Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NewsMax)   NOW Took Clinton Cash Before Falling Silent on Sexgate   (newsmax.com ) divider line
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

2935 clicks; posted to Main » on 20 Mar 2002 at 1:53 PM (14 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



68 Comments     (+0 »)
 


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2002-03-20 10:20:16 AM  
Wow. I'm floored. I can't BELIEVE this kind of stuff goes on in Washington.

</sarcasm>
 
2002-03-20 03:14:59 PM  
Maybe they were silent because their mouths were filled with Clinton mangoo?
 
2002-03-20 03:17:08 PM  
It's not news... it's News to the MAXX!
 
2002-03-20 03:19:19 PM  
Let the trolling begin *rolls up sleeves, ready to moderate*
 
2002-03-20 03:20:08 PM  
(shrugs)
 
2002-03-20 03:21:06 PM  
Yay! Fark=Equal Opportunity Poster! One Yellow Times, One Newsmax!

Life is so fair.

Clinton sucked, glad he's gone.

Femmi-Nazis suck, wish they were all gone with him.

That is all.
 
2002-03-20 03:21:17 PM  
mangoo? lol
 
2002-03-20 03:23:15 PM  
Some more bile from the Clinton obsessives over at Newsmax.

I bet Carl Limbacher never got a hummer in his life.


Hey, cretins, get over it!!!
 
2002-03-20 03:23:19 PM  
Xanax! Get your thread Xanax right here folks!
 
2002-03-20 03:23:59 PM  
I believe this story...even if it is in Newsmax.


And did you notice the UFOs?
 
2002-03-20 03:24:12 PM  
Typical NEWSMAX garbage. Right wing thugs who cannot tell truth from fiction. If Clinton would have been guilty of doing all of the things that right winders accused him of doing, he would have been impeached.
 
2002-03-20 03:24:48 PM  
Gwinny: Probably too late in the day...all the caffiene has worn off.
 
2002-03-20 03:24:50 PM  
Hmm...well we all know what a reliable source Newsmax is.
 
2002-03-20 03:25:25 PM  
"the lesbian feminist leader explained"

YES!!!
 
2002-03-20 03:26:01 PM  
Request:
NO MORE NEWSMAX
 
2002-03-20 03:27:36 PM  
um..Red99....?
 
2002-03-20 03:27:43 PM  
As Ironbar says, this is all in the past, get over it, the statute of limitations have expired. Time to get on with new topics and crimes. Clinton's crimes are a long series of pure accusations by right wingers -- they have NO facts to back them up. Right wingers can only wish that the Bushette would be just half as honest as President Clinton
 
sp
2002-03-20 03:28:18 PM  
03-20-02 03:24:12 PM Red99
Typical NEWSMAX garbage. Right wing thugs who cannot tell truth from fiction. If Clinton would have been guilty of doing all of the things that right winders accused him of doing, he would have been impeached.

He WAS impeached
 
2002-03-20 03:28:53 PM  
Red99: Clinton WAS impeached. The House voted to impeach him, remember? It was the Senate which didn't remove him.
 
2002-03-20 03:31:10 PM  
Glenlivid: hopefully you are right.

I think Red99 meant actually removed from office. Yes, Clinton was impeached, but the majority voted to let him stay in office.
 
2002-03-20 03:32:10 PM  
The house Republicans were full of false alligations and therefore the impeachment did not have any legal standing. They lied, Clinton did not lie, he simply defended himself. As Dan Rather said, "Even and honest man can lie." Of course Rather was not implying that Clinton lied, he simply said that if Clinton would have lied, he would have been honest about it.
 
2002-03-20 03:33:54 PM  
Oh pshaw, yeah, he was impeached, but he served out both terms.


You guys are just jealous because Clinton was elected twice and Dubya had to be appointed.

Have a nice tall glass of get the hell over it.
 
2002-03-20 03:34:32 PM  
All this is, is an attempt to drum up business for a book that would otherwise rot on the shelves...

3Horn
 
2002-03-20 03:39:16 PM  
The reason Clinton was impeached but not removed was because it was more embarrassing that way. They whole Monicagate thing was purely an excercise in embarrasssing the other team's guy.

