That's not a breakdown. That's a list of generalities that he doesn't agree with.

Boortz is losing his common sense. He had it at one time, but seems to have gone over the edge of reason lately.

lemme guess:

commies = WINNAR!
REAL AMERICANS = LOSER!

You believe in socialism? A great first 100 days.

You believe in capitalism? A horrible first 100 days.
Psh, give me a break. Obama has done next to nothing to please socialists. We're kind of pissed at him, actually.

You believe in individualism? A bad first 100 days.

You believe in collectivism? A grand first 100 days.

What the hell does this even mean? I don't think he's really passed legislation one way or another in this regard.

You're proud of your country? A depressing first 100 days.

You think your country is the focus of evil? A wonderful first 100 days.

I'm not proud of us at all, but that doesn't make me think that things are somehow 'wonderful' now. We're still murdering people, passing middle class tax dollars to large corporations, and enslaving people in the third world so we can buy cheap shiat at Wal*Mart. Nothing has changed.

You believe in federalism? The first 100 days were a disaster.

You believe in an omnipotent federal government? The first 100 days were wonderful.

Yes, because giving a shiatton of stimulus money to local governments to perform their own projects is sooooo omnipotent.


You think a president should be elected on substance? Bad first 100.

You think a president should be elected on style? Great first 100.

For some reason I don't think the response to the economy being "I know Jack Kemp" is a substantive argument. We can all agree that Obama was by far the more intelligent candidate out of the two main factions of the Corporate Party, but that didn't mean either of them were truly getting elected on substance. They were getting elected first and foremost because of the correct letter by their name.

You believe in socialism? A great first 100 days.

You believe in capitalism? A horrible first 100 days.

Nonsense that doesn't deserve to be adressed

You believe in individualism? A bad first 100 days.

You believe in collectivism? A grand first 100 days.

See above


You're proud of your country? A depressing first 100 days.

You think your country is the focus of evil? A wonderful first 100 days.

Bull. I'm proud when my country does what is right (ie follows the rule of law and promotes freedom/equal rights for ALL of its citizens) and also proud when it recognizes and tries to fix its mistakes.

You believe in federalism? The first 100 days were a disaster.

You believe in an omnipotent federal government? The first 100 days were wonderful.

citation needed

You think a president should be elected on substance? Bad first 100.

You think a president should be elected on style? Great first 100.

Ugh. Fine, I'll entertain your ridiculous assertion:

Obama: Revamp healthcare, increase regulation in the financial sector, tax cuts for the vast majority of the population (which includes me and most of you), was right about Iraq off the bat, repeatedly stated that nothing would come easy and that the problems he intended to tackle would take time, not afraid to attack anyone who harbors OBL including Pakistan

McCain (may as well be Palin, as she is the one that people were voting for, but that would be too easy): "We will defeat evil", "I know how to get us out of this mess", clueless on economic issues, flip-flopped hard on tax issues AND immigration, even his own party didn't want him in there

collectivism?

That would be the teabaggers and Boortz, the king of the retards.

Boortz is an idiot. Always has been.

I've never read a link to this guy's site that didn't suck.

I hate that socialism has become a conservative hot button sound byte, because the reality is, America is skewing towards socialism and its dangerous for ALL of us.

Unfortunately, with the conservative media harping on it, the liberals are just turning more and more of a deaf ear to it...

If you're into torture & teabagging, horrible first hundred days.

If you like watching right-wingers cry like little girls, excellent first hundred days.

Lucidz: I hate that socialism has become a conservative hot button sound byte, because the reality is, America is skewing towards socialism and its dangerous for ALL of us.

Isn't trolling in the drug thread enough for you?

Shaggy_C: Psh, give me a break. Obama has done next to nothing to please socialists. We're kind of pissed at him, actually.


Newsflash:

America was never meant to be a socialist country.

I Said: tax cuts for the vast majority of the population


Too bad he farked over small businesses with the SCHIP tax.

To summarize the article:

anyone who actually thinks obama is a "socialist" has no idea what the term actually means and should refrain from reproducing in order to further pollute the gene pool.

scratched: To summarize the article:


I like Boortz, but that made me LOL.

Thank god somebody posted a picture of a dog and a water sprinkler.
Things make sense now.

If you're into reading articles written for the lowest common denominator.

A grand 2 minutes

Neal Boortz has at least 8 years of "The Democrats Suck" programing now. I'm not gonna check him out for a while. Hopefully old age will bring some common sense into his noggin.

