If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(News.com.au) Strange No one's ever shot a film plants can watch. Until now. Wait, what?   (news.com.au) divider line 40
More: Strange, menstrual cycles, big films, South Australia, quantum mechanics, quality of life, sunshine, span, MGM  
•       •       •

5831 clicks; posted to Main » on 20 Mar 2010 at 9:30 PM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share via Emailshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!


40 Comments   (+0 »)
   


 
phlegmmo [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 01:36:15 PM  
"Although I liked the cinematography, I felt the plot was formulaic."
www.furnitureclinic.co.uk

 
stickmangrit [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 02:25:14 PM  
plants don'ts gots no goods movies downs heres.

 
phlegmmo [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 04:00:03 PM  
Finds every film hysterically funny
www.world-mysteries.com

 
phlegmmo [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 04:25:27 PM  
This couple enjoys porn
1.bp.blogspot.com

 
Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 08:27:03 PM  
Fern After Reading?

 
Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 09:11:23 PM  
Beeches?

 
Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 09:23:31 PM  
District Pine?

 
simpsonfan 2010-03-20 09:34:06 PM  
And some people said Mel Brooks was an idiot for having a showing for riders and horses of Blazing Saddles.

 
skinink 2010-03-20 09:34:33 PM  
Show the plants "Paul Blart: Mall Cop" and they'll never complain about having a movie to watch again.

 
The Grinch 2010-03-20 09:39:50 PM  
Plant porn? Snowballing On Cedars?

 
myislanduniverse 2010-03-20 09:48:40 PM  
"Wait, what?" Hahahaha... it just never gets old...

 
GungFu 2010-03-20 09:49:14 PM  
I wonder how poplar this will become.

 
xsarien 2010-03-20 09:50:26 PM  
I bet the snack bar charges way too much for Brawndo.

 
Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 09:51:34 PM  
GungFu: I wonder how poplar this will become.

I wonder what we're doing this fir.

 
Tony_Pepperoni 2010-03-20 09:51:43 PM  
i40.tinypic.com

Tree porn?

 
Fano 2010-03-20 09:53:01 PM  
img142.imageshack.us

Ole Jordy is glad to have something to watch. It makes life worth living again.

 
phlegmmo [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 09:57:57 PM  
Knot safe for work
farm4.static.flickr.com

 
NakedApe 2010-03-20 10:08:02 PM  
I was going to pass a mini-camera through a dog and show the recording to my lawn but then I realized it's already seen the ending.

 
Nick Nostril 2010-03-20 10:09:54 PM  
Someone needs to stop smoking so many of the plants, then things like this wouldn't happen.

 
Tony_Pepperoni 2010-03-20 10:11:51 PM  
i41.tinypic.com
/booty tree

 
spawn73 2010-03-20 10:12:15 PM  
Submitter is stupid.

Wait, what?

 
weapon13 2010-03-20 10:17:56 PM  
skinink: Show the plants "Paul Blart: Mall Cop" and they'll never complain about having a movie to watch again.

Holy crap that was an agonising "movie" to watch. I couldn't even finish it.
If they played them that, the plants would have died.

I give my plants a light show 24 hours a day and then later, reduce it to every 12 hours. They love it.

 
Lanny Budd 2010-03-20 10:27:33 PM  
Green Shalit gave it two leaves down.
Vincent Cornby said it was a popping good time.
Paulene Kale had to leaf halfway through the screening.
Ty Burr wrote a prickly review.

and Roger Ebark had to pass, as he was undergoing tree surgery for his canker.



/A Novel And Efficient Synthesis Of Cadaverine
//Yeah, I went there.

 
Begoggle 2010-03-20 10:44:01 PM  
The "wait what" is completely meaningless. Delete it.

 
Inaditch 2010-03-20 10:44:27 PM  
Call yourself a "conceptual artist" and any stupid shiat you come up with will get press. If your shiat is really stupid and/or offensive, you may get a grant.

 
Inaditch 2010-03-20 10:45:42 PM  
Begoggle: The "wait what" is completely meaningless. Delete it.

"Wait, what?" is always completely meaningless. It may have been funny the first time around, but I can't recall.

 
Tequila Monster 2010-03-20 10:49:48 PM  
I'm pining for tree porn!
i103.photobucket.com

 
ttyymmnn 2010-03-20 11:06:28 PM  
img682.imageshack.us

But how will we know if they are watching?

 
brap [TotalFark] 2010-03-20 11:12:04 PM  
Subby has obiously not seen the remake of Wicker Man a movie that only a vegetable can watch.

 
Shocktopus 2010-03-20 11:19:27 PM  
www.komar.org

It's a horror film.

 
hogans 2010-03-20 11:20:38 PM  
4.bp.blogspot.com

Normally, his kind are referred to as fruits.

 
mom_dropped_me 2010-03-20 11:22:33 PM  
Tequila Monster: I'm pining for tree porn!

that has to be shopped!

 
bohab 2010-03-20 11:41:07 PM  
Tequila Monster: I'm pining for tree porn!

img693.imageshack.us
img253.imageshack.us

awwww yea

 
Fano 2010-03-20 11:45:18 PM  
brap: Subby has obiously not seen the remake of Wicker Man a movie that only a vegetable can watch.

Are you kidding? It was the best comedy of the decade!

 
Loucifer 2010-03-21 12:00:05 AM  
No one's ever shot a film in my pants. Until now.

 
DrunkArse 2010-03-21 12:17:12 AM  
Citizen Kane.

If we have to watch it, so do they.

 
RadicalMiddle [TotalFark] 2010-03-21 12:39:14 AM  
DrunkArse: Citizen Kane.

If we have to watch it, so do they.


Citizen Cane?

 
spawn73 2010-03-21 12:44:33 AM  
RadicalMiddle: DrunkArse: Citizen Kane.

If we have to watch it, so do they.

Citizen Cane?


Rosebud.

Wait, what. That almost distracted me of my hatred towards the summiter.

 
BolloxReader 2010-03-21 01:11:51 AM  
The notion that a human can create something that is appealing on an artistic level to another species, much less a different kingdom, is the height of hubris. How do you judge aesthetic values and cultural expectations of acceptable expression among living things that communicate primarily through chemical rather than audible or visible vectors?

This entire line of thinking is bound up in the notion that he as an artist has the right to force his notion of "artistic expression" upon living things that have no ability to communicate permission or refusal. Patrons to an art museum choose to go there, just as moviegoers have consciously decided to gamble on Hollywood's ability to entertain. In both of those venues, participation in the artistic venue is voluntary and may be ended at any time by the audience members.

Imagine. You are taken from where you are today and placed in a sealed room. You are surrounded by plastic pastries, fruits, steaks, vegetables, but the only real food you are served is gruel. You have no idea how long you are there, only that while fed gruel you are forced to look upon all these inedible delights. Day after day passes, and you have no way of knowing where you are, why you are there or why you are being shown all this glorious, wonderful, delicious and inedible food.

There is a reason we have grow lamps and stick houseplants where they will get sun regularly. All he is doing is taunting his subjects with visions of clear, delicious days while feeding them museum light.

In his artistic hubris, this man has found a new way to bring trauma to our fellow living beings, and wishes to expand this to an even wider audience with no thought to the effects it will have on future inter-kingdom relations.

 
lilbjorn 2010-03-21 10:40:00 AM  
What? I've seen lots of vegetables enjoying movies.

 
Displayed 40 of 40 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

[Continue Farking]