If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(The New York Times) Obvious President Obama says Guantánamo won't close by January, meaning hundreds of detainees will not be opening Christmas presents with their families again this year   (nytimes.com) divider line 120
More: Obvious  
•       •       •

228 clicks; posted to Politics » on 18 Nov 2009 at 9:12 PM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!

120 Comments   (+0 »)


Fark.com's  Political Inclination Thermometric Analyzer:
Neutral 0.54% Commie
First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
bearsfolks [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 03:32:34 PM  
These "detainees" don't celebrate Christmas...they're Moslems.

 
ne2d [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 03:35:22 PM  
bearsfolks: These "detainees" don't celebrate Christmas...they're Moslems.

Thanks for pointing that out. Boy, I bet subby feels silly now.

 
loserkid182lr [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 03:52:56 PM  
Wasn't he supposed to close it down awhile ago? Geez politicians are retarded.

 
Racht [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 04:01:22 PM  
loserkid182lr: Wasn't he supposed to close it down awhile ago? Geez politicians are retarded.

He pledged to close it by January 21, 2010. Turns out there were a lot more people there than we thought who are in a legal quagmire, where we know they're terrorists and can't really justify releasing them into Afghanistan, but don't have evidence to charge them with anything. I mean, if we're going to follow the rule of law, we should be releasing anyone we can't charge, but there'd be some pretty massive political fallout from releasing 75 known terrorists. So I have no idea what the right call is.

 
manimal2878 [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 04:18:07 PM  
Racht: where we know they're terrorists and can't really justify releasing them into Afghanistan, but don't have evidence to charge them with anything.

If we don't have enough evidence to charge them... THEN HOW DO WE KNOW?

 
Barakku [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 06:45:41 PM  
loserkid182lr: Wasn't he supposed to close it down awhile ago? Geez politicians are retarded.

He actually tried to expand the US government's ability to hold people without charging them. He seems pretty pro-gitmo.

 
WhyteRaven74 [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 07:55:26 PM  
Well when the federal prisons people came out here to check out a prison the pants wetting by the local GOP officials was hilarious.

 
SouthernManDunWrong [recently expired TotalFark] 2009-11-18 08:05:09 PM  
Did ANYBODY REALLY think Gitmo was going to close? Excluding the libtards that actually believed him?

bwah ha ha ha ha ha ha!

 
bulldg4life [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 08:07:03 PM  
What do you gain by trolling about the hilarity of the US government indefinitely detaining people at an offshore military base that is the laughingstock of international justice for the supposed world leader in liberty and freedom?

I don't really see this as a laughing matter.

 
bulldg4life [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 08:07:59 PM  
hah, those stupid libs thought the US government would try and fix something that is horribly wrong and completely opposite the values that this country stands for!

stupid libs

 
Skail [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:02:51 PM  
bulldg4life: What do you gain by trolling about the hilarity of the US government indefinitely detaining people at an offshore military base that is the laughingstock of international justice for the supposed world leader in liberty and freedom?

I don't really see this as a laughing matter.


Because fark America, power for Republicans is what's important, you liberal hippie crybaby socialist.

 
NeverDrunk23 2009-11-18 09:15:12 PM  
So, every member from the League of FailTM going to run in here screaming 'We told you so!' as if they gained a victory?

 
spookidooki 2009-11-18 09:16:22 PM  
manimal2878: If we don't have enough evidence to charge them... THEN HOW DO WE KNOW?

Hunting witches is tricky business.

 
Gyrfalcon 2009-11-18 09:16:36 PM  
manimal2878: Racht: where we know they're terrorists and can't really justify releasing them into Afghanistan, but don't have evidence to charge them with anything.

If we don't have enough evidence to charge them... THEN HOW DO WE KNOW?


I thought Muslim = terrorist even if proven otherwise. Right? If they're in Gitmo, it must be because they're guilty of doing something horrible.

Kind of like if you're in prison, it's cause you're some kind of filthy child-molesting, murdering, drug-dealing scum.

 
thamike [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:17:20 PM  
bulldg4life: What do you gain by trolling about the hilarity of the US government indefinitely detaining people at an offshore military base that is the laughingstock of international justice for the supposed world leader in liberty and freedom?

I don't really see this as a laughing matter.


