If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Arkansas Democrat-Gazette)   Are you a felon who wants a gun? Just tell the gun shop not to run the background check within three days. If they don't, "the law says the purchase must go through"   (nwanews.com) divider line 504
    More: Stupid  
•       •       •

15708 clicks; posted to Main » on 27 Jul 2004 at 10:24 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



504 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all
 
2004-07-27 05:44:07 PM
I have no clue what macman is refering to when he quotes paperfor...But I'd like to know this. Of the people flaming this thread quickly tell me
a)you own a gun(s)
b)you have anyone killed/injured from a gun?
c)you know from direct or 1 degree of separation an incident that a gun prevented a death or injury.

a)7 guns are in my place
b)I know 1 person shot with a gun in the leg (accidentally by his brother), and 1 person who killed themselves with a shotgun.
c) none

Let's put this in perspective, shall we?
 
2004-07-27 05:44:25 PM
PhotoCindy you babysit irresponsible morons and compare them to me... thanks

when a gun is carried on your person to be prepared its quite different from leaving it where your farking kids can get to it

like i said my gun is locked up with a breach and a case lock, in a pinch i can get to it in less than a min, and its safe... don't deny me because you know idiots
 
2004-07-27 05:46:41 PM
wingnut396
You need to read futher up in the thread when one your Canadians fellows bragged that Canada has more guns per capita than the US. So, which is true? And if Canada has more guns, why don't they have more crime.


Yeah that's one of those statistical "damned lies". Canada may have more guns, although I've never seen a non-Moore source for the stat, but in cities gun ownership is basically nil. And in any case, the percentage of all guns in Canada that are not single-shot rifles is probably MUCH smaller than in the US. The percentage of handguns in particular is going to be tiny.

Many farmers have several rifles (in the past, all unregistered). That probably accounts for most of the guns counted in the statistic but I kinda doubt that can add up to more guns per capita, so basically I think the statistic is BS.
 
2004-07-27 05:47:29 PM
2004-07-27 05:36:16 PM wingnut396

You need to read futher up in the thread when one your Canadians fellows bragged that Canada has more guns per capita than the US. So, which is true? And if Canada has more guns, why don't they have more crime.


We have more homes per capita with firearms than the US does. We also have more rifles and shotguns per capita than the US does. The US, however pwns us (as the kids are want to say) when it comes to handguns per capita.

In Canada the vast majority of firearms are purchased for sport. In the US they're purchased for security.

Basically the difference all goes back to the fact that the USA is a revolutionary culture while Canada aquired it's independance peacefully. All revolutionary cultures tend to be paranoid and fearful. When you get a bunch of people who aquire power by taking up weapons and killing another bunch of people, it doesn't take them too long to realize that some other bunch of people could take up weapons and come and kill them. This tends to make the people and the governments a little jumpy.
 
2004-07-27 05:48:29 PM
Ghastly
You know, to be honest, at 20 yards your chances of escaping unharmed are pretty damned good.


I certainly agree. But in that scenaro I'd rather be faced with a knife than a gun. :)
 
2004-07-27 05:48:31 PM
macman37: what are you talking about? "whatever" is in reference to this converstion.... im bored, its going nowhere.
 
2004-07-27 05:52:22 PM
Chickity:

a) No, but I will.
b) Yes.
c) A good friend of mine (older friend, obviously). An intruder came into her room. She had a gun ready. As he walked in, she pointed the gun at him and said "do you really want to do this?" He left.
 
2004-07-27 05:54:21 PM
"c) A good friend of mine (older friend, obviously). An intruder came into her room. She had a gun ready. As he walked in, she pointed the gun at him and said "do you really want to do this?" He left."

um... isnt that scenario from some movie?
 
