You know what, Greta? I don't have the answers to everything. I'm not running for political office. I don't have the answers to everything, you know, in the world out there.

Where have we heard that same type of thing, from someone that has also jumped into the public spotlight?



Oh yeah.

FTA: "unless we bring men and women together children will not have mothers and fathers."


Wow! She must have been a biology major or something such like!

Greta, I am focusing on marriage right now, not adoption, not civil unions, just traditional marriage, and I'm going to do whatever it takes to promote that.

She's so retarded she doesn't understand that it would benefit the children of gay couples in a legal sense if the partnership was recognized under the law.

Wow. Keep thrusting these well educated people in the spotlight, right wingers. Its doing wonders for your cause.

When someone answers "I'll have to get back to you on that" it means, "I haven't been fed a canned response to that question yet"

Thinking is above her pay grade.

did miss usa design that website?

The light bulbs on my Christmas tree are brighter than that coont.

Diogenes: Thinking is above her pay grade.

I must have dyslexia, I read that as "gay parade."

FloydA: FTA: "unless we bring men and women together children will not have mothers and fathers."


Wow! She must have been a biology major or something such like!

Classy argument! I don't know if I've ever heard the "gays will cause human extinction" angle before.

Senescent Dawn: FloydA: FTA: "unless we bring men and women together children will not have mothers and fathers."


Wow! She must have been a biology major or something such like!

Classy argument! I don't know if I've ever heard the "gays will cause human extinction" angle before.


Well from what Miss California is suggesting, with all of those children running around who didn't have a mother or a father, I'd say extinction is pretty much certain...


...and perhaps deserved.

A beauty queen isn't very bright? NO WAI!!!!!11

What about maps and the Iraq? Beauty pageant winners aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

robsul82: A beauty queen isn't very bright? NO WAI!!!!!11

Who is dumber, the idiot who can't talk or the group that is paying her as a spokesperson?

I could almost understand the criticism is she were Miss California instead of Miss California USA--huge difference. Miss USA is just a repository for weirdness and stupidity. I can't believe they even ask those girls questions at all.

Darn. I was hoping she'd get the Republican VP nomination before anyone vetted her.

My only question is, how big are her boobies?

That's it. I'm quitting my job and starting a business with the sole purpose of slapping public figures on live television when they start doing blindingly stupid things like this.

I think it's a service the American people would appreciate.

"unless we bring men and women together children will not have mothers and fathers babbys will not be formed and such like."

Palin/Prejean '12 -- The future of the Republican Party!

haemaker: Palin/Prejean '12 -- The future of the Republican Party!

Palin/Prejean/Plumber '12: So stupid they don't know you can't have three!

Earlier in the day, Prejean gave a press conference on behalf of the National Organization for Marriage and unveiled her new ad for NOW,

Ironic Typo Perfection.

Top Ten Reasons to Make Gay Marriage Illegal

01) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.

02) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.

03) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.

04) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all like many of the principles on which this great country was founded; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.

05) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of marriages like Britney Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.

06) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children.

07) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.

08) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America.

09) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.

10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.

BuckTurgidson: Earlier in the day, Prejean gave a press conference on behalf of the National Organization for Marriage and unveiled her new ad for NOW,

Ironic Typo Perfection.

The fact that the organization is ACTUALLY abbreviated "NOM" is better.

"National Organization for Marriage"

NOM.. NOM NOM... NOM NOM NOM...

/more intelligent than the interview

I've got a hint for the folks who keep wanting "Everyday Heroes" on hot button issues: stop.

Please, just stop. Getting some ignorant and tissue thin spokesperson who has the combined knowledge of a flea and a kernel of corn on the issues they're speaking about doesn't make your case any stronger.

Yes, it makes them look like they're being destroyed in anything resembling national debate. And while that plays out to a certain crowd--it plays to the crowd that protested wasteful spending by buying teabags to waste themselves.

These are not exactly the bright lights of a movement. You might do better to actually marshal the folks who can speak, who can reason, and who can articulate your concerns--not throw up sacrificial lambs who will be eviscerated.

That seems to be the strategy. If you just sacrifice folks who can't speak, who can't reason, that "real Americans" will feel that you're attacking them. It's an interesting strategy, but it's similar to the expenditure of suicide bombers--only a bit slower. It's not even sacrificing pawns for better position, it's just adding signal noise, on an already busy channel.

Or, you can accept that perhaps you are arguing points that actually contravene the very beliefs you pretend to espouse about religious freedom, God's love, and family values.

Love makes a family. It makes them when the family is a man and a child, a woman and a child, a husband and wife and a child, a pair of men and a child, a pair of women and a child, or a passel of folks in a house of various generations who all love and care for a child. Love is the real factor, and maybe if you'd stop pretending that it's for the "good" of the children, when you stick your nose into other peoples' bedrooms, and that it contravenes the very concept of personal freedoms, then we might be able to actually address issues caring for our children, and their welfare.

