Do I own a timber company?

CanSomeonePleaseKilltheChristmasShoes:

No problem, with all these Neo-con tough guys ready to sign up, we could kick N Koreas little fanny in no time.

Hell it would be a cake-walk, I guarantee it!


They will probably greet us as liberators. They will probably throw flowers at our feet as we blast anyone/anything that moves. They will probably bow down and wash our feet with wine and dry them with their hair.

Probably not.

thunderation:

Seriously, the US can't win with you guys - unless of course there's a pot smoking bleeding heart in the white house.

I think this is the first sane proposal of the thread. Sounds like the ideal candidate to me.

/not sarcastic

Get over here and FEED ME, Mandrake!

Deterrence was a pretty good flick.

Mr. CB

You're not a US Citizen, you're a Bostonian. There's a difference.

/oh, and it's pronounced Quin-zee

"Who said anything about free speech? It's the growing attitude in this country that any kind of criticism makes you a traitor. This country is by the people and for the people, and thus any opinion a citizen holds shouldn't be dismissed as unpatriotic."

No kidding, and any retort dismissing your opinion shouldn't automatically mean that we are living in 1984. That said, it may be going too far to suggest that liberal views are inherently anti-American, even though it may seem that sometimes liberals are hoping things go badly in Iraq/Afghanistan/North Korea just so Ted Kennedy can have another talking point.

"If we could harvest liberal idiocy and ignorance, we could generate enough power to fly Planet Earth to Mars, hopefully where we would dump them the f--k off."


---Hillary Rodham Clinton, (D)-Senator, New York

You don't go to war with a nuclear power.

When the dust settles, I think there'll be a "Slopes-Monkey" Trial to send Il and Bush to the International slammer.

Wait, do MR. CLARENCE BUTTERWORTH and I actually agree on something?

- unless of course there's a pot smoking bleeding heart in the white house.


As opposed to a cokehead drunk, sure.

Did most of you forget your anti-depressants today?

better yet, take the blue pill

"mein fuhrer! I can WALK"

\nevermind, i'll do it myself.

ZAZ Oh you dumb-ass 'god' believers can vote...we just won't let you push your rediculous beliefs into our laws. The Xtians are the worst offenders in the USA...you don't see the Muslims trying to make all TV shows cover women in robes do you? Do the Jews try to make Saturday a day of rest for the media workers?

C... A... P... 8... 1... 1...

/the Matador... the Matador... it's ME!

damn they must some more rice. thats what they wanted last time

"binnster"

"Mr. Clarence Butterworthless"

"21-7-b"

Examples of the only types people OTHER people like "SweetlyKali" believe have any brains, just because they say so.

Its the "in" thing to do: disregard any "down-to-earth common sense" ideas as being ...simply..."stupid", and label those who think that way ..."trolls".

Because the mind of a ..."troll"...doesn't function on the high....intellectual.....level it takes to understand that in order to see the world as a conservative does, you must simply....BE..."stupid".

/anybody got a mop to clean up all the dripping sarcasm?

"No kidding, and any retort dismissing your opinion shouldn't automatically mean that we are living in 1984. That said, it may be going too far to suggest that liberal views are inherently anti-American, even though it may seem that sometimes liberals are hoping things go badly in Iraq/Afghanistan/North Korea just so Ted Kennedy can have another talking point."

Heh, the WWOD bracelet crack wasn't meant to say that we live in 1984. I honestly believe that'll never happen in the US, the country would sooner collapse. However, it does seem that people are more often now apt to copy attitudes and expressions that the book warned about in the first place.

Find a suitable lair. Lay in wait for terrorist suspect.



Upon arrival of terrorist suspect, perform cavity search for WMDs.
Tell them to, "Bear down, this will hurt."



Wipe hands on anything available. You dont know where that dirty terrorist has been.

ZAZ

>>>Bush is regularly compared unfavorably to Hitler

When he stops acting like Hitler the comparisons will end.

>>>where anybody who voted for him is dismissed as stupid and irrelevant

Irrelevant, no. Stupid? I never met them, but I know that only about 10% of Republicans can be considered "wealthy"...which leaves 90% as "stupid."

>>>where half the population thinks Christians should not have the right to vote

Please cite examples (other than your anus) of where this is true.


Bottom line: Don't like the name-calling and vitriol? Have your cowardly cohorts refrain from calling anyone who doesn't agree with this OBVIOUSLY INCOMPETANT president a "traitor." Otherwise, move along.

Rummy has AHS?

where half the population thinks Christians should not have the right to vote,

Oh, come on ZAZ. The only problem most of us have with Christians is the hardcore branch that is attempting to remake America in their image. You know, the branch that Bush belongs to.

Deterrence was a pretty good flick.

I call bullshiat. That was the most self-righteous, preachy, boring movie I've seen in years.