2004-07-27 05:54:27 PM
CCWs in my opinion are generally for those who carry money, especially at night... store owners who make night deposits and whatnot, but if you can convince your local police chief you need one and go through all the hoops to get one then go for it. Chances are you're not going to risk losing your CCW because you flash it to people and act like a big man and other such asshatry and perhaps lose your gun if its used in a crime.
 
2004-07-27 05:57:02 PM
my friends grandma stopped a robbery by shooting a crossbow bolt through the assailants leg pinning him to a wall, not a gun but a projectile weapons stopped a crime.

and paperforplastic, possibly... but if you were the criminal what would you do... i bet that shiat farking works
 
2004-07-27 06:01:38 PM
I think everyone can agree...

Crossbows are fricken cool!
 
2004-07-27 06:01:40 PM
Go Hawgs!!
 
2004-07-27 06:02:22 PM
ghastly, definatly
 
2004-07-27 06:03:22 PM
All I have to say right now about the BATF...

THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
--------
R E P O R T OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION
OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
UNITED STATES SENATE
NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION

FEBRUARY 1982
Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary
----
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
88-618 O WASHINGTON : 1982
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office
Washington, D.C. 20402


"These practices, amply documented in hearings before this Sub-committee, leave little doubt that the Bureau has disregarded rights guaranteed by the constitution and laws of the United States.

It has trampled upon the second amendment by chilling exercise of the right to keep and bear arms by law-abiding citizens.

It has offended the fourth amendment by unreasonably search-ing and seizing private property.

It has ignored the Fifth Amendment by taking private property without just compensation and by entrapping honest citizens with-out regard for their right to due process of law."
 
2004-07-27 06:04:36 PM
I was out reading the newspaper at the park for awhile... just got back and checked this thread out again.

"The United States is an extremely paranoid country."
Oh really?
Let's take a quick look at Switzerland, and ask the Anti-Gun Wachos why Switzerland remained "Neutral" throughout WWII when the rest of the continent was embroiled in war?
Is it because the Swiss are just so cool? Or they have the best chocolate and Hitler didn't want to fark that up?
Or was it because even a psycho like Hilter knew that it was impossible to take Switzerland because every swinging dick in the country was armed with a battle rifle and fully trained on how to use it? The Swiss have a history of being extremely well armed and trained and since the middle ages no one has farked with them.
Are they paranoid?
Ask Poland.
When Japan was making its war plans on the US they didn't plan any assaults into the US mainland. Why not? Because they themselves said "Because there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass".

Simple fact, guns in the hands of the citizens keep the citizens free.

Guns only in the hands of the government are a proven evil.
There is a cute little saying out there: "PEACE THROUGH SUPERIOR FIREPOWER"
That's the only real PEACE within our sphere of humanity. It's not paranoia. It's reality. An Armed Citizen is a FREE Citizen. An unarmed person is merely a victim waiting to happen.

If there are any Farkers with clean records near Utah that can come out to the Uintah Basin that have a fear of guns or have never fired a gun before... and you want to be enlightened and buy your own gun or something, send me an email. I'll be glad to teach you how to shop for a gun and make a wise selection, gun safety, and how to shoot, how to clean your gun... the whole enchilada. I'm an NRA Certified instructor. I'll do all this for free. It would be my pleasure. I'll do it for free because I believe in it and I think it's that important.
Utah isn't exactly the criminal base of operations... the Legion of Doom doesn't have a Branch Office out here or anything... but I have used my handguns in self defense twice here in Utah. Neither time required me to fire a shot, and neither time was the police called. Unreported instances like these number in the millions. The gun stopped the crime before there was a crime. Since there is no way of knowing how many times it happens, we have to look at related numbers associated to such matters. Like an across the board drop in crime in Florida by 21%. That speaks volumes.
No, we are not paranoid. We are smart.



Self Defense isnt a privilage to be granted by the state - it's a human right.
http://www.a-human-right.com/introduction.html
 
2004-07-27 06:04:52 PM
JeffyJeff, things that are not forbidden are permitted, rather than everything that isn't permitted is forbidden. That's what living in a free society means.

