelligence can be cut along just that one axis.
 
cot
2005-09-29 09:33:20 PM
MediaAreAllHacks: However, to paint it on the group, suggesting that they take less responsibility, as a whole, than those, as a whole, who are better off than they are is ridiculous.

People have already asked this question - why is it that American blacks have such a hard time relative to other minorities that come here like asians? Do you think Asians aren't given a hard time (particularly in the past)?

I won't comment on American blacks vs. American whites, but certainly vs. other minorities the culture of American blacks does NOT put as much value on intellectual achievement. This only makes it less likely that kids will work hard in school, get white collar jobs, etc.
 
2005-09-29 09:33:33 PM
People of all races are poor--in fact poor whites outnumber poor blacks three to one

What?
http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/povrace.html

Can you back up what you say with something? Blacks have the highest percentage of people in poverty compared to other races.
 
cot
2005-09-29 09:35:07 PM
Kepora_Gebora: Blacks have the highest percentage of people in poverty compared to other races.

I think what he was getting at is that in terms of total NUMBERS not percentage, poor whites outnumber poor blacks.
 
2005-09-29 09:36:32 PM
firefly212: So if we were all made in God's image, and evolution is a lie, how come there are different races?

Two possible reasons. The Original Race, having gone forth and multiplied, then spread out to all corners of the globe, reacted to their environment for survival and were altered.

Darwin's theory and the Theory of Creation are one and the same, except the latter is a much simplified version given to a species that knew nothing about the universe, usually stayed within 20 miles of their birth place for their entire lives, figured the world to be flat and the average Joe wouldn't even begin to grasp concepts of cellular division let alone the complexities of same species environmental mutation.

I agree with the latter.

FLMountainMan
Really, what proof is there of racial equality? On the contrary, there are mountains of evidence against it. You people are worse than the "Intelligent Design" idiots.

I used to apply to a similar theory, especially having worked in an environment where I was in the minority. I found it hard to grasp that educated professionals could so quickly respond with ghetto attitudes and ideas.

Eventually, getting older and wiser, and, thanks to the global expansion of the Internet plus being an actual avid reader of National Geographic (and not just for the boobs either), toss in the relatively new thing of telling true history and observing various nations from their point of view, I realized something.

People are the product of their environment.

Christians had the Crusades. Islam tried to take over most of the known world. Columbus found a small group of native indians which he actually admired greatly, BUT, being a businessman and being raised in a pro-slave environment, he also calculated their worth as slaves. Spain produced an arrogant people who produced the Conquistadors who had little regard for any other race but theirs. England later went on to do the same.

New Zealand -- basically part of Australia, prefers not to be lumped in with those 'thugs', meaning the Australians, who sprang from criminal stock, who have a unique view of life.

Japan, during WW2, was not ruled that much by the Emperor, who had then become basically a figurehead to the military. They trained their troops to an ancient warriors creed, drilled it into them that failure was not an option and only inferiors didn't fight to the death. It was basically a patriarchal society.

I found it interesting to discover that English Black people didn't talk Ebonics or Blacklish like American ones did, the same with those in France and most other countries. Nor did they yell discrimination and do little things like burn their own neighborhoods down in protest.

Then I looked at Africa, basically a Black run continent and noted how when Blacks came into power, they promptly did like a whole bunch of other third world nations did: exploit the krap out of their people, enforce the current government with military force, toss Civil liberties right into the garbage, created massive populations of the impoverished to support the few ruling rich and lied through their teeth.

Then I looked at the Middle Eastern nations, governed by a strict religion that hasn't changed much in several thousand years and their efforts to enforce it while assimilating modern technology.

It dawned on me that everyone didn't think like us.

The Vietnamese, during the Vietnamese War, happily turned on each other, creating the Vietcong, who introduced a particularly savage form of warfare that killed both friend and foe.

Everyone is a product of their close environment, both physically and mentally. Once the huge distances between lands were conquered in hours instead of months or years, people moved around.

America is hideously litigious, so it's natural that Blacks would pull the race card. Women started pulling the sex card as soon as the first sexual abuse lawsuits were won. Now, child molestation is 'the thing' and quite a few women, during a divorce, pull that to get custody of the kids and kids pull it to get back at adults they don't like.

We don't have the 'Massa' slavery now, but we do have the 39 hour week at minimum wage, illegals working 60 hours a week for 5 bucks an hour under poor conditions under threat of being turned into immigration and many 'Day Labor' places that take a sizable chunk of the worker's pay as a fee while they go off to work under conditions that often violate labor laws. Citrus Grove owners here used to hire Mexican illegals to work in the nasty conditions of the groves and pay them by check. Since most didn't have checking accounts, the paymaster would be happy to cash their checks -- for about a 10 or 15 percent fee. I know a slumlord who happily rented out trailers to illegals at about $400 a month, which were bug infested, falling down and their resale value would be in scrap metal only.

Check out the conditions of the workers in India's booming ship breaking industry. Take a peek at the conditions of the workers in the great DeBeers diamond mines. Examine the insane leader of Korea and his effect on the people. Check out any nation which basically controls the information it's people gets.

People are basically created equal, but it's their environment that forms their personalities and beliefs.
 
2005-09-29 09:38:21 PM
I think what he was getting at is that in terms of total NUMBERS not percentage, poor whites outnumber poor blacks.

But that's not saying much when you look at the percentages. Far more White people are well off than Black people. And there is a class effect in scoring - being White doesn't automatically mean you'll do well on standardized tests - White people from rural areas are typically outperformed by White people from suburbs.
 
2005-09-29 09:40:31 PM
Atreyou:
"You want some of that money that he's got? Fire up a heavy equipment business of your own, and hire only qualified black people. I won't sue you, I promise, in fact, I'll give you $20 start up capital, and would consider serious investment capital (maybe $40) if you could avoid getting sued for "discrimination" in the first year of operation."

____

Hahahah, news flash, moron: intentionally limiting your hiring pool to one race IS discrimination.
 