The_Sponge: America was never meant to be a socialist country.

What the hell does that mean?

"You believe in collectivism? A grand first 100 days"

I don't know. Perhaps Republicans just need to blame the media? Have they tried that?

You believe in HURR? A great first 100 days.

You believe in DURR? A good first 100 days.

You believe in HURR? A grand first 100 days.

You believe in DURR? A perfect first 100 days.

vernonFL: You believe in HURR? A great first 100 days.

You believe in DURR? A good first 100 days.

You believe in HURR? A grand first 100 days.

You believe in DURR? A perfect first 100 days.

Can I call you butter?

TFA:

Obama wanted to begin a new era of dependence on government, and that he has done.

...And I stopped reading right there. Is this guy even trying to be objective, or is he going on the Reaganite assumption that the gub'ment can do no right, and whatever the gub'ment does that isn't cutting taxes or killing people is socialistic, communistic, and fascist, all at once.

//Even though all three are mutually exclusive, and mortal enemies of each other
///But don't let that stop the WHARRGARBL...

hachijuhachi: The_Sponge: America was never meant to be a socialist country.

What the hell does that mean?


That the Founding Fathers didn't intend for America to become a place with an over-reaching federal government, and they sure as hell didn't want us to get over-taxed.

You want socialism? Move to Sweden.

The_Sponge: Shaggy_C: Psh, give me a break. Obama has done next to nothing to please socialists. We're kind of pissed at him, actually.


Newsflash:

America was never meant to be a socialist country.

From m-w.com:

Liberty - 1: the quality or state of being free: a: the power to do as one pleases b: freedom from physical restraint c: freedom from arbitrary or despotic control d: the positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges e: the power of choice

We can CHOOSE what we want. Asshole.

The_Sponge: That the Founding Fathers didn't intend for America to become a place with an over-reaching federal government, and they sure as hell didn't want us to get over-taxed.

You want socialism? Move to Sweden.

Which is why one their first actions was using the military to make people pay their whiskey taxes.

Winners: Influenza, socalism, gays in Iowa.

Losers: Pirates, teabaggers, Bea Arthur.

The_Sponge: That the Founding Fathers didn't intend for America to become a place with an over-reaching federal government, and they sure as hell didn't want us to get over-taxed.

What makes you say that? Do you even know that the federalists and anti-federalists were jockeying for power between the states and the national government the exact same way we are today? Your idea that all of the founding fathers were rugged individualists^tm who hated the idea of a strong federal government is laughably absurd. The founding fathers loved taxes too. What do you think the tea party was even about? Not about high taxation - it was about the fact that the local governments couldn't impose their own taxes above and beyond what King George and Parliament already levied.

Christ I can't stand this stupidity.

Third Day Mark: We can CHOOSE what we want. Asshole.


Go fark yourself, douchebag.

How the fark do we have liberty when the government controls more of your life and taxes your more than you should be.

Boortz undaunted, telling truths heroically until reason triumphs.

The_Sponge: Third Day Mark: We can CHOOSE what we want. Asshole.


Go fark yourself, douchebag.

How the fark do we have liberty when the government controls more of your life and taxes your more than you should be.

Your problem is you are too farking stupid to understand the very definition of the word Liberty.

Lets correct that problem first. Otherwise, STFU and GBTW

Do people not understand that a functional Socialist government taxes more, but returns that in the form of services? I.e. They are not "over-taxing," as the money is returned to you in other ways. Perhaps you may worry about "getting your share," but when everyone has good roads, good infrastructure, healthcare, and the ability to retire happily, I think the worries will subside.

Shaggy_C: What makes you say that? Do you even know that the federalists and anti-federalists were jockeying for power between the states and the national government the exact same way we are today? Your idea that all of the founding fathers were rugged individualiststm who hated the idea of a strong federal government is laughably absurd. The founding fathers loved taxes too. What do you think the tea party was even about? Not about high taxation - it was about the fact that the local governments couldn't impose their own taxes above and beyond what King George and Parliament already levied.

Christ I can't stand this stupidity.


Fark it....let's have government programs for everything.

Can't afford a car? The government can buy you a hybrid.
Can't afford a place to live? The government can pay for your rent.
Want to go to college? The government can pay for it.

The_Sponge: How the fark do we have liberty when the government controls more of your life and taxes your more than you should be.

At present, this is the least taxed and most deregulated America in modern history.

mmmmm....sexy delicious warrgarble.


Oh and PLEASE tell me there will be a Joe the Plumber analysis today.