In order for the government to ban things, there must be a compelling governmental interest that overides the people's interest in freedom.

I can't help that you're scared of guns. A therapist might be able to help you out. Remember, Freud said that a fear of weapons is a sign of sexual and emotional immaturity. Generally, we don't ban things because some people have an irrational fear of things. I have an irrational fear of enclosed spaces. Should we ban them?

You say there are no scenarios where a gun is less dangerous than a knife. How about when a cop has a gun on his or her belt, and a person with a knife is trying to stab him or her? In that case, the knife is much more dangerous to the cop, and the gun is more dangerous to the attacker.

Did you know that more children drown every year in 5 gallon buckets than are accidentally killed with guns? Strange, but true. Did you know that if you have a gun in your house, odds are still much better that you'll be killed in an accident in the bathroom than killed with the gun? And that's despite the fact that very few people commit suicide by bathroom. Did you know that mistakes made by physicians kill well more than twice as many people in the US each year than die by guns, INCLUDING gun suicides? (it's over 100,000 a year by doctor farkups, and around 40,000 a year for guns, most of which are deliberate suicides) Cars also kill far more people accidentally each year than guns kill total. And that's not even looking at other stupid human tricks, like smoking, or eating fast food, or lack of exercise, or even asbestos-related fatalities.

If you die by gun, odds are excellent that you committed suicide (around 16,000 a year out of 300 million people). Odds are much less that you'll be murdered (around 8000 a year out of 300 million people. And oddds are INFANTESIMALLY small that you'll be accidentally killed with a gun (around 800 a year, out of 300 million people).

Fear of guns is pretty irrational...
 
2004-07-27 06:06:45 PM
This thread needs more babyhead.
 
2004-07-27 06:08:05 PM
was in a gun shop a few years ago, and the clerk told the guy he couldn't buy a gun because he was a convicted felon... so he had his girlfriend fill out the paperwork instead.

wow, that's effective legislation there.
 
2004-07-27 06:09:32 PM
badcrc, that's a crime. It's a felony called a "straw purchase". Did you see if the sale was completed?
 
wee [TotalFark]
2004-07-27 06:11:02 PM
Wow, skeet with a Tommy gun? I'm not a bad shot, but that sounds pretty hard core... :-)

Oh yeah, in case anyone was wondering what kind of machine gun nut I am, the Thompson I own is semi-auto, and requires no special licenses, permits or fees to own (although it will require a Short Barreled Rifle transfer stamp once I get the 10.5" barrel on it). It's the military style one, not a Chicago typewriter sort of thing. Think Saving Private Ryan and not Al Capone.

Anyone with 50 grand burning a hole in their pocket can pick up a nice deal on a set of three consecutivly-numbered Thompsons. WWII, Korea and Vietnam. Collect them all!
 
2004-07-27 06:12:01 PM
Don't forget the First Million Mom March....

http://www.barefootsworld.net/images/1st_mmm_march.gif
 
2004-07-27 06:15:38 PM
Wee, I generally shoot over 100,000 rounds a year. Skeet with a SMG is amusing, but I prefer shooting up (unoccupied) cars with beltfeds. My favorite: The MG-34 on an AA mount. 900 RPM of wholesome stuttering goodness....
 
2004-07-27 06:18:03 PM
Paper, it's not scary down here at all. However, we generally DO go out of our way not to piss off people for no reason. "an armed society is a POLITE society", and all that....
 
2004-07-27 06:19:01 PM
HoChiWaWa

why do people think the military is willing to slaughter its own people and destroy its own cities.... the most adament people i know when it comes to revolution to protect freedom are farking in the military.

I second this.
 
2004-07-27 06:19:08 PM


 
2004-07-27 06:34:20 PM
Jeffy Jeff

I'm not saying that in every situation a gun is more deadly than a knife. However there are scenarios where a gun is much more dangerous than a knife but there are no scenarios where a gun is that much less dangerous than a knife.

