They had to make a sequel to Zombieland.

Rule #4: Doubletap

/loved the movie

mcsestretch: /loved the movie

Rule 7 should be a personal policy at any workplace: Keep the Dumb Dumbs Close at Hand.

Lets hope it's good 3d and that the dvd will come with the option to turn it off.
I don't think I have ever seen a movie that wasn't ruined by the 3d gimmick. Of course, times makes fools of us all.

Eh. Zombieland didn't need a sequel. If it does actually come out, though, I really hope it's given as much attention as the first.

Cloverfield, too, was perfect where it was. Didn't need some prequel explaining the mystery away or some dumb action flick or anything else. But there they are with that whole "WE MADED MONMEY LETS MAKE ANODER"

Hated it, walked out. Nothing against zombies, but rather just the Michael Cera knockoff. That kid is a poor mans Michael Cera, which is a shiattier taste of shiat.

What are either of these guys gonna do when they cant play awkward teenagers anymore? Awkward adults? Weak.

WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out.

Hated it? Did the trailer of zombies, flying milkshakes and Woody Harrelson mislead you into thinking it was going to be anything but an over-the-top zombie comedy? Douche.

/Loved Zombieland

WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out. Nothing against zombies, but rather just the Michael Cera knockoff. That kid is a poor mans Michael Cera, which is a shiattier taste of shiat.

What are either of these guys gonna do when they cant play awkward teenagers anymore? Awkward adults? Weak.

Cera is a jackass that has played the same role since Superbad. The guy in this movie, Eisenberg, has played similar dudes in this and in Adventureland, but they were similar guys in completely different situations, where as Cera is the same guy in the same situation. Plus, Eisenberg doesn't have the same number of movies that Cera has, so there is hope that he'll become more than a one trick pony.

Also, why you would walk out of this movie is beyond me. If a movie is good enough (which this one certainly is) you get over an actor you might not like and still enjoy the movie.

And as far as the future holds? Cera will probably crash and burn, but Eisenberg will probably keep going.

What the fark is with the obsession with making everything 3D suddenly? STOP IT!

I loved this movie and was really hoping they'd make a sequel. But I'm sick of 3d. In movies. I'm a fan in real life.

Wow...It's, like, 1983 all over again.

Speaking of the Mayan Apocalypse, I saw 2012 last night. I was laughing most of the way through it, especially the destruction scenes.

Oekss: What the fark is with the obsession with making everything 3D suddenly? STOP IT!

My understanding is that they're harder to pirate.

Zombieland was good but also a let down. There was too much talking and not enough zombie killing. I bet they'll bring Bill Murray back as a zombie.

And Little Rock will still be underage, you sick farks.

/would Double Tap
//loved the flick
///More Emma, PLEASE!

WWZ.

Oekss: What the fark is with the obsession with making everything 3D suddenly? STOP IT!

I've heard from A/V experts that since more and more people have home theater systems, 3D is the last gimmick the movie makers have for now to try to get you into the theater. I guess it's been working for children's movies but I don't see it helping Zombie movies.

though I haven't seen any live action flicks in 3D, the 3D for animated flicks has generally been good and not gimmicky. The 3D adds more of a visual depth rather than the "WHOA WATCH OUT FOR THIS shiat WE POINTED TOWARDS THE CAMERA! IT'S COMING RIGHT AT YOU MOTHERfarkER!" of the 1950s. So I'm not really getting the biatching about 3D.

that said, Zombieland does not need a sequel.

/hell yes

We need to start a contest as to who the celebrity zombie should be in the sequel.

I vote Shatner.

WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out. Nothing against zombies, but rather just the Michael Cera knockoff. That kid is a poor mans Michael Cera, which is a shiattier taste of shiat.

What are either of these guys gonna do when they cant play awkward teenagers anymore? Awkward adults? Weak.

They'll probably star in a reboot of Two and a Half Men.

The first 10 minutes of the film I was trying to figure out if that was Michael Cera or not. But yeah, I enjoyed it anyway.

I can't tell if Emma Stone is really that hot or if the fact that she has hooked up with geeky guys in a couple movies makes her hot and gives me the feeling that I have a shot with her.

I'll probably need a lot more pictures to figure out this mystery.

/Zombieland was awesome.
//I would pay $10 just to see the opening credits in 3D.

BigMevy: WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out. Nothing against zombies, but rather just the Michael Cera knockoff. That kid is a poor mans Michael Cera, which is a shiattier taste of shiat.

What are either of these guys gonna do when they cant play awkward teenagers anymore? Awkward adults? Weak.

They'll probably star in a reboot of Two and a Half Men.

The first 10 minutes of the film I was trying to figure out if that was Michael Cera or not. But yeah, I enjoyed it anyway.

