... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

Wow, a sign about how Bush is a war criminal.

How.....beyond the pale. Truly.

that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

This was a GOP sponsored and promoted protest.

that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

But, but Democrats! Don't you flame people for such lame counters?

Oh, yeah, and none of those were at official Democratic protests. These were at official GOP protests organized by the elected leadership of the party. False equivalence is false.

GAT_00: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts

Of course, the first picture is a satire of a satire... or are the works of Charlie Chaplin lost on you?

Slide show doesn't work. From the first pic it looks like what's typical of any PETA protest ever though. Protests bring the crazies, no exceptions. If you look for the crazies it'll over shadow just about any protest, at least where people bring signs.

Angry liberals are angry in this thread.

that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

Two wrongs make a right...gotcha

Were those Bush signs at rallies sponsored by Congressional Dems?

[Oops! Didn't mean to quote you quoting GAT_00]

that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

Well, that makes it okay then!

When the fark did Dennis Kucinich ever call Bush a Nazi? That, essentially, is what the House GOP is doing here.

Protests might be more effective without the protesters.

that1guy77: Angry liberals are angry in this thread.

Stupid conservatives are stupid in this thread.

Uh oh. GAT is gonna throw the bullshiat flag again.

Do we know for certain that no libs with offensive signs got any encouragement from the Dems ? Cause if they did, or if there's even a chance that they did then that makes the tea party signs ok.

Did Dennis Kucinich ever officially say that Bush wasn't a Nazi ?

It used to be the administration's job to make the rules. It used to be us against them. Now its us against us.

I've been here for 30 years and I got to tell you guys, what's going on here is about America. Its about democracy. Its about the Bill of Rights, basic cable, call waiting and free trips to the salad bar! It's about everything that's makes this country great; OUR COUNTRY!

We can do something about this, we can finally say, when some people are having a good time, drinking some beers, throwing some meat, that we're not gonna protest.

...

We're not gonna protest.

...

We're not gonna protest!

We're not gonna protest! We're not gonna protest! We're not gonna protest!

/Gutter is a tool!

that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

All other arguments aside, if you're going to defend that banner of dead bodies from Dachau comparing it to Obama's health care plans then you're one seriously farked up person, just as farked up as the person who made it, and everyone there who saw it and said "right on!!".

So farked up that there is no real word to describe just how farked up that is.

That banner is perhaps the single worst thing I've ever seen held up at a protest, and we've all seen the stupid shiat those extreme fundamentalist muslims like to hold up at their rallies. Even though I also disapprove of those with Bush / Hitler comparison banners a Charlie Chaplin Bush / Hitler or a sign calling Bush a war criminal come no where close to comparing.

Don't defend that banner, it's disgusting and all involved should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

/I hope Bush / Hitler won't be filtered

It floors me to see a bunch of seniors carrying signs that say "keep the government's hands off my health care". OK, we'll just stop sending you those Medicare checks. Problem solved.

And someone please tell me exactly how providing health care to people is "taking away our freedom". If non-sequiturs were losers, this argument would be Jon Gosselin.

Barakku: Slide show doesn't work.

I've been having problems with some slide show links and it turned out to be Adblock Plus. YMMV

Barakku: Slide show doesn't work

This. Broken slideshow is broken.

Slaxl: All other arguments aside, if you're going to defend that banner of dead bodies from Dachau comparing it to Obama's health care plans then you're one seriously farked up person


Agreed. I can't even put into words how dumb it is to say that the Holocaust was, in any way, the same as providing health care to citizens. WTF?

Of course the signs (on both sides) are okay. A little juvenile and over the top, but okay. You're supposed to have a pretty healthy mistrust of government. Your job as a citizen. Checks and balances. The individual politician doesn't really have your best interest in mind, as so many of you have pointed out repeatedly (though, usually concerning "the other team". These threads are always so funny. The stock some of you put in politicians you've never met, know anything about or would let into your homes...mind boggling.

flaEsq: Barakku: Slide show doesn't work

This. Broken slideshow is broken.


It works if you don't use the link here, just go to huffingtonpost.com and find the article - it's on the main page.

If Dante were alive today, I would hope he would reconfigure Hell with special attention to people who put up slideshows on the internet -- or submit them to fark. Not to mention telemarketers, hackers, purveyors of quack erectile disfunction nostrums, whoever decided to put high fructose corn syrup in every single food sold in America, protestors who hold up incredibly stupid signs and those kids who keep coming onto my lawn.

Trivia Jockey: It works if you don't use the link here, just go to huffingtonpost.com and find the article - it's on the main page.

Thanks mate, fixed it right up.

that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

I learned it from YOU, DAD.

Spad31: Of course the signs (on both sides) are okay. A little juvenile and over the top, but okay.


I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one.

Trivia Jockey: Spad31: Of course the signs (on both sides) are okay. A little juvenile and over the top, but okay.


