So what do you call the mental condition of someone who holds onto a dead vision long after it passed away? And, the subject of this fantasy has given public allegiance to the enemy?

/adjustment disorder?
//sexual masochism?

Just pick a condition:
Psychology Today

nvmac

Republicans.

You know those Japanese soldiers who hid out in the jungles during WWII waiting to strike, and years after the war were still there, thinking the Allies were still enemies?

Bloody William: You know those Japanese soldiers who hid out in the jungles during WWII waiting to strike, and years after the war were still there, thinking the Allies were still enemies?

No?

What has subby been doing to just now realize those "Democrats" are still around?

popcorn? check. tinfoil hat? check. keyboard spitguard? check. i'm ready.
the comment threads give me nightmares. these n*ggaz is crazy.

He sounds fat.

nvmac: So what do you call the mental condition of someone who holds onto a dead vision long after it passed away?

Should we ask the "Firefly" and "Deadwood" fans?

/runs into bunker

2wolves: nvmac

Republicans Keynesians.

FTFY

Stupid man world.

/cheesecake

It's. Fake.

Subby Fails!

Actually, they would be gone if people stopped paying attention to them. Thank for feeding them attention, subby.

I keep checking back and every time I check their newest thread has >100 posts.

/crazy biatches

Lesson for Dimocrats: Never leave a child alone with a loaded gun, a stove in use, an open refrigerator.

Dimocrats and other Hopium addled addicts are learning the same in regards to Boob Obama.

PINOs and Dimocrats and the Hopium addled have yelped since April 2007 - when we were the only ones who dared to do so - every time we published an article about the unqualified, inexperienced Barack Obama. They howled when we correctly stated that Obama, if elected, would be The Third Bush Term.

I like these people. They're shamelessly crazy. I want to put them in a roomfull of 9/11 truthers and Kennedy assassination conspiracy theorists to see what happens.

Preferably from a safe distance.


If that doesn't amuse me enough, we can always drop in a few Freepers in clown suits.

Give them some cheesecake.

LOL:

HillaryforTexas Says:
March 28th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
I plan to be attending the protest Tea Party here in san Antonio on April 15th. And yes, I may have to stand shoulder to shoulder with everything from rabid pro-lifers, to global-warming deniers, to crazy total free-marketers, to Ron Paul loonies. But I will. Because it's important.

Shouldn't they change the domain to HillaryIs45.org now?

godofusa.com: Republicans Keynesians Evolutionists.

FTFY

Yankees Team Gynecologist: godofusa.com: Republicans Keynesians Evolutionists.

FTFY

oh that's just... weak... I can't even score it.

You're a disgrace to trolls.

Hillaryis67.

facepalm.jpg

Yankees Team Gynecologist: godofusa.com: Republicans Keynesians Evolutionists. Randians.

Shoop Da Woop

FTFLulz

godofusa.com: Keynesians.

Since when is following the predominant economic theory considered grasping at a fallen dream? You'd have sounded better off mentioning the Austrian school since the only people interested in following that still seem to think it is 1852.

Gordon Bennett: PINOs

What the hell is a "PINO"?

If that doesn't amuse me enough, we can always drop in a few Freepers in clown suits.

Go with the "science is a commie plot" crowd, they'd fit in better with the other tinfoil hatters.

This is in reply to the concerns raised in the prior thread about Hillary being boxed in by Barack and Hatchetface.

So the women who were (correctly) FURIOUS when people commented on Hillary Clinton's physical appearance think it's acceptable to call Michelle Obama "hatchetface"?

OtherLittleGuy: nvmac: So what do you call the mental condition of someone who holds onto a dead vision long after it passed away?

Should we ask the "Firefly" and "Deadwood" fans?

/runs into bunker

FTFY

Gordon Bennett: I like these people. They're shamelessly crazy. I want to put them in a roomfull of 9/11 truthers and Kennedy assassination conspiracy theorists to see what happens.

See, the Kennedy assignation people aren't NEARLY as nuts enough.

I say throw the Cheesecakers, the truffors, the "Amero" people and Michelle Bachman in a room together. Maybe throw some Randians and Birch society members in for color.

what_now: See, the Kennedy assignation people aren't NEARLY as nuts enough.

Ya - you gotta get some of those Moon Landing Conspiracy nutters in there, as well.

Or anyone who writes for this site:

http://www.evolutionnews.org/ (new window)

Hillary is 44? You'd have to be nuts to believe that. biatch is clearly past 60.

/wait, what are we talking about again?

We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States. Senator Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic Party's nominee for President because she is not only the best candidate running, but she is also the one candidate that will without doubt beat the Republicans and restore sanity to the White House.

For the next year, we will bring you news and commentary of the 2008 race for president. Our focus will be on Senator Clinton and the Democrats. Once Senator Clinton wins the nomination we will turn our focus to the Republican nominee.

Although we feel that Senator Clinton will be the nominee (we thought that way back in March 2006) the race, as always in a democracy, will be an exciting one. We will have lots to say especially with regards to the media and blog coverage of the campaign. We will keep an especially sharp eye on "progressives" or Democrats who repeat Republican talking points to undermine Hillary or any of our candidates.

At the left hand side of our website we have posted permanent commentary pages on certain issues such as Iraq which we will continue to update.

Feel free to comment on our posts and to send us any tips, which we will keep confidential.

