Subby didn't hear about last week's Bill's game, obviously.

It's over, TO. It's over.

Nobody cares anymore.

beerrun: Subby didn't hear about last week's Bill's game, obviously.

That was his only TD of the entire year.

it's funny cuz Roy Williams is actually on the team and complaining about Romo, but people would rather still talk about TO

Whodat?: It's over, TO. It's over.

Nobody cares anymore.

Except the media who is still constantly trying to hoorang him into saying something controversial.

Di Atribe: beerrun: Subby didn't hear about last week's Bill's game, obviously.

That was his only TD of the entire year.

It's not TO's fault, it's the Bills lack of an offense. When TO and Evans combined can't reach the endzone in most games, you have a problem with the QB, line, play-calling or all three

Epiphany: It's not TO's fault, it's the Bills lack of an offense. When TO and Evans combined can't reach the endzone in most games, you have a problem with the QB, line, play-calling or all three

Of course it's not TO's fault. Sure. We can go with that.

However, bagging on your former teammates when those teammates are clearly doing better than you this year? Lame.

Hai u guys u leave my boyfriend Tommy Romero alone. Were goin to Cabo to be togethur 4ever!

/got nuthin'

InferiousX: Whodat?: It's over, TO. It's over.

Nobody cares anymore.

Except the media who is still constantly trying to hoorang him into saying something controversial.

That's true, but you'll note this is from The Buffalo News and not ESPN. His profile isn't what it used to be, and it's going nowhere but down.

Epiphany: Di Atribe: beerrun: Subby didn't hear about last week's Bill's game, obviously.

That was his only TD of the entire year.

It's not TO's fault, it's the Bills lack of an offense. When TO and Evans combined can't reach the endzone in most games, you have a problem with the QB, line, play-calling or all three

Dick Jauron.

That's not fair. That's his [former] Quarterback. That's his [former] teammate.

[Picture of T.O. crying]

He's just going with the plays that are called.

The difference between T.O. and Jerry Rice:
Jerry credits his team and fellow players for him achieving success. T.O. claims that his team and fellow players can't win unless he gets the ball.

Big difference.

heavymetal: The difference between T.O. and Jerry Rice:
Jerry credits his team and fellow players for him achieving success. T.O. claims that his team and fellow players can't win unless he gets the ball.

Big difference.

That's farking hilarious. Really, really funny. T.O. is a huge fan of Jerry Rice, and speaks highly of him and the help he gave him when they were both in SF. He also says that Jerry Rice is the best WR in history.

I think failmitter is using the T.O. angle to start a discussion about his favorite team, the lame ass Bills. The Bills suck, they've always sucked and they always will suck. Let it go.

Epiphany: That's farking hilarious. Really, really funny.

T.O. has said several times, in several cities, for several teams, that the reason they weren't winning was because he wasn't getting the ball. He's said it enough times that even when he doesn't say it I think he believes it in his heart and just doesn't want to suffer the media backlash.

Epiphany: That's farking hilarious. Really, really funny. T.O. is a huge fan of Jerry Rice, and speaks highly of him and the help he gave him when they were both in SF. He also says that Jerry Rice is the best WR in history.

He might be a fan of him but he sure doesn't emulate him or try to be anything like him.

Rice is the best ever. Owens isn't even the best of his generation.

TO is a great WR, he just needs to get the fark out of Buffalo.

heavymetal: T.O. claims that his team and fellow players can't win unless he gets the ball.

Big difference.

He hasn't said anything like that in Buffalo.

He has criticized the overall performance of the Bills' offense, but far less than it deserves to be criticized.

falcon176: it's funny cuz Roy Williams is actually on the team and complaining about Romo, but people would rather still talk about TO

Roy and Tony are not communicating well, but I think it's obviously not on Tony as he has been fine completing passes to nine other receivers. Roy seems confused by his routes, confused by the timing, and unsure where Tony wants him to go.

Hoping to see them get this straight come Sunday, that first slant route (WHAT THE HELL A SLANT BY THE COWBOYS?!?!) to Roy in last week's game was a beauty, I'd love to see more of those.

