When I hear the word "twitter", I can't help but picute her pleasuring herself.

/never twittered
//or facebooked
///or myspaced
////get off my lawn

Stacked Chubby republican purebred Meghan McCain thinks Karl Rove is 'creepy' for following her on Twitter, joins the rest of America and asks him to get lost; "You've had your eight years, now go away"

I'd tweet her twitter.

kronicfeld: Stacked Chubby

So?

Stacked Stalked republican purebred Meghan McCain

The only hope for the GOP is for people like her to pull it out of the flaming pile of burning shiat that's currently in.

kronicfeld: Stacked Chubby

You are usually better than this. Maybe you need more coffee this morning.

kronicfeld: Stacked Chubby republican purebred Meghan McCain thinks Karl Rove is 'creepy' for following her on Twitter, joins the rest of America and asks him to get lost; "You've had your eight years, now go away"

I see no problem with this. There's nothing wrong with a little extra junk in the trunk. Or as that wise old song said:

"The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'
That's what I said
The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand
Or so I have read"

Karl is nothing anymore. He's a joke of a talking head on a joke of a network the stupid 3rd of our country watches because it tells them the lies they want to hear.

Can't we all just get along and agree she's a hottie trailed by an unshakable Bekins van full of family issues?

Headso: The only hope for the GOP is for people like her to pull it out of the flaming pile of burning shiat that's currently in.

What?! She's basically a closet DLC member. Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP.

necropoultryac: When I hear the word "twitter", I can't help but picute her pleasuring herself.

/never twittered
//or facebooked
///or myspaced
////get off my lawn

The correct term is "twatted"

If he wasn't asking to see her tweets, what was he asking her to show?



Oh.

filth: Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP.

Damn right! They need to listen to the TRUE leaders of the republican party -

filth: What?! She's basically a closet DLC member. Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP

Her stances on social issues seem to be not from the dark ages, their social issue platform and war against science is what is losing the GOP votes every time some geezer republican buys the farm and no young voter takes his place.

filth: What?! She's basically a closet DLC member. Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP.

Current realities would seem to contradict that assertion.

I think it's funny that this young woman is so threatening to you people. She offers constructive criticism and you guys immediately claim she's a traitor, without giving even the slightest consideration of what she's saying.

Sorry, Meghan but your 15 minutes ended about the same time your Daddy decided to campaign like a doofus... now, go spend some of Momma's money at the mall.

"Back under (Barry) Goldwater and (Ronald) Reagan, we were an umbrella party," she said. "I think the Republican Party still has a lot of offer... I don't think Karl Rove will be the catalyst."

What's sad is that most of her positions come from a much more traditionally Conservative place than the scores of wannabes and Neocons who are lining up to deride her.

Defense of the Constitution, personal responsibility, and the government NOT poking its nose into your business, and keeping the heck out of your choices of worship, and out of your bedroom.

What's sad is that the radicals who think that Gods, Guns, and Glory are "Conservative" and don't seem to understand history or sad things like facts are getting hett up that someone is asking them to abandon radical positions, and return to Conservative thought.

It's about as sad as O'Reilly denying that Nixon ever met Mao.

Pick up a goddamn history book and stop listening to idiots who have less damn perspective than this guy...

ObeliskToucher: Sorry, Meghan but your 15 minutes ended about the same time your Daddy decided to campaign like a doofus... now, go spend some of Momma's money at the mall.

Yeah, it's weird how women think they have a voice in politics, when clearly they should be making cookies and shopping.

hubiestubert: What's sad is that the radicals who think that Gods, Guns, and Glory are "Conservative" and don't seem to understand history or sad things like facts are getting hett up that someone is asking them to abandon radical positions, and return to Conservative thought.


They think that blind ignorant dogma is the party platform, unfortunately.

She's been getting a lot of attention in the last year or so. It'll be interesting to see if she's got a real future in American politics or if she's going to fade away shortly.
If she's really serious she might consider actually, you know, running for some sort of public office.

Diogenes: filth: What?! She's basically a closet DLC member. Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP.

Current realities would seem to contradict that assertion.

I think it's funny that this young woman is so threatening to you people. She offers constructive criticism and you guys immediately claim she's a traitor, without giving even the slightest consideration of what she's saying.