They never updated the About page? Good gravy.

Nasty Obamses stole it from us my precious. It was supposed to be ours.

But we'll make him pay my precious. We'll sick the Hannity on him, and he's not very nice is he?

Not very nice at all.
Hillary! Hillary!

tryptik: Or anyone who writes for this site:

http://www.evolutionnews.org/ (new window)

Actual headline from the site:

"Darwinists Trick Themselves in Texas"

Darwinists? What? I like how they take believing in the scientific theory and rational observation, and try to put it on the same level as believing in religion. They even go and give it a name implying the blind, fanatical following of the man who first took the theory and wrote it down.

In my experience, as soon as someone resorts to renaming something and using patronizing semantics, it pretty much means they know they are full of shiat and just don't care in the least. And a lot of times, they are ashamed of themselves and hide from it by getting even MORE deep in belief.

Think anything from "Evolutionists" or "Darwinists" to "Sanitation Engineer" and "Janitorial Technician."

Copperbelly watersnake: Nasty Obamses stole it from us my precious. It was supposed to be ours.

But we'll make him pay my precious. We'll sick the Hannity on him, and he's not very nice is he?

Not very nice at all.
Hillary! Hillary!

Dude, you won. Please collect your prize, a bill for a bottle of LCD cleaner for my monitor, at the door.

It's probably just a few republican astroturfers and somethingawful goons amusing themselves by pretending to be rabid Hillary fans at this point.

/it's like the political version of an AOL chat room

Copperbelly watersnake: Nasty Obamses stole it from us my precious. It was supposed to be ours.

But we'll make him pay my precious. We'll sick the Hannity on him, and he's not very nice is he?

Not very nice at all.
Hillary! Hillary!

Awesome! You win.

Gosling:

They never updated the About page? Good gravy.

Their Admin was promising all sorts of updates and changes a month or so ago. The only change was the "Accept No Substitutes" across the banner.

I've been checking the site every few days, out of sheer disbelief that it's still going. A fair number of the posters are obvious sock puppets, but I think there are a few True Believers mixed in as well.

The weirdest thing about the whole thing is, troll site or not, somebody's generating a page-length article, complete with links, every two days or so. That's a weapons-grade crazy level of dedication.

Copperbelly watersnake: Nasty Obamses stole it from us my precious. It was supposed to be ours.

But we'll make him pay my precious. We'll sick the Hannity on him, and he's not very nice is he?

Not very nice at all.
Hillary! Hillary!

Win. Winny win win.

Ok, so I've been staring at this quote from the site, and I just can't get it to make sense.

FTFA: my sense of histories previous goes to the one or two percent leading world economic power is you don't get back on the right track

Can someone please parse this sentence for me in some way that at least makes it syntactically viable, if not logical?

man... I'm really nostalgic for 2008. It's really getting me excited about 2012.

/palinis45.com

44 was never written by Democrats, it was written by the American Communist Party. I recognize the writing style.

Holy crap, it really is still popular to laugh at them.

Was HillaryIsSecretaryOfState.org unavailable?

WTF was that? Does Frontpage come with a Free Republic template?

I'd be real interested to know who those people really are, nothing on that page tracked like fans of ANY Democrat, no matter how butthurt.

nmrsnr:
FTFA: my sense of histories previous goes to the one or two percent leading world economic power is you don't get back on the right track

Can someone please parse this sentence for me in some way that at least makes it syntactically viable, if not logical?

Rephrased:

"History tells me that the top 1 or 2 percent will be wielding worldwide economic powers if we don't get back on the right track."

.... I think. Talk about a sentence revealing the jumbled way you think.

minorshan: nmrsnr:
FTFA: my sense of histories previous goes to the one or two percent leading world economic power is you don't get back on the right track

Can someone please parse this sentence for me in some way that at least makes it syntactically viable, if not logical?

Rephrased:

"History tells me that the top 1 or 2 percent will be wielding worldwide economic powers if we don't get back on the right track."

.... I think. Talk about a sentence revealing the jumbled way you think.

It almost seems like they took your version, ran it through an online translator, then translated it back.

Jonesy Boogieman: Copperbelly watersnake: Nasty Obamses stole it from us my precious. It was supposed to be ours.

But we'll make him pay my precious. We'll sick the Hannity on him, and he's not very nice is he?

Not very nice at all.
Hillary! Hillary!

Awesome! You win.

You won't be laughing when Obama cries out in anguish while giving a speech in Hawaii and grasps his hand to his chest.

Fano: Jonesy Boogieman: Copperbelly watersnake: Nasty Obamses stole it from us my precious. It was supposed to be ours.

But we'll make him pay my precious. We'll sick the Hannity on him, and he's not very nice is he?

Not very nice at all.
Hillary! Hillary!

Awesome! You win.

You won't be laughing when Obama cries out in anguish while giving a speech in Hawaii and grasps his hand to his chest.

It's the big one! I'm coming 'Lizabeth!

The thought of president Hillary traumatized me pretty badly too, but I got over it eventually.

These poor folk just need time to heal.

Gosling: They never updated the About page? Good gravy.

Even better, I'm pretty sure they never put any content in the "Why Hillary?" page.

I'd say they can't be performance artists. They'd have revealed themselves for the LOLZ by now. I think they should spend April 1 writing an incredible praise of Obama's presidency.

Hey, I love The Cheesecake Brigade. Always will.