What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.

So, pretty much exactly what he did with 9/11...hoping to use the loss of American lives as a political tool.

I think we need to make him another bunker to go hide in.

TFA: Panetta called Cheney's actions "dangerous politics."

I wonder what he would call running to Reuters to whine about the former administration. *scratches head*

Seriously people, Dick Cheney is out. He has no power and only very minor influence now that his opposition controls Washington. The only reason the general public even know his political opinions these days are because the left continues to whine about him.

Shut up, and he'll probably just fade away. Or keep him relevant by complaining about him... suits me just fine.

Was the [0BVIOUS] tag busy?

No, Dick... I don't think Obama is going to be as irresponsible as you and Bush were when you failed to protect America from attacks on our home soil. I know... I know, Dick... You just really want someone to be worse at their job than you and Bush Jr. were, but I just don't think anyone is willing to lower themselves to your level of suck. You should choose more realistic goals, like dying in a fire or choke on a bowl of dicks.

No... I won't feel bad if he actually dies in a fire or chokes on a bowl of dicks.

SpeshilEdjukashin: The only reason the general public even know his political opinions these days are because the left continues to whine about him.

Ummm... no. The reason the general public even knows what his political opinions are now is because Fox News hires him to come on their shows and spew his garbage.

But of course... blame the left... (it's what Dick Cheney does after all) and from what I can tell, that suits you just fine.

SpeshilEdjukashin: I wonder what he would call running to Reuters to whine about the former administration. *scratches head*

Seriously people, Dick Cheney is out. He has no power and only very minor influence now that his opposition controls Washington. The only reason the general public even know his political opinions these days are because the left continues to whine about him.

Shut up, and he'll probably just fade away. Or keep him relevant by complaining about him... suits me just fine.


Cheney knows there's a lot of extremely damaging and possibly incriminating evidence against him out there. Knowing that this information is now in the hands of the Obama administration, I think ole Dick is shakin' in his cowboy boots and he's playing proactive defense by way of the news outlets. If an attack on the US occurs on Obama's watch, then he sees that as an oppurtunity to justify his policies and exonorate himself.

as I understand it, the left actually controls Fox News.

Dick is just trying to keep his ass out of jail, the rubbery twat.

Infinite Monkeys In Front Of A Computer: I think ole Dick is shakin' in his cowboy boots and he's playing proactive defense by way of the news outlets.

all while putting some coin in his pocket.. we all do realize that he gets paid (paid well i'm sure) for all these speeches and TV appearances, right?

This deserves the obvious tag, not the dumbass tag.

Of COURSE Cheney's knows the odds of another attack are very very high. Even if you want to ignore all the embassy attacks under Bush (which SKYROCKETED, BTW), it was only 8 years between WTC attacks.

There is no other reason for him to throw the intelligence community under the bus (not Obama, the intelligence community) like this.

JohnnyC: SpeshilEdjukashin: The only reason the general public even know his political opinions these days are because the left continues to whine about him.

Ummm... no. The reason the general public even knows what his political opinions are now is because Fox News hires him to come on their shows and spew his garbage.

And what happens when they pay him a small appearance fee to come on? The blogosphere explodes, at least a dozen troll headlines are submitted to Fark and one gets greenlit, CNN and MSNBC talk about it...

It's called cheap advertising, just like when Drew was "trying to trademark NSFW."

SpeshilEdjukashin: And what happens when they pay him a small appearance fee to come on?

Legal prostitution?

tchamber: What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.

Done in one.

I'm shocked.

See, this is my shocked font

Since he has experiences orchestrating false flag situations, he should be able to throw a quickie together to take care of The Messiah.

hell, i'm afraid Cheney is planning an attack...

What are the odds that Cheney is actively working towards that end?

tchamber: What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.

Please cite where Cheney said that.

Cheney, Rush and whole bunch more want to see Obama fail bad enough to wish for another 9/11.

Thats some sick politics there Lou

As stated above, I'm sure he was hoping for it the first time around too. Quite a profitable thing war is.

