So, subby, are you suggesting that the FBI shouldn't be looking for someone who bombed two US companies?

Isn't that the same number of bombings as Bill Ayers?

BladBoy: Isn't that the same number of bombings as Bill Ayers?

I see. One of those. You are a jackass.

Complete Hypocrisy:

1. Oh Noes! The government sez right wing extremists are bad!

2. Oh Noes! The government is wasting resources on left-wing extremists!

tchamber: BladBoy: Isn't that the same number of bombings as Bill Ayers?

I see. One of those. You are a jackass.

You failed to understand Bladel's sarcasm. You are a simpleton. You're my kind of simpleton, yet a simpleton, nevertheless. The paranoia of the right wing gets sillier and sillier.

All apologies, I meant Bladboy.

Every time I see a Washington Times link, I try to think back and recall anything of merit that this particular newspaper has ever published in its entire history. And nothing ever comes to mind.

The Reverend Moon is just hopng they won't get around to him any time soon.

Amazingly enough, the Obama is not one-track minded and can work on more than one thing at once. As can his administration.

True, it's a different way of doing things from the last president we had, but don't worry, you'll get used to it soon!

I'm cool with this...the guy is a piece of shiat.

luxdsg: Amazingly enough, the Obama is not one-track minded and can work on more than one thing at once. As can his administration.

True, it's a different way of doing things from the last president we had, but don't worry, you'll get used to it soon!



But go ahead and keep making this out to be some kind of political pissing contest.

The quote in the headline is from Rep Mark Souder, who
also said in 2004 "the closer to the clearness of the Bible,the
less ability I should have to compromise."

In other words:

WHHHHAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGBLLLLLLLLLLLLL!

For Republicrat scumbags, independents are Public Enemy #1.

(obligatory)

Sir Cumference the Flatulent: For Republicrat scumbags, independents are Public Enemy #1.

Agreed. Anyone who things that anyone other than the major two parties can possibly be qualified or have useful ideas are obviously grave threats to our society.

i find it amazing that someone thinks the president picks the fbi most wanted list.

Crosshair: Sir Cumference the Flatulent: For Republicrat scumbags, independents are Public Enemy #1.

Agreed. Anyone who things that anyone other than the major two parties can possibly be qualified or have useful ideas are obviously grave threats to our society.

So, you have to bomb buildings to be an independent? Is that "Fark Independent", or regular?

I find it amazing that this went green.
No, wait, the other thing. Tedious.

Dancin_In_Anson: But go ahead and keep making this out to be some kind of political pissing contest.



I'm not sure if talking about the people Bush caught is really the path you want to head down.

So the Republican comments, from the article, amount to:

This is terrible, because only FURRNERS and MUUUSLIMS are terrorists worth worrying about!

and

This is Great, because he's not a Republican! All of whom are respectable decorated veterans.

I find this a bizarre designation. It's seems like nothing more than an artificial way to bring parity to an extremely lopsided phenomenon -- which is terrorism perpetrated by all stripes of the Right.

Not-killing people is not terrorism. He's a criminal, not a terrorist.

Dancin_In_Anson: I'm cool with this...the guy is a piece of shiat.

Animal Rights activist are a bunch of crazy assholes who just make people side with the companies who do the testing, same way with Peta. Peta makes me want to eat more red meat and eat Veal.

having a hard time deciding if it's the washington times that's the worst or the new york post

\hot like a group marriage

Pocket Ninja: Every time I see a Washington Times link, I try to think back and recall anything of merit that this particular newspaper has ever published in its entire history. And nothing ever comes to mind.



Comes to mind.

According to the article it was the FBI that added this guy to the most wanted list...

Am I missing something? Does the president himself choose who's on the list?

Pocket Ninja:

.... I try to think back and recall anything of merit ... in its entire history. And nothing ever comes to mind.

That's the way I get with Conservatism.

GoodyearPimp: Pocket Ninja: Every time I see a Washington Times link, I try to think back and recall anything of merit that this particular newspaper has ever published in its entire history. And nothing ever comes to mind.



Comes to mind.

Think before you post pictures man.

GoodyearPimp: Comes to mind.

