He should have known he was in trouble when he got in a tight squeeze.

Easy, make him the wife for ten men in prison.

This is what happens when you allow gay marriage.

Having 10? Maybe they should sentence him to get married again.

Seriously though, you have to respect the mojo of a guy who can be married and banging 9 chicks at once and still not have the house burn down or his tires slashed. I'm sure it's all done through fear of the Jesus being held over their head, though.

How about having 9 wives you have to drive to soccer practice?

9 wives who hog the remote should be punishment enough....

Nine wives, nine times to die.
I've been bitten once, but I won't be twice shy.

9 wives on the rag?

/hell, Row 1, Seat 1

As wacky as these sects are, I don't see how the argument for multi-marriage is any different than the argument for gay marriage.

Rip his balls off and surgically reattach them...9 times?

Having 9 wives is like having your own golf course.

When does Texas get its own tag???

Remember there wouldn't have been a Texas had there been a back door to the Alamo

in before gay marriage derailing attempts....

BunkoSquad: This is what happens when you allow gay marriage.

iollow: As wacky as these sects are, I don't see how the argument for multi-marriage is any different than the argument for gay marriage.



o wait...

Kome: Having 9 wives is like having your own golf course.

But after 9 are you really up for another round?

iollow: As wacky as these sects are, I don't see how the argument for multi-marriage is any different than the argument for gay marriage.

Marriage between two invididuals can clearly define legal rights while marriage between many is confusing and threadjacking.

BunkoSquad: This is what happens when you allow gay marriage.

I don't think he should have been convicted, and I also don't think he should have been charged with bigamy. The girl was "of age" in some states, which means this conviction is based on an arbitrary standard that doesn't apply equally across the nation.

And who farking cares if you marry more than one person?

Philip J. Fry: Marriage between two invididuals can clearly define legal rights while marriage between many is confusing and threadjacking.

You can clearly define rights within a polygamous marriage. Haters are just bigoted.

iollow: As wacky as these sects are, I don't see how the argument for multi-marriage is any different than the argument for gay marriage.

The problem with polygamy-for-Jesus (as opposed to polygamy-because-you're-an-idiot) is that it usually involves sexual coercion, often against minors.

He should have become a priest.

belowner: BunkoSquad: This is what happens when you allow gay marriage.

I don't think he should have been convicted, and I also don't think he should have been charged with bigamy. The girl was "of age" in some states, which means this conviction is based on an arbitrary standard that doesn't apply equally across the nation.

And who farking cares if you marry more than one person?

Bet you a nickel the marriage was also arranged without the girls consent, making it a case of rape rape instead of joke (statutory) rape.

belowner: You can clearly define rights within a polygamous marriage.

And yet no one's even attempted to do so.

Haters are just bigoted.

Interestingly, most, if not all, of the people who are pro-gay marriage neither hate nor are even intolerant of polygamy. Instead, we just say that you have to figure out the rights first, because the several centuries of common law building up default provisions in two-person marriages wouldn't be applicable to polygamy, so you're starting from scratch. But nice try, jackoff.

Toro the Bull: When does Texas get its own tag???

Remember there wouldn't have been a Texas had there been a back door to the Alamo

I imagine that if Perry gets reelected it won't be long after that. He would probably do something so monumentally stupid that we would be forced to have our own tag. Something like executing an innocent man and then screwing up the coverup. But we still wouldn't be as crazy as Florida. California should have its own tag too.

I don't get the second part of your comment. Why would Texas not exist if there was a back door to the Alamo?

Oh, and Subby, they're not a "polygamist sect". They don't believe in Polygamon. They're a Mormon sect that practices polygamy.

belowner: BunkoSquad: This is what happens when you allow gay marriage.

I don't think he should have been convicted, and I also don't think he should have been charged with bigamy. The girl was "of age" in some states, which means this conviction is based on an arbitrary standard that doesn't apply equally across the nation.

And who farking cares if you marry more than one person?

The same people who say that gays being allowed to marry somehow destroys the sanctity of marriage. At least I should think they would be upset about it.

i have to throw my hat into the "i have no problem with multi-way marriage" arena. so long as nobody is being brainwashed.

see, it's the brainwashing i have a problem with.


/PS: Open relationships are FTW

Tainted1: Bet you a nickel the marriage was also arranged without the girls consent, making it a case of rape rape instead of joke (statutory) rape.

She's got feet, don't she?

Toro the Bull Quote 2009-11-06 11:16:50 AM
When does Texas get its own tag???

Remember there wouldn't have been a Texas had there been a back door to the Alamo

Wow, do some research. The crazy fundie Mormons in this case weren't from Texas. The fled there when the law was chasing them in other states. Then again, I guess it's just easier for you to be ignorant and spiteful. BTW, the war for Texas independence wasn't won at the Alamo. I wouldn't however expect a moron like yourself to know anything about history.

/Hates stupid people

Kazan: i have to throw my hat into the "i have no problem with multi-way marriage" arena. so long as nobody is being brainwashed.

see, it's the brainwashing i have a problem with.


/PS: Open relationships are FTW

Only if done right. Open relationships are not for everyone. Much like weed.

belowner: Tainted1: Bet you a nickel the marriage was also arranged without the girls consent, making it a case of rape rape instead of joke (statutory) rape.

She's got feet, don't she?

Some of the stories involve young girls being held down by the priest and raped on the altar by their new "husbands", so the existence of her feet may be irrelevant, you jackass.

Theaetetus: Oh, and Subby, they're not a "polygamist sect". They don't believe in Polygamon. They're a Mormon sect that practices polygamy.

