/hot like a third chromosome 21

I can never get enough articles about Jenny McCarthy. Every time you think she's dug beneath the barrel right down to bedrock, she finds a new opening and goes even deeper.

I think the whole vaccination scare got so much traction because all of the women who put career ahead of having a family just can't deal with the thought that it was their old, shriveled up womb that caused the autism.

Must have been the shots! The shots are to blame!

I fully support the idea that old broads shouldn't have babies. Once you're 35, it's time to start planning for grandmotherhood.

If you visit shakesville, a relatively well known and popular feminist site (whose founder regularly writes op-eds for the Guardian), they are up in arms about the scientists and reporters who hate mothers who studied and reported on this.

(Bonus: they are also upset with Michelle Obama's efforts to stop childhood obesity because it's just more hatred of fat people.)

I thought fathers age was also an important factor?

This won't stop the shiatbaggery coming from the antivaxxers though. If anything, they'll turn it around into a "Why are you blaming the mother?" attack against the researchers.

//Antivaxxers - holding back autism research and public health...

What's the over-under on number of posts? 200? It's going to be the same shiat as every damned other thread on the topic.

You'd inject it.

/then wash off the crazy

1) On the chance that that strechted out coont really is in the article I'm not going to click it.

2) "Study shows older women have higher risk of having (insert medical condition here) children". It's a fact. Is there any medical condition that doesn't have increased risk with an older mother?

Jeezus. I guess I should refresh more often.

...but Jenny McCarthy says she reads a lot about vaccines, so she's obviously an expert, amirite?

/reads lots of books on cooking herbs, so is obviously an expert on homeopathy
//who needs their chakras fixed with basil? Anyone?

*CTRL+F "vaccine"*

ahh yes, the whargarble is strong in the comments

Jenny McCarthy has an autistic child? Why hasn't she said anything about this before now?

I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

RoyBatty: If you visit shakesville, a relatively well known and popular feminist site (whose founder regularly writes op-eds for the Guardian), they are up in arms about the scientists and reporters who hate mothers who studied and reported on this.

(Bonus: they are also upset with Michelle Obama's efforts to stop childhood obesity because it's just more hatred of fat people.)

Feminist sites like Jezebel and XX Factor are forming an echo chamber to rival freerepublic, but instead of paranoid gun nuts it's mostly sophomores at Oberlin.

Nick Nostril: Jeezus. I guess I should refresh more often.

It's ok. Her older photos are nice to look at.

Sergeant Pecker's Lonely Hearts Club Gang Bang: 1) On the chance that that strechted out coont really is in the article I'm not going to click it.

2) "Study shows older women have higher risk of having (insert medical condition here) children". It's a fact. Is there any medical condition that doesn't have increased risk with an older mother?

Life?

Or it could just be the rotten eggs.

She needs to stfu and get hot and 15 years younger again. Leave the sciencing to the scientists

Methinks some people are doing it wrong. Your thirties and forties shouldn't be spent trying to make babies in some vain grasp for vicarious immortality, it should be spent having uninhibited no-babies-plz sex and enjoying your financial freedom.

/will do it right
//willing to help you, mam, if you want to change your ways
/convert!

Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Surely, the Chinese with their 1000 year old eggs will destroy us all.

Rapmaster2000: Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Surely, the Chinese with their 1000 year old eggs will destroy us all.

Fried rice?

RoyBatty: If you visit shakesville, a relatively well known and popular feminist site (whose founder regularly writes op-eds for the Guardian), they are up in arms about the scientists and reporters who hate mothers who studied and reported on this.

(Bonus: they are also upset with Michelle Obama's efforts to stop childhood obesity because it's just more hatred of fat people.)

Mmmmm, fat feminists.

Then how do you explain all of the gormless fourteen year old oxygen thieves whose mothers are only now turning thirty?

Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

tototototo: /hot like a third chromosome 21

That's Down Syndrome

/Nice Try!

as crazy as she is.....i would hit it....

/with a frying pan....biatch be too crazy

In other news, 1000 infected with the mumps in NY and NJ.

Link (new window)

Have kids at a younger age, that way you avoid increased risk of many disorders if you wait, and you actually have the energy to raise them.

Barbeaubot: Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

that's why tribbles are born pregnant. never seen an autistic tribble, have you?

/autistic kids ROCK!

Rapmaster2000: Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Surely, the Chinese with their 1000 year old eggs will destroy us all.

Just don't fertilize them, no matter how sexy they look on the plate.

Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Did you study from the Jenny McCarthy school of medical science?

Read this the other day. The scientists do state that this doesn't account for the rapid increase in autism cases, but it does make a big impact on it.

But this doesn't mean anything to the anti-vaccinationists. They're convinced the retraction of Wakefield's paper is a "big pharma" conspiracy, and nothing will persuade them otherwise.

PsyLord: Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Did you study from the Jenny McCarthy school of medical science?

Is that you, Tebow?

PsyLord: Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Did you study from the Jenny McCarthy school of medical science?

Ova form in utero, so if I start counting my age at my date of birth, my eggs are a bit older than that. Those biatches already turned 30!

Not again. Study = discounted.

I see what submitter did, but article doesn't mention McCarthy. It does mention this:

"A 2007 Kaiser Permanente study conducted in California reported that autism risk increased with both the mother's and father's age."

PsyLord: In other news, 1000 infected with the mumps in NY and NJ.

Link (new window)

77% of the cases were vaccinated? I have a feeling some vaccine maker has gotten a call to see what they had in those bottles.

Either that, or that strain of mumps has mutated and we need a new vaccine.

HAI GUYZ, HAS ANYONE SEEN THIS PICTURE OF A HOT BLOND GETTING HOSED?

How many militant feminists does it take to change a light bulb?
2
1 to change the light bulb and 1 to suck my cawck.

Barbeaubot: PsyLord: Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Did you study from the Jenny McCarthy school of medical science?

Ova form in utero, so if I start counting my age at my date of birth, my eggs are a bit older than that. Those biatches already turned 30!

Right, they form when you form, therefore, they can never be older than you... unless somehow, you received transplanted ovaries from someone older than you.

If you count your age by your birth date, then sure, you are almost 1 year younger than your eggs. But you get my point.

The study also shows that children with an older father (40+) and a younger mother (in her twenties) have a much higher risk of autism-spectrum disorders. So the clock is ticking for you too, guys.

I have an autistic younger brother, so I'm getting a kick out of these replies...

/ true story
// Jenny McCarthy is a retarded coont

PsyLord: Barbeaubot: I don't understand why people get offended by provable facts. Your eggs are older than you are, and they don't age well.

Did you study from the Jenny McCarthy school of medical science?

The irony... It burns.

meat0918: Have kids at a younger age, that way you avoid increased risk of many disorders if you wait, and you actually have the energy to raise them.

Absolutely, if you're financially and emotionally stable enough to handle it. I had my two kids in my mid-20s, because we could afford it and felt "ready"... Looking back at how much work it was, I can't imagine having enough energy to start over with a newborn now, and I'm only in my early 30s.

Plus, this way I'll presumably be young enough to spend years enjoying (and spoiling) my grandkids when the time comes! I feel a little sad for people in their 40s who are just getting started as parents. They'll be in their 60s when junior graduates from high school. So much for enjoying the empty nest (and spending the inheritance on world travel and fine scotch)....

Because when you want honest medical advice, choose the woman who played in BASEketball.

/a good film
//but Robert Vaughn carried her ass

pounddawg: How many militant feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

THAT'S NOT FUNNY!

AmericanGrizzly: That's Down Syndrome

DEVO (new window)