Not even if I was three sheets to the wind, it was 2am, and she was the last chick in the bar.

That is just nasty.

Bet she uses those teeth of hers.

Meh.. might +1, but you missed the easy chance at using "WorldNutDaily", you know, being teh clevers.

They'll just pretend they never heard of her, and never supported the Birfers.

Just like they pretend they never concluced Obama's birth certificate was authentic, when they thought they could use it to hurt Hillary in the general election.

gilgamesh23: Bet she uses those teeth of hers.

Yep. You made it turtle up.

CRAZY EYES



You know em when you see em.

Is the tag off tonight?

WND can go down from where it is?

I read the article title as "WorldNetDaily Can't Stop Washing Oily Taints"

/It's actually "WorldNetDaily Can't Stop Whitewashing Orly Taitz"

Meh, seen better, had worse......

/ had no standards as a youth. It moved, had a vagina and I was willing to romp her.

The article basically rehashes everything that's gone on with Orly, and states that WND is a biased site that's willing to overlook reality to promote a specific political view. This was a relatively unnecessary article. It brought nothing new to the table, as most rational people know Orly is crazy, and WND is just right-wing rhetoric.

Taitz reminds me of an ostrich.

/she wasn't even born here

She was always crazy, but it became more obvious when she was on Fox and refused to mention allegations that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a girl in 1990

/where's the proof?

Shvetz: The article basically rehashes everything that's gone on with Orly, and states that WND is a biased site that's willing to overlook reality to promote a specific political view. This was a relatively unnecessary article. It brought nothing new to the table, as most rational people know Orly is crazy, and WND is just right-wing rhetoric.

Yes, though it's funny how crazy ideas often become mainstream discourse. The birthers started out with that potential, but they tipped over into the too-crazy-to-be-believed category. Lucky for us.

Wonderful what you people focus on.

Phil Moskowitz: Wonderful what you people focus on.

Does any body really listen to this person? Wow, just wow. Maybe if we'd just ignore anything this bunch has to say, they'd crawl in a hole and die from lack of attention.

Larry Sinclair -- best known for his claims that he did drugs and had sex with Barack Obama

Just get a hot air balloon man.

Bigdogdaddy: Does any body really listen to this person? Wow, just wow. Maybe if we'd just ignore anything this bunch has to say, they'd crawl in a hole and die from lack of attention.

I'm a fan of keeping up the attention in hopes that she'll continue her crusade. She's too damned funny to completely ignore. Besides, if she keeps on going, she'll rack up even more fines imposed by the court and get her followers to pony up even more money for her to continue.

WND is up?

At this point, the only reason WND has any significant traffic is from
people stopping by to point ant laugh.

Unfortunately, that may be enough to keep them going.

I hate it when lawyers use numbers (numbers) twice (twice) because there is no reasons one (one) use of the number (number) is not enough.

Stop it at once (once)!

If Taitz goes down, so does WorldNetDaily

Wouldn't that be just horrible. JUST HORRIBLE!

/really, I'm crying on the inside, this laughter is just for show.

Shvetz: The article basically rehashes everything that's gone on with Orly, and states that WND is a biased site that's willing to overlook reality to promote a specific political view. This was a relatively unnecessary article. It brought nothing new to the table, as most rational people know Orly is crazy, and WND is just right-wing rhetoric.


Huffington Post is a biased site that's willing to overlook reality to promote a specific political view. This was a relatively unnecessary article. It brought nothing new to the table, as most rational people know Hufington Post is just left-wing rhetoric.

Pretty well applies to any news source -CNN, Fox, MSNBC, (fill in the blank) Never depend on one source for information. You have to find the truth for yourself.