Here's something to think about...At the time, there were over 200 FBI agents investigating the President's blowjob. If those 200 had been doing their job instead of engaging in a McCarthy-istic witch hunt, I wonder if the attacks of Sept 11 would have happened at all? I guess the world will never know...
 
2002-03-20 03:39:49 PM  
What? NOW is aother paid front for the DNC? Gee, does that ever come as a surprise. Duh.
 
2002-03-20 03:40:00 PM  
Uh, the President was elected by the current laws of the land, I thought? Or has the Electoral College been eradicated by Vice-Presidential mandate?
 
2002-03-20 03:40:31 PM  
Clinton is now irrelavant. I'm officially declaring it as of... now.
 
2002-03-20 03:41:50 PM  
As Ironbar says, this is all in the past, get over it

You mean, like the Florida vote count?
 
2002-03-20 03:41:50 PM  
If it weren't for investigators, Clinton would have had the cleanest record in Presidential history. Why spend time investigating any President for crimes because they have diplomatic immunity anyway.
 
2002-03-20 03:41:57 PM  
The fact remains:
NOW raised hell about sexual harassment in the corporate workplace.
They raised hell with Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill.
They STFU when it happened in the White House.

I guess it isn't so bad when it is done by people on your "side."
 
2002-03-20 03:43:23 PM  
I don't think the Monica Lewinsky thing ever happened. I think the Republicans invented all of it as a smear job and Clinton apologized simply to make everyone happy.
 
2002-03-20 03:43:55 PM  
Reliable news source: gets both sides of a story.

NewsMax: writes one side of the story - because it's trying to sell her book in its bookstore.


with a grain of salt, people.......
 
2002-03-20 03:45:49 PM  
"Even and honest man can lie." Of course Rather was not implying that Clinton lied, he simply said that if Clinton would have lied, he would have been honest about it.

How the fark can you be HONEST about lying unless you admitted you lied?! Clinton DID lie - to the grand jury and to the public in general! Don't you remember "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky . . ."??
 
2002-03-20 03:50:03 PM  
When was the last time any news source really got both sides of a story. All media is biased -- one way or the other.
 
2002-03-20 03:50:22 PM  
he didn't screw her. he said he didn't screw her.

she gave him a hummer.

if you don't know the difference, maybe you need to get out once in a while.
 
2002-03-20 03:56:50 PM  
Ironbar That was great. You were going for irony in your post, weren't you?
 
2002-03-20 04:02:56 PM  
Churchill: "When was the last time any news source really got both sides of a story. All media is biased -- one way or the other."

perfect argument you make for chucking objectivity entirely. I must disagree. Every reporter has their own opinions.

In this case, however.. well, let me get it straight.

Clinton's admin (through HHS) gave federal money to a political advocacy group.

Said political advocacy group has *always* been liberal and has *always* believed that Clinton was doing more for women than any other president in the last 15 years.

So, the most powerful man in the world has money given to a nearly powerless advocacy group to keep them quiet about an unfolding scandal? When they undoubtedly would have sided with him regardless?

That just doesn't make any sense.
 
2002-03-20 04:10:21 PM  
Red99:

From one fellow liberal to another:

I think you have your head up your a$$.

Clinton had sex with "that woman."
He tried to cover it up.
He lied about it under oath.
He was impeached.
He was an embarassment.

Get over it.

And all you right-wingers: Get over it! He's gone.

We have more important things to talk about, like, mmmmm I dunno, whether Bush and his folks stole the election, perhaps?

*ducks
 
2002-03-20 04:21:04 PM  
My $.02.

Did Bush steal the election? No.
Did Bush -try- to steal the election? With all his might.

He won, sure. By a few hundred votes in one precinct. No matter how you slice it, he has no mandate from the masses. Most of us did not want him. His brother played every card in a way to guarantee that the whole situation would be drawn out to the point where the Constitutional deadline would expire before a standard on 'hanging chads' could be determined for a better, though still subjective vote count. From what I heard, Gore would have lost even with a recount, and that's acceptable. But the manner in which this was handled sickens me.

