Ahh yes, because falling in love with a long time friend, then falling in a moment of mutual weakness is so much less noble than paying women to fark you.

/I like Spitzer on Slate

This was green lit?
lolz

Doak: Ahh yes, because falling in love with a long time friend, then falling in a moment of mutual weakness is so much less noble than paying women to fark you.

Uh, yeah, actually. I'd much rather my girlfriend cheated on me with some gigolo for a bit of anonymous, stringless sex than if she fell in love with someone else she'd known for a long time.

Hell, I think people are generally way too sensitive about cheating anyway, but having your SO say "Oh, I wanted a bit of strange with someone different, just to get it out of my system" seems way better than "Oh, I've known this person forever and our feelings were so strong we just couldn't help ourselves!"

This isn't really defending Spitzer, he's a hypocritical fark and Mark Sanford has handled his affair better than some. But I have to say, I'd much rather be cuckolded by a prostitute than someone my girlfriend actually cared about.

Spitzer was an idiot. He was on pass for a Senate seat at least. He saw a lot of the crap coming from Wall Street before it happened. I hope he can come back from all of this.

RemyDuron: Doak: Ahh yes, because falling in love with a long time friend, then falling in a moment of mutual weakness is so much less noble than paying women to fark you.

Uh, yeah, actually. I'd much rather my girlfriend cheated on me with some gigolo for a bit of anonymous, stringless sex than if she fell in love with someone else she'd known for a long time.

Hell, I think people are generally way too sensitive about cheating anyway, but having your SO say "Oh, I wanted a bit of strange with someone different, just to get it out of my system" seems way better than "Oh, I've known this person forever and our feelings were so strong we just couldn't help ourselves!"

This isn't really defending Spitzer, he's a hypocritical fark and Mark Sanford has handled his affair better than some. But I have to say, I'd much rather be cuckolded by a prostitute than someone my girlfriend actually cared about.

Interesting theory. Given a choice between "Yeah, I farked somebody else, but I have no emotional attachment to them," versus, "Yeah, I farked somebody else and wrote them long love letters," I think most people would be more pissed off by the latter. Some people would be pissed off if their partner didn't actually fark someone else, but just sent them love letters.

Or as bad as Transformers 2.

At least Spitzer paid for it out of his own pocket.

Gato Negro that cartoon would be much more realistic if the elephant had set the other hurdle up high for the donkey.

I dunno. Wasn't the Spitzer character forcing his whores to do weird shiat?

Mentat: Spitzer was an idiot. He was on pass for a Senate seat at least. He saw a lot of the crap coming from Wall Street before it happened. I hope he can come back from all of this.

He farks with his socks on! No coming back from that.

Noam Chimpsky: I dunno. Wasn't the Spitzer character forcing his whores to do weird shiat?

Just bareback. Apparently he was pretty pushy about it and the "service" had to warn the girls to be ready to fend him off.

I remain a liter for a reason. This does nothing but make me X out of the tab. WHARRGLBLLBEE REPUBLITARD, DEMOCRAP, HE SAID, SHE SAID, BUTTHURT, B...B...B...BUT BUSH, B... B...B BUT OBAMA!!ELEVENTY!. Drew makes money, this site has gone to hell.

torquestripe: Mentat: Spitzer was an idiot. He was on pass for a Senate seat at least. He saw a lot of the crap coming from Wall Street before it happened. I hope he can come back from all of this.

He farks with his socks on! No coming back from that.

cameroncrazy1984: Gato Negro that cartoon would be much more realistic if the elephant had set the other hurdle up high for the donkey.

Which party is the party of "family values" again?

The reason Democratic sex scandals don't tend to stick is because, while we might be cads as well, we're not also hypocrites. It's the hypocrisy thing that really gets the whole sex scandal thing to stick out.

The difference is what Spitzer did was illegal.

Was Spitzer a competent Governor regardless of his fondness for high class hookers?

What middle aged man wouldn't pay to have hot young chicks if budget allowed? You pay one way or another, why not just be upfront, and save time.

kleppe: The difference is what Spitzer did was illegal.

Sanford used public funds in regards to his affair. Also illegal.

Want to try again?

Bloody William: The reason Democratic sex scandals don't tend to stick is because, while we might be cads as well, we're not also hypocrites. It's the hypocrisy thing that really gets the whole sex scandal thing to stick out.


Oh, I see. Having no morals is an advantage.

kleppe: The difference is what Spitzer did was illegal.

Um... besides Chelsea Clinton Is Carrot Top's Lost Twin's point...

He's the governor of a state and disappeared for five days. Nobody knew where he was. Let's face it, for at least two of those five days we were at least a little concerned he might have died. Then he came back, and lied about his whereabouts.

That's pretty clear dereliction of duty. Egregious deriliction. Egregious, scandalous, magnanimous, fantantamous, obsequious dereliction.

Gato Negro: Bloody William: The reason Democratic sex scandals don't tend to stick is because, while we might be cads as well, we're not also hypocrites. It's the hypocrisy thing that really gets the whole sex scandal thing to stick out.


Oh, I see. Having no morals is an advantage.

Seems to work for the republicans.