I called her a DLC member. Sorry for using shorthand on the internet, but I don't think I was unclear or without consideration.

Diogenes: filth: What?! She's basically a closet DLC member. Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP.

Current realities would seem to contradict that assertion.

I think it's funny that this young woman is so threatening to you people. She offers constructive criticism and you guys immediately claim she's a traitor, without giving even the slightest consideration of what she's saying.

Diogenes, just to save some effort, I'd ignore the republicans if I were you. It should shorten your search for an honest man.

filth: I called her a DLC member. Sorry for using shorthand on the internet, but I don't think I was unclear or without consideration.

Perhaps he was unclear. Instead of using the word "consideration", he should have said "comprehension".

Etchy333: ObeliskToucher: Sorry, Meghan but your 15 minutes ended about the same time your Daddy decided to campaign like a doofus... now, go spend some of Momma's money at the mall.

Yeah, it's weird how women think they have a voice in politics, when clearly they should be making cookies and shopping.

No, it's weird when the children of wealthy parents act like they've earned something - credibility in a political party, in this case - when it's their parents who have done all the work. If Meghan wants credibility in the party, she should take the time to earn it -- by running for office, raising money for and supporting other candidates, etc.

Elizabeth Cheney has worked within the party for several years, in contrast, so I would pay a lot more attention to her opinions about what the party should be doing. She's also built a life of her own, separately from her parents, and that gives her opinions more weight than a 22-year-old who's just begun to emerge from the "parental bubble" (where Mommy & Daddy are there to protect her from ouchies).

Get some experience, Meghan, and then let's hear your opinions...

I_Can't_Believe_it's_not_Boutros: Diogenes, just to save some effort, I'd ignore the republicans if I were you. It should shorten your search for an honest man.

They just keep cropping up in the most inconvenient places!

MacEnvy: filth: I called her a DLC member. Sorry for using shorthand on the internet, but I don't think I was unclear or without consideration.

Perhaps he was unclear. Instead of using the word "consideration", he should have said "comprehension".

What wit! Why aren't you busy writing a hit sitcom? Or a Slap Chop ad?

filth: I called her a DLC member. Sorry for using shorthand on the internet, but I don't think I was unclear or without consideration.

Only without real thought. McCain's approach is far more traditionally Conservative than the crop of folks who are riding into Frogtown to complain about her "lite" positions.

That they're based on the ideals that Goldwater laid out, and were abandoned by a great many "Conservatives" to bring in the religious Right under that big tent--who then moved to drive out those same folks from the center of the party to take more and more radical positions shows that perhaps your consideration was ill used. That the rigid and increasingly radical fringe would like to ignore that the party is made up of more than just Conservatives, but Moderates and Progressives--you might want to take a look at that Loosey Goosey Teddy Roosevelt who I suppose you'd call a dirty Commie by today's standards.

We lost because folks skewed too hard not just to the right, but advocated policies that undermine our own traditional positions. We have advocated interference in the home, we have ballooned the government's size, we spent without care of consequence, we have advocated interference with the market.

Calling our OWN out is what we NEED to do in order to fix things. We have to be our own harshest critics in order to keep our moral and ethical center, and that is something that cheerleaders and apologists have forsaken. The only way we're going to ever see power again, is if we fix the deep rents of hypocrisy and divides within our own ideology, and ignoring that simply means that you're part of that larger problem, and I suggest that either you plug your ears a bit more and sit in the corner, or you get the fark out of the way so we can return the party to its ethical center and earn the respect and votes of the American people the old fashioned way.

hubiestubert: filth: I called her a DLC member. Sorry for using shorthand on the internet, but I don't think I was unclear or without consideration.

Only without real thought. McCain's approach is far more traditionally Conservative than the crop of folks who are riding into Frogtown to complain about her "lite" positions.

Hey, fark you. What the hell's up your ass? I don't give a rat's ass about her stance on social issues. Where she's DLC material is in her weakness on fiscal issues.