Why would two guys that worked for the Washington Post 30 years ago come to mind?

GoodyearPimp: Pocket Ninja: Every time I see a Washington Times link, I try to think back and recall anything of merit that this particular newspaper has ever published in its entire history. And nothing ever comes to mind.



Comes to mind.

Ouchie. That's a pwnin'.

tchamber: So, subby, are you suggesting that the FBI shouldn't be looking for someone who bombed two US companies?

And apparently targeted first responders?

And people wonder why the Republican Party has been reduced to a stinking pile of unprocessed sludge? It's crap like this, morons. Good god, the stupidity leaching out of that opinion piece could contaminate the entire Chesapeake Bay.

While I think him showing up on this was a silly move to stop violent right wingers from crying, this guy moved from activist to criminal when he started building bombs.

Woodward and bernstein worked for the post you idiots.

GoodyearPimp: Comes to mind.

Washington Times

insano: Woodward and bernstein worked for the post you idiots.

I'm pretty sure that's Rodgers and Hammerstein.

insano: Woodward and bernstein worked for the post you idiots.

And it seems almost cruel that in those days reporters had to wear 8lb neckties and STILL do higher quality fact checking than we see today.

insano: you idiots.

Getting mighty plural with your ad hominem attacks, there, aren't ya, Sparky?

HotWingConspiracy: While I think him showing up on this was a silly move to stop violent right wingers from crying, this guy moved from activist to criminal when he started building bombs.

What's silly? Who would you put on the list instead?

MorrisBird: insano: you idiots.

Getting mighty plural with your ad hominem attacks, there, aren't ya, Sparky?

Specifically I was referring to the the poster of the picture and the guy who said he pwned.

GoodyearPimp: Pocket Ninja: Every time I see a Washington Times link, I try to think back and recall anything of merit that this particular newspaper has ever published in its entire history. And nothing ever comes to mind.



Comes to mind.

Dude.

HotWingConspiracy:

I'm pretty sure that's Rodgers and Hammerstein.



Looks like Dean and Lewis to me

DarnoKonrad: I find this a bizarre designation. It's seems like nothing more than an artificial way to bring parity to an extremely lopsided phenomenon -- which is terrorism perpetrated by all stripes of the Right.

Not-killing people is not terrorism. He's a criminal, not a terrorist.

FTA: Authorities said such attacks typically target property, but that is what may set San Diego apart. San Diego planted two bombs during one of the attacks; the second set to detonate after the first.

"It is possible that this device was planted to target first responders,"

This is the important bit that differentiates him as being a somewhat over-the-top psycho.

insano:

Specifically I was referring to the the poster of the picture and the guy who said he pwned.

As well he would have been


.... if not for the whole wrong newspaper detail.

Mercutio74: insano: Woodward and bernstein worked for the post you idiots.

And it seems almost cruel that in those days reporters had to wear 8lb neckties and STILL do higher quality fact checking than we see today.

When your tie gets caught in your typewriter(what?) you have to read what you wrote.

I'd like to meet the person who thinks the president tells the FBI who to put on their most wanted list, just to see if they carry a drool cup or just let the saliva run down their front.

"The FBI is hoping to find San Diego with the help of the publicity generated by adding him to the list, which also features such notorious international terrorists as Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahri and Adam Gadahn, the American-born al Qaeda spokesman."

This animal nut has no business being on the same list as these three great men, and when it comes to threats to the governing body formally known as the U.S. , Ron Paul supporters are the most likely to succeed when it comes to overthrowing them and installing their own Sharia law (The constitution). Be afraid, be very afraid.

Shryke: GoodyearPimp: Pocket Ninja: Every time I see a Washington Times link, I try to think back and recall anything of merit that this particular newspaper has ever published in its entire history. And nothing ever comes to mind.

Comes to mind.

Ouchie. That's a pwnin'.

Well, it might be a pwnin'...if Woodward & Bernstein had ever worked for the Washington Times, which didn't exist until 1982.

Unfortunately, they worked for the Washington Post.

GoodyearPimp: Comes to mind.

what a asswipe

C'mon guys, it's like confusing the New York Times and the NY Post. They are practically the same thing!