That kinda bugged me too. I kept thinking that he was a mix of Adam Sandburg and Michael Cera

Kyro: WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out.

Hated it? Did the trailer of zombies, flying milkshakes and Woody Harrelson mislead you into thinking it was going to be anything but an over-the-top zombie comedy? Douche.

/Loved Zombieland

Zombieland was a trite piece of crap. I thought comedies were supposed to be funny. Even the supposedly hilarious cameo was lame and disappointing.

MrCheeks: BigMevy: WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out. Nothing against zombies, but rather just the Michael Cera knockoff. That kid is a poor mans Michael Cera, which is a shiattier taste of shiat.

What are either of these guys gonna do when they cant play awkward teenagers anymore? Awkward adults? Weak.

They'll probably star in a reboot of Two and a Half Men.

The first 10 minutes of the film I was trying to figure out if that was Michael Cera or not. But yeah, I enjoyed it anyway.

That kinda bugged me too. I kept thinking that he was a mix of Adam Sandburg and Michael Cera

Is that a mix of Andy Sandburg and Adam Sandler? Not that any real mixing is necessary

Brown Jenkems: Kyro: WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out.

Hated it? Did the trailer of zombies, flying milkshakes and Woody Harrelson mislead you into thinking it was going to be anything but an over-the-top zombie comedy? Douche.

/Loved Zombieland

Zombieland was a trite piece of crap. I thought comedies were supposed to be funny. Even the supposedly hilarious cameo was lame and disappointing.

So what do you think is funny?

/Died at the cameo, and I was spoiled on it. Laughed at many other points in the film.
//My only problem with it was the ending.

I loved it, and am happy to see Woody coming back for this one. IMHO he made that movie his, and he and almost he alone owned the entire film.

Without him it would have been pretty farking shiatty.

"farkING SNOWBALLS!!!!!!"

It didn't really add anything to the genre.
/but it was still entertaining.
//no Shaun of the Dead by any means.

WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out. Nothing against zombies, but rather just the Michael Cera knockoff. That kid is a poor mans Michael Cera, which is a shiattier taste of shiat.

What are either of these guys gonna do when they cant play awkward teenagers anymore? Awkward adults? Weak.

Can you also not tell the difference between LEonardo Dicaprio and Matt Damon? Because that's another comparison people make that I've never understood. Micheal Cera plays "Micheal Cera" in everything since Arrested Development. It's hilarious sometimes, like in Superbad, and horrible in others, like Year One.

Micheal Cera would have ruined Zombieland. Eisenberg might have played a few similar characters in Adventureland and Zombieland, but at least they were characters rather than him just playing "Jessie Eisenberg". I think he'll be around much longer than Cera.

Zombieland was great! Which rule was it to enjoy the little things? Because it applies here.

FunkOut: Speaking of the Mayan Apocalypse, I saw 2012 last night. I was laughing most of the way through it, especially the destruction scenes.

So.... all of it?

There was so much SFX and so little story to that steaming turd, I had to check again and make SURE it wasn't a Michael Bay film.

Brillant MORE Emma Please
BUT STOP IT WITH THE 3D

if it didn't add to final destination 4 it won't add it here


\cardio

Ed Grubermann: And Little Rock will still be underage, you sick farks.

Yeah, but she gets to double-tap Rob Pattinson, it would be worth it.

/not that way, you sick farks
//gratuitous Emma in 3-D, please
///hadda do a sequel
////zombie slashies!

Kyro: WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out.

Hated it? Did the trailer of zombies, flying milkshakes and Woody Harrelson mislead you into thinking it was going to be anything but an over-the-top zombie comedy? Douche.

/Loved Zombieland

The trailer made me think it would be an over-the-top zombie comedy, ala Shaun of the Dead. What I got instead was an awkward teen comedy with about three zombie scenes. It was alright, but not at all what it should have been.

LeroyBourne: It didn't really add anything to the genre.
/but it was still entertaining.
//no Shaun of the Dead by any means.

It flipped the genre ENTIRELY on its head. It's an anti-Romero zombie movie. It did a lot more different things with the genre than Shaun, IMO.

Although i didn't exactly like it flipping the genre on its head. I like Romero's depressing endings.

madmann: FunkOut: Speaking of the Mayan Apocalypse, I saw 2012 last night. I was laughing most of the way through it, especially the destruction scenes.

So.... all of it?

There was so much SFX and so little story to that steaming turd, I had to check again and make SURE it wasn't a Michael Bay film.

There were a few touching emotional scenes too. Also amusing.

mcsestretch: They had to make a sequel to Zombieland.