That they're based on the ideals that Goldwater laid out, and were abandoned by a great many "Conservatives" to bring in the religious Right under that big tent--who then moved to drive out those same folks from the center of the party to take more and more radical positions shows that perhaps your consideration was ill used. That the rigid and increasingly radical fringe would like to ignore that the party is made up of more than just Conservatives, but Moderates and Progressives--you might want to take a look at that Loosey Goosey Teddy Roosevelt who I suppose you'd call a dirty Commie by today's standards.

We lost because folks skewed too hard not just to the right, but advocated policies that undermine our own traditional positions. We have advocated interference in the home, we have ballooned the government's size, we spent without care of consequence, we have advocated interference with the market.

Calling our OWN out is what we NEED to do in order to fix things. We have to be our own harshest critics in order to keep our moral and ethical center, and that is something that cheerleaders and apologists have forsaken. The only way we're going to ever see power again, is if we fix the deep rents of hypocrisy and divides within our own ideology, and ignoring that simply means that you're part of that larger problem, and I suggest that either you plug your ears a bit more and sit in the corner, or you get the fark out of the way so we can return the party to its ethical center and earn the respect and votes of the American people the old fashioned way.

Blah blah blah. What other crap are you going to assume about my position? I don't care if message merchant lightweights and fixers slapfight until Jesus comes back. I only said that Meghan McCain is not GOP leadership material. I've explained why. That does not for a minute mean that I'm calling forth Zombie Nixon or Mike Huckabee. One for time: fark you, you self-righteous gasbag. How's that for calling out our own?

hubiestubert: It's about as sad as O'Reilly denying that Nixon ever met Mao.

You're kidding, right? O'Reilly didn't seriously suggest that Nixon never met Mao?

*googles*

Oh, sacred mother of fark.

seventypercent: hubiestubert: It's about as sad as O'Reilly denying that Nixon ever met Mao.

You're kidding, right? O'Reilly didn't seriously suggest that Nixon never met Mao?

*googles*

Oh, sacred mother of fark.

He's not kidding. (new window)

filth: Blah blah blah. What other crap are you going to assume about my position? I don't care if message merchant lightweights and fixers slapfight until Jesus comes back. I only said that Meghan McCain is not GOP leadership material. I've explained why. That does not for a minute mean that I'm calling forth Zombie Nixon or Mike Huckabee. One for time: fark you, you self-righteous gasbag. How's that for calling out our own?

Actually, you what you said was:

filth: What?! She's basically a closet DLC member. Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP.

McCain is hardly a leader for the party. She's just out of college, and right now, she's a commentator. What's funny is that folks assume that anyone who speaks to power, wants to serve as power. That may be true in many cases, but this is the assumption that journalists lead.

The Fourth Estate has a place, and a duty, but the conflation of the place of journalists as "leaders" of political parties and movements shows exactly how skewed things are now.

And that is the real point here. That folks who are most hett up about Ms McCain fail not just history, but civics.

hubiestubert: filth: Blah blah blah. What other crap are you going to assume about my position? I don't care if message merchant lightweights and fixers slapfight until Jesus comes back. I only said that Meghan McCain is not GOP leadership material. I've explained why. That does not for a minute mean that I'm calling forth Zombie Nixon or Mike Huckabee. One for time: fark you, you self-righteous gasbag. How's that for calling out our own?

Actually, you what you said was:

filth: What?! She's basically a closet DLC member. Leadership by people like her would be the absolute fastest way to destroy the GOP.

McCain is hardly a leader for the party. She's just out of college, and right now, she's a commentator. What's funny is that folks assume that anyone who speaks to power, wants to serve as power. That may be true in many cases, but this is the assumption that journalists lead.

The Fourth Estate has a place, and a duty, but the conflation of the place of journalists as "leaders" of political parties and movements shows exactly how skewed things are now.

And that is the real point here. That folks who are most hett up about Ms McCain fail not just history, but civics.

So are you impliedly apologizing for accusing me of slandering Teddy Roosevelt? Anyway, I have no idea what your point is. Are you trying to parse "leadership" into advocates and party officials? That doesn't make any damn sense, but just so we're clear, I contend that Meghan McCain's advocacy is too light on conservative fiscal principle, a trait she, sadly, shares with far too many Republicans all across the social issues spectrum.

filth: Hey, fark you. What the hell's up your ass? I don't give a rat's ass about her stance on social issues. Where she's DLC material is in her weakness on fiscal issues.