Those who want to poke their nose into other peoples' business have no interest in God's love, loving kindness, or anything looking like "Christian" values, you're just being a Nosey Nellie.

And my Grandma taught me that was rude.

elvisbloom: Wow. Keep thrusting these well educated people in the spotlight, right wingers. Its doing wonders for your cause.

When someone answers "I'll have to get back to you on that" it means, "I haven't been fed a canned response to that question yet"

Perez Hilton is the one who made her a celebrity. If he would have shut up and not said anything about her answer no one would have known her name and saying "that is above my pay grade" means "I can't find a good canned response to this so I will punt"

Hang On Voltaire: elvisbloom: Wow. Keep thrusting these well educated people in the spotlight, right wingers. Its doing wonders for your cause.

When someone answers "I'll have to get back to you on that" it means, "I haven't been fed a canned response to that question yet"

Perez Hilton is the one who made her a celebrity. If he would have shut up and not said anything about her answer no one would have known her name and saying "that is above my pay grade" means "I can't find a good canned response to this so I will punt"

Miss California and Perez Hilton taking sides in a "debate". America as a whole just lost 3 IQ points.

hubiestubert:
Those who want to poke their nose into other peoples' business have no interest in God's love, loving kindness, or anything looking like "Christian" values, you're just being a Nosey Nellie.

And my Grandma taught me that was rude.

Yeah so if you think that neighbor is being beat by her husband you just don't make direct eye contact

PALIN/PREJEAN '12

/shocked I'm not seeing this bumper sticker already

Senescent Dawn: Classy argument! I don't know if I've ever heard the "gays will cause human extinction" angle before.

Are you the only farker who doesn't watch South Park? ;o)

mediablitz:
Miss California and Perez Hilton taking sides in a "debate". America as a whole just lost 3 IQ points.

I agree there. I think America is the biggest loser in this whole stupid thing

Hang On Voltaire: hubiestubert:
Those who want to poke their nose into other peoples' business have no interest in God's love, loving kindness, or anything looking like "Christian" values, you're just being a Nosey Nellie.

And my Grandma taught me that was rude.

Yeah so if you think that neighbor is being beat by her husband you just don't make direct eye contact

Did you just equate gay sex with wife beating?

Hang On Voltaire: hubiestubert:
Those who want to poke their nose into other peoples' business have no interest in God's love, loving kindness, or anything looking like "Christian" values, you're just being a Nosey Nellie.

And my Grandma taught me that was rude.

Yeah so if you think that neighbor is being beat by her husband you just don't make direct eye contact

Yes! Two people who love each other and want to be together and are gay is just like spousal abuse. Excellent argument!

This is why we Republicans keep winning elections!

Dear Ms. Prejean;

Please STFU and take off your pants. That's a good girl.

Sincerely,
America

MrKraclenutz:
Did you just equate gay sex with wife beating?

Do you just not get humor?

"Marriage is good." -Miss Dumbass USA

Why the fark would you bother televising that? She's a bumbling, rambling fool. She should go back to the kitchen.

TeddyRooseveltsMustache: "Marriage is good." -Miss Dumbass USA

Why the fark would you bother televising that? She's a bumbling, rambling fool. She should go back to the kitchen.

She is the best person to speak for the movement, think about that.

Hang On Voltaire: Do you just not get humor?

Congrats on a new low, troll-or-farktard!

ricewater_stool: My only question is, how big are her boobies?

Big C

I know boobies

Barbigazi: TeddyRooseveltsMustache: "Marriage is good." -Miss Dumbass USA

Why the fark would you bother televising that? She's a bumbling, rambling fool. She should go back to the kitchen.

She is the best person to speak for the movement, think about that.

The beautiful thing of this story is that within the echo chamber the right wing has sequestered itself in now, there will be bloggers and talk radio hosts and other pundits who talk about how brilliant she is. They will call her a great weapon against the gay agenda, and promote her.

Of course, outside that, she seems utterly brainless and further discredits their movement. But since right wing "commentary" has devolved into a small circle of idiots telling each other how brilliant they are, they can't see that.

I missed Chuck Norris's talking points in WND this morning, so I have to ask, is this one of the idiot Hollyweird celebutards from the People's Republik of Kalifornia I'm supposed to tell to shut up and go back to looking pretty?

hubiestubert:

These are not exactly the bright lights of a movement. You might do better to actually marshal the folks who can speak, who can reason, and who can articulate your concerns--not throw up sacrificial lambs who will be eviscerated.



I agree with your post. I just wanted to suggest that perhaps these really are the brightest, most reasonable, most eloquent spokespeople of this particular movement.

Obdicut: Hang On Voltaire: Do you just not get humor?