As to Clinton screwing around. We elected a lawyer. He screwed up. Would I have considered a hummer 'sex'? Hell no, I'd consider it foreplay. After all, if you give or get a hummer, but don't actually have genital sex, are you still a virgin? If so, you didn't have sex. And my lifelong republican grandmother swears up and down that she never inhales her cigarettes. Ever.
 
2002-03-20 04:22:42 PM  
me too schmee... welcome to reality
 
2002-03-20 04:28:47 PM  
munch...munch...munch...

Who made the popcorn? It's good! Lotsa butter!

munch...munch...munch...
 
2002-03-20 04:30:34 PM  
Oy, TellarHK, you need to see Chasing Amy. Are all lesbians virgins if they haven't been banged? 69ing isn't sex? I think that that mentality is part of what keeps AIDS churning and STDs from ever being "a thing of the past".
 
2002-03-20 04:30:35 PM  
Shoot Red99 beat me to the punch. Someone needs to remind the right that Clinton is no longer in office, so no one cares any more. They wanna kick a dead horse ? Then let's talk about Tricky Dick and his total raping of the Executive office, or of Ronald Reagan and of his grand vision to ruin America thru deficit spending.


Oh and let's not forget Bush Sr. who forgot to finish a war by killing Hussein, so now his son has to declare that country a member of the Evil Axis so we can have a second go around.
 
2002-03-20 04:32:25 PM  
Typical liberal knee-jerkers on here. They don't like the story so they slam the source. Does that mean I can discount everything CNN reports?
 
2002-03-20 04:34:49 PM  
"Here's something to think about...At the time, there were over 200 FBI agents investigating the President's blowjob. If those 200 had been doing their job instead of engaging in a McCarthy-istic witch hunt, I wonder if the attacks of Sept 11 would have happened at all? I guess the world will never know"

I saw that Michael Moore interview on the Daily Show too. And it was a good point about prioritizing, but I don't think that our lack of information about 9-11 was directly caused by that investigation-that seems to be an oversimplification. Rather, I think it was a more gradual shift in relying less on people going deep undercover and a greater reliance on technology. That's why we were blindsided, because it really was a low-tech operation.
 
2002-03-20 04:42:19 PM  
Hmmmmm. Does this mean that the Clinton Administration
actually used it's good offices to buy N.O.W.'s $ilence
and acquie$cence? Or was it merely attempting to keep it's
fellow traveller afloat? Hell, ... N.O.W. would have in
no way attacked Slick Willie for he was their "main man" -- a banner carrier for their agenda. Therefore, this was a coincidental kickback for N.O.W.'s past and continued support.

This is "news?"

03-20-02 03:27:43 PM Red99
"Right wingers can only wish that the Bushette would be just
half as honest as President Clinton
"

Funniest. Post. Ever.
 
2002-03-20 04:43:04 PM  
You guys are just jealous because Clinton was elected twice and Dubya had to be appointed.

Have a nice tall glass of get the hell over it.


Hahahaha....Mr. Pot, meet Mr Kettle......
 
2002-03-20 04:44:21 PM  
Make that 41 stories this month on Clinton Scandals run by NewsMax
 
2002-03-20 04:59:18 PM  
OOOOOH , I draw my first right wing fire from ModDoctor !!!

"Please Skinhead, save me from calling you a total retard,..."

FIRST OF ALL, learn to read. The name is Skinink, not Skinhead, no matter what white supremast thoughts float through your mind.

And I'm a retard. Yet any thing wrong with big gubmint is all the fault of liberals. Are conservatives so spineless they can't right the wrongs ? They're the retards.

"Bush I was handcuffed by liberals in Congress who wanted the war to end before Saddam was whacked. Look it up -- before you go off halfcocked."

Ever hear of Covert operations.... hell any hawkish conservative could've set one in action, right ...Oops a car bomb killed Saddam...must've been the Kurds.

In closing, Clinton is still gone , yet his shadow still scares conservatives / Republicans. Turn on your nightlights, and put the issue to bed.
 
2002-03-20 06:16:50 PM  
Good riddance to Clinton and his peronista wife. Oy.

Now let's move on, ya farkers.
 
Displayed 50 of 68 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter








In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report