(Some Guy) Most awesome photos you'll see today of a 1930's Russian Flying Fortress dogfighting a Nazi flying saucer, velociraptors suspiciously absent
come for the cool fake airplane and stay for the awesome russish:
In 1930s Russian army was ... by the idea of creating huge planes. At that times they were proposed to have as much propellers as possible to help carrying those huge flying fortresses into the air, jet propulsion has not been implemented at those times yet.
Not much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes - a heavy bomber K-7.
Now modern history lovers in Russia try to reconstruct according the plans left in once to be top-secret Russian army archives their look in full color. This is one example based on ideas of Russian aviation engineers of that times.
Sgygus:I'm guessing that this aircraft never left the ground.
According to that Wikipedia article it actually did leave the ground... no info on how fast it could fly, though.
"K-7 first flew on 11 August 1933. Then on 21 November 1933 the aircraft crashed due to structural failure of one of the tail booms, killing 14 people aboard and one on the ground. Although two more prototypes were ordered in 1933, the project was canceled in 1935 before they could be completed."
DarkSoulNoHope:Confabulat: What would be the point of one of those anyway, other than just being a badass airplane with giant guns? Doesn't seem very practical.
Not to also mention, quite slow and unless they did the gun turrets properly, easy to shoot down.
I know. Silly concept. (yeah, the Russian version was a spruce goose, but they were on the right track)
crab66: It looks a hell of a lot like the actual photos in the article.
The photo of the K-7 in the Wiki article looks like it might fly ... but the 'K-7' in the headline-linked article not only appears much larger, but has all kinds of crap thrown on it as well.
Esn:Sgygus: I'm guessing that this aircraft never left the ground.
According to that Wikipedia article it actually did leave the ground... no info on how fast it could fly, though.
"K-7 first flew on 11 August 1933. Then on 21 November 1933 the aircraft crashed due to structural failure of one of the tail booms, killing 14 people aboard and one on the ground. Although two more prototypes were ordered in 1933, the project was canceled in 1935 before they could be completed."
Sgygus
2009-11-07 12:32:22 AM
FlashHarry
2009-11-07 12:35:33 AM
In 1930s Russian army was ... by the idea of creating huge planes. At that times they were proposed to have as much propellers as possible to help carrying those huge flying fortresses into the air, jet propulsion has not been implemented at those times yet.
Not much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes - a heavy bomber K-7.
Now modern history lovers in Russia try to reconstruct according the plans left in once to be top-secret Russian army archives their look in full color. This is one example based on ideas of Russian aviation engineers of that times.
GAT_00
2009-11-07 12:38:40 AM
FredaDeStilleto
2009-11-07 12:40:24 AM
jims4x4toy
2009-11-07 12:44:01 AM
House of Tards
2009-11-07 12:46:09 AM
Confabulat
2009-11-07 01:17:53 AM
mamoru
2009-11-07 01:21:04 AM
Esn
2009-11-07 01:32:01 AM
According to that Wikipedia article it actually did leave the ground... no info on how fast it could fly, though.
"K-7 first flew on 11 August 1933. Then on 21 November 1933 the aircraft crashed due to structural failure of one of the tail booms, killing 14 people aboard and one on the ground. Although two more prototypes were ordered in 1933, the project was canceled in 1935 before they could be completed."
Mentat
2009-11-07 01:33:36 AM
DarkSoulNoHope
2009-11-07 01:33:49 AM
Not to also mention, quite slow and unless they did the gun turrets properly, easy to shoot down.
Sgygus
2009-11-07 01:35:47 AM
The K-7 is not the same aircraft as shown in the linked article, if I am not mistaken.
The All-Powerful Atheismo
2009-11-07 01:38:02 AM
According to that Wikipedia article it actually did leave the ground... no info on how fast it could fly, though.
Except for that whole "Maximum Speed" thingy
EviLincoln
2009-11-07 01:41:05 AM
majestykelf
2009-11-07 01:41:33 AM
Crimson Skies II: Holy Shiat, Look At That Monstrosity!
Who's with me?
Robo Beat
2009-11-07 01:42:25 AM
OnmyojiOmn
2009-11-07 01:48:32 AM
/Hot like Rivet
video man
2009-11-07 01:48:51 AM
queezyweezel
2009-11-07 01:49:14 AM
Not to also mention, quite slow and unless they did the gun turrets properly, easy to shoot down.
I know. Silly concept.
(yeah, the Russian version was a spruce goose, but they were on the right track)
crab66
2009-11-07 01:50:08 AM
The K-7 is not the same aircraft as shown in the linked article, if I am not mistaken.
It looks a hell of a lot like the actual photos in the article.
The renders are exaggerated bullshiat.
fearmongert
2009-11-07 01:50:33 AM
Zeno-25
2009-11-07 01:51:06 AM
Battleship turrets on a huge farking plane!? No wonder it crashed, it probably blew itself apart.
The Soviets always had a way of outdoing themselves...
DerekSD
2009-11-07 01:52:56 AM
except for that whole can't fly thing.
Sgygus
2009-11-07 01:57:23 AM
The photo of the K-7 in the Wiki article looks like it might fly ... but the 'K-7' in the headline-linked article not only appears much larger, but has all kinds of crap thrown on it as well.
/similar looking landing gear, I admit
Its_not_a_meme
2009-11-07 02:08:16 AM
According to that Wikipedia article it actually did leave the ground... no info on how fast it could fly, though.
"K-7 first flew on 11 August 1933. Then on 21 November 1933 the aircraft crashed due to structural failure of one of the tail booms, killing 14 people aboard and one on the ground. Although two more prototypes were ordered in 1933, the project was canceled in 1935 before they could be completed."
Fly? Yes. Land? No.