Congrats on a new low, troll-or-farktard!

We just don't get the subtleties of his art.

That made my tummy hurt...

And I only watched one min.

I guess what I'm confused on, if Miss Vermont was ahead on points before her speech, how did the prejudice from her answer cost her the title?

I know that it's a nice narrative, that she's a victim here, but there was such a thing as a gracious loser at one point...

You know, taking responsibility for your own actions and your own performance...

I am so offended that mainstream news shows are giving this dumbf*ck a platform to spread her stupidity. I also can't believe that she actually thinks heterosexual marriage is threatened by teh ghey menace. I mean, that's a grade of stupid I'm just astounded by. It's so dumb any program should be ashamed of themselves for promoting a discussion at a level below what an average 8 year old is capable of.

Heterosexual marriage is only threatened by heterosexuals. I've read a lot of the bitter divorced-man threads on Fark over the years (usually facepalming most of the time) and I've never read people blaming GAYS for the decline of their heterosexual marriages in the anonymous rant-freedom of the internets. Here are the things bitter divorced dudes on Fark blame:
- ex-wife
- ex-wife
- b*tch who took all my money
- women in general
- bad sex (this is blamed on the woman)
- the legal system which "benefits" women by giving them children, child support
- lawyers
- sometime, insane in-laws
- women
- crazy women
- asshole who stole my woman
- cheating whore ex-wife
- cheesecake and nachos that made lazy ex-wife a land orca
- ETC.

And women tend to blame...
- men
- men's inability to communicate
- men who cheat
- no-good assholes
- drunk jerks
- bad fathers
- wanting different things out of a relationship
- constant conflict (this is portrayed as the man's fault)
- terrible in-laws
- men's jealousy
- etc.

So... where the f*ck are the gays in this? Are the gays standing in your bedroom egging you on in a massive shouting match while they eat popcorn and enjoy the fireworks, heteros?

"Yeah! Tell her again that she doesn't make you happy any more, Dave!"
"Mmm, this popcorn is delicious. Is this jalapeño seasoning, Marc?"
"Yup... Linda! Now would be a good time to cry while mentioning that Dave always tries to make you feel inadequate in bed."
"No, Dave, no! Resist going to the marital counselor! She always sides with Linda!"
"Linda, now would be a good time to mention that you may be in love with someone at work who supports you emotionally in the ways that Dave cannot."
"Oooooh! I didn't think Dave would smash the wedding portrait!"

The ignorance, it was painful to watch

bobbette: I am so offended that mainstream news shows are giving this dumbf*ck a platform to spread her stupidity. I also can't believe that she actually thinks heterosexual marriage is threatened by teh ghey menace. I mean, that's a grade of stupid I'm just astounded by. It's so dumb any program should be ashamed of themselves for promoting a discussion at a level below what an average 8 year old is capable of.

Heterosexual marriage is only threatened by heterosexuals. I've read a lot of the bitter divorced-man threads on Fark over the years (usually facepalming most of the time) and I've never read people blaming GAYS for the decline of their heterosexual marriages in the anonymous rant-freedom of the internets. Here are the things bitter divorced dudes on Fark blame:
- ex-wife
- ex-wife
- b*tch who took all my money
- women in general
- bad sex (this is blamed on the woman)
- the legal system which "benefits" women by giving them children, child support
- lawyers
- sometime, insane in-laws
- women
- crazy women
- asshole who stole my woman
- cheating whore ex-wife
- cheesecake and nachos that made lazy ex-wife a land orca
- ETC.

And women tend to blame...
- men
- men's inability to communicate
- men who cheat
- no-good assholes
- drunk jerks
- bad fathers
- wanting different things out of a relationship
- constant conflict (this is portrayed as the man's fault)
- terrible in-laws
- men's jealousy
- etc.

So... where the f*ck are the gays in this? Are the gays standing in your bedroom egging you on in a massive shouting match while they eat popcorn and enjoy the fireworks, heteros?

"Yeah! Tell her again that she doesn't make you happy any more, Dave!"
"Mmm, this popcorn is delicious. Is this jalapeño seasoning, Marc?"
"Yup... Linda! Now would be a good time to cry while mentioning that Dave always tries to make you feel inadequate in bed."
"No, Dave, no! Resist going to the marital counselor! She always sides with Linda!"
"Linda, now would be a good time to mention that you may be in love with someone at work who supports you emotionally in the ways that Dave cannot."
"Oooooh! I didn't think Dave would smash the wedding portrait!"

You've discovered the secret plot.

You will NEVER get another decent haircut or tasteful interior remodeling AGAIN!

TeddyRooseveltsMustache: "Marriage is good." -Miss Dumbass USA

Why the fark would you bother televising that? She's a bumbling, rambling fool. She should go back to the kitchen.

Better spokesperson than Bachmann.