2005-09-29 09:46:29 PM
gruntmints
1) 4th year education major
2) product of "poor" education and "affluent" area education, substantial time in both
3) In case you dont know, teacher education INVOLVES gaining in-class experience, with a requirement that you already have experience in order to even be accepted into the program (so a first year education major essentially doesnt exist at UMD)
4) Statistical averages are based on test scores, yes, but they discount all the aformentioned factors, which do include parent involvement (parent involvement is mostly parent encouragement in the child's education), and teacher certification. Believe it or not, experience goes hand in hand with training. You put a person through 4-5 years of school and include training with that, you're more likely to have a better educator than someone who just picks up and starts teaching with no background in classroom instruction and pedagogy. Also, you have to take into account desire; a person who WANTS to teach regardless of pay etc.etc.etc., is going to do a much better job than someone who has no desire to be in the classroom and is therefore only concerned with school 8-5. You get a teacher who cares about school in an 5-8 manner, you'll get someone who puts effort into their work and therefore sees fruit.
5) I'd ask you to go spend time in a poor area of schools yourself. I HAVE experience working with those kids and being of being one myself. Biggest factor, coming from real life experience? PARENT INVOLVEMENT.
6) Teaching students who are good academically is easy as pie? of course it is, they're good academically, so that statement is moot. Teaching students who are rich is easy as pie? Perhaps, but I assure you their parents are more likely to take part in their education. Anecdotal evidence, I come from the MD county with the highest population of black students (prince georges). Every school is below par, except 1: Eleanor Roosevelt. Why? It's the school where A) most of the white and asian students in the county attend and B) These same students have, yes, here it comes, parents who are more involved in their education. Seems like people don't realize the impact a little parent invovlement has on a child's education. And there are different levels: there's the parent that's at school every other day (intrusive), and the parent that simply forms a relationship with the teachers and makes sure the kid is doing the work. Either way, the student will excel.

So yes, I know the deal. I'm down with all that jazz. I even encourage classmates doing placements to go to the poor schools because I tell them it will be good experience for them.


Ok, you've got more experience and knowledge than I assumed from the earlier post I responded to, I apologize for being pejorative. I also am a teacher, (m. sc. in education, which basically means on avg that I have 3 more ed. classes than you b.ed people, also I have to have a full degree before entering the program). I also got experience from earlier work, didn't go straight through school to become a teacher, I almost think it ought to be a requirement (note I said almost), I would certainly suggest it to anyone thinking about entering teachers college.

I consider my hs education to have been decent, though most people considered the school system I came from to be rather poor. A lot depended on whether you were in the "good" classes or the "bad" classes. I fell in with the academic crowd, and for that reason as much as any, I did rather well and was in those higher-end academic classes. My teachers were mostly good (with notable exceptions), but when I look at the teachers the lower-end academic students had to deal with? What a bunch of moronic, uncaring, horrible teachers.

It's clear from your post that you're one of those people I talked about in my earlier post to cot that have the drive to succeed and get out of poverty and I applaud you for that, I think that we focus way too hard on intelligence as a virtue, when drive is so very much more important (spoken as someone who believes he has more intelligence than drive, but I suspect that's a common self-reflection whether it's accurate or not).

I absolutely 100% agree that parental involvement is the biggest factor in student success; there are a myriad of studies that support that as well. However, we have to be careful in saying that not to ignore the single-mother with 2 or 3 jobs. Exactly how involved can she be? Also, I find schools are very flip-floppy about parental involvement. They say they want it, and some really do, but a lot of them (and this changes from teacher to teacher and principal to principal) are really harsh to the parents, I think they want the parents to be involved, but only under circumstances the school controls exactly. These monster schools that we bus students across a city to are a problem as well, they don't encourage parental involvement, we need a movement back to smaller, more localized schools. Both parents and school officials need to work much harder to come together.

I have spent time in schools in poorer areas (in 2 countries).

/One suggestion: quote a person's name in front of your response to their post, it helps for finding those responses later on.
 
2005-09-29 09:53:42 PM
Waaaaaaaa, the man is keeping us down! Waaaaaaa

stfu already
 
2005-09-29 09:57:01 PM
Cot I'm glad somebody can read here. yeah--more NUMBERS. Thanks for clearing that up for that reading impaired poster.

Now--Blacks have the (by far) highest high school drop out rates, by far the highest incarceration rates, the highest disciplinary rates in public schools, and have bay far the highest unwed motherhood rates (close to 8 out of ten black children are abandoned by their fathers--a shockingly ugly trait tolerated by NO OTHER culture).

Is everybody starting to see the correlation between black behaviour and high rates of poverty? This isn't rocket science...
 
2005-09-29 09:59:20 PM
Tallgordon

"Thanks for not picking a fight.

What I think that 400 years of oppression has to do with passing a test today is two things."

(eloquent and thoughtful explantion of your position snipped for brevity)

I don't know what more we (as a country) can do. I believe affirmative action does a terrible disservice to those minority individuals who achieve success through study and hard work and can compete as equals intellectually. I don't think "black people are stupid" but continually lowering standards and choosing applicants based on their race IS racist. It breeds a culture of entitlement and leads to lawsuits such as this.

While I happen to disagree with you, I do appreciate your well thought reply.
 
2005-09-29 10:01:00 PM
Hey Kepora--why don't you post the studies you've observed linking lack of money to getting bad grades? I know this topic backwards and forwards, so be forewarned...
 
2005-09-29 10:01:03 PM

Cot I'm glad somebody can read here. yeah--more NUMBERS. Thanks for clearing that up for that reading impaired poster.


Reading impaired? Now there's no need to get testy. I was merely questioning what you were driving at by comparing the numbers of poor Black people and White people - you can't draw a direct comparison like that because there are just more White people in general. The only comparisons you can draw are with percents.
 
2005-09-29 10:08:02 PM
Huh? Sorry Kep but that's absurd. The whole theory that black academic failure being linked to poverty has been refuted so many times, in so many ways, that I am astonished anyone would even have the gall to bring it up.

Tell me--do you know what magnet schools were in the 80's? And why they were created? How about bussing?
 
2005-09-29 10:13:05 PM
I know this topic backwards and forwards, so be forewarned...

Oh cool, so do I. My masters thesis is on the topic (well, close, looking more at employment than academia, but it's still related). What's your background with it? I love discussing this with people who know a lot about it.

