So the feed would come over broadband? Maybe I'm overlooking something here, but am I supposed to get HDTV quality programming over my DSL? Or are they riding over cable lines? confused... halp! Or is this just iTunes tv for $30.00 more dollars a month than I already pay?
Dr.Knockboots:Or is this just iTunes tv for $30.00 more dollars a month than I already pay?
It would be $30 on top of whatever you pay for broadband.
Depending on the channel lineup, I could be very interested in this. I'm currently paying about $95 a month for satellite and $50 a month for broadband. If I could drop the satellite and get everything through my AppleTV and have a similar lineup I'd definitely be interested.
Heck, it might be enough to convince me to stop using boxee.
The Icelander:It would be $30 on top of whatever you pay for broadband.
Depending on the channel lineup, I could be very interested in this. I'm currently paying about $95 a month for satellite and $50 a month for broadband. If I could drop the satellite and get everything through my AppleTV and have a similar lineup I'd definitely be interested.
Heck, it might be enough to convince me to stop using boxee
Would I really want that service eating up my internet bandwidth? I'd have to see how this would work in person.. skeptical.. but interested.
This would be a good deal if there were enough networks signed on. Right now, you can't get HBO programs on iTunes, for example, and I doubt that would change.
There isn't a single TV series that I watch that isn't available in iTunes. For $30 a month, I'd be all over that, except for one thing. Live sports. Without the ability to watch ESPN live, I don't think I could talk myself into dropping cable entirely.
MonkeyAngst:This would be a good deal if there were enough networks signed on. Right now, you can't get HBO programs on iTunes, for example, and I doubt that would change.
There are lots of HBO programs available on iTunes
So, I will have to buy an Apple TV, Apple monitor, use Apple software on my Apple Mac. Every program will cost $1, even PBS and free-to-air channels. I will only be able to choose from one hundredth of the options on the most popular cable or satellite providers. It will low-fidelity, and low resolution, with proprietary DRM and compression that screws with the qaulity and makes it impossible to use anywhere except the one device I paid for it on. But it will download and install Quicktime to every media device in my zip code, and I will have to pay 2-3 times what I pay for my current TV.
But I will have a little orgasm every time I use it, and get to smug it out at the stupid Cable and $atellite U$ers in online forums whenever I get the chance?
Is it me or has the offerings under AppleTV REALLY diminished these last few months? IT seems like there's RARELY a new movie, let alone something recent.
Unfortunately, it'll still be Apple's software, which means it will be incredibly finicky, break easily on Windows and not work like anything else. And you'll have to install their web browser, video player, retarded web store and their GUI widgets to make it work right.
Dr.Knockboots
2009-11-02 03:56:53 PM
Maybe I'm overlooking something here, but am I supposed to get HDTV quality programming over my DSL? Or are they riding over cable lines? confused... halp!
Or is this just iTunes tv for $30.00 more dollars a month than I already pay?
The Icelander
2009-11-02 04:01:22 PM
It would be $30 on top of whatever you pay for broadband.
Depending on the channel lineup, I could be very interested in this. I'm currently paying about $95 a month for satellite and $50 a month for broadband. If I could drop the satellite and get everything through my AppleTV and have a similar lineup I'd definitely be interested.
Heck, it might be enough to convince me to stop using boxee.
Dr.Knockboots
2009-11-02 04:19:12 PM
Depending on the channel lineup, I could be very interested in this. I'm currently paying about $95 a month for satellite and $50 a month for broadband. If I could drop the satellite and get everything through my AppleTV and have a similar lineup I'd definitely be interested.
Heck, it might be enough to convince me to stop using boxee
Would I really want that service eating up my internet bandwidth? I'd have to see how this would work in person.. skeptical.. but interested.
DamnYankees
2009-11-02 04:27:22 PM
I Said
2009-11-02 04:27:30 PM
And it will only carry 20 channels, with IFC being 5 of them.
FlashHarry
2009-11-02 04:28:21 PM
GurneyHalleck
2009-11-02 05:28:36 PM
WhyteRaven74
2009-11-02 05:37:11 PM
And incur the wrath of Apple's lawyers. You're better off trying to stiff a loan shark.
Merkin_ball
2009-11-02 05:49:08 PM
/It's Evolution Baby! -- and the pic is hot too.
tallguywithglasseson
2009-11-02 05:53:18 PM
MonkeyAngst
2009-11-02 06:23:31 PM
GranoblasticMan
2009-11-02 06:24:48 PM
/It's Evolution Baby! -- and the pic is hot too.
Birdo? O_o
Shazam999
2009-11-02 06:24:57 PM
The Angry Hand of God
2009-11-02 06:25:53 PM
Yukon Cornelius
2009-11-02 06:25:59 PM
Kar98
2009-11-02 06:26:41 PM
So pretty much what I've got for basic cable right now, right? With "IFC" = religious channels?
Thisbymaster
2009-11-02 06:30:23 PM
kpottruff
2009-11-02 06:36:40 PM
You forgot the extra smug.
TUO3MTA3
2009-11-02 06:45:16 PM
There are lots of HBO programs available on iTunes
hailin
2009-11-02 06:45:25 PM
Pass.
/I don't have cable or satellite
T.rex
2009-11-02 06:52:15 PM
1. HD should be watched on a big HD TV.
2. There's not really any extra cost to get the HD broadcast on a cable TV subscription.
And-1
2009-11-02 06:52:16 PM
But I will have a little orgasm every time I use it, and get to smug it out at the stupid Cable and $atellite U$ers in online forums whenever I get the chance?
Sign me up!
ursomniac
2009-11-02 06:52:24 PM
likefunbutnot
2009-11-02 06:54:15 PM
I'll stick with piracy.
Its_not_a_meme
2009-11-02 06:54:39 PM