(YouTube) Coolest video you'll see today: Entire Ares I-X flight captured from aircraft flying near point of impact (launch to splashdown). Bonus: Sweet prandtl glauert shock cloud on descent
Very cool, but I want to see the footage of the upper portion's descent. I don't think they put parachutes on that one. It likely made a satisfying splash when it hit the water.
Same thing happened with Dr. Manhattan's story during The Watchmen. The whole time all I could think of was this scene.
That's the scene.
I saw it for the first time of the Challenger disaster. My brother had it playing on one TV with the sound up, and the Challenger coverage on another with the sound off. Very surreal.
DarthBrooks: Station keeping is a lot easier at prop-driven speeds.
Ok. Here is a station-keeping mother:
Man, this is AMERICA. I want NASA to be flying some ultra-high performance scramjet with cameras that use scintillated platinum apertures just for the launch photos.
DarthBrooks:33% fail rate on the chutes - that's pretty awful, considering the experience level with Shuttle SRBs.
Although given the amount of Ares-hate by the about-to-be-unemployed KSC Shuttle staff, would employee sabotage be that unlikely?
They likely designed it to allow for one parachute to fail every time and to still have a 'within spec' landing.
As an engineer, I'd rather have one chute fail just to see what would happen and to gather that extremely useful data. It's better to tell the 'mucky-mucks' that if one fails, this is exactly what to expect.
And I'm pretty sure the two contracts are kept quite separate. Usually that's a requirement when you're dealing with one organization doing more than one contract. They don't want you spending money on one project out of the budget of the other... also there's some anti-trust issues that make lawyers spooge.
The payload placeholder was also hit during separation, oops. Take a look at the chutes again, I say more like a 50% failure, as the left's effectiveness had obviously been compromised by the failed chute.
Breadhead:The payload placeholder was also hit during separation, oops. Take a look at the chutes again, I say more like a 50% failure, as the left's effectiveness had obviously been compromised by the failed chute.
They're still working on the chutes and haven't completed testing yet.
portscanner:Bonus: Sweet prandtl glauert shock cloud on descent
Should I check for what that term means on Urban Dictionary?
Basically, momentary vapor clouds that appear around objects moving at transonic speeds due to air pressure wackiness. The F-22 picture posted is a prime example.
cretinbob
2009-11-03 01:47:59 PM
CtrlAltDelete
2009-11-03 02:23:05 PM
Insurance_EE_guy
2009-11-03 02:43:49 PM
+1 video is +1
SpinStopper
2009-11-03 02:44:09 PM
and...
CtrlAltDelete: Is it bad that watching all I could think of was a bunch of deep voices repeating Koyaanisqatsi...
No shiat ;)
HagarTheHorrible
2009-11-03 02:48:45 PM
CtrlAltDelete
2009-11-03 02:49:36 PM
Same thing happened with Dr. Manhattan's story during The Watchmen. The whole time all I could think of was this scene.
SpinStopper
2009-11-03 03:33:49 PM
Same thing happened with Dr. Manhattan's story during The Watchmen. The whole time all I could think of was this scene.
That's the scene.
I saw it for the first time of the Challenger disaster. My brother had it playing on one TV with the sound up, and the Challenger coverage on another with the sound off. Very surreal.
DarthBrooks
2009-11-03 03:51:01 PM
Although given the amount of Ares-hate by the about-to-be-unemployed KSC Shuttle staff, would employee sabotage be that unlikely?
Rain-Monkey
2009-11-03 05:27:18 PM
I love me some Cessna planes, but doesn't NASA have enough money left for a chase plane that might be... oh, I don't know... a jet??
DarthBrooks
2009-11-03 07:21:28 PM
Station keeping is a lot easier at prop-driven speeds.
Rain-Monkey
2009-11-03 07:45:15 PM
Ok. Here is a station-keeping mother:
Man, this is AMERICA. I want NASA to be flying some ultra-high performance scramjet with cameras that use scintillated platinum apertures just for the launch photos.
Tr0mBoNe
2009-11-03 08:10:29 PM
Although given the amount of Ares-hate by the about-to-be-unemployed KSC Shuttle staff, would employee sabotage be that unlikely?
They likely designed it to allow for one parachute to fail every time and to still have a 'within spec' landing.
As an engineer, I'd rather have one chute fail just to see what would happen and to gather that extremely useful data. It's better to tell the 'mucky-mucks' that if one fails, this is exactly what to expect.
And I'm pretty sure the two contracts are kept quite separate. Usually that's a requirement when you're dealing with one organization doing more than one contract. They don't want you spending money on one project out of the budget of the other... also there's some anti-trust issues that make lawyers spooge.
Fleet
2009-11-03 08:41:32 PM
Oh dear. Junior-year film class just came rushing back to me.
buckler
2009-11-03 08:47:04 PM
I thought I told you to stop making up animal names!
portscanner
2009-11-03 08:58:12 PM
Should I check for what that term means on Urban Dictionary?
Nescio quid dicas
2009-11-03 08:58:55 PM
Nescio quid dicas
2009-11-03 09:03:53 PM
Should I check for what that term means on Urban Dictionary?
portscanner
2009-11-03 09:07:59 PM
Should I check for what that term means on Urban Dictionary?
I guess, based on your reply, rule #35 applies here?
Nescio quid dicas
2009-11-03 09:10:13 PM
wut?
Breadhead
2009-11-03 09:26:56 PM
Nescio quid dicas
2009-11-03 09:31:25 PM
They're still working on the chutes and haven't completed testing yet.
travel4sanity
2009-11-03 09:33:23 PM
Bacontastesgood
2009-11-03 09:38:23 PM
Cailin Tinn
2009-11-03 09:49:34 PM
MadCat221
2009-11-03 09:58:18 PM
Should I check for what that term means on Urban Dictionary?
Basically, momentary vapor clouds that appear around objects moving at transonic speeds due to air pressure wackiness. The F-22 picture posted is a prime example.