And on a side note, I'm not a Truther, but I can't say I would be the least bit surprised if one day we discovered that Cheney & Co. had involvement or specific knowledge of 9/11

Hey, it proved Bush's homeland security policy didn't work.

This is why Obama hasn't done much to the Bush policies. He's not a stupid man, he realizes that if he pulls the plug on all the intelligence programs he slammed in his campaign rhetoric and we get hit again it's over for him. Him and his party will get voted out of office so fast their heads will spin.

Kinda sucks for the republican party that a terrorist attack is about the only way they'll get back into power in the next 4-8. Time for a new party if you ask me.

Ponetta is a douche. I do not think Clinton wanted 9-11 to happen, I do not think Bush wanted 9-11 to happen and I do not think Cheney hopes something like 9-11 happens to Obama. If one is going to make such a claim, you had better have some pretty strong evidence to back your claim. If you have none, don't be a douche and keep your pie hole shut.

Infinite Monkeys In Front Of A Computer: So, pretty much exactly what he did with 9/11...hoping to use the loss of American lives as a political tool.

I think we need to make him another bunker to go hide in.

and bomb it.

Everyone already knows this. Far right Republicans in general are desperately hoping it happens. If only someone could just get around to gassing or nuking a big city- no one would ever vote for them dang libs again! Just admit it you buncha Freeper farktards. You could give two shiats about America. It's all about your backwards ass ideology.

/newsletter availableon request

I read about this in "No shiat, Sherlock" magazine.

jpo2269: If one is going to make such a claim, you had better have some pretty strong evidence to back your claim. If you have none, don't be a douche and keep your pie hole shut.

What more evidence do you need than the well-publicized cronyism, profiteering, and complete disregard for international and national law?

Panetta doesn't have enough credibility to make this kind of statement.

How many people remember all the anti-China news articles in the first months of Bush/Cheney presidency, before 9/11 ? They were looking for an enemy, but looking in the wrong place, and by doing so leaving the US open to the real enemy.

JohnnyC: SpeshilEdjukashin: The only reason the general public even know his political opinions these days are because the left continues to whine about him.

Ummm... no. The reason the general public even knows what his political opinions are now is because Fox News hires him to come on their shows and spew his garbage.

But of course... blame the left... (it's what Dick Cheney does after all) and from what I can tell, that suits you just fine.

Keep in mind, SpeshilEdjukashin claims that racist Fox viewers are Democratic plants to make the Republicans look bad.

Well, if it happens before 9/11/09 we're in the clear. Remember, attacks before that date are the fault of the previous President.

me_the_farker: Infinite Monkeys In Front Of A Computer: So, pretty much exactly what he did with 9/11...hoping to use the loss of American lives as a political tool.

I think we need to make him another bunker to go hide in.

and bomb it.

Just tell Biden where it is, the rest will follow.

JohnnyC: No, Dick... I don't think Obama is going to be as irresponsible as you and Bush were when you failed to protect America from attacks on our home soil. I know... I know, Dick... You just really want someone to be worse at their job than you and Bush Jr. were, but I just don't think anyone is willing to lower themselves to your level of suck. You should choose more realistic goals, like dying in a fire or choke on a bowl of dicks.

No... I won't feel bad if he actually dies in a fire or chokes on a bowl of dicks.

Hell, I would have a celebration.

agoratrader: me_the_farker: Infinite Monkeys In Front Of A Computer: So, pretty much exactly what he did with 9/11...hoping to use the loss of American lives as a political tool.

I think we need to make him another bunker to go hide in.

and bomb it.

Just tell Biden where it is, the rest will follow.

10/10!

Panetta's actions "dangerous politics."

cheney loves death


other people's

godofusa.com: tchamber: What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.

Please cite where Cheney said that.

Please cite where any citation every made a whit of difference to you.

The day facts are put in your face, and you admit you are wrong, is the day I believe in the 2012 myth.

Karma Chameleon 2009-06-14 08:36:02 PM
jpo2269: If one is going to make such a claim, you had better have some pretty strong evidence to back your claim. If you have none, don't be a douche and keep your pie hole shut.

What more evidence do you need than the well-publicized cronyism, profiteering, and complete disregard for international and national law?

