If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(Washington Post) Amusing Anti-strip club law ruled unconstitutional. "The restrictions are [so broad] that the owners of FedEx Field could be punished for allowing a Washington Redskins player to give a teammate a congratulatory pat on the rear"   (washingtonpost.com) divider line 36
More: Amusing  

36 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
 
kona [TotalFark] 2009-04-04 03:25:31 PM  
i betcha it goes a lot further than that in the home locker room at FEDEX

 
AlwaysRightBoy [TotalFark] 2009-04-04 03:42:52 PM  
When I have a restriction............

 
FunkOut [TotalFark] 2009-04-04 04:57:25 PM  
We can't have that! Large sweaty muscular men touching one another's bottoms is what America is all about!

 
Smeggy Smurf 2009-04-04 04:59:04 PM  
What we need is a simple federal law requiring all future laws to clearly state how they protect us and where it is specifically stated that the government is authorized to make such a law.

Either that or kill them all and start over. Both will work also.

 
AzErNy 2009-04-04 05:00:59 PM  
James P. Keary, a spokesman for County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D), said the county is studying its options.

img.domaintools.com

/Studying its options
//Blonde or Brunette

 
Hollerin Charlie 2009-04-04 05:09:47 PM  
I'll be in my bunk?

 
fusillade762 2009-04-04 05:10:57 PM  
Stripper thread!!!

 
KIA 2009-04-04 05:11:47 PM  
Maybe the state can just stay the hell out of what consenting adults do on private property?

It's a dream...

 
Unsung_Hero 2009-04-04 05:13:18 PM  
Smeggy Smurf: What we need is a simple federal law requiring all future laws to clearly state how they protect us and where it is specifically stated that the government is authorized to make such a law.

I like that. Laws should (in plain english) require a preamble that explains the perceived need for the law, the intended effects, and the legal authority before the actual legalese.

 
Sue Dunham 2009-04-04 05:13:19 PM  
What's up with the bum patting in sports? I always thought it was pretty weird. Try it at your place of work next time someone does a good job. I think you'll get a different reaction.

 
Needlessly Complicated 2009-04-04 05:14:20 PM  
Yes, anti-strip club laws are broad restrictions.


/am i rite?

 
JerseyTim [TotalFark] 2009-04-04 05:18:33 PM  
Erroneous! Erroneous! A Redskins player would never have the occasion to congratulate.

 
farfigneugan [TotalFark] 2009-04-04 05:19:15 PM  
Needlessly Complicated: Yes, anti-strip club laws are broad restrictions.


/am i rite?


Took me a second. Nice.

 
SeamusFerrell 2009-04-04 05:20:55 PM  
AzErNy: James P. Keary, a spokesman for County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D), said the county is studying its options.



/Studying its options
//Blonde or Brunette


This is the D.C. area. I think the options are black or black.

 
Despairagus 2009-04-04 05:38:25 PM  
i101.photobucket.com

 
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude [TotalFark] 2009-04-04 05:39:06 PM  
kona: i betcha it goes a lot further than that in the home locker room at FEDEX

Cameron Diaz approves:

NSFW (new window)

 
ham006 2009-04-04 05:41:34 PM  
SeamusFerrell This is the D.C. area. I think the options are black or black.

They only have Black strippers in DC area?

//seriously

 
jake3988 2009-04-04 05:54:19 PM  
azerny: /Studying its options //Blonde or Brunette
=======================================

In that pic, I'd go brunette.
/Cute brunette!

 
Rozinante 2009-04-04 06:19:01 PM  
Sue Dunham: What's up with the bum patting in sports? I always thought it was pretty weird. Try it at your place of work next time someone does a good job. I think you'll get a different reaction.

People do at my place of work. Usually while saying "good job".
We need more women to calm the place down. Either that, or their wives need to put out more.

 
YouPeopleAreCrazy 2009-04-04 06:21:05 PM  
Smeggy Smurf: What we need is a simple federal law requiring all future laws to clearly state how they protect us and where it is specifically stated that the government is authorized to make such a law.

Also:
If you want a new law in place, you must also identify one old one to be struck from the books. Any law, but they go hand in hand. They get voted on as a pair.

Want a new one, get rid of an old one. We have too damn many.

/this works at every level, from school board or city council on up

 
anfrind 2009-04-04 06:54:40 PM  
Unsung_Hero: Smeggy Smurf: What we need is a simple federal law requiring all future laws to clearly state how they protect us and where it is specifically stated that the government is authorized to make such a law.

I like that. Laws should (in plain english) require a preamble that explains the perceived need for the law, the intended effects, and the legal authority before the actual legalese.


That seems perfectly reasonable to me. I spend a fair amount of time at work writing design documents (software engineer for a defense contractor), and the very first thing that needs to appear in any design document is an explanation of its purpose, followed immediately by a brief outline of how the problem will be solved. The technical details don't even make an appearance until about 1/3 of the way into the document. And I never start implementing the design until after the design has been completed and peer-reviewed (unless time constraints force me to start coding before the review process has completed).

