Eh, the conservative talk radio jerk jocks already sent it out there, so it's gospel by now.

Who gives a shiat?

FTFC:

the sad thing is it was very believable. And given the position Obama fills it's a sad state of affairs that it fits his M.O.

Priceless.

make me some tea: Eh, the conservative talk radio jerk jocks already sent it out there, so it's gospel by now.

Yep. Look no further than the Wall Street Journal.

Visualingo: Who gives a shiat?

He should have been....well I'm not sure what, but either not watching TV or not watching elitist documentaries. World's wildest police chases on TRU TV would have been a good start.

Oh wait, it's been debunked? Well then fake but accurate!

Same guy who originally posted it there is also the one posting the retraction. I'm impressed.

Who the hell actually believes stuff like that?

I flipped between that documentary and live coverage of the election results last night, so I'm getting a kick out of these replies.


Guess what: I was able to concentrate on the documentary, get up to the minute election results, and chat with The Boy all at the same time.

And I *don't* have a political staff of hundreds of people.

Dan Rather makes this ok.

are you sure he and michelle weren't eating lobster at the waldorf?

FlashHarry: are you sure he and michelle weren't eating lobster at the waldorf?

again, Dan Rather makes that ok also.

I really want to see this doc. I remember hearing about it during the campaign, and was psyched.

Gibbs did not deny he was watching the HBO special. In absence of know what 0 was doing.....

sigdiamond2000: FTFC:

the sad thing is it was very believable. And given the position Obama fills it's a sad state of affairs that it fits his M.O.

It's a sad state of affairs when it's believable that certain media personalities may have committed certain criminal acts in 1990.

SouthernManDunWrong: Gibbs did not deny he was watching the HBO special. In absence of know what 0 was doing.....

Woah, woah, that post was nigh on incoherent! That's not like you, man... usually, your posts are well thought out, original, intelligent, and concise!

Oh wait- exactly the opposite of that. My bad.

You can debunk most of what Fox News says just by using Google.

And what would be so horrible if he did?

Lionel Mandrake: And what would be so horrible if he did?

Because if he was watching the election results he could more ably employ his liberal telekinetic powers to skew the numbers. This requires a lot of concentration and won't work if he's eating Cheez-Its and watching a documentary.

CitizenTed: Lionel Mandrake: And what would be so horrible if he did?

Because if he was watching the election results he could more ably employ his liberal telekinetic powers to skew the numbers. This requires a lot of concentration and won't work if he's eating Cheez-Its and watching a documentary.

That's when my liberal telekinetic powers are at their most powerful.

Saborlas: You can debunk most of what Fox News says just by using Google.

Pretty much. Though, most of Fox's viewers don't know how to use the googles.

So what? Fox "News" has the right to make crap up. They even sued to make sure that they did.

Wasn't NewsBusters one of the places that 'broke' this ignorant lie?

Fox News has become so deranged and petty they're now lying about the president watching HBO. Really think about that for a moment.

Saborlas: You can debunk most of what Fox News says just by using Google.

Geek Squad charges an extra $50 to install that, and in the Obama economy, who has that type of cash to spare?

If someone made a documentary about me and put it on TV I would watch it.