Anyway, here are some of my sources:

Biddle, B. J. (2001). Poverty, ethnicity, and achievement in American schools. In B. J. Biddle (Ed.), Social class, poverty, and education: Policy and practice (pp. 1-29). New York, NY: Routlege Falmer.

Bullock, H. E. (2004). Class diversity in the workplace. In M. S. Stockale and F.J. Crosby (Eds.), The psychology and management of workplace diversity (pp. 224-242). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Sameroff, A. (1996). Presidential Address: Democratic and Republican models of development: Paradigms or perspectives. Developmental Psychology Newsletter, 1-9.

Tyson, L. (2003, July 7). Needed: Affirmative action for the poor. Business Week, 3840, 24.


Since the education component is not the main focus of my thesis, I don't have as many sources for that as I do for employment. Hope you enjoy these.
 
2005-09-29 10:16:38 PM
Dances--400 years of oppression? LOL. Man, in the 40 years I've been alive we've inflated their test scores (200 points have routinely been magically added to their test scores for thirty years), built low-cost or no-cost tenements for them (read the histories of the "slum tenements" in cities like Detroit and you will learn that in the 50's and 60's most were beautiful and people were fighting to get into them), givebn them preferences for hiring, and a million other things. This is oppression? Actually, things have been done for blacks that have never been done for any other group. The money being thrown at black academic failure, in mind-boggling and nothing works. 10% of blacks do very well--but going back 100 years, that percentage has never changed much (Dubois called it the negroe "talented tenth")
but the rest do poorly.

This 400 years of oppression thing is played out and just another excuse. I think if people put societal pressure on, god forbid, blacks, they'd perform. The black people I've known aren't any dumber than the white people. It's all culture IMO...
 
2005-09-29 10:17:28 PM
darkion

I think this just shows that the LAST thing most of these people want is true equality.

True equality would scare the hell out of most of the people calling for it.



Well said.
 
2005-09-29 10:20:52 PM
MediaAreAllHacks

Thanks for the response! It's good to know that you're a teacher as well (I assumed from your response that you probably were, considering most farkers would have no clue what a placement was). I do agree, localized schooling should be emphasized. There's also the issue of overcrowding in schools, especially in my county, where many schools are so overcrowded they're using trailors, which i find to be shameful. The issue with parent involvement however; yes I agree, it can be generalized to the point where some people with special circumstances are left out, aka, the single mother (or father, it happens) with 2-3 jobs. In such cases as that, I believe teachers should be going above and beyond the call of duty. I can't see any purpose of going into education if you aren't willing to sacrafice for the sake of a child's future. The whole 5-8 instead of 8-5 deal. What's your view on the teacher putting more time into a student's work when the parent is simply unable?
 
2005-09-29 10:26:07 PM
Kep--I haven't read those yet, but do those books explain why poor whites and Asians outperform middle-class blacks and have been for 100 years?
 
2005-09-29 10:34:01 PM
kitabel
[Quoting me]"to ignore the great tradition of empire in Africa and some of their accomplishments"

Perhaps you would care to list them? I believe this text box contains enough space.
Please: before you begin, omit those of Hamitic (Egypt) or Semitic (Carthage) origin.
Short list?


Have fun reading, this was from the web as it's been 12 years and my memory was spotty and I couldn't find my book, but it was about 30 mins search. I'm assuming you were thinking this would be difficult from the tenor of your response? If not, I apologize, but if so: you might want to think about doing a couple seconds of research before you spout off, research makes you look less like an idiot.


Some of the following are my words, some are not. Sources listed at the bottom.

Ancient Mali
Urban Life developed in ancient Mali as early as the first century BC. The empires of Ghana, Mali, and Songhay formed in this area.

The empire of Ghana was the power from about the 4th century to the 11th century.
Mali rose in its ashes and ruled from the early 13th century to the late 15th century.

At its height, Mali was larger than all of any other kingdom of the time except Genghis Khans. Note, Europeans were straggling out of their mud huts during this era. Their most famous ruler, Mansa Musa went on a pilgrimage to Mecca (yes, they were part of the Islamic trade routes at this time as they had something to offer, unlike the Europeans who were only peripherally involved in the trade, and they converted to Islam at some point). He became famous for how much gold he spread. He completely saturated the Gold market in the Middle East.

Songhay rose in the waning days of Mali (it was being destroyed by internal fighting among the sons and grandsons of Mansa Musa. Songhay ruled a larger area than even Mali at its height had, and was brought down by the attack of a Moroccan army.

As far as accomplishments other than being an empire:
The city Timbuktu, now known mostly as a really remote place, was renowned for educating scholars who impacted the entire Islamic world, and they had a very large library there, preserving many works that would otherwise have been lost to us. And really, what more can be accomplished than making an empire, and establishing learning of all types? Architectural stuff maybe, I think there is a decent amount left there. This isnt an in-depth look, feel free to actually research before you make future asinine comments.

On to the Swahili:
Situated on the Eastern Coast of Africa, the Swahili peoples were active in trade from bce until Portuguese and other Europeans forcibly displaced them in the 1600s. Their architecture is renowned, and was remarked upon by Europeans when they arrived. They were more city-states in the mold of ancient Greece than an actual empire as such.

The Zulu
You know about them? actually it was the Nguli empire, but we all know them better as the Zulu, big empire, formed at a bad time, destroyed by Europeans (early 18th century).

South-Central Africa
By the 1400s small empires thrived in south-central Africa. One was centered at Luba. Another was centered at Lunda - where, it appears, people learned metal working from Luba. A third empire was centered in the kingdom of the Kongo, which dominated areas such as Loango, Kakong, Ngoi and Kisama.

Aksum -> Ethiopia
In the sixth century, the kingdom of Aksum was doing what many elsewhere had been doing: pursuing trade and empire.
Aksum's port city on the Red Sea, Adulis, bustled with activity. Its agriculture and cattle breeding flourished, and Aksum extended its rule to Nubia, across the Red Sea to Yemen, and it had extended its rule to the northern Ethiopian Highlands and along the coast to Cape Guardafui.
They were destroyed by the Muslims (economic destruction as they were cut off from trade) by the end of the 8th century.