ZAZ


On Fark, where Bush is regularly compared unfavorably to Hitler, where anybody who voted for him is dismissed as stupid and irrelevant, where half the population thinks Christians should not have the right to vote, if calling Iran a threat in the 1980s is wrong it is a quite trivial infraction in context. And I don't think the accusation is wrong. I remember the hostage crisis. Since the revolution Iran has been a major supporter of terrorism.

Holy crap, that's a lot of WAAAAAAAAAAAAAH LIBERAL OPPRESSION WAAAAAAAAH! in one post. And wow, the amount of exaggerate-for-effect is just insane. Let me clarify this, in case anyone is stupid enough to think ZAZ is right about liberals.

Hitler = Worse than Bush
Bush Voters = Believed the Bullshiat - Only half at fault
Christian Voters = Vote! Just please, please, please try not to infringe on my farking life or rights.
Iran = Minor threat in 1980's. Nation = Not Threat / Fundamentalist Haven = Threat.

Iran hasn't been a major supporter of terrorism in years - well, until we invaded the guy next door. The -government- of Iran doesn't support terror, but the fundies do. Maybe we should have helped strengthen that government, hm?

the end is near
we are all going dieeeeeeeeeeeeee

underdog

The only reason I brought up Clinton is to show the hypocrisy that of the people who are "outraged" that we are friendly with Musharif now when they weren't during the 90's. Its just like the farktards blaming Bush for being friendly with Saudi Arabia when every president since FDR has been as well.

Big story, not much coverage. Credible? I think not!

2005-01-27 11:06:55 AM B82
And if Bush had ignored Musharref (did Clinton give him any aid btw? Cuz I don't remember it), you EXACT SAME WHINERS would be blaming Bush for pushing Pakistan into North Korea's arms.

/no win situation

There we go, folks! Zero to painted-in-a-corner in 4 years flat! NO-WIN SITUATION...WOO HOO!!!!!

But wait. That was just the first act. The next 4 years will be Bush Gone Wild - Uncensored. There are still plenty more enemies to make in this crazy ol' world. Bring 'em on! Mission Accomplished!

/yep, we're nothing but bratty whiners who don't appreciate the WWIII goodness we're getting

Geez, I submitted this less than an hour ago and already almost 200 comments...they did change my tag though.

[b]Mike_71 [/b]
[i]and say we had no business going to Iraq because the chemical and biological weapons our troops found and DESTROYED...

don't count....as "WMD" to them.[/i]

wtf... I remember hearing a year or two ago that we found a very small number of shells with a little mustard gas in them. I'm not sure that was even totally confirmed. And that's it. What biological weapons?

We have not found WMDs in Iraq. That's common knowledge. I don't know what you're reading, but to make such claims that fly in the face of almost all other sources, you'd best post some really hard evidence. Send it to Bush while you're at it.

SweetlyKali:

I can see the one or two, but how do they jump to 'possibly more than eight'? Seems kind of a random call, doesn't it?

Based on their ability to produce plutonium, not at all. That's about how much plutonium for bombs they'd have had by mid-2003, according to intelligence estimates, enough for at least six to eight. It's probably a conservative estimate at that.

The plutonium is the hard part, since they certainly have the missle technology (they can hit the West Coast) and the nuclear know-how.

Problem is, he DID, and one of the strategic reasons for going to Iraq is to be able to better deal with Syria, Iran, and North Korea.

If the stategy your referring is access to the fuel required to wage war on the other side of the planet, you may actually be onto something. Problem is: a war waged for those reasons is nakedly imperialist in nature.

So, which is it:
The administration is characterized is one of nobility and altruism such that the world has never seen?
Or, the administration has been lying through their teeth about a matter of fundamental national security?

"And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy." And the Lord did grin. And the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths, and carp and anchovies, and orangutans and breakfast cereals, and fruit-bats and large chu..."

oh @#$@#!.... html tags, not message board tags...
[i] = , etc. I suck.

You're making less sense than usual, Mike_71 . Stop trying to be witty and just answer the farking question.

Mr. President... I'm beginning to smell a big, FAT commie rat!

"There will be no fighting in the war room!"

Mike_71

i know this probably flies in the face of everything you have ever known, but if thousands of people call you (Mike_71) a troll, then it is perhaps likely that when you call others a troll they won't care too much



just close your eyes and think of a couple of turtles getting sexy until the pain goes away



it works for me

Mike_71:

Its the "in" thing to do: disregard any "down-to-earth common sense" ideas as being ...simply..."stupid", and label those who think that way ..."trolls".

Mikey, Mikey, Mikey.

We don't label 'em trolls. We label 'em dumbasses.

orange soup: why isn't the US "liberating" them?

The US would never invade a country that actually had nukes. If GWB was sure Iraq had WMD he NEVER would have invaded.

All the countries that exist in the world today should have their borders fixed and each be given at least one nuke as a deterant to invaders. All wars of arrgession would end.

/Frank Herbert had the right idea

MikeRaphon

I haven't had a chance to use "vaginian", I couldn't hold it back any longer.

Wow, the pinko commie's are up early this morning. Do all of you have a fark message system that wakes you up at one time?