If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(I Heart Chaos) Boobies Hot damn... it's time for a Foobies wet t-shirt contest (Not safe for work)   (iheartchaos.com) divider line 11
More: Boobies  
•       •       •

18296 clicks; posted to Foobies » on 24 Apr 2009 at 5:27 PM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»

11 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
 
Dreadstar [TotalFark] 2009-04-24 02:55:02 PM  
Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

 
SoothinglyDeranged [TotalFark] 2009-04-24 03:01:16 PM  
Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails


I could not possibly agree more, actually.

 
Dreadstar [TotalFark] 2009-04-24 03:17:18 PM  
Guess it could be worse, could be an ad-infested popup slide show...

 
SoothinglyDeranged [TotalFark] 2009-04-24 03:27:48 PM  
too true

 
Dancin_In_Anson [TotalFark] 2009-04-24 03:42:56 PM  
Shiat farking hell goddamn
yeah!

Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails


I'm with you fellers.

 
SilentStrider [TotalFark] 2009-04-24 04:13:49 PM  
Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.


i am also in agreement.

 
stickmangrit [TotalFark] 2009-04-24 08:04:47 PM  
SilentStrider: Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

i am also in agreement.


gotta say i like this better, seeing as thirty high-res pics on one page tends to fark my shiatty connection up quite severely.

at least they don't do that flash pop-up pics shiat like farking Attu.

 
cranberryzero [TotalFark] 2009-04-25 12:30:10 AM  
stickmangrit: SilentStrider: Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

i am also in agreement.

gotta say i like this better, seeing as thirty high-res pics on one page tends to fark my shiatty connection up quite severely.

at least they don't do that flash pop-up pics shiat like farking Attu.


okay, the reason we switched to the current nsfw gallery format, which i've heard tons of mostly negative feedback about is twofold-- mainly with rapidly increasing bandwidth, it saves a crapload of bandwidth and therefore money. but it also takes a fraction of a time to build the galleries, but mainly it's because of bandwidth. at some point when i'm not so poor, i'd like to move back to the old format.

 
Dancin_In_Anson [TotalFark] 2009-04-25 08:17:16 AM  
Fair 'nuff CBZ...BTW...I love your site and can get over it.

 
Dreadstar [TotalFark] 2009-04-25 08:57:04 AM  
Yeah, I meant no disrespect, because at the end of the day, it's quality stuff. Just a minor pet peeve on my part, and I can certainly understand the logic.

 
SoothinglyDeranged [TotalFark] 2009-04-25 11:15:10 PM  
cranberryzero: stickmangrit: SilentStrider: Dancin_In_Anson: Dreadstar: Fantastic.

/although I think I liked IHC better when they just put all the pics on one page instead of one pic and one hundred eleventy thumbnails

I'm with you fellers.

i am also in agreement.

gotta say i like this better, seeing as thirty high-res pics on one page tends to fark my shiatty connection up quite severely.

at least they don't do that flash pop-up pics shiat like farking Attu.

okay, the reason we switched to the current nsfw gallery format, which i've heard tons of mostly negative feedback about is twofold-- mainly with rapidly increasing bandwidth, it saves a crapload of bandwidth and therefore money. but it also takes a fraction of a time to build the galleries, but mainly it's because of bandwidth. at some point when i'm not so poor, i'd like to move back to the old format.


That's a very fair point. Never mind and please, carry on.

 
Displayed 11 of 11 comments


[Continue Farking]