Around the year 1270, at Amhara, in the northern highlands of Ethiopia, a new Christian dynasty, the Solomonids, was founded by Yikunno-Amlak, a conqueror who was described as a king of kings. His dynasty was believed to be a continuation of the Christian kingdom that had been in Aksum centuries before. Yikunno-Amlak was to be described as descended from Solomon's son, Manelik and the Queen of Sheba. His Christian subjects believed that they were God's chosen people, that they were maintaining purity in Christian belief, and that they were members of a second Israel.

After 1478 the Solomonids were weakened by a conflict over succession - their attempt to solve the problem of succession apparently having failed. War between two Solomonid princes continued for several years. Muslims took advantage of Solomonid weakness, declared a holy war, and the Solomonid Empire collapsed. But a Solomonid king remained, a local king rather than a king of kings, the Solomonids would rise again, the last of them to be Haile Selassie in the 20th century.

Zimbabwe
During the 1300s and into the 1400s Zimbabwe was the richest state on Africa's eastern coast, but it was also declining: Zimbabwe was losing its timber. Its lands were overgrazed and farmlands were eroding. Zimbabwe declined as a power, and it was abandoned around 1450. Successor states arose: Torwa to its west, Changamire just to its north, and Mutapa on the Zambezi River. Mutapa's economy was also based on cattle and wealth from the gold trade, and Mutapa expanded locally by military conquest.
Toward the end of the 1400s, Kilwa's preeminence on the east coast was fading as dynastic struggles sapped its strength. Kilwa was losing the trade in gold from Sofala to Mutaba. And Mutaba's gold trading attracted the Portuguese, who had begun sailing along Africa's eastern coast. Trade between Africans and the Europeans was on the rise, in slaves as well as gold.


Sources:
http://www.fsmitha.com
http://www.vmfa.state.va.us/mali_geo_hist.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/africa/features/storyofafrica/index.shtml
 
2005-09-29 10:36:04 PM
See, that's the interesting thing - they don't always. Students from low-SES backgrounds who meet the minimal qualifications for college enroll at about half the rate from students from middle- or high-SES backgrounds with equal qualifications - regardless of race. Adolescents from the poorest 20% of families are six times more likely to drop out of school than adolescents from the richest 20% of families - again, regardless of race. I do recommend the Biddle text if you haven't already read it. It does go into where funding for public schools comes from, and how the funding can vary between about $3000 per student in poor areas to $15,000 per student in wealthy areas - the funding is used for teacher salaries, classroom supplies, etc. Now, I don't think that just throwing money at the problem is going to fix it, but there is an issue of funding (or lack thereof) in public schools.


What is your background on this topic? Sheer interest?
 
2005-09-29 10:38:09 PM
Kep--do those books also explain how the abandonment rate of black children by their fathers was 4 in ten in 1950, but today it's nearly 8 in ten? Incarceration rates mimic this exact same trend which is wierd, since you'd think that the closer you got to the bad old days of segregation (you know, when blacks couldn't be around us fabulous white people which is of course the only answer to black problems)black misbehaviour rates would have been higher.
 
2005-09-29 10:40:02 PM
I showed you my sources, now you show me yours. Why are you dodging my question about your background with this?
 
2005-09-29 10:41:49 PM
turtle553:

I think for a suit to be brought for discrimination, they must hire/promote less than 80% of the candidates in a protected class than for white people.

So if 100 white people apply and the company hires 20 and 100 minorities apply, they must hire at least 16 or it is grounds for a lawsuit.

Once a lawsuit is filed, it is up to the company to prove there was no discrimination, they now have the burden of proof.

/Read this yesterday for an HR class
//More like skimmed over it


So even if only 10 people passed a basic test that all applicants must take and pass then the company is still guilty of discrimination? That is a crock of shiat.

On the plus side, if they hire 16 monorities they gots to hire 20 of us honkey's.
 
2005-09-29 10:42:20 PM
gruntmints
What's your view on the teacher putting more time into a student's work when the parent is simply unable?

I agree that teachers in general should put more work into a student when they have special needs, and that includes when the parent is unable. Many teachers (and others agree with them) say that it's unfair to the others, everyone deserves equal attention. While I'm not terribly comfortable with the following analogy (but I've never been sure why) I think there is some merit to it as a response: if a student is choking to death, do you say, "oops, I can't help them because that would be giving special attention"? It's obviously an extreme, but as I said, I think there is some merit in it. I especially think developing a relationship (not of the Letourneau (sp?) type for you sick minds) where you can emphasize education is helpful and is something students with parental involvement don't need nearly as much.
 
2005-09-29 10:45:06 PM
So if 100 white people apply and the company hires 20 and 100 minorities apply, they must hire at least 16 or it is grounds for a lawsuit.

That's not exactly right. It's percentage of qualified applicants from the target area they were recruiting in. So if you have 100 white applicants, 100 minority applicants, and have to hire 36 of them and only one minority meets your qualifications, then it's fine to hire just that one. But the company needs to be prepared to show documentation for its hiring practices in the event a discrimination lawsuit is brought against them. Writing that documentation is a standard procedure and there's no reason not to do it - I've done it for every consulting job I've done.
 
2005-09-29 10:46:13 PM
Kep Kep Kep. Wait right there. That was pretty good--that answer was very artful. I wish I was at my home in Austin because I have all the charts of money per student spent in public schools, and there is very little difference between "wealthy areas" and "poor areas." Unless of course you get into private vs public schools, where that is certainly the case. Regardless--this still doesn't do a thing to address racial differences in test scores, does it?

Are you familiar with magnet schools? And why they were created in the 80's?

what's my background? well I grew up as a flaming liberal who blamed white people for black failure, and then when I got older and started researching the whole issue, I was shocked at how totally wrong I was.
 
2005-09-29 10:49:54 PM
Kepora_Gebora:

That's not exactly right. It's percentage of qualified applicants from the target area they were recruiting in. So if you have 100 white applicants, 100 minority applicants, and have to hire 36 of them and only one minority meets your qualifications, then it's fine to hire just that one. But the company needs to be prepared to show documentation for its hiring practices in the event a discrimination lawsuit is brought against them. Writing that documentation is a standard procedure and there's no reason not to do it - I've done it for every consulting job I've done.