The_Sponge: Shaggy_C: What makes you say that? Do you even know that the federalists and anti-federalists were jockeying for power between the states and the national government the exact same way we are today? Your idea that all of the founding fathers were rugged individualiststm who hated the idea of a strong federal government is laughably absurd. The founding fathers loved taxes too. What do you think the tea party was even about? Not about high taxation - it was about the fact that the local governments couldn't impose their own taxes above and beyond what King George and Parliament already levied.

Christ I can't stand this stupidity.


Fark it....let's have government programs for everything.

Can't afford a car? The government can buy you a hybrid.
Can't afford a place to live? The government can pay for your rent.
Want to go to college? The government can pay for it.

OH, I see. You have NO idea what a Socialist Government is, I gotcha. I was worried for a minute.

At least there are fewer and fewer of these kooks running around. And if the dems have to screw up as badly as the GOP did to lose power, the GOP may be dead.

SherKhan: Boortz undaunted, telling truths heroically until reason triumphs.

*golf clap*

The_Sponge: Fark it....let's have government programs for everything.

Yes. That's exactly what I said.

Way to live up to the stereotype.

Shaggy_C: What do you think the tea party was even about? Not about high taxation - it was about the fact that the local governments couldn't impose their own taxes above and beyond what King George and Parliament already levied.

No taxation without representation, moron. That's what the tea parties were about. What the hell textbooks have you been reading?

Third Day Mark: and taxes your more than you should be.

Your problem is you are too farking stupid to understand the very definition of the word Liberty.

Lets correct that problem first. Otherwise, STFU and GBTW


Listen dumbass....you're the one who got personal, not me.

If Congress/state government vote in more gun control laws, does that mean that we have liberty?

I see you're smoking a cigar in your pic...you can thank Obama for increasing taxes on that....making them more expensive for you, and farking over you local smoke shop.

The_Sponge: I Said: tax cuts for the vast majority of the population


Too bad he farked over small businesses with the SCHIP tax.

Small tobacco businesses?
SCHIP is a tax on tobacco products.

mergentr: Shaggy_C: What do you think the tea party was even about? Not about high taxation - it was about the fact that the local governments couldn't impose their own taxes above and beyond what King George and Parliament already levied.

No taxation without representation, moron. That's what the tea parties were about. What the hell textbooks have you been reading?

He hasn't been reading anything. He's been listening to the truth warriors like Limbaugh, Hannity, Boortz and Mike Savage/Weiner. Reading takes time. Much easier to let someone else do all the heavy lifting for him and just plug in for his daily marching orders.

/Now if you'll excuse me I have to finish downloading my olbermann & maddow podcasts
// /irony

mergentr: No taxation without representation, moron. That's what the tea parties were about. What the hell textbooks have you been reading?

What do you think they wanted to use that representation for? Don't call me a moron. The colonists were pissed because they wanted to be able to levy their own taxes and import duties, which King George and Parliament would not let them do, claiming that they were the only body allowed to make laws regarding taxation in British lands.

Code_Archeologist

Fallacy: appeal to ridicule:

funny the first few times - but does it mean you have run out of arguments?

Shaggy_C: The_Sponge: Fark it....let's have government programs for everything.

Yes. That's exactly what I said.

Way to live up to the stereotype.


IIRC, aren't you one of the people on Fark who support the idea of the government paying for college? If not, then I apologize.

My point was over-reaching because I want to know where you draw the line. I'm sick and tired of seeing new government programs popping up. And how can we pay for it with a massive deficit?

The_Sponge: Third Day Mark: and taxes your more than you should be.

Your problem is you are too farking stupid to understand the very definition of the word Liberty.

Lets correct that problem first. Otherwise, STFU and GBTW


Listen dumbass....you're the one who got personal, not me.

If Congress/state government vote in more gun control laws, does that mean that we have liberty?

I see you're smoking a cigar in your pic...you can thank Obama for increasing taxes on that....making them more expensive for you, and farking over you local smoke shop.

I see alot of blah blah blah and not the actual addressing of "Hey, you know what, you're right. Our founding fathers built this country on the principal of Liberty and that means we can choose what we want from our government."

No, instead I see alot of "if" and "You can thank Obama for raising your taxes"

Ok. Thanks President Obama. Really don't smoke cigars often enough to be affected by it... but this jerk says I should thank you anyways. So, thanks chief.

Pull your head out of your ass and stop for a moment to think "You know what, I made an ass of myself. I should really cut my losses now before this gets alot worse."

/You won't though.