Don't know where else to put this, but I need someone to settle the argument:

Was Tony Romo born with some specific birth defect that causes him to look like a 1890s circus-style retarded person? Or is he just that ugly?

You stay classy, TO.

/Miles Austin, motherfarker

TheJoe03: TO is a great WR, he just needs to get the fark out of Buffalo.

No matter where you go, there you are.

Di Atribe: That was his only TD of the entire year.

It always amazes me when people talk shiat without looking at the stats. It's inconsequential, but TO has actually scored (2) TDs this season - one rushing, one receiving.

The Bills' problem has NOTHING to do with Owens. The Cowboys' problem has much more to do with Romo.

\That's the nature of the QB position.

TheJoe03: TO is a great WR, he just needs to get the fark out of Buffalo into retirement.

FTFE

/enough is enough
//tired of the primadonnas

heavymetal: The difference between T.O. and Jerry Rice:
Jerry credits his team and fellow players for him achieving success. T.O. claims that his team and fellow players can't win unless he gets the ball.

Big difference.

Don't kid yourself - Jerry Rice was often thought by his teammates to be a selfish dbag.

murp0837: The Bills' problem has NOTHING to do with Owens. The Cowboys' problem has much more to do with Romo.

From NFL.com: Total Offense (YPG)

1. New Orleans Saints 428.7
2. Dallas Cowboys 411.1

You sure that Romo's the Cowboys' "problem"?

Gonz: murp0837: The Bills' problem has NOTHING to do with Owens. The Cowboys' problem has much more to do with Romo.

From NFL.com: Total Offense (YPG)

1. New Orleans Saints 428.7
2. Dallas Cowboys 411.1

You sure that Romo's the Cowboys' "problem"?

Especially since he hasn't thrown an interception in 3 consecutive games, and in that same time period has thrown 8 TDs and 1,269 yards.

murp0837: Di Atribe: That was his only TD of the entire year.

It always amazes me when people talk shiat without looking at the stats. It's inconsequential, but TO has actually scored (2) TDs this season - one rushing, one receiving.

Actually, I did look at the stats. Here (pops).


The Bills' problem has NOTHING to do with Owens. The Cowboys' problem has much more to do with Romo.

\That's the nature of the QB position.

It always amazes me when people talk shiat without looking at the stats.

Hmm, didn't TO buy Tony the farking tickets to Mexico?

TheJoe03: TO is a great WR, he just needs to get the fark out of Buffalo.


How bout if someone just threw the dang ball to him?

Di Atribe: Actually, I did look at the stats. Here (pops).

You should have looked Here

http://www.nfl.com/players/terrellowens/profile?id=OWE755129

Romo is the reason why the Cowboys have failed these last few years.

somethingvague: Don't know where else to put this, but I need someone to settle the argument:

Was Tony Romo born with some specific birth defect that causes him to look like a 1890s circus-style retarded person? Or is he just that ugly?

who cares what he looks like. It how he plays football that matters.

murp0837: Romo is the reason why the Cowboys have failed these last few years.

So let me get this straight: Because TO has TWO TDs instead of ONE, that means that he is excelling in Buffalo where he failed in Dallas (where he had TEN), but he only failed in Dallas because Tony Romo is a crappy QB. Is that the point you're trying to make?

Nhojwolfe: who cares what he looks like. It how he plays football that matters.

Well.....

Di Atribe: murp0837: Romo is the reason why the Cowboys have failed these last few years.

So let me get this straight: Because TO has TWO TDs instead of ONE, that means that he is excelling in Buffalo where he failed in Dallas (where he had TEN), but he only failed in Dallas because Tony Romo is a crappy QB. Is that the point you're trying to make?

Obviously he is from an alternative timeline, where Brad Johnson is still the Cowboys QB and they won the Superbowl in 2007 and 2008.

anyone think owens well go into the HOF?

Fundamental Thereom Of Farkulus: anyone think owens well go into the HOF?

Probably.

SOOO glad we're rid of that cancer. Roy Williams is a benign mole compared to TO.

Could TO at least spend his bye week visiting a training field?

