| Jane Harman, vigorous Democratic supporter of illegal NSA wiretaps, completely outraged she was wiretapped. Jane, you ignorant slut (salon.com) | 143 |
|||
| More: Dumbass | ||||

more» | | Fark.com's Political
Inclination
Thermometric
Analyzer:
| |
![]() |
![]() |
| ninjakirby
|
2009-04-22 02:22:45 AM |
| Benevolent Misanthrope
|
2009-04-22 02:25:09 AM |
| Action Replay Nick
|
2009-04-22 02:34:07 AM |
| NewportBarGuy
|
2009-04-22 02:49:37 AM |
| Party Boy
|
2009-04-22 02:49:38 AM |
lols from this humorously developing hot, totally farked up mess
Dem Rep Jane Harman did in fact urge The New York Times not to publish its big expose of Bush-era warrantless wiretapping
we'll see what I may or may not have said four years ago in conversations with an advocacy group like AIPAC or any other groups about the chairmanship of the intelligence committee or anything else. It's totally proper for members of Congress to talk to advocacy groups and our constituents; that's part of our job...Then here comes the memory
I'm saying that, No. 1, I don't know that there was a phone conversation. If there was and it was intercepted, let's read exactly what I said to whom. We don't know who that was either.
I can't recall with any specificity a conversation I may have had four years ago. That is why I have asked Attorney General Holder to release any transcripts that he has that involve wiretaps of me. And, by the way, there's a question about whether they were legal, and there's another question about whether other members of Congress, who also talk regularly to advocacy groups and constituency groups, might have been picked up and may be wiretapped even now or maybe I'm even wiretapped now.
I mean, the person I was talking to was an American citizen.... Well, I know that anyone I would have talked to about, you know, the AIPAC prosecution would have been an American citizen. I didn't talk to some foreigner about it.Jane, you ignorant slut.
| Party Boy
|
2009-04-22 02:51:10 AM |
| NewportBarGuy
|
2009-04-22 02:52:14 AM |
| Action Replay Nick
|
2009-04-22 02:54:18 AM |
| Party Boy
|
2009-04-22 02:55:43 AM |
| luxdsg | 2009-04-22 03:05:07 AM |
| NewportBarGuy
|
2009-04-22 03:05:13 AM |
| Action Replay Nick
|
2009-04-22 03:12:42 AM |
| Alunan | 2009-04-22 03:12:53 AM |
| Party Boy
|
2009-04-22 03:16:53 AM |
(Israelis Lobbied for Fugitive Rich's Pardon)
In the last week, those defending the pardon have offered Clinton's desire to help Israel as an explanation for what many have called inexplicable. Last Friday, at a House Government Reform Committee hearing on the Rich matter, former Deputy Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said that he changed his position on the Rich pardon after he heard about Israel's support of it.
Holder testified that after speaking to Rich lawyer and former White House counsel Jack Quinn about the pardon on Jan. 19 (the day before the pardon was granted), "I received a phone call from the White House counsel, Beth Nolan, asking me my position. I am not sure if it was Ms. Nolan or Mr. Quinn who brought to my attention that Prime Minister Barak had weighed in strongly on behalf of the pardon request, but this assertion really struck me. With that significant piece of new information I ultimately told Ms. Nolan that I was now 'neutral, leaning towards favorable' if there were foreign policy benefits that would be reaped by granting the pardon."
------
(Eric Holder is disqualified by the Marc Rich pardon)
...It suggests that Holder, whatever his other qualifications, could not say no to power. The Rich pardon request had power written all over it -- the patronage of important Democratic fundraisers, for instance. Holder also said he was "really struck" by the backing of Rich by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and the possibility of "foreign policy benefits that would be reaped by granting the pardon." This is an odd standard for American justice, but more than that, what was Holder thinking? That U.S.-Israeli relations would suffer? Holder does not sound naive. He sounds disingenuous.
| NewportBarGuy
|
2009-04-22 03:25:55 AM |
| Party Boy
|
2009-04-22 03:31:31 AM |
| NewportBarGuy
|
2009-04-22 03:40:58 AM |
| Party Boy
|
2009-04-22 03:46:23 AM |
| NewportBarGuy
|
2009-04-22 03:56:25 AM |
| Hobodeluxe
|
2009-04-22 05:27:32 AM |
| Psycho Zombie Monkey | 2009-04-22 06:55:35 AM |
| Marcus Aurelius
|
2009-04-22 08:01:59 AM |
| FlashHarry
|
2009-04-22 08:12:37 AM |
| Edsel | 2009-04-22 08:13:05 AM |
| DarnoKonrad | 2009-04-22 08:15:20 AM |
| GilRuiz1 | 2009-04-22 08:16:52 AM |
| HappyDaddy | 2009-04-22 08:20:03 AM |
| Podna | 2009-04-22 08:21:34 AM |
| Anti_illuminati
|
2009-04-22 08:26:02 AM |
| DirkValentine | 2009-04-22 08:28:34 AM |
| MugzyBrown
|
2009-04-22 08:28:49 AM |
| Random Reality Check | 2009-04-22 08:30:06 AM |

| DirkValentine | 2009-04-22 08:30:13 AM |
| DirkValentine | 2009-04-22 08:30:49 AM |
| mikeandeichmann | 2009-04-22 08:31:29 AM |
| MugzyBrown
|
2009-04-22 08:32:08 AM |
| Jackpot777
|
2009-04-22 08:32:27 AM |
| amiable | 2009-04-22 08:33:01 AM |
| Random Reality Check | 2009-04-22 08:34:05 AM |
| Anti_illuminati
|
2009-04-22 08:34:23 AM |
| Anti_illuminati
|
2009-04-22 08:35:45 AM |
| Random Reality Check | 2009-04-22 08:36:54 AM |
| heap | 2009-04-22 08:40:25 AM |

| MrShinra | 2009-04-22 08:40:26 AM |
| Alphax | 2009-04-22 08:42:33 AM |
| LasersHurt | 2009-04-22 08:43:32 AM |
| Anti_illuminati
|
2009-04-22 08:45:34 AM |
| DarnoKonrad | 2009-04-22 08:45:57 AM |
| HotWingConspiracy
|
2009-04-22 08:46:50 AM |
| YonderScott | 2009-04-22 08:49:40 AM |