You do know that body armor w/o rifle plates (what officers wear) will stop handgun rounds, but to a knife it looks like butter?
 
2004-07-27 06:36:54 PM
2004-07-27 06:04:36 PM Mad Ogre

No, we are not paranoid. We are smart.


And we look for things that make us go.
 
2004-07-27 06:40:17 PM
There are a number of gay and lesbian shooting clubs now; the Pink Piatols.

The Philadelphia chapter has gotten some press coverage.

I like the idea of the neanderthals seeing gays and lesbians doing some good shooting on the local news. Makes it less enticing for them to go out and do some gay-bashing, since the word is now out that now some faggots pack heat.
 
2004-07-27 06:41:46 PM
2004-07-27 06:40:17 PM arturner
since the word is now out that now some faggots pack heat.


Feh, I want my faggots packing meat, not heat.
 
2004-07-27 06:51:14 PM
computerboy, i mean shiat... if people really think that poorly of our government and our military to think that they'd use nukes, nape and tanks to overrun their own cities, then i'm supprised they aren't packing heat and trying to start the revolution. rather than using that as some sort of ass backwards excuse to get rid of guns.
 
2004-07-27 07:20:43 PM
there aren't enough pictures on this thread
 
2004-07-27 07:28:34 PM
2004-07-27 06:51:14 PM HoChiWaWa

computerboy, i mean shiat... if people really think that poorly of our government and our military to think that they'd use nukes, nape and tanks to overrun their own cities, then i'm supprised they aren't packing heat and trying to start the revolution. rather than using that as some sort of ass backwards excuse to get rid of guns.


The thing is, all the revolutionary scenerios don't involve a civil war against the current form of government. They all envision a government that's become a dark and twisted blend of The Palpatine Empire and Nazi Germany with cruel heartless stormtoopers who think nothing of barging into your house and raping your personal freedoms. But somehow they'll stop short of dropping daisycutters and smartbombs on rebel strongholds or sending tanks in to subdue domestic enemies of the state.

You're afraid of this evil government and it's kill-bots but somehow you're still convinced that even when faced with their own extinction they'll fight in such a way that Johnny Lunchbox and his 9mm pistol will still have a chance of winning.

I think if your government ever becomes this dark imperal souless nazi force you all seem to fear it will become, it won't really have any compunctions against making an example by flattening a city that's sympathetic to the "enemy".

Besides, once the government brands the neo-revolutionaries as the enemy how much support do you think you'll be getting from the jobless, starving masses when you're the ones the government blames for their troubles.

You've already got the most effective weapon against government tyrany that mankind has every created. It's called a vote. It's just a pity so few of you choose to use it. Efforts spent convincing more people to exercise their right to vote will do more to prevent your government from becoming a cruel and opressive regime than effort spent convincing more people they need to stockpile weapons and await the revolution.
 
2004-07-27 07:31:33 PM
HoChiWaWa

Yup. The trick for anyone wanting to use the military to oppress citizens is to do it on a small scale. Simply put, if military force is used on a large scale it will begin to mess with soldiers desire to follow orders as they begin to realize that the people they are fighting against are friends and family. Or a battle buddies friends and family, etc.. At some point even the most hardheaded soldier stops and thinks about what he/she has been ordered to do. Having grown up military and still having family serving I have a lot more faith in most of the soldiers, but like any large organization there are bound to be a few bad apples (think Iraq prison scandals). Also even small-scale military intervention in the past has had their political costs (Waco and the National Guard, union disputes, etc.).

Large changes have happened in the past and various populations have resisted, but our politicians are too smart for that. Nope, some of them will chip away at our freedoms till it becomes commonplace and accepted by the average citizen. We are trading "security" for liberty and it sucks. I will now give a personal example.