Then again, it will probably never happen unless we remove all of the lawyers from government and replace them with scientists and engineers.

 
WFern 2009-04-04 06:59:21 PM  
Weird. I was just listening to this. (new window)

(Forward to 4:21 - it's surprisingly insightful)

 
kbarham 2009-04-04 07:52:36 PM  
This assumes the Redskins would have anything worth celebrating.

/Redskins fan
//but still...

 
TheRockit 2009-04-04 08:15:13 PM  
has anyone else snickered in a juvenile fashion about one of the involved parties being named 'Jack Johnson'?

Seriously, Jack Johnson is acting in his part as a representative to the people in a matter concerning adult entertainment (strippers mostly)... that's just amusing!

 
King Something [TotalFark] 2009-04-04 08:57:23 PM  
TheRockit: has anyone else snickered in a juvenile fashion about one of the involved parties being named 'Jack Johnson'?

Seriously, Jack Johnson is acting in his part as a representative to the people in a matter concerning adult entertainment (strippers mostly)... that's just amusing!


He's not nearly as involved as his brother Hugh.

 
teqman 2009-04-04 09:11:27 PM  
anfrind: That seems perfectly reasonable to me. I spend a fair amount of time at work writing design documents (software engineer for a defense contractor), and the very first thing that needs to appear in any design document is an explanation of its purpose, followed immediately by a brief outline of how the problem will be solved. The technical details don't even make an appearance until about 1/3 of the way into the document. And I never start implementing the design until after the design has been completed and peer-reviewed (unless time constraints force me to start coding before the review process has completed).

Ah, I see someone else is required to use the Rational Unified Process(TM).

/puke

 
Dimndgal1 2009-04-04 09:45:39 PM  
Of all the crap that is wrong in PG County, I'm glad that lawmakers have wasted so much time and effort on this type of crap. Screw the horrific state of the schools, the corrupt officials, or the rampant crime and turf wars... strip club regulation is where the focus must be!
Besides, everyone I know just goes to Baltimore where the strip clubs are plenty and the booze flows expensively!


/glad the Skins are of SOME use to the county

 
Magorn 2009-04-04 10:02:36 PM  
U.S. District Judge Marvin J. Garbis struck down the 2005 law, saying that its grandfather clause improperly favored Tommie Broadwater Jr. and that the law was overly broad.

Ahh good ol' Tommy "the gangsta" Broadwater....Proud to say that I'm nearly single-handedly responsible for crashing his campaign to be US Rep Broadwater (no great virtue on my part, I just happened to have a tape recorder and a camera handy after covering the candidates debate, and was able to get a record of him threating to run two women down with his car because they were confronting him about crime and drugs at his club)

 
Nem Wan 2009-04-04 10:20:42 PM  
Even with the grandfather clauses the law sought to shut down strip clubs operating since 1981. Social conservatives should have figured out by now that they're not allowed to ban things that have been around long enough for their parents to have hated them too.

 
anfrind 2009-04-04 10:58:56 PM  
teqman: Ah, I see someone else is required to use the Rational Unified Process(TM).

Officially, we actually use the waterfall model, although now that I think about it, one might argue that we're actually using RUP without using the actual name (we do a lot of iterative development and component-based engineering).

I'm not going to complain, though. The software we usually deliver is complex enough that maintaining it would most likely be a nightmare if we tried to develop it using an evolutionary model.

Hmm...I think I'm beginning to see what's wrong with today's lawmaking process...

 
Revenge of John Gault 2009-04-04 11:18:31 PM  
farm4.static.flickr.com
I guess it might just depend on how the whole pat on the bum thing ends up.

 
Ron77Mayz 2009-04-04 11:52:47 PM  
Nem Wan: Even with the grandfather clauses the law sought to shut down strip clubs operating since 1981. Social conservatives should have figured out by now that they're not allowed to ban things that have been around long enough for their parents to have hated them too.

PG county votes mostly Democrat. Check out the long lines the polling places had during the 2008 election. The problem was that the law was designed to protect a politican's professional investment. That's the real offense part about it!

 
veale728 [TotalFark] 2009-04-05 01:18:29 AM  
AzErNy: //Blonde or Brunette

both?

 
Sid Deuces 2009-04-05 02:14:09 AM  
Broad restrictions have no place in the strip club industry.
Excepting for Bondage Theme Night.

 
Harriet Vane [TotalFark] 2009-04-05 08:55:34 AM  
Smeggy Smurf: What we need is a simple federal law requiring all future laws to clearly state how they protect us and where it is specifically stated that the government is authorized to make such a law.

I don't know about there, but here we have explanatory memoranda that do at least the first two things on your list. They're presented with every bill. The second reading speech also sets out that kind of stuff.

 
RawData 2009-04-05 09:37:57 PM  
Sportbois are so ghey.

/bring the kids

 
Displayed 36 of 36 comments


[Continue Farking]