Then you obviously missed the quote from the guy who had just taken his HR course. I understand how you have your thesis to try and back you up but that doesnt really help you in the real world. When a black person can keep a job while producing nothing then biatch when they dont get a raise. Life isnt fair, produce or you lose.
 
2005-09-29 10:52:23 PM
BobC:

what's my background? well I grew up as a flaming liberal who blamed white people for black failure, and then when I got older and started researching the whole issue, I was shocked at how totally wrong I was.

You LIE!!!! Everything is whitey's fault!!!!

Nevermind all the black people I know that have built their own buisinesses with their own sweat. Its all about the effort.
 
2005-09-29 10:55:55 PM
I wish I was at my home in Austin because I have all the charts of money per student spent in public schools, and there is very little difference between "wealthy areas" and "poor areas."

I would actually love to see that. Do you have an electronic copy you could send to me? I am dead serious about this. And I really would like to see some of your sources in creating that if it's not too much trouble. You seem to have resources that I do not and I'd very much like to read them.

I have a basic understanding of magnet schools, created in the hope of de-segregating schools. I'm not really sure what you're getting at here. I'm also not sure why you feel the need to be so antagonistic about this. I'm here to discuss topics with people. You seem more interested in picking a fight. I'm not interested in fighting with you.

well I grew up as a flaming liberal who blamed white people for black failure

I was going to say, I disagree with that. I'm White and I'm not apologetic about it, considering I had as much to say in that as anyone else did being born the color they were.
However, I do think there are issues with poverty in the US, which is a very complicated issue that has some connections with race but is certainly not limited to any particular race. I don't think that poverty is always externally attributed, but there are times when it is. When there are differing college applications and dropout rates among equally qualified poor and wealthy people, it indicates that something is going on there.
 
2005-09-29 11:00:12 PM
BobC
what's my background? well I grew up as a flaming liberal who blamed white people for black failure, and then when I got older and started researching the whole issue, I was shocked at how totally wrong I was.

I've seen this exact scenario with one of my parents. I have the same discussion with her, I expect it will work with you about as well as with her (which is to say, make your think for a minute, but not change much ;).

There are two aspects to this I think (major ones, a whole bunch of others). First, "blaming" white people is a bad way to think of it, because as many people have said "I haven't done anything, why should I be blamed?" To think that as a society some members have "succeeded" at the expense of other members? I think this is obvious, it's the extent to which it affects people that is more in question, and how much responsibility those with more luck have for those who have had less.

Personally, I'm not at all in favour of special practices for different races, I'm in favour of different special practices for poor people, especially in regards to education. See the discussion gruntmints and I are having on the importance of parental involvement, equal dollars may not be enough when you have a culture that doesn't value education.

I'm not all that certain I'm worried about the current generation of people, there is a certain level of personal responsibility. I am, however, concerned about changing the cultural dynamic so that future generations do not fall into the same trap as the current ones.

The second aspect is that "flaming liberals" like you were, and I am, have a habit of ignoring something that we all actually know. People who are given something do not appreciate it. I can't tell you how many times growing up adults "sold" something to me, for a ridiculously low price, mostly so I would appreciate their gift. Just giving things to people does not lead to them having the social and exonomic skills to lift themselves out of poverty. It leads to low self-worth, and doesn't teach them anything. As liberals, we have been far too dogmatic in our approach and seem unwilling to look at the failures in what we are doing.

Sometimes the conservatives are right in their approach, just usually for the wrong reasons ;)
 
2005-09-29 11:00:34 PM
Kep--I love how artfully you word things, but I am going after you. Let's take this post from you:

So if 100 white people apply and the company hires 20 and 100 minorities apply, they must hire at least 16 or it is grounds for a lawsuit.

That's not exactly right. It's percentage of qualified applicants from the target area they were recruiting in. So if you have 100 white applicants, 100 minority applicants, and have to hire 36 of them and only one minority meets your qualifications, then it's fine to hire just that one. But the company needs to be prepared to show documentation for its hiring practices in the event a discrimination lawsuit is brought against them. Writing that documentation is a standard procedure and there's no reason not to do it - I've done it for every consulting job I've done.

Okay--Define "qualified applicants from the target area?" They FAILED THE TEST SO THEY AREN'T "QUALIFIED." Isn't that the whole point of this original article?

And I love this about how an employer has to spend money and time proving their test isn't racially biased. In other words, these companies are guilty until proven innocent.

Nice try. I noticed you haven't brought up the 600 lb gorilla in the middle of the living room. Tell the Farkers about the legal concept of "Disparate Impact" which lies at the base of ALL these lawsuits...
 
RCL
2005-09-29 11:04:26 PM
andrew0182

"DROxINxTHExWIND: No it's not!! ... Just come out of the closet and stop being a punk about it."


Is there anyone that you don't think is racist in this thread besides yourself?




Winnar of teh thread.

Having black skin does not mean you deserve a head start. Having white skin does not mean you're better. What part of "the content of their character" do people not understand???
 
2005-09-29 11:05:14 PM
Then you obviously missed the quote from the guy who had just taken his HR course

Well there's a few things about that. Having adverse impact against a minority group isn't necessarily grounds for a problem. An organization is under no obligation to hire people who aren't qualified, period. Now, if an employment test for selection passes one group of people at a higher rate than another, so much so that fewer than 80% of the minority group passes at the rate of the majority group, the org will need to demonstrate the validity of the test. That's what's going to happen with FedEx. If they show that the test is related to the job analysis, they'll probably be given the option of creating an equally valid test that doesn't have the adverse impact. If they are unable to do so (such as due to a lack of resources, or if creating another test would be less valid), they can keep the test they're using.

Of course, there are people who will hold that against FedEx, even if this test is perfectly valid and there is no reason on FedEx's part why minorities aren't passing at the same rates as White people. Those people would probably boycott FedEx, protest, etc. If that has no impact on FedEx's business, they'll be likely to keep things as they are. If it has a significant impact on FedEx's image and business, they may switch to another selection procedure.
 