Rule #4: Doubletap

/loved the movie

That's a good subtitle for the sequel too--Zombieland 2: Doubletap

Thoguh: WeezinTheJuice: Hated it, walked out. Nothing against zombies, but rather just the Michael Cera knockoff. That kid is a poor mans Michael Cera, which is a shiattier taste of shiat.

What are either of these guys gonna do when they cant play awkward teenagers anymore? Awkward adults? Weak.

Can you also not tell the difference between LEonardo Dicaprio and Matt Damon? Because that's another comparison people make that I've never understood. Micheal Cera plays "Micheal Cera" in everything since Arrested Development. It's hilarious sometimes, like in Superbad, and horrible in others, like Year One.

Micheal Cera would have ruined Zombieland. Eisenberg might have played a few similar characters in Adventureland and Zombieland, but at least they were characters rather than him just playing "Jessie Eisenberg". I think he'll be around much longer than Cera.

I'm not sure that's Cera's fault though. He's really really typecast. It's not like he's cast to play people who don't act like awkward teenagers and still plays "himself." He gets cast as awkward adolescent types because that's what he's known for.

Hoboclown: The trailer made me think it would be an over-the-top zombie comedy, ala Shaun of the Dead. What I got instead was an awkward teen comedy with about three zombie scenes. It was alright, but not at all what it should have been.

While technically a zombie movie, it actually is a awkward love comedy that just happens to be set in a zombie universe. Thats the best part of the movie.... its pretty unique in its setting, style, and how well it was executed given the elements used.

With the spread of 5.1/7.1 home audio systems, HD 16:10 tvs and projectors,etc.. the trade offs between the theater and seeing the movie at home have come to side with watching it at home. With the new 3D technology the theaters are trying to do home theaters. Everyone keeps talking about Avatar as a tech gimmick, and it is, but that's the point.

The question is will this feature move beyond gimmick or stay at the level of IMAX? Will smell-o-vision make a came back?

---

as for Zombieland 2, Why? you made a great movie that I really cannot see having room for a sequel.

Oekss: What the fark is with the obsession with making everything 3D suddenly? STOP IT!

People will go to the movies to see a new 3-D movie. They'll even pay extra. Coraline was really cool to watch in the theater in 3-D. It definitely lost some luster on the DVD at home. The home version of the 3-D was just crap, so it was better to watch it in 2-D.

Alebak: Zombieland was great! Which rule was it to enjoy the little things? Because it applies here.

rule 32

mcsestretch:

Rule #4: Doubletap

/loved the movie

not enough it seems, rule 2 was double-tap, rule 4 was beware of bathrooms

/loved it too
//wiki helps as well

zedster: as for Zombieland 2, Why? you made a great movie that I really cannot see having room for a sequel.

I would hope that they just show a whole new set of characters set in the same timeline but in a different location. But they won't.

IdBeCrazyIf: Hoboclown: The trailer made me think it would be an over-the-top zombie comedy, ala Shaun of the Dead. What I got instead was an awkward teen comedy with about three zombie scenes. It was alright, but not at all what it should have been.

While technically a zombie movie, it actually is a awkward love comedy that just happens to be set in a zombie universe. Thats the best part of the movie.... its pretty unique in its setting, style, and how well it was executed given the elements used.

More than that. It was a buddy film with Columbus and Tallahassee (and Little Rock and Wichita), and set up Zombieland 2 to have a pseudo-family feeling.

SPOILER BELOW!!

You know what I loved most about Zombieland?
It didn't end up a cliche.
Shaun of the Dead is great, but in the end, it goes south. Best friend dies, guy gets girl, blah, blah, blah.
When Woody locks himself up in the cage I thought "Annndd here's where the hero dies."
I was SO glad they broke that mold.

OtherLittleGuy: Shaun of the Dead

...was true to classic zombie form in that the survivors act like idiots. They stay in the city... they leave their second floor apartment with several lockable doors and enough food for a few days to go to a ground level building filled with windows and doors... it's a funny movie but it pisses me off.

Also Shaun of the Dead exists in a universe where the outbreak is local and if they just hung out for a few days they'd be rescued by the army (and are eventually - making pretty much the entire survival suspense factor of the movie pointless). Unlike Zombieland where its worldwide and everyone and all of civilization has broken down.

Zombieland reminded me of L4D ... but with hot chicks and funny jokes :-)

I reserve judgment on live-action 3D potential until Avatar comes out.

Ecliptic: I reserve judgment on live-action 3D potential until Avatar comes out.

Its annoying because behind all the hype of Avatar it really is nothing more than a technical experiment.

Someone needs to tell the studios that Cameron is not to films as Carmack is to games. Technical experimentation and stretching technology is great when you'll have a chance at at least breaking even.