I am currently trying to get most of my guns back. Why? Simple I was staying at a friend house and because of it being a small Apt. I was sleeping in a large walk-in closet (insert gay joke here). We both are EE's and it is common for us to have various electronics that we are working on in there. A maintenance man comes in and see the following: a capacitor bank, a micro-controller development kit, mysterious equations on a dry erase board, signs of someone sleeping in the closet, and guns in said closet. He gets scared and calls the bomb squad. Long story short they show up find nothing, but feel like being jacka$$es. So after cooperating with them fully (never mind accusing use of none existing crimes like "gun hiding") they decide to take my guns. Note, they had a warrant to search for a bomb, found none. They also checked use out and nope, nothing. They had an "expert" look at my guns, nope all legal. So what did they do? Take them anyways. It has been almost a month and last I was told (after getting my dad to call them as they ignored me...several times) was that they are ballistic finger printing them and call back Thursday.

After talking to a lawyer, guess what he suggested? That if I get them back to just let it go as this is post 9/11 and such things are tolerated now. WTF!? So it seems like the Constitution of the United States only applies when they feel like it now. The Second and Fourth Amendments are in void. If you haven't noticed...I'm pi$$ed.
 
2004-07-27 07:37:01 PM
Ghastly

The ones that will kick your door down and haul you away are unlikely to be military or agencies we vote for directly. Quote below if for effect, but true.

1979 Senate hearings on ATF abuses
I asked him, "Well, this sounds just like something I remember back in 1936 and 1937. We called these people Gestapo."
He smiled and said, "Mr. Earl, no; we are a little bit different than Gestapo."
I said, "Oh, how?"
He said, "Well after this we are not going to take you out and put you against the wall and shoot you."
This was the only difference that he, in his own explanation, was different from a Gestapo type raid.
 
2004-07-27 07:39:33 PM
Hey, doesn't every citizen in Iraq have a gun?
 
2004-07-27 07:40:29 PM
Paper, it's not scary down here at all. However, we generally DO go out of our way not to piss off people for no reason. "an armed society is a POLITE society", and all that....

Yeah, I hear you guys have no experience with this "road rage", and that never involves sidearms.
 
2004-07-27 07:41:19 PM
Stoffel

Hey, doesn't every citizen in Iraq have a gun?

Yup, but usually no ammo. Saddam wasn't stupid enough to give them both as far as I know.
 
2004-07-27 07:47:04 PM
ghastly i vote, i don't think that there will be a revolution in my lifetime even if we continue down this slipery slope we are on, but, if it did happen in our lifetime i have a feeling that much of our military would be in support of it not supressing it. Therefore i think we would have a chance, a damn good one.

computerboy, that farking blows... they better give you your guns back man, thats farked up
 
2004-07-27 07:50:14 PM
not_fnorgby, ya because stupid farks on the LA freeway represent the whole of the united states
 
2004-07-27 08:10:22 PM
Okay, so let's say the day has come. Your and your militia of gun owners have decided your government has gone too far and the only option is to start killing people. The revolution is here. What's going to happen?

Well from the picture you paint your government is completely unconcerned with human life. It's trained it's police force to be brutal, efficient and cruel. After all, the police is only used against enemies of the state and enemies of the state are less than human anyways. It's also probably trained it's military to be brutal, efficient and cruel. The military isn't going to be used against it's own people, just enemies of the state. You're either with the Empire or you're an enemy. There is no middle ground. There is no grey area. It doesn't matter if you're born in the Empire or not, if you're not for the Empire you're against it. If you're against the Empire you're an enemy. If you're an enemy, you're not human.

Where is this rebel resistance going to come from? Well the cities will probably be pretty heavily armed police fortresses. The police will be trained to be heartless jackasses as you believe they are now and police, unlike most soldiers, are trained for urban combat. The resistance isn't going to be very strong in the cities. Most city dwellers are too concerned with getting their next paycheque to worry about joining an armed resistance. Beside's they've been taught since birth that those who are against the Empire are enemies and evil persons and the Stormtroopers are there to protect them and uphold the peace. No, any resistance in the city will be crushed pretty easily.

