(Reason Magazine) The most impressive trick played by liberals is creating a narrative wherein attempting to fundamentally reconfigure the American economy makes one a moderate, while the nearly powerless who dissent are "Stalinists"
Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
sigdiamond2000:Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
sigdiamond2000:ason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's e
sigdiamond2000: Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
David Harsyani is a local columnist in Denver who gets syndicated by Reason. And his typical column is always about whitewashing social conservatism. His standard column structure is typically something along the lines of: "I am a supporter of gay marriage and all, but I would reluctantly trade these people's rights for a repeal of the stifling and statist regulations that require pharmacists to be credentialled".
sigdiamond2000:Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
Hoffman is too stupid to have any beliefs. I've met squirrels with more character them him.
It's called "Congress", and it costs businesses relatively little to get whatever laws passed that they want. All they need are suitcases full of money and it happens.
So who needs political parties when you can just pay for whatever legislation you want?
jehovahs witness protection:sigdiamond2000: Boy, for a magazine that prides itself on being rugged individualist independents, Reason sure does spend a lot of time defending the Republican Party these days.
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
None of these words have any meaning, right? I'm pretty sure any word that ends in "ist" is just a pejorative. The "ist" means "you're a bad person and you should feel bad".
DRTFA, but even an outsider can see how the American economy got remade over the last 25 years in the other direction. Calling a course correction 'radical' is where I would part company with this guy.
It's hard to call the GOP the party of Lincoln, when Lincoln would have been run out of town on a rail for being a RINO.
None of these words have any meaning, right? I'm pretty sure any word that ends in "ist" is just a pejorative. The "ist" means "you're a bad person and you should feel bad".
It's heading that way as both sides fling around the phrases with impunity.
slayer199:Did you RTFA? They ripped the GOP to shreds.
Hardly. They're completely whitewashing the essential nature of this "free-market uprising" and this mythical new "Capitalism Party" because they desperately need this movement to appear ideologically pure.
Jesus, what a crock of bullsh*t. The NY-23 "uprising" was orchestrated almost completely by the far-right social conservative fringe of the Republican Party, and had more to do with ACORN, gays, and abortion than fiscal conservatism.
It's embarrassing to watch Reason play so dumb about this. But I guess they need to in order to validate their worldview.
sigdiamond2000
2009-11-05 11:13:27 AM
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
JusticeandIndependence
2009-11-05 11:13:30 AM
ne2d
2009-11-05 11:19:25 AM
notmtwain
2009-11-05 11:19:32 AM
There are no Stalinists in Fox holes.
Wait, maybe there are.
///The Stalin comparison merely related to the purging of the moderate candidate, not to all the efforts to slow or oppose legislation.
jehovahs witness protection
2009-11-05 11:19:53 AM
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
Because defending the liberals is treason.
slayer199
2009-11-05 11:20:15 AM
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's e
Did you RTFA? They ripped the GOP to shreds.
mrshowrules
2009-11-05 11:26:16 AM
Cagey B
2009-11-05 11:26:37 AM
House of Tards
2009-11-05 11:26:45 AM
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
David Harsyani is a local columnist in Denver who gets syndicated by Reason. And his typical column is always about whitewashing social conservatism. His standard column structure is typically something along the lines of: "I am a supporter of gay marriage and all, but I would reluctantly trade these people's rights for a repeal of the stifling and statist regulations that require pharmacists to be credentialled".
mrshowrules
2009-11-05 11:29:03 AM
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
Hoffman is too stupid to have any beliefs. I've met squirrels with more character them him.
GAT_00
2009-11-05 11:29:06 AM
Marcus Aurelius
2009-11-05 11:35:27 AM
It's called "Congress", and it costs businesses relatively little to get whatever laws passed that they want. All they need are suitcases full of money and it happens.
So who needs political parties when you can just pay for whatever legislation you want?
Lionel Mandrake
2009-11-05 11:36:47 AM
Another thing: Calling Doug Hoffman a "tepid, traditional conservative" is f*cking ridiculous. This author's either an idiot or purposely glossing over this guy's extreme social conservative beliefs.
Because defending the liberals is treason.
What does that even mean?
MuadDib
2009-11-05 11:43:01 AM
It's called "Congress", and it costs businesses relatively little to get whatever laws passed that they want.
You seem to be a little fuzzy on the meaning of the word "capitalism."
Rev.K
2009-11-05 11:50:41 AM
Never question
Bruce Dickinsonjehovahs witness protection!madmann
2009-11-05 11:50:44 AM
None of these words have any meaning, right? I'm pretty sure any word that ends in "ist" is just a pejorative. The "ist" means "you're a bad person and you should feel bad".
unyon
2009-11-05 11:53:43 AM
It's hard to call the GOP the party of Lincoln, when Lincoln would have been run out of town on a rail for being a RINO.
vygramul
2009-11-05 12:02:18 PM
None of these words have any meaning, right? I'm pretty sure any word that ends in "ist" is just a pejorative. The "ist" means "you're a bad person and you should feel bad".
It's heading that way as both sides fling around the phrases with impunity.
HansensDisease
2009-11-05 12:05:24 PM
/wait wut?
DamnYankees
2009-11-05 12:15:06 PM
sigdiamond2000
2009-11-05 12:15:28 PM
Hardly. They're completely whitewashing the essential nature of this "free-market uprising" and this mythical new "Capitalism Party" because they desperately need this movement to appear ideologically pure.
Jesus, what a crock of bullsh*t. The NY-23 "uprising" was orchestrated almost completely by the far-right social conservative fringe of the Republican Party, and had more to do with ACORN, gays, and abortion than fiscal conservatism.
It's embarrassing to watch Reason play so dumb about this. But I guess they need to in order to validate their worldview.
House of Tards
2009-11-05 12:17:34 PM
It's heading that way as both sides fling around the phrases with impunity.
Sounds like one o' them big words they teach at the Marxist indoctrination centers we call college.
Eddie Adams from Torrance
2009-11-05 12:25:57 PM
They're not playing.
CitizenTed
2009-11-05 12:30:12 PM
Dusk-You-n-Me
2009-11-05 12:31:37 PM