2005-09-29 11:11:16 PM
Okay--Define "qualified applicants from the target area?" They FAILED THE TEST SO THEY AREN'T "QUALIFIED." Isn't that the whole point of this original article?

The point of this original article is that the test is passing minorites at a substantially lower rate than White people. If this is because the minorities truly are not qualified, fine. If it is because there's something wrong with the test, then it comes out in court.

And I love this about how an employer has to spend money and time proving their test isn't racially biased. In other words, these companies are guilty until proven innocent.

As I said, standard procedure in compensation plans, performance appraisals, selection practices, etc. All start with a job analysis, all are thoroughly documented to show job-relatedness. FedEx should already have this information.

Nice try. I noticed you haven't brought up the 600 lb gorilla in the middle of the living room. Tell the Farkers about the legal concept of "Disparate Impact" which lies at the base of ALL these lawsuits...


Sure - http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G702.htm

Look at #3, and the subheadings of 2 and 3 under it. I basically covered that in my last post before this one.

And I still mean what I said about seeing your chart. Is it something you are able to send to me?
 
2005-09-29 11:14:32 PM
Can we go back to talking about Asian females being shiatty drivers? Please?
 
2005-09-29 11:18:00 PM
I can tell you one place where a lot of this information is compiled--check out a book called "The End of Racism" by Dinesh D'Souza. It's fascinating.

The legal concept of "Disparate Impact" came about (I believe) in the late 70's after achievement tests in public schools were reevaluated by black psychiatrists and behaviouralists, in hopes of getting all the "racial bias" out--and black test score didn't change a bit. Soooo then race pimps like Jesse Jackson and his cronies started arguing the concept of "disparate Impact"--which means any test where blacks do worse than whites is, by definition, racist. This is the dirty little secret in American Politics and Academia. This Disparate Impact theory is at the base of ALL these class action suits.

Companies, as Hep sso rightfully points out, have to fend off lawsuit after lawsuit, costing them money hand over fist, to prove they are not racist. They are guilty until proven innocent.

Contrary to what Hep is telling you, black organizations can and do go in and count little black heads in corporations and if they don't see the numbers, they sue. Read the book "Shakedown" on Jess Jackson if you want to know what's really going on out there. Orginizations like the NAACP have been making a killing on these lawsuits because they know they can get away with it
 
2005-09-29 11:20:29 PM
Kepora_Gebora:

Well there's a few things about that. Having adverse impact against a minority group isn't necessarily grounds for a problem. An organization is under no obligation to hire people who aren't qualified, period.


Thats where you are wrong, once a company gets to a certain threshold of peoplel working for them, they have to make sure that an appropriate number of those people are monorities. If you dont you will not be eligible for certain gov'ment contracts, especially here in the ATL. Its a crock these last 25 years where you used to hire the most qualified, now you have to look at who you havent hired then pick the most qualified of those(blacks mainly, you dont hear asians, mexicans, irish biatching). If I was a black man I would be offended but my name would Quantavious so it would all be ok.
 
2005-09-29 11:21:14 PM
Snowburnt could be accidentally stupid.
 
2005-09-29 11:29:41 PM
I really don't get this. Are they saying FedEX should make the test easier?
 
2005-09-29 11:32:02 PM
I can tell you one place where a lot of this information is compiled--check out a book called "The End of Racism" by Dinesh D'Souza. It's fascinating.

Thanks, I'll look into that.

And to steamingpile

That's a quota. Quotas are illegal. They have to have an AA program, yes, but that doesn't mean that a certain number of token minorities will be hired to fill a quota.
 
2005-09-29 11:33:33 PM
Kep--a company is "under no obligation to hire people who aren't qualified?" LOL LOL LOL!!!!!!!

COME ON. Corporations have been successfully SUED even when they showed that not enough blacks EVEN APPLIED IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

This is how the whole "minority outreach" crap got started. Corporations are now expected to GO LOOKING FOR THEM if they don't apply!!

kep I can tell you have read one side of this argument, ignored the other side, so I am done here until you read "The End of Racism" by Dinesh D'sousa. I am tired and cannot continue to refute outright foolishness like this.
 
2005-09-29 11:39:35 PM
And I can tell you started this looking for a fight. So perhaps it is best that you say you're done. I don't mind discussing controversial issues with people, but I don't see the point in entering the discussion already angry. As I've said, I have no interest in fighting with you, and I would still like to see your chart. Given that, I'm not really sure why you accuse me of ignoring the other side of the argument. I don't feel it necessary to resort to any kind of personal attack here. Then again, I suppose this is Fark, so I should've kept that in mind ;-)
 
2005-09-29 11:49:12 PM
Kepora_Gebora
Could you give a citation for the "no quotas" law(s)?

Thanks
 
2005-09-29 11:55:18 PM
I'm not angry, I'm frustrated, to hear the same old misinformation over and over and over and over.How can you, with a straight face, tell me no one is "under obligation to hire people who aren't qualified" when the whole original premise of this thread was the fact that blacks and hispanics are failing a test more often than whites, so Fed Ex is spending millions to fight off a class action lawsuit?!!! If that was YOUR BUSINESS and you had to pay stables of lawyers millions of dollars to PROVE you're NOT GUILTY of racism, would you be so dismissive?

This is part of the reason that corporations are heading out of the US in DROVES. They can't fend off these suits anymore--nor should they have to. It's money down the drain all to prove how not guilty they are in the land where you're innocent until proven guity!!

Does your college textbook talk about that?
 
2005-09-29 11:58:01 PM
There's no reason that the name should be a handicap, nor should it reflect a particular mental state of the parents. The fact that you think it does is a big farking clue that you are racist.

You'd almost have a point, except:

A) Names like Leroy and Jamal are not African names, they are American black names.

B) Black Americans aren't African. They are American. They were born here.

In a perfect world, names shouldn't be a handicap, but this isn't a perfect world. So refusing to name your kid something you know will make them more successfull is your choice, but the consequences of that choice are yours, and your kids. By all means, don't name your kid Jason, name him Jaysen, or maybe Jacen. Then shake your fist at the night sky when the calls don't come for jobs and lament that we don't live in a perfect world, which, by the way, we never will....

