Poke defendants?

Have they got Commodore 64's?

People have friends on Facebook? Am I doing it wrong?

Seems to make sense to me. Is there not a way to keep people from seeing who you're friends are?

Lawyers have friends???

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Lawyers have friends???

Other lawyers?.

It's dumb that an issue was made of this. The rules of judicial-attorney conduct are already sufficient without making special rules up for facebook and other internet fads.

The law is slow cultural and technological change. "Friend" is a now the equivalent of "acquaintance" 5 years ago.

"Hey! You're in a court; not in Clancey's Poolroom!"

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Lawyers have friends???

This

"A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats."
Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790)

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Lawyers have friends???

Only acquaintances who would be too difficult or too expensive to take advantage of.

First thing I thought of:



/he may as well be poking someone

If you get invited by a judge to join them in a mafia war...

#2: "A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats."
Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790)

Benny is always relevant:)

luckyeddie: Have they got Commodore 64's?

SYS 64738

Prison Farm-ville ?

phhht.

All the cool judges are on Adult Friend Finder.

But the committee's majority concluded that the possibility of the appearance of impropriety required that they recommend against friending, said Judge T. Michael Jones of the First Judicial Circuit Court, a committee member

I like how lawyers and judges are more concerned about ethical behavior than climate researchers.

Weaver95: But the committee's majority concluded that the possibility of the appearance of impropriety required that they recommend against friending, said Judge T. Michael Jones of the First Judicial Circuit Court, a committee member

I like how lawyers and judges are more concerned about ethical behavior than climate researchers.

I like how you're flailing for a failing.

Falcc: Weaver95: But the committee's majority concluded that the possibility of the appearance of impropriety required that they recommend against friending, said Judge T. Michael Jones of the First Judicial Circuit Court, a committee member

I like how lawyers and judges are more concerned about ethical behavior than climate researchers.

I like how you're flailing for a failing.

apparently, ethics don't matter when you agree with the politics of whomever is doing the lying.

I am the first to point out that headline said 'poke him?'

/sad at the slippage of savvy farkers

Weaver95: Falcc: Weaver95: But the committee's majority concluded that the possibility of the appearance of impropriety required that they recommend against friending, said Judge T. Michael Jones of the First Judicial Circuit Court, a committee member

I like how lawyers and judges are more concerned about ethical behavior than climate researchers.

I like how you're flailing for a failing.

apparently, ethics don't matter when you agree with the politics of whomever is doing the lying.

Actually, it's more your humorless, pedantic comments that don't matter

/Lighten up, Francis

It's not a ruling. It's a recommendation. And this deserves the STUPID tag, not the FLORIDA one.