The rural areas are where the resistance will spring up. They've probably been training for years and stockpiling weapons. What weapons have they been stockpiling? Well the weapons the corporations (who really run things) feel safe in selling them. Assault rifles, machine guns, rockets, grenades, pistols, shotguns, submachine guns, some body armor. Nothing that will be a serious threat to the weapons the corporate empire itself owns. None the less the resistance gets started, some rural towns are swarmed. Empire loyalists are taken out in the streets and exicuted and the small local police departments are quickly over run.

Food supplies to the cities are cut off and people begin to starve. The Empire blames this on the rebels. The rebels are the enemy. They want you to starve. They want to overthrow the Empire that has given you peace and order. They have been taking loyal citizens out into the streets and shooting them like dogs. The rebels are evil. Blah blah blah. Now to the starving populace of the cities who are only interested in getting their next paycheque and watching their big screen TVs how sypathetic do you think they'll be to your rebellion. Chances are they'll be informing on their neighbours pretty quick if they suspect they're sypathetic to the rebels. They'll be demanding that the Empire drop daisycutters on the rebel strongholds.

The Empire, in the interests of protecting it's loyal citizens protects itself by dropping daisycutters on the rebel strongholds. The military then moves in and cleans up the survivors with robotic armored assault vehilces and powered armor suits and weapons the likes of which John Redneck has never dreamed. On the off chance that a few soldiers might not have been trained sufficiently enough to callously kill these enemies of the state they'll make sure no soldier is fighting against his own hometown. It's easy enough to kill people you don't know when you've been brought up your whole life beliving they're inhuman anyways.

But let's suppose the rebels do manage to hold out for awhile longer. What's going to happen to the multinational corporations who are really running things when they feel threatened. Well first, they'll pull out their businesses and cause economic collapse and chaos. Now the starving, jobless masses will really love you and your shotgun toting rebels. Next, they'll send in their own corporate mercinaries, for security purposes, of course. These will be foreigners who have probably had a life far more brutal than that of your typical rebel or loyalist and they will think nothing of chewing your throat out with their own teeth for an extra 50 cents in their paycheque, let alone care about unleashing a biological, chemical, or incindiary attack against these upstarts. They're better armed, they're better trained, and they really, really, really, want to kill you not for anything like political ideals or other such nebulous and maliable concepts, but because they have been raised to be cruel and heartless killing machines.

In the end the rebellion is crushed and the loyalists will gladdly accept even more Empire control in their lives for fear of going through such a hell again.

But let's suppose beyond all reason the rebellion manages to defeat the military, the police, and the corporate mercinaries and is now battering the gates of the Empire's last stronghold. With their backs against the wall and their fingers on the button, with their very own survival at stake do you not think this evil Empire will employ a scorched earth nuclear strike as an act of sheer desperation and panic, if not revenge?

If you let things get to the point where you need an armed resistance to put them right then guess what. You've already lost.

You should be concentrating on grassroots political movements. You should be raising people's consciousness and giving them truly alternative, viable voting choices. That will do far more for ensuring your continued freedom than stockpiling weapons ever will.
 
2004-07-27 08:24:35 PM
DasWiggy
Did you know that if you have a gun in your house, odds are still much better that you'll be killed in an accident in the bathroom than killed with the gun?


Wiggy... that was an excellent post. Well said. As to the stat I quoted above, I can believe that and that is eye-opening. However, what if you compare the chance of accidental death by gunshot between a house that owns a gun and one that doesn't? I'm sure the number is small but then again, so is the number of accidental bathroom deaths. Your chance of encountering either first-hand is so small as to approach zero. Two negligibly small number numbers are effectively equal. Interesting but perhaps not as important as the "damn lies" suggest.