/and bravo for the specious logic used to determine I'm a racist, it's always so unassailable...
 
2005-09-30 12:20:09 AM
I liked how Kep told me she was white. As if I didn't know from the get-go.
 
2005-09-30 12:25:34 AM
By all means, don't name your kid Jason, name him Jaysen, or maybe Jacen. Then shake your fist at the night sky when the calls don't come for jobs and lament that we don't live in a perfect world, which, by the way, we never will....

mrsirjojo -- great point (and imagery)
 
2005-09-30 01:58:41 AM
"...black and Hispanics fail at a much higher rate..."

i think this one deserves the obvious tag
 
2005-09-30 02:14:01 AM
mrsirjojo

Poster you replied to said:

There's no reason that the name should be a handicap

And you said that it is a handicap. You're observing that discrimination exists and you're suggesting that blacks change what they do to minimize the negative effects of discrimination. They're saying that it's a problem that people discriminate based on names associated with certain races. You seem to think that the problem is with the parents, not with the people who are discriminating against people with racially-tied names.

Questions for you:

1) Should people discriminate based on an individual's name?
2) If American black culture has decided to give blacks distinctive names, what is the problem with this?
3) Should the people discriminating based on name be forced to stop discriminating, or should the blacks be forced to name their kids with "white" names or risk handicapping their children?

By arguing for assimilation of blacks into "white" culture, even in the realm of naming alone, you are making an argument that can be fairly construed as racist, even if you don't recognize it as such.
 
2005-09-30 02:56:55 AM
jayday: Syntax is the least of your worrys.

Your biggest problem is you doesnt right good.


Doesn't write good English, or good code? I thought both forms of writing were ok this time of day.

/did I miss the joke?
 
2005-09-30 04:20:47 AM
peachykeen: You know the people suing aren't Asian. Then again, I doubt many Asians work for FedEx as drivers and handlers.


Actually, twin women managers work at the hub in Nashville. They look Asian. I'm not sure what the hell they are, but they're pretty hot. Oh wait, the suit claims racism not sexism.
 
2005-09-30 08:00:31 AM
Back in 1992 when I took some test to get into a community college -- I aced the test. Well, about a month later -- already well into my classes, I'm notified (as well as about five other people that took the test the same day as I did) that I took the test for "African Americans" and that I needed to retake the test for "Whites".

I farking hate this country, and only have three days left in it...

If that wasn't racist, I don't know what is... I know it has made ME somewhat of a racist. Just that single incident alone.

The old mayor of Atlanta (Bill Campbell) said a few times publically, "If anybody knows any better solution to affirmitive action, I'd like to hear it."

Okay Billy, I'll bite... It's called the U.S. Constitution. Everybody is treated equally.
 
2005-09-30 09:06:37 AM
Fark Fed Ex, they're NON Union and I only use Brown. Fed Ex stinks and I don't like them -Norton
PS- I miss Norton.
 
2005-09-30 09:38:47 AM
BobC

"Dances--400 years of oppression? LOL."

BobC - that actually that was tallgordon not me. I happen to agree with you.

\ I really like threaded usenet textreaders over this web based stuff. Let's go!!! Who's with me?!!! YEAH!!!!! u,h guys?
 
2005-09-30 10:23:12 AM
RaveX: mrsirjojo

Poster you replied to said:

There's no reason that the name should be a handicap

And you said that it is a handicap. You're observing that discrimination exists and you're suggesting that blacks change what they do to minimize the negative effects of discrimination. They're saying that it's a problem that people discriminate based on names associated with certain races. You seem to think that the problem is with the parents, not with the people who are discriminating against people with racially-tied names.

Questions for you:

1) Should people discriminate based on an individual's name?
2) If American black culture has decided to give blacks distinctive names, what is the problem with this?
3) Should the people discriminating based on name be forced to stop discriminating, or should the blacks be forced to name their kids with "white" names or risk handicapping their children?

By arguing for assimilation of blacks into "white" culture, even in the realm of naming alone, you are making an argument that can be fairly construed as racist, even if you don't recognize it as such.


All good points.

Heres one for you...

Wouldn't you say that affirmative action is a "temporary" measure used to assimilate blacks into a white dominated world? Why should blacks get it both ways then? If you want to use racism to temporarily even the playing field, and integrate into the white dominated world, then meet the system halfway and drop the unique names.

So if you want those who are discriminting to ignore the name on an application, say for a job at Fed-Ex, why do you want them to ignore the race of the test taker?
 
2005-09-30 10:50:04 AM
GEEZ!

Did anyone read my last post? It pretty well answers a lot of your arguements.


BTW: In the 50s it was oppression. In the 60s it was Civil Rights and Equality. In the 70s it was blending in. By the 80s it was 'equal but separate,' 'Roots,' 'Back to Africa' and spawning a thousand African and quasi-African names. (LaTisha and Schawanna are NOT African names.) Then the Nation of Islam was created -- a Black based version of the religion that even Muslims deny, pretty much hostile against nearly everything. By the 90s rap appeared, ghetto-style clothing became a fad (funny -- it glorifies hand-me-downs of poverty) and Black promptly shot themselves in the foot by rapping about 'biatches and Ho's and the glory of dealing drugs and shooting rivals'.

Around the middle of the 90s it became uncool for a White comic to make fun of Blacks but Black comics could tear up Whites. By 2000, some Black comics were chastising Blacks for 'acting Black.' Affirmative action was stopped -- to which Blacks raised a fuss.

NOW Blacks exploit Blacks (which has gone on for a few decades anyhow) by creating TV shows like Court TV where they seem to deliberately locate the nastiest Black people they can find to place in front of a Black judge and act all ghetto or Black TV shows showing sophisticated Blacks still pretty much affecting ghetto language and mannerisms. Somewhere along the way it became acceptable for a Black guy to have 5 or 6 kids by 3 or 4 women and the women by 3 or 4 men and NOT go after them for child support.

