What poll are we taking about, here? "People who make middle-aged lesbians sexually excited" or something?

I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

I guess we've found the one thing Republicans hate worse than a Clinton- successful and attractive black man.

skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

There's nothing to complain about so far. It's not that she's doing a good job or a bad job. What are we suppose to complain about... Her being average?

Huh? How many people actually know what her job is, much less how to evaluate it?

they have too many things to complain about at the moment

Lost Thought 00: Huh? How many people actually know what her job is, much less how to evaluate it?

When has that ever stopped them from complaining?

Lost Thought 00: Huh? How many people actually know what her job is, much less how to evaluate it?

I know how to evaluate her job. When she does something, you call it socialist. Badabing badaboom, home in time for supper.

She pees standing up.
/It's true

Hick: She pees standing up.
/It's true

Maybe hoping the snipers have been practicing?

Hick: She pees standing up.
/It's true

That's because she wears underwear with a dikhole.

ragekage: skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

I guess we've found the one thing Republicans hate worse than a Clinton- successful and attractive black man.

You are a race-baiting, partisan hack. You are the lowest common denominator that our politicians have to cater to to win.

/You also sound fat.

skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

To a Republican, the State Department is vestigal so it doesn't matter either way how she does.

randomjsa: There's nothing to complain about so far. It's not that she's doing a good job or a bad job. What are we suppose to complain about... Her being average?

Like you assholes have ever needed an excuse to complain about anything.

And don't worry, they're still biatching and moaning about Hillary. ENTER THE WHARRGARBILL!

She and Bill are mentioned in Obama's Axis of Evil or whatever they fark name they've made up to cry about.

Hillaryis44.org is still going strong too.

Bigger Leftist Intarweb Schlong:
And don't worry, they're still biatching and moaning about Hillary. ENTER THE WHARRGARBILL!


Wow. No wharr has been left ungarbled.

Funny, I thought Fark assured me that Clinton was a disastrous choice because she would usurp the Presidency of the good and honorable Barack H. Obama, upstaging and foiling him at every turn.

deltabourne: Funny, I thought Fark assured me that Clinton was a disastrous choice because she would usurp the Presidency of the good and honorable Barack H. Obama, upstaging and foiling him at every turn.

Well, they were right about her wreaking havoc at the Dem's convention after all.

skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

From those poll numbers, which have to include some (R)'s no doubt, they must think she's doing okay. Actually, and of course I can't speak for all (R)'s, I don't think she was ever really hated. There was some respect, a little pity, a little concern that she was more than a little left of center. Then we got handed the inevitability of the steaming pile of John McCain and what the hell could we say?

Even the little screw-ups with the red button, I never for a second thought that was something she could be blamed for. But, it's still early.

skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

Only %21 of the American public now identify themselves as Republicans, compared to about %34 who identify as Democrats.

The %29 who don't approve of Hillary's job performance are Republicans, and former Republicans (as are, for the most part, the %35 who don't approve of Obama's job performance).

They aren't WHARRGARBLING about Hillary because they're too busy WHARRGARBLING about everything Obama does.

alienchickenpie: Wow. No wharr has been left ungarbled.

The best part about the WHARRGARBILL is that I got it back as change from a guy who just assumed it was a 'Where's George?' bill.

GOP fails so hard, even their WHARRGARBL gets ignored most of the time. If I didn't have a finely honed lulz detector, it might have passed unnoticed.

skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

Aside from the incident with the "overcharge" button, she hasn't done much worth comment on.

She's put in some long hours and has kept her mouth shut -- unlike Biden.

So what's to complain about?

flannelled fool: Then we got handed the inevitability of the steaming pile of John McCain and what the hell could we say?

Save us, Mike Huckabee?
You're our only hope, Mittens McFullofshiat?

I think they meant that her pole is bigger than Obama's.

heap: Save us, Mike Huckabee?

Gawd, who knows? I 'm still wading through a recent FreeperLand thread where the head Freeper has tossed the gauntlet down at Mitt Romney's feet. Called him an "abortionist" and assorted other stuff. Here's the money quote:

But Romney is a NO go. And I don't care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate. If Romney's in I'm out!

G.O.P., R.I.P!

*Shakes head*

flannelled fool: Here's the money quote:

heh, you left out the real money

I voted for Sarah

kinda says it all...

randomjsa: skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

There's nothing to complain about so far. It's not that she's doing a good job or a bad job. What are we suppose to complain about... Her being average?

She gave the 'button of fail' to Russia, and demonstrated levels or culpable ignorance of massive proportions when she didn't have even a remote understanding of cultural, historical, and religious significance of the Church of the Lady of Guadalupe.

This means she is fail, utterly and completely incapable of being a good S.O.S.

And she's ugly. And smells like poop. POOP! heheh huuhh huuahaha POOP!

Mugato: I think they meant that her pole is bigger than Obama's.

She either has one huge case of Clitoral Elephantiasis, or Obama has an extremely small dick. Perhaps it's a combination of both factors.

deltabourne: Funny, I thought Fark assured me that Clinton was a disastrous choice because she would usurp the Presidency of the good and honorable Barack H. Obama, upstaging and foiling him at every turn.