I should also clarify that I'm not really afraid of guns. When I look around me I see stupid people. It sucks but let's face it, "news of the stupid" is what makes Fark so entertaining most days. Stupid people with guns, especially concealed guns, make me very frightened. I barely trust Americans at large to drive down the street without doing something dangerous to themselves and to others. I don't like the idea of all of these people carrying a gun.

One big difference between me and many gun-owners is that I'm not afraid of the government or what it might become. I'm just not. That's not to say that I think the US government is great. It has its problems, but I don't fear it turning into a Nazi-esque nightmare.

You suggest therapy for my fear of guns. I suggest therapy for if you fear your government. To me, fear of government is no more rational than fear of an armed citizenry is to you.
 
2004-07-27 08:32:08 PM
I know it's been said plenty, but I'll say it for those who might scroll to the very end.

If you are pro-gun because you think you're going to protect yourself from the GOVERNMENT, you are a fool.

Yes, that's how it worked 200 years ago when the army just had GUNS too.

Now, the army has tanks, jets, bombs, sharks with lasers on their heads, etc.

You will not defeat this with your Wal-mart gun. You need a clue, not a gun.
 
2004-07-27 08:32:17 PM
ghastly you writing a book or somthing? thats pure speculation... noone knows how it will happen until it does... i certianly won't start it... hell i dunno if i have the guts to join it... but our forfathers belived we could do it as they did... others will too... who knows what will happen only time will tell

// under arrest by the grammer police for elipsis abuse
 
2004-07-27 08:35:07 PM
Oh yea, what Ghastly said too.
 
2004-07-27 08:35:51 PM
jeffy jeff, you anti gun folks play up the paranoia of our forfathers as if its somthing to be ashamed of, they fought off the greates empire of their day for a free nation and included as many checks and balances as they could to keep gov't in line with one final line of defence... the people... i don't want a revolution i don't fear the gov't, but our forefathers did and if shiat goes bad i hope someone stands up for their ideals lest they fade into history
 
2004-07-27 08:39:20 PM
stratos see my comment about how most military people are more for freedom than they our for our gov't

i'm pro gun because i feel i have the right to own one... you have that right too wether or not you choose to excercise it not because i fear the government... but if the time comes i'd like to think i'd fight for the freedom others so freely give away
 
2004-07-27 08:40:42 PM
If you let things get to the point where you need an armed resistance to put them right then guess what. You've already lost.

Yep. And protecting Second Amendment rights is a crucial step in making sure we don't get to this point.
 
2004-07-27 08:41:13 PM
godamn... our=are... whatever, i'm home from work now and drinking so forgive me
 
2004-07-27 08:43:12 PM
2004-07-27 08:32:17 PM HoChiWaWa
but our forfathers belived we could do it as they did...


That's because your fore fathers had absolutely no concept of a bomb so big it could destroy an enitre city being deployed by a flying machine 3 miles up in the air. Your forefathers had no concept of massive machines of metal costing millions of dollars able to kill hundreds of soldiers, much less civillians with a few well lobbed shells. Your forefathers had no concept of armoured robotic assault vehicles carring machine guns capable of leveling a small building, or flying gunships making deadly Figure Eights in the air while laying down pinpoint accurate machinegun fire. Your forefathers had no concept of artillery capable of devistating an entire city from over a dozen miles away.

It was much easier to launch an armed rebellion back in the days when both sides were equally armed.

The government also has a hell of a lot more money to spend on bullets that you do.

Like I said. If you allow your government to get to the point where it can only be removed by armed revolution then you've already lost.
 
2004-07-27 08:43:44 PM
thank you sloth, ya we have to protect it now... but even if we "already lost" at some point we should fight... many thought we already lost the revolutionary war... but a little help from the french and a lot of determination and we farking won... may be less likely now... but not less worth trying
 
Displayed 50 of 504 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report