I would welcome specific claims, not this general bs. Also, if you could try to provide something that doesn't come from a fal-leftist media source, I would appreciate that as well.

9/11 II - Muslim Boogaloo is not the only hope for the Republicans, aneki. There's also hope for the GOP if Great Depression 2.0 happens within the next year-and-a-half, or....

Actually, that's about it - they need either a major act of terrorism or catastrophic economic collapse in order to not in the way of the Whigs, which should tell any interested observer all they need to know about how badly the GOP is doing right now.

Of course, because he is an awful human being.

I cant believe that piece of shiat was VP.

tchamber [TotalFark] Quote 2009-06-14 05:37:58 PM
What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.


Democrats NEVER hoped for attacks...and never hoped for failure in Iraq.......oh, wait....they did......CONSTANTLY

Hell even Harry Reid, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Dick Durbin, ( and the list goes on ) ALL claimed that the war was lost just as the surge was beginning.

Of course they were all wrong but that doesn't mean they weren't hoping.....

As for Cheney...it was OBAMA who said he can do just as good a job keeping us from being attacked using a lightweight approach..

Cheney has said he totally disagrees..

This isn't Sept 10th 2001...everyone should know better by now.

If we're attacked, it will be on OBAMA.....and no one else.

libbynomore2: tchamber [TotalFark] Quote 2009-06-14 05:37:58 PM
What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.


Democrats NEVER hoped for attacks...and never hoped for failure in Iraq.......oh, wait....they did......CONSTANTLY

Hell even Harry Reid, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Dick Durbin, ( and the list goes on ) ALL claimed that the war was lost just as the surge was beginning.

Of course they were all wrong but that doesn't mean they weren't hoping.....

As for Cheney...it was OBAMA who said he can do just as good a job keeping us from being attacked using a lightweight approach..

Cheney has said he totally disagrees..

This isn't Sept 10th 2001...everyone should know better by now.

If we're attacked, it will be on OBAMA.....and no one else.



You are a pathetic human being.

tweekster Quote 2009-06-14 08:57:16 PM
libbynomore2: tchamber [TotalFark] Quote 2009-06-14 05:37:58 PM
What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.


Democrats NEVER hoped for attacks...and never hoped for failure in Iraq.......oh, wait....they did......CONSTANTLY

Hell even Harry Reid, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Dick Durbin, ( and the list goes on ) ALL claimed that the war was lost just as the surge was beginning.

Of course they were all wrong but that doesn't mean they weren't hoping.....

As for Cheney...it was OBAMA who said he can do just as good a job keeping us from being attacked using a lightweight approach..

Cheney has said he totally disagrees..

This isn't Sept 10th 2001...everyone should know better by now.

If we're attacked, it will be on OBAMA.....and no one else.

You are a pathetic human being.


Actually the problem is YOUR inability to respond to a coherent thought with one of your own.

let me guess....Obama supporter right???

typical....

libbynomore2: Actually the problem is YOUR inability to respond to a coherent thought with one of your own.

let me guess....Obama supporter right???

typical....

Just out of curiosity, do you get paid by fark to troll or is just a hobby?

Does anyone else here think that the head of the CIA has no business making political statements?

STFU and GBTW, Panetta.

libbynomore2: tchamber [TotalFark] Quote 2009-06-14 05:37:58 PM
What's so dumbass about that? That's EXACTLY what Cheney is hoping. Farking fat turd.


Democrats NEVER hoped for attacks...and never hoped for failure in Iraq.......oh, wait....they did......CONSTANTLY

Hell even Harry Reid, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Dick Durbin, ( and the list goes on ) ALL claimed that the war was lost just as the surge was beginning.

Of course they were all wrong but that doesn't mean they weren't hoping.....

As for Cheney...it was OBAMA who said he can do just as good a job keeping us from being attacked using a lightweight approach..

Cheney has said he totally disagrees..

This isn't Sept 10th 2001...everyone should know better by now.

If we're attacked, it will be on OBAMA.....and no one else.

And as you've also said regarding that, you will be "THRILLED" about it.