IAmRight: Epiphany: That's farking hilarious. Really, really funny. T.O. is a huge fan of Jerry Rice, and speaks highly of him and the help he gave him when they were both in SF. He also says that Jerry Rice is the best WR in history.

He might be a fan of him but he sure doesn't emulate him or try to be anything like him.

Rice is the best ever. Owens isn't even the best of his generation.

Owens is the best receiver of his generation, and he's top 10 all time. He's got the numbers and there's no denying that he's a game changer.

Epiphany: Owens is the best receiver of his generation, and he's top 10 all time. He's got the numbers and there's no denying that he's a game changer.

I'd take Moss over Owens, but it's not a landslide.

Fundamental Thereom Of Farkulus: anyone think owens well go into the HOF?

I think most people think that, he's one of the best ever, he's just a douche. Most WR's are douches though, so who cares? First ballot HOFer.

you have pee hands: Epiphany: Owens is the best receiver of his generation, and he's top 10 all time. He's got the numbers and there's no denying that he's a game changer.

I'd take Moss over Owens, but it's not a landslide.

It's debatable, but the main reason I'd take Owens over Moss is that he never quits on the field, unlike Moss. No matter how shiatty his team is, he busts his ass. He might yell at the Coach or QB, but it's because he wants to win and if the team is farking up, getting him the ball usually helps.

TheJoe03: Fundamental Thereom Of Farkulus: anyone think owens well go into the HOF?

I think most people think that, he's one of the best ever, he's just a douche. Most WR's are douches though, so who cares? First ballot HOFer.

Yeah, he's a lock for the HOF.

FormlessOne: Could TO at least spend his bye week visiting a training field?

The only way that would make the Bills a better team, is if he's visiting the training field to bury Dick Jauron underneath it.

Epiphany: you have pee hands: Epiphany: Owens is the best receiver of his generation, and he's top 10 all time. He's got the numbers and there's no denying that he's a game changer.

I'd take Moss over Owens, but it's not a landslide.

It's debatable, but the main reason I'd take Owens over Moss is that he never quits on the field, unlike Moss. No matter how shiatty his team is, he busts his ass. He might yell at the Coach or QB, but it's because he wants to win and if the team is farking up, getting him the ball usually helps.


As a Cowboys fan who watched him quit on routes and look very average last year, there is a decent list of guys I'd play before him now. Would take moss over owens. or Ellis...

just_intonation: You stay classy, TO.

/Miles Austin, motherfarker

This slays me.

We don't need you Owens! We have Roy Williams, Patrick Crayton, Miles Austin now! Who will it be in three weeks?

^^^ had Crayton, now has Austin in FF

Epiphany:
It's debatable, but the main reason I'd take Owens over Moss is that he never quits on the field, unlike Moss. No matter how shiatty his team is, he busts his ass. He might yell at the Coach or QB, but it's because he wants to win and if the team is farking up, getting him the ball usually helps.

That's true, but his method of yelling at the coach and QB was a team chemistry disaster, and it's not like his QBs have been bad before this year. Of course Moss was a pretty big off the field distraction before he got to New England, too.

Physically, he's a lot stronger than Moss but he's not as fast and Moss has better hands. They've both obviously had great careers. I could be wrong but I think Moss is a little younger and will have a few more years to bolster his career numbers.

you have pee hands: Epiphany:
It's debatable, but the main reason I'd take Owens over Moss is that he never quits on the field, unlike Moss. No matter how shiatty his team is, he busts his ass. He might yell at the Coach or QB, but it's because he wants to win and if the team is farking up, getting him the ball usually helps.

That's true, but his method of yelling at the coach and QB was a team chemistry disaster, and it's not like his QBs have been bad before this year. Of course Moss was a pretty big off the field distraction before he got to New England, too.

Physically, he's a lot stronger than Moss but he's not as fast and Moss has better hands. They've both obviously had great careers. I could be wrong but I think Moss is a little younger and will have a few more years to bolster his career numbers.

He doesn't have as good of hands as Moss anymore. Ever since he had his hand surgically repaired he isn't the same.

Moss loses points for his pathetic attitude in Oakland, but I'd call it a tie.