I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one.

All good. We're allowed to disagree. Doesn't mean we can't have a beer.

/buys next round

Spad31: Of course the signs (on both sides) are okay. A little juvenile and over the top, but okay.

Really? A sign with a stack of holocaust victims is ok? Really?

Jaboobinator: Spad31: Of course the signs (on both sides) are okay. A little juvenile and over the top, but okay.

Really? A sign with a stack of holocaust victims is ok? Really?

Nah. Not the specific sign. More the silly, over the top sentiment so apparent on both sides.

/Really.

Slaxl: that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

All other arguments aside, if you're going to defend that banner of dead bodies from Dachau comparing it to Obama's health care plans then you're one seriously farked up person, just as farked up as the person who made it, and everyone there who saw it and said "right on!!".

So farked up that there is no real word to describe just how farked up that is.

I defended the banner? Really? Prove it in what I posted. That's weapons grade stupidity right there. To put your capacity for logic in perspective, it would make more sense if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

that1guy77: Angry liberals are angry in this thread.

Really? Cuz the very Boobies was an angry conservative. With, like, pictures and stuff to back up his angryness.

/lib here for the lulz

Here come the "I was just joking !".

that1guy77: if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

Okay...creative and pretty funny. I may have to use that somewhere.

/Buys round

that1guy77: Slaxl: that1guy77: ... because libtards would never put up offensive signs or look like libtards with offensive shirts.

All other arguments aside, if you're going to defend that banner of dead bodies from Dachau comparing it to Obama's health care plans then you're one seriously farked up person, just as farked up as the person who made it, and everyone there who saw it and said "right on!!".

So farked up that there is no real word to describe just how farked up that is.

I defended the banner? Really? Prove it in what I posted. That's weapons grade stupidity right there. To put your capacity for logic in perspective, it would make more sense if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

Angry idiot is angry in this thread.

Spad31: that1guy77: if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

Okay...creative and pretty funny. I may have to use that somewhere.

/Buys round

Guinness please.

that1guy77: Spad31: that1guy77: if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

Okay...creative and pretty funny. I may have to use that somewhere.

/Buys round

Guinness please.

Done.

Spad31: A little juvenile and over the top, but okay

See, piles of naked emaciated corpses are just a little over the top.

Spad31: All good. We're allowed to disagree. Doesn't mean we can't have a beer.

/buys next round


Congress could really learn a thing or two about debate from Fark.

This country will continue to be farked up until partisan politics and extremists on either side are gone.

We're screwed....

sweetmelissa31: Spad31: A little juvenile and over the top, but okay

See, piles of naked emaciated corpses are just a little over the top.

It's just a frat prank.

sweetmelissa31: Spad31: A little juvenile and over the top, but okay

See, piles of naked emaciated corpses are just a little over the top.

Yeah, agreed. So are the 'Bush is Hitler' signs. The silliness is not really very productive.

As bad as these are, it's a little dishonest to insinuate that the Republican party is somehow responsible for the content of these signs.

that1guy77: I defended the banner? Really? Prove it in what I posted. That's weapons grade stupidity right there. To put your capacity for logic in perspective, it would make more sense if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

You defended it on the grounds of "but, but..."

Spad31: Yeah, agreed.

Maybe of the corpses were of regular white people it would be somewhat more distasteful.

GAT_00: that1guy77: I defended the banner? Really? Prove it in what I posted. That's weapons grade stupidity right there. To put your capacity for logic in perspective, it would make more sense if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

You defended it on the grounds of "but, but..."

HEY! There's our GAT!

/Buys round

You're the most fun to come along in these threads in years. (I'd make references to really old time Farkers, but...you'd miss the jokes...since you weren't here)

GAT_00: that1guy77: I defended the banner? Really? Prove it in what I posted. That's weapons grade stupidity right there. To put your capacity for logic in perspective, it would make more sense if you took a shiat on your keyboard and let the weight of your feces type for you.

You defended it on the grounds of "but, but..."

The "but, but..." was alluding to the irony of hypocrisy... which like the ceiling of the ceiling in your room, went over your thick head. But of course you knew that and like to troll along.

Is it really a "defense" to just frantically try to change the subject to something somewhat similar that the other side did in order to distract attention away from an uncomfortable reality ?

I mean, what kind of pathetic little crotch sniffing dog would even attempt a defense that weak and pathetic ? It pretty much has to be just a joke.

that1guy77: GAT_00:

You defended it on the grounds of "but, but..."

The "but, but..." was alluding to the irony of hypocrisy... which like the ceiling of the ceiling in your room, went over your thick head. But of course you knew that and like to troll along.

/oops typo

that1guy77: which like the ceiling of the ceiling in your room, went over your thick head. But of course you knew that and like to troll along.


Yeah... he's the one that's trolling.

I'm betting that that guy didn't click the link before he made his equivocation.