Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I could not possibly agree more, actually.

Guess it could be worse, could be an ad-infested popup slide show...

too true

Shiat farking hell goddamn
yeah!

Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

i am also in agreement.

SilentStrider: Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

i am also in agreement.

gotta say i like this better, seeing as thirty high-res pics on one page tends to fark my shiatty connection up quite severely.

at least they don't do that flash pop-up pics shiat like farking Attu.

stickmangrit: SilentStrider: Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

i am also in agreement.

gotta say i like this better, seeing as thirty high-res pics on one page tends to fark my shiatty connection up quite severely.

at least they don't do that flash pop-up pics shiat like farking Attu.

okay, the reason we switched to the current nsfw gallery format, which i've heard tons of mostly negative feedback about is twofold-- mainly with rapidly increasing bandwidth, it saves a crapload of bandwidth and therefore money. but it also takes a fraction of a time to build the galleries, but mainly it's because of bandwidth. at some point when i'm not so poor, i'd like to move back to the old format.

Fair 'nuff CBZ...BTW...I love your site and can get over it.

Yeah, I meant no disrespect, because at the end of the day, it's quality stuff. Just a minor pet peeve on my part, and I can certainly understand the logic.

cranberryzero: stickmangrit: SilentStrider: Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

i am also in agreement.

gotta say i like this better, seeing as thirty high-res pics on one page tends to fark my shiatty connection up quite severely.

at least they don't do that flash pop-up pics shiat like farking Attu.

okay, the reason we switched to the current nsfw gallery format, which i've heard tons of mostly negative feedback about is twofold-- mainly with rapidly increasing bandwidth, it saves a crapload of bandwidth and therefore money. but it also takes a fraction of a time to build the galleries, but mainly it's because of bandwidth. at some point when i'm not so poor, i'd like to move back to the old format.

That's a very fair point. Never mind and please, carry on.