Don't even bother with that guy. He's like an epileptic with Tourette's and mother issues.

 
haemaker [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:18:02 PM  
I heard there is no Christmas in the silly Middle East
No trees, no snow, no Santa Claus
They have different religious beliefs

They believe in Muhammad and not in our holiday
And so every December, I go to the Middle East and say

"Hey there Mr. Muslim
Merry farking Christmas
Put down that book the Koran
And hear some holiday wishes

In case you haven't noticed
It's Jesus's birthday
So get off your heathen Muslim ass
And farking celebrate

 
Ball Sack Obama 2009-11-18 09:21:34 PM  
bulldg4life: What do you gain by trolling about the hilarity of the US government indefinitely detaining people at an offshore military base that is the laughingstock of international justice for the supposed world leader in liberty and freedom?

I don't really see this as a laughing matter.


Agreed, and it's definitely not as funny as your Bulldogs' pathetic attempt at a season thus far.

 
TheMadChaosopher 2009-11-18 09:22:03 PM  
so will Obama get ANYTHING accomplished in his 1st year?

besides bowing down before every other world leader, I mean.

 
Gyrfalcon 2009-11-18 09:22:40 PM  
spookidooki: manimal2878: If we don't have enough evidence to charge them... THEN HOW DO WE KNOW?

Hunting witches is tricky business.


Can you swim a terrorist the same way you can swim a witch? I hear that's proof positive.

 
wet_dream 2009-11-18 09:22:43 PM  
thamike: bulldg4life: What do you gain by trolling about the hilarity of the US government indefinitely detaining people at an offshore military base that is the laughingstock of international justice for the supposed world leader in liberty and freedom?

I don't really see this as a laughing matter.

Don't even bother with that guy. He's like an epileptic with Tourette's and mother issues.


Damn, you just described 75% of the Libs in the country.

 
zamboni 2009-11-18 09:23:53 PM  
bearsfolks: These "detainees" don't celebrate Christmas...they're Moslems.

i93.photobucket.com

 
wet_dream 2009-11-18 09:24:01 PM  
TheMadChaosopher: so will Obama get ANYTHING accomplished in his 1st year?

besides bowing down before every other world leader, I mean.


Does spending a lot of money count?

 
odinsposse 2009-11-18 09:24:47 PM  
TheMadChaosopher: so will Obama get ANYTHING accomplished in his 1st year?

besides bowing down before every other world leader, I mean.


So you'd agree that Obama hasn't done any harm this year.

 
wet_dream 2009-11-18 09:25:59 PM  
odinsposse: TheMadChaosopher: so will Obama get ANYTHING accomplished in his 1st year?

besides bowing down before every other world leader, I mean.

So you'd agree that Obama hasn't done any harm this year.


Ummm, SPENT A LOT OF FARKING MONEY -- FOR NOTHING I MIGHT ADD...

 
Nabb1 [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:26:33 PM  
Ball Sack Obama: bulldg4life: What do you gain by trolling about the hilarity of the US government indefinitely detaining people at an offshore military base that is the laughingstock of international justice for the supposed world leader in liberty and freedom?

I don't really see this as a laughing matter.

Agreed, and it's definitely not as funny as your Bulldogs' pathetic attempt at a season thus far.


Damn, that was below the belt, but then again they did make Jonathan Crompton look like Drew Brees a month ago.

 
ProdigalSigh 2009-11-18 09:27:26 PM  
manimal2878: Racht: where we know they're terrorists and can't really justify releasing them into Afghanistan, but don't have evidence to charge them with anything.

If we don't have enough evidence to charge them... THEN HOW DO WE KNOW?


From what I remember when Guantanamo was first making headlines after Obama took over the big issue was that there was simply no or very little data on many of the detainees. No files concerning their incarceration, no judicial motions/actions, no paper trails for many of the detainees; I remember reading that and knowing that whatever timeline he had hoped for walking in was screwed.

 
bulldg4life [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:27:42 PM  
Ball Sack Obama: Agreed, and it's definitely not as funny as your Bulldogs' pathetic attempt at a season thus far.

Man, the attacks on bulldogs every time you post in a thread responding to me is almost funny.

Almost.

 
spookidooki 2009-11-18 09:28:37 PM  
wet_dream: Ummm, SPENT A LOT OF FARKING MONEY -- FOR NOTHING I MIGHT ADD...

You're right.