/can't believe i'm replying to a troll.

Gato Negro: Bloody William: The reason Democratic sex scandals don't tend to stick is because, while we might be cads as well, we're not also hypocrites. It's the hypocrisy thing that really gets the whole sex scandal thing to stick out.


Oh, I see. Having no morals is an advantage.

I'm sorry, which party had a governor who was found to have skipped the country chasing some strange in the last two weeks?

Which party/political group has had nearly a half dozen sex scandals involving homosexuality after condemning it?

Which party has had several dozen sex scandals?

Which party is led or find guidance in individuals with multiple marriages?

Now, which party claims to be the party of morality and family values?

/This. This is why you are hypocrites.

Chelsea Clinton Is Carrot Top's Lost Twin: /can't believe i'm replying to a troll.

Me neither, but it's a slow night. Winding down to get some sleep. Morning meeting at work. Feh.

BTW, his staff misundedrstood the voice mail. They thought he was going hiking on the Appalachian Trail, But he meant he was going for some Argentinian tail.


/easy mistake?

Chelsea Clinton Is Carrot Top's Lost Twin: /can't believe i'm replying to a troll.

Could be worse, I'm watching Merlin. I've seen MST3K episodes with better production values. Except for that girls chest. Those production balues are first rate and then some. If I had one of those mini watermelons I'd be microwaving it.

kleppe: The difference is what Spitzer did was illegal.

and using taxpayer money to fly to Argentina to sex up your mistress isn't?

At least Spitzer was giving a job to locals, as opposed to outsourcing his infidelity to Argentina. No seriously, at least Spitzer didn't ditch out on his office for several days without telling anyone for his sexcapades, which used taxpayer money.

I honestly don't care who boinks who, provided that they do their damn job. Sure, Spitzer looked like a hypocrite for what he did, but at least he didn't abandon his post.

I would like to respond to everybody in this thread who is cheering for a side. Both guys are heels. I don't care if you want to try to say one guy is "better" or "worse" because frankly, if you are making that argument, you are probably doing it for partisan reasons and not accurately evaluating the situation.

This is an entirely subjective matter, guided largely by our individual prejudices. Politics certainly make that list. The important fact is that both clearly crossed a line, not what their metaphysical landing point is.

HighOnCraic: RemyDuron: Doak: Ahh yes, because falling in love with a long time friend, then falling in a moment of mutual weakness is so much less noble than paying women to fark you.

Uh, yeah, actually. I'd much rather my girlfriend cheated on me with some gigolo for a bit of anonymous, stringless sex than if she fell in love with someone else she'd known for a long time.

Hell, I think people are generally way too sensitive about cheating anyway, but having your SO say "Oh, I wanted a bit of strange with someone different, just to get it out of my system" seems way better than "Oh, I've known this person forever and our feelings were so strong we just couldn't help ourselves!"

This isn't really defending Spitzer, he's a hypocritical fark and Mark Sanford has handled his affair better than some. But I have to say, I'd much rather be cuckolded by a prostitute than someone my girlfriend actually cared about.

Interesting theory. Given a choice between "Yeah, I farked somebody else, but I have no emotional attachment to them," versus, "Yeah, I farked somebody else and wrote them long love letters," I think most people would be more pissed off by the latter. Some people would be pissed off if their partner didn't actually fark someone else, but just sent them love letters.

When I was in high school I read Stranger in a Strange Land and it has affected my view on relationships ever sense. I would probably be hurt if my girlfriend farked someone, with no emotional attachment, without asking me. If she asked I'd probably feel some pain (the "I'm not good enough? Why?" kind), but I'd think it was selfish to feel that way. But if she loved someone else. . . that would be a great, great pain.

I guess I don't view sex as something exclusive to love or relationships. Sex is a pleasurable activity, there is a great variety to lovers, I perfectly understand wanting something different.

chapman: I would like to respond to everybody in this thread who is cheering for a side. Both guys are heels. I don't care if you want to try to say one guy is "better" or "worse" because frankly, if you are making that argument, you are probably doing it for partisan reasons and not accurately evaluating the situation.

This is an entirely subjective matter, guided largely by our individual prejudices. Politics certainly make that list. The important fact is that both clearly crossed a line, not what their metaphysical landing point is.

Eh, I don't think so. They are very different situations. In terms of hurting the wife, Sanford is worse IMO, for reasons I all ready explained. In terms of which disrespected their office more, Spitzer is worse, because he used public funds for something he had gone after people for as AG. In terms of which is worse overall, it's hard to say.

RemyDuron: chapman: I would like to respond to everybody in this thread who is cheering for a side. Both guys are heels. I don't care if you want to try to say one guy is "better" or "worse" because frankly, if you are making that argument, you are probably doing it for partisan reasons and not accurately evaluating the situation.

This is an entirely subjective matter, guided largely by our individual prejudices. Politics certainly make that list. The important fact is that both clearly crossed a line, not what their metaphysical landing point is.

Eh, I don't think so. They are very different situations. In terms of hurting the wife, Sanford is worse IMO, for reasons I all ready explained. In terms of which disrespected their office more, Spitzer is worse, because he used public funds for something he had gone after people for as AG. In terms of which is worse overall, it's hard to say.

