Fark Logo

Not NewsSportsShowbizGeekPoliticsVideoMusicBusinessSubmit Link |

(Reason Magazine) Interesting
The most impressive trick played by liberals is creating a narrative wherein attempting to fundamentally reconfigure the American economy makes one a moderate, while the nearly powerless who dissent are "Stalinists"



First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
sigdiamond2000
2009-11-05 11:13:27 AM


Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.

Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.

 
JusticeandIndependence
2009-11-05 11:13:30 AM


{GROAN}

 
ne2d
2009-11-05 11:19:25 AM


Not nearly as impressive as the trick played by Republicans by creating a narrative wherein they are the party of limited government.

 
notmtwain
2009-11-05 11:19:32 AM


If I understand what he is saying, it's something like:

There are no Stalinists in Fox holes.

Wait, maybe there are.

///The Stalin comparison merely related to the purging of the moderate candidate, not to all the efforts to slow or oppose legislation.

 
jehovahs witness protection
2009-11-05 11:19:53 AM


sigdiamond2000: Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.

Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.


Because defending the liberals is treason.

 
slayer199
2009-11-05 11:20:15 AM


sigdiamond2000: ason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.

Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's e


Did you RTFA? They ripped the GOP to shreds.

 
mrshowrules
2009-11-05 11:26:16 AM


Came here fot a Usual Suspects reference. Leaving dissappointed.

 
Cagey B
2009-11-05 11:26:37 AM


Help help I'm being oppressed, etc.

 
House of Tards
2009-11-05 11:26:45 AM


sigdiamond2000:
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.


David Harsyani is a local columnist in Denver who gets syndicated by Reason. And his typical column is always about whitewashing social conservatism. His standard column structure is typically something along the lines of: "I am a supporter of gay marriage and all, but I would reluctantly trade these people's rights for a repeal of the stifling and statist regulations that require pharmacists to be credentialled".

 
mrshowrules
2009-11-05 11:29:03 AM


sigdiamond2000: Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.

Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.


Hoffman is too stupid to have any beliefs. I've met squirrels with more character them him.

 
GAT_00
2009-11-05 11:29:06 AM


You sound whiny and out of power.

 
Marcus Aurelius
2009-11-05 11:35:27 AM


Can It Be? A Party for Capitalism?

It's called "Congress", and it costs businesses relatively little to get whatever laws passed that they want. All they need are suitcases full of money and it happens.

So who needs political parties when you can just pay for whatever legislation you want?

 
Lionel Mandrake
2009-11-05 11:36:47 AM


jehovahs witness protection: sigdiamond2000: Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.

Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.

Because defending the liberals is treason.


What does that even mean?

 
MuadDib
2009-11-05 11:43:01 AM


Marcus Aurelius: Can It Be? A Party for Capitalism?

It's called "Congress", and it costs businesses relatively little to get whatever laws passed that they want.


You seem to be a little fuzzy on the meaning of the word "capitalism."

 
Rev.K
2009-11-05 11:50:41 AM


Lionel Mandrake: What does that even mean?

Never question Bruce Dickinson jehovahs witness protection!

 
madmann
2009-11-05 11:50:44 AM


Stalinist! Marxist! Communist! Socialist! Leninist! Fascist!

None of these words have any meaning, right? I'm pretty sure any word that ends in "ist" is just a pejorative. The "ist" means "you're a bad person and you should feel bad".

 
unyon
2009-11-05 11:53:43 AM


DRTFA, but even an outsider can see how the American economy got remade over the last 25 years in the other direction. Calling a course correction 'radical' is where I would part company with this guy.

It's hard to call the GOP the party of Lincoln, when Lincoln would have been run out of town on a rail for being a RINO.

 
vygramul
2009-11-05 12:02:18 PM


madmann: Stalinist! Marxist! Communist! Socialist! Leninist! Fascist!

None of these words have any meaning, right? I'm pretty sure any word that ends in "ist" is just a pejorative. The "ist" means "you're a bad person and you should feel bad".


It's heading that way as both sides fling around the phrases with impunity.

 
HansensDisease
2009-11-05 12:05:24 PM


Yeah! It's really despicable how those libs are calling everyone Socialist!

/wait wut?

 
DamnYankees
2009-11-05 12:15:06 PM


Wait, I thought Van JObama was the Stalinist. WHO IS THE STALINIST?!?!?!

 
sigdiamond2000
2009-11-05 12:15:28 PM


slayer199: Did you RTFA? They ripped the GOP to shreds.

Hardly. They're completely whitewashing the essential nature of this "free-market uprising" and this mythical new "Capitalism Party" because they desperately need this movement to appear ideologically pure.

Jesus, what a crock of bullsh*t. The NY-23 "uprising" was orchestrated almost completely by the far-right social conservative fringe of the Republican Party, and had more to do with ACORN, gays, and abortion than fiscal conservatism.

It's embarrassing to watch Reason play so dumb about this. But I guess they need to in order to validate their worldview.

 
House of Tards
2009-11-05 12:17:34 PM


vygramul:
It's heading that way as both sides fling around the phrases with impunity.


Sounds like one o' them big words they teach at the Marxist indoctrination centers we call college.

 
Eddie Adams from Torrance
2009-11-05 12:25:57 PM


sigdiamond2000: It's embarrassing to watch Reason play so dumb about this. But I guess they need to in order to validate their worldview.

They're not playing.

 
CitizenTed
2009-11-05 12:30:12 PM


BoTh sIDez aRe tEh baD.

 
Dusk-You-n-Me
2009-11-05 12:31:37 PM


He'll flip ya.

 
Displayed 25 of 137 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

Redisplay/refresh comments

[ Continue Farking ]