Now if there had been imminent global financial collapse or something, I might understand all of this government spending.

 
winterwhile 2009-11-18 09:30:14 PM  
ha ha ha ha

I hope they rot in Club Med

suck it up libs, you can't do anything right

 
wet_dream 2009-11-18 09:30:53 PM  
ProdigalSigh: on many of the detainees. No files concerning their incarceration, no judicial motions/actions, no paper trails for many of the detainees; I remember reading that and knowing that whatever timeline he had hoped for walking in was

So wouldn't it have been better to develope a plan and then assign a time line to the plan, rather then just establsh a time line with no plan?

 
FMLYHM 2009-11-18 09:30:54 PM  
Racht: loserkid182lr: Wasn't he supposed to close it down awhile ago? Geez politicians are retarded.

He pledged to close it by January 21, 2010. Turns out there were a lot more people there than we thought who are in a legal quagmire, where we know they're terrorists and can't really justify releasing them into Afghanistan, but don't have evidence to charge them with anything. I mean, if we're going to follow the rule of law, we should be releasing anyone we can't charge, but there'd be some pretty massive political fallout from releasing 75 known terrorists. So I have no idea what the right call is.


If we don't have any evidence, then how do we know they're " known terrorists"? And in such a case wouldn't the right call be letting them go free?

 
Bocanegra 2009-11-18 09:30:58 PM  
Was the "FAIL" tag on vacation?

 
RemyDuron 2009-11-18 09:31:08 PM  
farking goddamn cowardly spineless NIMBY bastards!

 
bulldg4life [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:31:26 PM  
NeverDrunk23: So, every member from the League of FailTM going to run in here screaming 'We told you so!' as if they gained a victory?

It's like you are motherf*cking Kreskin

 
erik-k 2009-11-18 09:33:44 PM  
Racht: loserkid182lr: Wasn't he supposed to close it down awhile ago? Geez politicians are retarded.

He pledged to close it by January 21, 2010. Turns out there were a lot more people there than we thought who are in a legal quagmire, where we know they're terrorists and can't really justify releasing them into Afghanistan, but don't have evidence to charge them with anything. I mean, if we're going to follow the rule of law, we should be releasing anyone we can't charge, but there'd be some pretty massive political fallout from releasing 75 known terrorists. So I have no idea what the right call is.


Regardless of what we do after, we've got to close that place the fark down and pen them up somewhere else while we plan the next move. Yes it's complete BS, but gitmo and the crimes that were committed there (starting with its creation) are emotional lightning rods that short-circuit any useful (rational) discussion.

 
thamike [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:33:57 PM  
wet_dream: So wouldn't it have been better to develope a plan and then assign a time line to the plan, rather then just establsh a time line with no plan?

Where have I heard that before?

 
wet_dream 2009-11-18 09:34:22 PM  
spookidooki: wet_dream: Ummm, SPENT A LOT OF FARKING MONEY -- FOR NOTHING I MIGHT ADD...

You're right.

Now if there had been imminent global financial collapse or something, I might understand all of this government spending.


The funny this is, well not really funny funny, but now Obama is warning us that all the debt could result in a double dip recession.

Well, Duh...

 
public option 2009-11-18 09:42:50 PM  
Wait is this even slightly critical of Obama? If so, FARK YOU BUSH RIGHT WINGER PANTY SNIFFERS, DIAF PESTILENCE ON COUNTRY!!!

If not, meh

 
Gyrfalcon 2009-11-18 09:43:06 PM  
thamike: wet_dream: So wouldn't it have been better to develope a plan and then assign a time line to the plan, rather then just establsh a time line with no plan?

Where have I heard that before?


It wasn't the war in Iraq. They didn't have a time line OR a plan.

 
Bocanegra 2009-11-18 09:47:21 PM  
wet_dream: Don't even bother with that guy. He's like an epileptic with Tourette's and mother father issues.

Damn, you just described 75% of the Libs in the country.


FTFH

 
wet_dream 2009-11-18 09:49:50 PM  
Gyrfalcon: thamike: wet_dream: So wouldn't it have been better to develope a plan and then assign a time line to the plan, rather then just establsh a time line with no plan?

Where have I heard that before?

It wasn't the war in Iraq. They didn't have a time line OR a plan.


Hey, I won't argue, Bush farked up both of those wars. If I had been in charge, I would have tossed a couple of Tactical Nukes into Toro Bora when Osama was hiding there. Then dared the world to say something. Then politely asked Hussein to come clean.

 
Korovyov [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 09:50:51 PM  
FMLYHM: f we don't have any evidence, then how do we know they're " known terrorists"?