I don't think Spitzer expensed his whoring. I might be wrong of course.

Tickle Mittens: RemyDuron: chapman: I would like to respond to everybody in this thread who is cheering for a side. Both guys are heels. I don't care if you want to try to say one guy is "better" or "worse" because frankly, if you are making that argument, you are probably doing it for partisan reasons and not accurately evaluating the situation.

This is an entirely subjective matter, guided largely by our individual prejudices. Politics certainly make that list. The important fact is that both clearly crossed a line, not what their metaphysical landing point is.

Eh, I don't think so. They are very different situations. In terms of hurting the wife, Sanford is worse IMO, for reasons I all ready explained. In terms of which disrespected their office more, Spitzer is worse, because he used public funds for something he had gone after people for as AG. In terms of which is worse overall, it's hard to say.

I don't think Spitzer expensed his whoring. I might be wrong of course.

I think he expensed the travel to his hooker, not the actual hooker, IIRC. Did it ever come out if Sanford had done the same?

Bloody William: I'm sorry, which party had a governor who was found to have skipped the country chasing some strange in the last two weeks?

WTF is this some new lingo?

Pussy may many things, but strange?

Bucky Katt: kleppe: The difference is what Spitzer did was illegal.

and using taxpayer money to fly to Argentina to sex up your mistress isn't?

Fly the chick to the keys or something and go on a fishing trip. boom

tshetter: Bloody William: I'm sorry, which party had a governor who was found to have skipped the country chasing some strange in the last two weeks?

WTF is this some new lingo?

Pussy may many things, but strange?

Strange, unfamiliar, previously unknown.
"New" might be a better term but "chasing some strange" is by no means uncommon.

Oh well, so much for Ashley Dupree's big movie career.

There are two significant differences between Spitzer and Sanford.

1. Spitzer didn't disappear for a week.
2. Spitzer resigned.

Well if the gossip page of the New York Post says he said it, then it MUST be true!

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: tshetter: Bloody William: I'm sorry, which party had a governor who was found to have skipped the country chasing some strange in the last two weeks?

WTF is this some new lingo?

Pussy may many things, but strange?

Strange, unfamiliar, previously unknown.
"New" might be a better term but "chasing some strange" is by no means uncommon.

Is new pussy going to fix you dinner? New pussy can't cook. Is new pussy going to teach your kid to read? New Pussy is illiterate.

Doak: Ahh yes, because falling in love with a long time friend, then falling in a moment of mutual weakness is so much less noble than paying women to fark you.

/I like Spitzer on Slate

A "moment of weakness" he flew out there like 3 times and sent countless emails and to my knowledge still does not plan to break up with her.

What are you talking about?

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: There are two significant differences between Spitzer and Sanford.

1. Spitzer didn't disappear for a week.
2. Spitzer resigned.

3. Spitzer broke the law, a law he was perfectly happy enforcing on others.

I asked a few guys what their reactions were about the Sanford scandal. The unanimous response from guys were:

"Is she hot? Then he is forgiven. If not, what an asshole!"

/Yet to ask the reaction from the MBUs
//Obscure?

cameroncrazy1984: Gato Negro that cartoon would be much more realistic if the elephant had set the other hurdle up high for the donkey.

Yeah it's the Republican set the bar high for anyone but themselves.

This guy said lying about an affair was grounds for impeachment but when he does it, it doesn't count.

There's room for both of them on Satan's love seat.

torquestripe: He farks with his socks on! No coming back from that.

David Vitter wore diapers and you're complaining about socks! C'mon!

HighOnCraic: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: tshetter: Bloody William: I'm sorry, which party had a governor who was found to have skipped the country chasing some strange in the last two weeks?

WTF is this some new lingo?

Pussy may many things, but strange?

Strange, unfamiliar, previously unknown.
"New" might be a better term but "chasing some strange" is by no means uncommon.

Is new pussy going to fix you dinner? New pussy can't cook. Is new pussy going to teach your kid to read? New Pussy is illiterate.

Silly cooze, pussy cant read

Gato Negro,

I wouldn't have a problem with Republicans trashing their own moral standards if they weren't trying to legislate them to the rest of us.

Mentat: David Vitter wore diapers

IOKIYAR

Larry Craig = BJs in public restrooms to strangers = meh, let him serve out his term
Bill Clinton = BJ from underling in oval office = OMG impeach him now!

beer4breakfast: I wouldn't have a problem with Republicans trashing their own moral standards if they weren't trying to legislate them to the rest of us.


I wouldn't have a problem with democrats having no principles if they weren't trying to legislate 'right and wrong' to the rest of us.

See: Affirmative Action, Global Warming^TM, Political Correctness, Hate Speech, Hate Crimes, Redistribution, Reparations, etc.

Gato Negro: i41.tinypic.com

I don't know what s harder--the cartoon, or you for posting it.

1. "Moral" needs to be put in quotes, because it's bullshiat
2. Only the elephant should be attempting the bullshiat hurdle activity
3. The elephant should be much closer to the ground

Good god, that's some epic fail.