Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(   Kentucky based adult store Victor's Little Secret to take on Victoria's Secret in Supreme Court lingerie smackdown   ( divider line
    More: Cool  
•       •       •

4394 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Apr 2002 at 1:51 PM (15 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

31 Comments     (+0 »)
2002-04-16 08:52:56 AM  
"At issue is whether a company with a famous trademark has to prove actual damages under a law designed to stop copycat business ventures."

Corporate buttwipes. What kind of 'damage' is a tiny shop in Kentucky going to do to something as big as Victoria Secret?
2002-04-16 08:56:34 AM  

Go, Victor, go.
2002-04-16 10:40:40 AM  
For some reason, I don't think I want to know what Victor's "little secret" is.
2002-04-16 10:41:01 AM  
By the way, great headline.
2002-04-16 01:53:29 PM  
May the best sheer lace bra win !
2002-04-16 01:54:51 PM  
They contend they chose the name because Victor wanted to keep his new store a secret from a previous employer.

2002-04-16 01:55:43 PM  
Ooooo! Cat fight! Cat fight!
2002-04-16 01:56:38 PM  
Victor's little secret-2 inch cock.
2002-04-16 01:56:39 PM  
"Victor and Cathy Moseley opened their store in a strip mall in Elizabethtown, Ky., in 1998 with the name "Victor's Secret." They contend they chose the name because Victor wanted to keep his new store a secret from a previous employer."

I call Bullshiat. They did it because it was a funny play on words similar to "Victoria's Secret". I hope they both lose because they are rejects.
2002-04-16 01:57:18 PM  
I want to be on that jury. Imagine all the evidence you'd have to inspect.
2002-04-16 01:57:39 PM  
Fight the power, Homer, er, Victor!

[image from too old to be available]
2002-04-16 01:57:45 PM  
Any one have a picture of their spokes-model?
2002-04-16 02:00:15 PM  
How about this one?

Phil's Diller for Victor's Secret...
[image from too old to be available]
2002-04-16 02:01:21 PM  
" lingerie store..."

That's some family!
2002-04-16 02:01:21 PM  
This isn't the first time this issue has been tested in court. Any wonder that THIS time the supreme court makes a note of it?

"erm.. I need to retire to my chambers to inspect the catalog.. I mean evidence! evidence!"
2002-04-16 02:03:00 PM  
Pix of Clarence Thomas in a thong, anyone?
2002-04-16 02:05:17 PM  
I'm thinking Victoria's Secret catalogues may actually put a dent in Victor's business. Who needs whips when you have that catalogue glued to your hands with lotion?
2002-04-16 02:06:18 PM  
Kentucky orders $30 in victories secret lingerie? I am moving to Kentucky tomorrow.
2002-04-16 02:07:42 PM  
Victor Victoria!
2002-04-16 02:09:40 PM  
My eyes, the goggles do nothing
2002-04-16 02:09:41 PM  
Obviously, the only course of action is to make each store offer a full catalog of the Victoria Secret models in hardcore, provocative poses without any lingerie. Only then will justive be served.
2002-04-16 02:10:47 PM  
My bad Christian Bale. Didn't see yours.
2002-04-16 02:10:54 PM  
If Victor loses, he should take his business underground. And name it Victory. "Victory - a secret lingerie shop." That'll work.
2002-04-16 02:11:49 PM  
I would like to apologize for posting that heinous picture. Mods, feel free to remove.
2002-04-16 02:17:30 PM  
We Need PICTURES!!!!!!!
2002-04-16 02:23:07 PM  
# 2 in GIS for "victor's secret"

[image from too old to be available]
2002-04-16 02:25:58 PM  
Great to know that this was news YESTERDAY when I submitted it.....
2002-04-16 02:43:35 PM  

Yeah, I submitted it too. I think submission credit goes to TOTALFARK subscribers or something.

2002-04-16 03:00:28 PM  
Ok, you two. Here's what Fark had to work with as far as submissions for this one. Decide for yourselves why this one got the link.

Interesting-----Victor's Little Secret v. Victoria's Secret. - The Supreme Court Battle
Obvious-----Victoria's Secret suing Kentucky's own Victor's Little Secret
Cool-----Kentucky based adult store Victor's Little Secret to take on Victoria's Secret in Supreme Court lingerie smackdown
Ironic-----Family-owned lingerie store in central Kentucky goes to court with Victoria's Secret
Interesting-----High Court to hear Victoria's Secret trademark case. Judge demands that the models show up for a testimony and to show him some of that phat ass.
Boobies-----Supreme Court to decide whether Victoria's Secret owns trademark on boobies
2002-04-16 03:39:13 PM  
Did someone say Victor Victoria?
Why yes, yes someone did...

[image from too old to be available]
2002-04-16 05:47:32 PM  
OK, fine, the "boobies" was inappropriate (hate boobie links with no boobies), and "phat ass"??!?

But how is this "cool"? I think it's more "obvious."

Which is why I submitted that, of course. :P
Displayed 31 of 31 comments

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.