I think we're more surprised that Bill has kept his mouth shut thus far.

Edsel: deltabourne: Funny, I thought Fark assured me that Clinton was a disastrous choice because she would usurp the Presidency of the good and honorable Barack H. Obama, upstaging and foiling him at every turn.

I think we're more surprised that Bill has kept his mouth shut thus far.

I am absolutely shocked by this. He must be too busy chasing tail.

randomjsa: skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

There's nothing to complain about so far. It's not that she's doing a good job or a bad job. What are we suppose to complain about... Her being average?

Oh really? You've got no problems with slamming Obama's foreign policy, but when it comes to his Secretary of State there's "nothing to complain about".

Why wasn't I involved in this vote?

Where are the signups?!

Edsel: I think we're more surprised that Bill has kept his mouth shut thus far.

*shrug* Pres. Clinton is a pretty clueful guy, save in that one obvious personal weakness of his. He's smart enough to know that running his mouth, particularly in independent directions, doesn't help him, his wife, or his party.

Gosling: To a Republican, the State Department is vestigal so it doesn't matter either way how she does.

Arguably, it usually is. I recall hearing that its entire budget is lower than that of the Pentagon's publicity arm, for instance -- and I don't think people are expecting that a modern Secretary of State be as assertive in formulating policy as, say, Kissinger. People look to the President to determine what's to be done, and the SoS follows. And in this particular Secretary's case, she probably knows that her political future is *toast* if she's perceived as sinking the administration through excessive infighting or grandstanding on her on behalf, so if she still wants to be President some day she'll probably take that into account.

Bad_Seed: randomjsa: skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

There's nothing to complain about so far. It's not that she's doing a good job or a bad job. What are we suppose to complain about... Her being average?

Oh really? You've got no problems with slamming Obama's foreign policy, but when it comes to his Secretary of State there's "nothing to complain about".

Let's be honest. The post of Secretary of State is pretty useless to people who divide the world into "enemies whose asses we kicked and who now like us", "enemies whose asses we are currently kicking" and "enemies whose asses we have not yet kicked."

flannelled fool: heap: Save us, Mike Huckabee?

Gawd, who knows? I 'm still wading through a recent FreeperLand thread where the head Freeper has tossed the gauntlet down at Mitt Romney's feet. Called him an "abortionist" and assorted other stuff. Here's the money quote:
But Romney is a NO go. And I don't care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate. If Romney's in I'm out!

G.O.P., R.I.P!

*Shakes head*


thanks to that I read this.

"Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!"

and it made my week

00ghost27: thanks to that I read this.

"Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!"

and it made my week

I hope they keep that faith in Palin. Colbert couldn't even come up with something that good.

00ghost27: "Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!"

and it made my week

"Guys, they don't call them hittles."

Nemo's Brother: You are a race-baiting, partisan hack. You are the lowest common denominator that our politicians have to cater to to win.

Bwahahaha! You, of all people, calling someone a partisan hack?

Nemo's Brother: ragekage: skinnycatullus: I just realized a couple of days ago that I haven't heard any screaming and gnashing of teeth about all the horrible things Clinton is doing as Sec. of State. Are Republicans saving that for later? Do they think she's doing a good job? It's all very confusing.

I guess we've found the one thing Republicans hate worse than a Clinton- successful and attractive black man.

You are a race-baiting, partisan hack. You are the lowest common denominator that our politicians have to cater to to win.

/You also sound fat.

Nope, I'm a recently-former Republican who calls it likes I sees it. Sorry, pal. Be an apologist for the farkward nutjobs that took over the party as long as you please; don't bother me no more.

She is a biatch.

I know there is lots of Hilary bashing here (and she deserves some of it herself) but she has so far done a good great job of SoS.

If she continues to do such a good job I imagine she will be top choice in 2016. As of now I don't think Biden would have much of a chance. He is too glib.

Corvus: If she continues to do such a good job I imagine she will be top choice in 2016. As of now I don't think Biden would have much of a chance. He is too glib.

And would be 74. Mind you, Clinton would still be pretty old too, 69's kinda cutting it close to too damn old.

00ghost27: thanks to that I read this.

"Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!"

Which apparently misses it's target and just flies around aimlessly for months after.

Wolf Blitzer is a Substitute Teacher: Corvus: If she continues to do such a good job I imagine she will be top choice in 2016. As of now I don't think Biden would have much of a chance. He is too glib.

And would be 74. Mind you, Clinton would still be pretty old too, 69's kinda cutting it close to too damn old.

Reagan was 69. The oldest. That would be funny if she tied his record...

whidbey: Reagan was 69. The oldest. That would be funny if she tied his record...

Yeah, that was kind of my point. Look at Reagan's second term. Was he lying to Congress about not recalling Iran-Contra? Or was Alzheimer's kicking in already?

Wolf Blitzer is a Substitute Teacher: whidbey: Reagan was 69. The oldest. That would be funny if she tied his record...

Yeah, that was kind of my point. Look at Reagan's second term. Was he lying to Congress about not recalling Iran-Contra? Or was Alzheimer's kicking in already?

There's nothing quite like a President falling asleep during Cabinet meetings...

Or Vice Presidents even...