Not Mormon. Calling them Mormon is like calling the Westboro Baptist Chuch "Roman Catholics" because they can trace their roots back to a common origin.

My god.
It's full of Polanskis.

Tainted1: belowner: BunkoSquad: This is what happens when you allow gay marriage.

I don't think he should have been convicted, and I also don't think he should have been charged with bigamy. The girl was "of age" in some states, which means this conviction is based on an arbitrary standard that doesn't apply equally across the nation.

And who farking cares if you marry more than one person?

Bet you a nickel the marriage was also arranged without the girls consent, making it a case of rape rape instead of joke (statutory) rape.

You said rape twice

Tavernknight:

Only if done right. Open relationships are not for everyone. Much like weed.

i'll agree with the premise on OR. I haven't actually gotten to exercise mine... no opportunity when you're too busy paying of student loans to go troll for opportunity.



however I think people who knowingly poison themselves are largely retards - i do have a problem with their poisoning themselves poisons others.

eat it, chew it, snort it, whatever - just don't turn it into an aerosol and thereby force others to engage in your stupidity.

I just imagined 8 clones of my girlfriend and what that would be like when she was at her worst and most emotional.

Oh God. The horror. It is Hell. I have envisioned Hell for the first time.

I'll let you guys know if my eyes went totally black too. I'm not close to a mirror.

mtylerjr: Theaetetus: Oh, and Subby, they're not a "polygamist sect". They don't believe in Polygamon. They're a Mormon sect that practices polygamy.

Not Mormon. Calling them Mormon is like calling the Westboro Baptist Chuch "Roman Catholics" because they can trace their roots back to a common origin.

Nope, it'd be like calling them a Baptist sect. Which they are.
This group doesn't merely trace their roots back to a common origin with Mormons, but use the same holy books and dogma and follow the same beliefs of their prophets. In fact, if you ask them, it's the normal mormons (say that three times fast) who have abandoned the explicit teachings of Prophets Smith and Young, the kiddie diddlers.

While I agree that 16 qualifies as being a minor, it's a far cry from being a 'child'. While sex with a 16yo might not be the smartest thing to do it's hardly the tragedy that the DA is making it out to be, unless it was forced, of which there is no mention.

I think they're grabbing at straws in the wind and looking to prosecute on any charge just so they don't end up looking like total farkups.

/marriage is overrated

old_toole: Bet you a nickel the marriage was also arranged without the girls consent, making it a case of rape rape instead of joke (statutory) rape.

You said rape twice

Liberals have to distinguish between types of rape so they can excuse Roman Polanski. Rape rape is rape. Polanski sodomizing a 13 year old girl was "misplaced love".

Theaetetus: Some of the stories

Prove it. More importantly, that wasn't the case here, you jackass.

Toro the Bull Quote 2009-11-06 11:16:50 AM
When does Texas get its own tag???

Remember there wouldn't have been a Texas had there been a back door to the Alamo

Idiot, they were there voluntarily. I bet you get lots of visitors to your back door though.

Kome: Having 9 wives is like having your own golf course.

I thought golf courses only went up to 18, not 27.

//hot, like Polanski, Cruise, and Oprah in a 3-way

He reminds me of this guy:

belowner: Theaetetus: Some of the stories

Prove it. More importantly, that wasn't the case here, you jackass.

Prove it. And as for jackass-ness, you're the one claiming it wasn't rape because, and I quote, "she's got feet, don't she?" So, in summary, you can go fark yourself with a rusty spike.

I have nothing against polygamy, as long as it works both ways. These sects do NOT practice polygamy, since only the men are allowed to have multiple spouses. The woman in these sects are given no such choice, and forced into their marriages.

Theaetetus: Interestingly, most, if not all, of the people who are pro-gay marriage neither hate nor are even intolerant of polygamy. Instead, we just say that you have to figure out the rights first, because the several centuries of common law building up default provisions in two-person marriages wouldn't be applicable to polygamy, so you're starting from scratch. But nice try, jackoff.


Interestingly, most, if not all, of the people who are not pro-gay marriage just say that you have to figure out the rights first, because the several centuries of common law building up default provisions in two-sex marriages wouldn't be applicable to sexually equal pairings, so you're starting from scratch. But nice try, jackoff.

HEHE

belowner: old_toole: Bet you a nickel the marriage was also arranged without the girls consent, making it a case of rape rape instead of joke (statutory) rape.

You said rape twice

Liberals have to distinguish between types of rape so they can excuse Roman Polanski. Rape rape is rape. Polanski sodomizing a 13 year old girl was "misplaced love".

there are no liberals here defending Polanski

you are a douche

Theaetetus: nterestingly, most, if not all, of the people who are pro-gay marriage neither hate nor are even intolerant of polygamy.

You are completely full of shiat, jackoff.

Jeff73:
Interestingly, most, if not all, of the people who are not pro-gay marriage just say that you have to figure out the rights first,

bullshiat. they're saying that "gay marriage is an abomination" and it "Violates the sanctity of marriage" and other bigoted theocentric bullshiat.

belowner: And who farking cares if you marry more than one person?

Baby Jesus does, you dirty farking sinner.

The Laughing Kookaburra: Theaetetus: nterestingly, most, if not all, of the people who are pro-gay marriage neither hate nor are even intolerant of polygamy.

You are completely full of shiat, jackoff.

find me a large group of pro-gay-marriage people who are anti-plural-marriage given that all the participants are unbrainwashed adults.