So, even with all that has been handed to them, including an enormous amount of educational scholarships, discrimination laws and allowing reverse discrimination, their environment still creates a problem. Clustered in tight communities, they're bombarded by anti-White propaganda, constantly fed krap about segregation in the past, leaders forever bring up slavery (careful to not mention that (a) Blacks happily sold Blacks to the slavers and (b) nearly every other race on the globe was enslaved at one time or the other.) Doing jail time has become a mark of manhood and bullet or knife scars are even better. Toss in the 'Back to Africa' mystique where shops sell African clothing and stuff and pretty well distort how native Africans lived pre-European invasion and you have a mess.

The environment promotes gangs, drugs, theft, settling disputes with weapons, being suspicious of most pale skinned races and encouraging welfare families.

Like the Black TV Judge Mathis observed with a Black defendant one day. He was going to college on a Black scholarship, but was spending money on $200 shoes, was wearing tons of gold jewelry and being 'ghetto fabulous' -- which meant that instead of sucking down the limited money for the education, he could have paid some himself. However, the environment encouraged such things.

You should go to Black Voices on AOL and read some of the posts there. it'll give you and idea on the pressures from each other that the Blacks face.
 
2005-09-30 12:59:37 PM
pstudent12

Hey! Thanks for calling me a retard. It just makes me want to try all that much harder to carry on an intelligent conversation with you.

/i am rubber, you are glue. your words bounce off me and fly up your ass, where they explode.
 
2005-09-30 02:21:14 PM
equal opportunity my arse.

most of the legislation concerning equal opportunity employment is designed to make it explicitly harder for white males (who didn't fight in vietnam... cause no one messes with our heros or john rambo) to advance.

it's not equality... it's racism and sexism combined.

most of the folks who push this sort of agenda are just out to "damn the man". in short... they are bigots.

HEE HEE TRollin TRollin TRollin like a river.
 
2005-09-30 09:42:23 PM
2005-09-30 02:21:14 PM openfry [TotalFark]

it's not equality... it's racism and sexism combined.


That is just utter nonsense at its finest. It is NOT racism when the goal of something is to lift up and give opportunities to past wrongs commited against a race. Bitter that now more minorities get opporunities than whites? Well the irony in that is only fitting
 
2005-09-30 09:53:36 PM
2005-09-30 10:50:04 AM Rik01

NOW Blacks exploit Blacks (which has gone on for a few decades anyhow) by creating TV shows like Court TV where they seem to deliberately locate the nastiest Black people they can find to place in front of a Black judge and act all ghetto or Black TV shows showing sophisticated Blacks still pretty much affecting ghetto language and mannerisms. Somewhere along the way it became acceptable for a Black guy to have 5 or 6 kids by 3 or 4 women and the women by 3 or 4 men and NOT go after them for child support.


Wow the bitterness and racism in your entire rant is disgusting.

Yes blacks conspire against themselves by going on court TV, where "they" have created said shows. Don't mind Jerry Springer though, it portrays a great example of whites. By the way, stop allowing the TV to make your decisions

So, even with all that has been handed to them, including an enormous amount of educational scholarships, discrimination laws and allowing reverse discrimination, their environment still creates a problem.

So you are going to sit here and deny the racism that still goes on against blacks? Deny the massive underfunding of poor communities when it comes to schools, libraries, etc?

(a) Blacks happily sold Blacks to the slavers and

This is the type of incorrect history that allows such racism to continue. Blacks did not "happily" sell blacks into slavery. They were FORCED TO by the invading European wealthy nations who said "hand them over or else..."

(b) nearly every other race on the globe was enslaved at one time or the other

When were the whites enslaved in massive numbers?

Doing jail time has become a mark of manhood and bullet or knife scars are even better. Toss in the 'Back to Africa' mystique where shops sell African clothing and stuff and pretty well distort how native Africans lived pre-European invasion and you have a mess.

I hope you go re-read history. Africa was full of thriving societies, the Egyptians, Ethiopians, et al were so far advanced in many respects than the European nations obsessed with dominance, violence, money. They and the later European colonists destroyed what was left of these civilizations enslaved by greedy white people from the day they set foot on the continent.

The environment promotes gangs, drugs, theft, settling disputes with weapons, being suspicious of most pale skinned races and encouraging welfare families.

Umm, no. The system promotes gangs, drugs, theft, violence, because it does a laughable job of giving them the same opportunities whites were given previously by the government to get out of poverty.

Welfare families is a great myth fed to you by Ronald Reagan

Like the Black TV Judge Mathis observed with a Black defendant one day. He was going to college on a Black scholarship, but was spending money on $200 shoes, was wearing tons of gold jewelry and being 'ghetto fabulous' -- which meant that instead of sucking down the limited money for the education, he could have paid some himself. However, the environment encouraged such things.

You should go to Black Voices on AOL and read some of the posts there. it'll give you and idea on the pressures from each other that the Blacks face.


Wow, you pick examples from your TV and internet surfing habits to justify your racist views of an entire group of people. You know, I was watching Jerry Springer (even though I don't watch TV and would rather read a book to educate myself, try it sometime) and I noticed how the girls on there were such trailer trash. Since that portrays an accurate view of the entire white race, I think its safe to say all whites are trailer trash /sarcasm

Please go away
 
2005-09-30 10:02:55 PM
Big Al: That is just utter nonsense at its finest. It is NOT racism when the goal of something is to lift up and give opportunities to past wrongs commited against a race. Bitter that now more minorities get opporunities than whites? Well the irony in that is only fitting


This is the biggest example of White Man's Guilt I've seen. Why should in this day and age minorities get more oppurtunities then those evil whites? Because of wrongs commited generations ago? When is it enough and we can actually start treating people as equals?
 
2005-09-30 11:40:54 PM
blindpreacher
This is the biggest example of White Man's Guilt I've seen. Why should in this day and age minorities get more oppurtunities then those evil whites? Because of wrongs commited generations ago? When is it enough and we can actually start treating people as equals?

What makes you think they were generations ago rather than ongoing? As I've said previously, I'm not for supporting specific races, I think there have been enough injustices to go around and we should help poor people in general.
 
Displayed 601 of 601 comments



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report