Not all information is admissible in court, even if confirmed... and even if it's been meticulously kept.

And in such a case wouldn't the right call be letting them go free?

Mmm. Where? Bear in mind that just because somebody isn't facing charges of crimes against or within the United States, that does not mean that he doesn't stand to be accused of crimes against others (or, for that matter, that there's reason to believe that he is in fact a militant interested in terrorism, but that the criminal case is hopeless because of how evidence was gathered or handled). And under present law, the US is not supposed to deport detainees to countries where they will be tortured. So that's part of the problem: the need to bribe other nations in order to accept people who have been portrayed as militant terrorists, and whose harboring may piss off governments who are still of the opinion that said detainees are in fact militant terrorists.


The other part is that many of our domestic politicians are courageously defying the administration and screaming about how these detainees apparently will be able to exercise mind-control on other prisoners and how it's obvious that moving detainees into domestic prison facilities will culminate in generally uneducated, English-deficient terrorists becoming far more successful in sneaking company-level formations into the US and staging successful assaults on prisons that have held numerous other detainees for years and years utterly without incident. Heroes, the lot of them.

 
Tripp Johnston Private Eye 2009-11-18 09:52:12 PM  
Expected.

Fark you, Obama, you lying sack of sh*t.

 
thrgd456 2009-11-18 09:59:05 PM  
Obama is a liar

 
Gyrfalcon 2009-11-18 10:01:21 PM  
wet_dream: Gyrfalcon: thamike: wet_dream: So wouldn't it have been better to develope a plan and then assign a time line to the plan, rather then just establsh a time line with no plan?

Where have I heard that before?

It wasn't the war in Iraq. They didn't have a time line OR a plan.

Hey, I won't argue, Bush farked up both of those wars. If I had been in charge, I would have tossed a couple of Tactical Nukes into Toro Bora when Osama was hiding there. Then dared the world to say something. Then politely asked Hussein to come clean.


Yes, but see, that is both a plan and a time line!

 
public option 2009-11-18 10:01:24 PM  
The funny thing about all these fark obama fellators is that if they sense the least bit of criticism toward the chosen one, they immediately resort to attacking the person with a different point of view, ad hominem, a typical liberal attack medium. And then they justify their hostility by pointing out what a doofus bush was, assuming that anybody that criticizes obama was a mouthbreathing bush fellator on the order you view your crown prince. Newsflash, just because someone criticizes obama does not mean they supported bush.

Yes I am conservative, but bush's spending policies would make most liberals blush. Only now, obama is doing what bush did on a grander scale and the fark liberals are defending him, while excoriating bush and co for doing the same thing during his administration. A bunch of bullshiat, american politics that is.

 
Bocanegra 2009-11-18 10:02:09 PM  
It amazes me how quick the Fark Libs jump on a thread about an unemployed mother of 5 from Alaska yet run like cockroaches from a flashlight any time you mention something retarded Obama has done/promised.

 
bulldg4life [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 10:03:26 PM  
public option: The funny thing about all these fark obama fellators

Bocanegra: It amazes me how quick the Fark Libs

Do you guys have a common script to work from or is this all spur of the moment?

 
Bocanegra 2009-11-18 10:08:33 PM  
bulldg4life: public option: The funny thing about all these fark obama fellators

Bocanegra: It amazes me how quick the Fark Libs

Do you guys have a common script to work from or is this all spur of the moment?


Oh, it's definitely spur of the moment. However it's getting, much, much easier to criticize this administration. It's quickly turning into Carter 2.0 - this is apparent given Obama's poor approval rating (and its most steep decline ever for a president's approval rating since tracking began).

But really. Please defend this. And the rest of the president's non-accomplishments of the past year. You just continue to reinforce the fact that your ilk are just as brainwashed as those who blindly supported Bush the last 8 years.

 
jake3988 [TotalFark] 2009-11-18 10:10:43 PM  
loserkid182lr 2009-11-18 03:52:56 PM Wasn't he supposed to close it down awhile ago? Geez politicians are retarded.
=======================================================

No.

A) Bush Administration didn't keep a file on, well, anyone.
B) Republicans (and some dems) are being douchebag obstructionists on the funding and the proposal.
C) Once that gets squared away, it's still gonna take a few months.

/Still glad beyond belief he's actually going it.

 
Displayed 50 of 120 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

[Continue Farking]