Perhaps it's been years of soaking in what amounts to Voodoo Economics, and a foundational weakness in understanding fiscal policy that folks have been not just championing, but making apology for since it collapsed under its own weight, and lack of oversight. My kids, and yours are going to be paying for this mess, that could have been avoided if regulatory bodies had been doing their damn jobs instead of giving a pass for folks because they were making short term profit for donors.

The sham of policy for the last eight years and the sheer weight of apologist rhetoric for what amounts to a wholesale looting of the American Treasury bothers me a bit, and it bothers me because folks like to cloak it as some kind of ideological impasse, when in fact, it was just greed, ignorance, and a whole lot of stupid rolled into one.

And the sad thing is, if we'd been following good Conservative logic, we would have avoided this mess, as opposed to the tortuous and twisted sort that radicals have touted for years.

Man, I hope she's going to be representative of the next generation of the GOP. Socially liberal, right - leaning a bit to center. Kinda like Eisenhower.

I like Meghan.

She has the appeal her father had before he went to the darkside of unelectable (pandering to the base).

filth: I called her a DLC member.

The DLC wouldn't make a bad model for center right opposition party. You're not confusing those guys with the DNC are you?

filth: MacEnvy: filth: I called her a DLC member. Sorry for using shorthand on the internet, but I don't think I was unclear or without consideration.

Perhaps he was unclear. Instead of using the word "consideration", he should have said "comprehension".

What wit! Why aren't you busy writing a hit sitcom? Or a Slap Chop ad?

Actually, I'm working on Republican marketing and branding. You may have heard of my last idea - that all the right-wingers go out and "tea bag America". It was a phenomenal success.

filth: So are you impliedly apologizing for accusing me of slandering Teddy Roosevelt? Anyway, I have no idea what your point is. Are you trying to parse "leadership" into advocates and party officials? That doesn't make any damn sense, but just so we're clear, I contend that Meghan McCain's advocacy is too light on conservative fiscal principle, a trait she, sadly, shares with far too many Republicans all across the social issues spectrum.

The point is, and still is: you implied that Ms McCain is essentially a Democrat in hiding, when she tends towards much older and much more traditional Republican tenets. And it shows a lack of history on your part.

The more she says the sexier she gets.

Seriously.

h8_u_2: She has the appeal her father had before he went to the darkside of unelectable (pandering to the base).

Psh, McCain was hardly 'unelectable', he lost because the economy tanked and because he couldn't separate himself from the supremely unpopular Bush. Plenty of smart people who weren't rabid "mavricks" voted for him out of principle.

Meg, I think you should sit down, there's something I need to tell you...I know this is gonna be hard for you to hear, and it's hard for me to say, but it's time that you learned the truth about yourself...Meg, you're a democrat

Megan McCain is against a woman's right to choose, which is the number one issue that will keep the GOP out of power. Megan is part of the problem and only serving as a final nail in the coffin.

Shaggy_C: he lost because the economy tanked and because he couldn't separate himself from the supremely unpopular Bush. he was towing a Sara Palin-sized anchor.

I wonder how much dirt Rove has on people.

I wonder how far they're going to push, degrade, and belittle him.

I wonder if he'll get pissed and go all Palestinian on them.

She isn't stacked, she's fat. She'd go down one or two cup sizes if she got her waist down to 26".

Shaggy_C: Psh, McCain was hardly 'unelectable', he lost because the economy tanked and because he couldn't separate himself from the supremely unpopular Bush. Plenty of smart people who weren't rabid "mavricks" voted for him out of principle.

And his popularity fell right off the map after what's her head from up north joined the campaign. It sorta also happened at the same time as the big financial implosion, but I can't help but think that Palin's presence was a very difficult thing for moderates to swallow.

kronicfeld: Stacked Chubby

You tell'em Mary!

If she doesn't want people to follow her twitter may she shouldn't publish something that anyone in the world with an internet connection can see.

She seem to be fairly moderate on her positions in general, but she also doesn't seem to understand very much either.

She gets a lot of leeway for being easy on the eyes. Kinda reminds me of someone...