Watching Obama screw up so bad, one wonders if we'll get an "our bad" from the MSM for making sure I knew how much was Palin's wardrobe budget.

How much did she lose by? Was this the determining factor? Maybe it wasn't even close.

Is the dude who hoaxed the paper going to jail?

All in all, a pretty weak article.

GORDON: Watching Obama screw up so bad, one wonders if we'll get an "our bad" from the MSM for making sure I knew how much was Palin's wardrobe budget.

4/10

see, the fact that Palin's wardrobe were truthfully being worn by her make your analogy off-base

Editor of The Sunday Telegraph, Neil Breen, published a two-page spread with articles explaining how the newspaper was the victim of a hoax,

Yeah, that poor newspaper - they were the victims, alright.

saying Mr Johnson had also claimed to have similar photographs of another prominent Australian woman.

Hrmmm.. and that wasn't enough of a hint for ya?

She was then accused of being a racist, fuelled by her maiden speech to the federal parliament in which she warned Australia was "in danger of being swamped by Asians". She was also briefly jailed in 2003 for electoral fraud.

Oh, this is just awful, she sounds like she would have been a really intelligent and compassionate leader.

Unfortunate. But as a perpetrator of voter fraud, she deserves the karmic backlash.

"Were we wrong? Should we have not done that?"

GORDON: Watching Obama screw up so bad, one wonders if we'll get an "our bad" from the MSM for making sure I knew how much was Palin's wardrobe budget.

HUUUURRRRRRR!!

Am I the only one that absolutely hates the saying "my bad"?

GORDON: Watching Obama screw up so bad, one wonders if we'll get an "our bad" from the MSM for making sure I knew how much was Palin's wardrobe budget.

Wrong nation, man. But--hey wait a minute, you aren't one of those globalization supporters, are you?

How about a real photo that cost a mayor re-election?

Electrocreep: Am I the only one that absolutely hates the saying "my bad"?

No. No you're not.

I really can't bring myself to care about that woman.

Wow, she sounds like wonderful person.

GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Yeah, I agree with that guy up top! This is a perfect time to bash Obama because, well, Rush isn't on today. How else will we get our daily dose or retardation? So screw all of you libtards!

Electrocreep 2009-03-22 11:56:23 AM
Am I the only one that absolutely hates the saying "my bad"?

No, that and hearing an adult say "brain fart" is cringeworthy

The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Thanks, I just ripped my eyes out and I'm typing on a Braille keyboard I secured for just such an occasion.

GORDON: Watching Obama screw up so bad, one wonders if we'll get an "our bad" from the MSM for making sure I knew how much was Palin's wardrobe budget.

Yeah, but Obama, obviously having paid nothing for his campaign suits, has passed over $1 trillion in spending already. Just think how much Palin would have spent by now. It would be somewhere in the Brazilians!

/Wait, she wasn't running for president?

Wait the man who brought us this...
"It's as simple as something that nobody knows that her eyes are as big as her bubbly toes
on the feet of a queen of the hearts of the cards and her feet are all covered with tar balls and scars "

Is selling fake nude photos now? This is a sad economy.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

gah!

The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

That sound you hear is the collective shuddering of everyone in the forum..

Bacontastesgood: How much did she lose by? Was this the determining factor? Maybe it wasn't even close.

Her party had 0.4% of the final vote, placing last out of the seven parties competing in the election.

RE: StoneyBologna's post of the lady wearing the Palin T-shirt.

That woman is showing the world that she wants Sarah Palin. What's the dude behind her want?

Ooooh here we go again, too-good farkers talking about how they wouldn't hit it. Come on, the girl in that pic isn't so bad.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

You discovered something on the internets i have never seen. Now i hope you die horribly. Soon.

GORDON: Watching Obama screw up so bad, one wonders if we'll get an "our bad" from the MSM for making sure I knew how much was Palin's wardrobe budget.

A more interesting question is how much guys like you are paid to post. If it were my astroturf campaign bonus points would be counted for quickness after green light, number of replies, maybe the ability to make the irrational sound coherent. Since it's a RNC funded project though and those willing to do this sort of work are 'little people' you'll have to settle for be awarded Rush bumper stickers.

The results (new window) for the seat she contested (from the Australian Electoral Commission).

She would have lost anyway, as did the Conservatives who lost statewide.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Dude. Was that necessary?

Hide your chickens: RE: StoneyBologna's post of the lady wearing the Palin T-shirt.

That woman is showing the world that she wants Sarah Palin. What's the dude behind her want?

One of the girls from "children of the corn"?

This thread already has epic portions of fail. The initial post was a troll with an IQ of 90 tops, followed by a Palin tangent and The Dreaded Rear Admiral's attempt to GORGOR us into submission sans linky. All I can do for us now is post a fail pic of galactic scale.

I vote for the 'she had it coming/karma at work' option. But the guy who faked the photo sounds like a loser.

The media making up stuff to influence elections, You don't say!

eddie van heinous: The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Dude. Was that necessary?

I felt it added a certain je ne sais quoi the thread was missing.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral: eddie van heinous: The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Dude. Was that necessary?

I felt it added a certain je ne sais quoi the thread was missing.

Better question, do you GIS things you CAN'T fap too often?

she caused an international furor after demanding an end to special welfare benefits for indigenous Australians in 1996.

She was then accused of being a racist, fueled by her maiden speech to the federal parliament in which she warned Australia was "in danger of being swamped by Asians". She was also briefly jailed in 2003 for electoral fraud.

Sounds to me like being photographed in a nightie might have actually helped her image. It would be like finding definitive proof that Ann Coulter really is a woman.

Right, this racist waste of space is so unpopular she couldn't even buy votes. If anything the media attention helped her out.

Conservationist: Oh it's OK, she was a right-wing politician, so slandering her is a civic duty.

Some bright affluent person helped make sure she wouldn't make it into office.

And do our brave defenders of democracy even blink?

Indeed.

It's fascinating when Republican slam Democrats for using tactics that the Republicans themselves invented. Does the term "Swift Boat-ed" mean anything to you?

(And yes, I know the article in question is about an Australian politician.)

The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Oh, I bet you can.

Saying the photos cost Hanson the election is an exaggeration ; she has none of the popularity she had in the mid-90's, and whilst I don't doubt the photos hurt her chances, she didn't have much of a chance in the first place.

I'm no fan of her politics at all, but the Sunday Telegraph did an incredibly irresponsible thing in publishing the photos in the first place, and not only because they were fake. Such private moments in people's lives - even public figures - have no public interest whatsoever.

I'm curious - is it me, or did this part just whiz by most folks?

The far-right Australian politician Pauline Hanson has received an apology over the publication of 30-year-old raunchy photographs of a near naked woman that local newspapers incorrectly claimed were her, a day after she lost a bid for re-election.

In other words, the pictures were published after she lost. The pictures had no bearing on her re-election bid. Not to excuse the sleaze factor here, but, c'mon.

hyperflame: Conservationist: Oh it's OK, she was a right-wing politician, so slandering her is a civic duty.

Some bright affluent person helped make sure she wouldn't make it into office.

And do our brave defenders of democracy even blink?

Indeed.

It's fascinating when Republican slam Democrats for using tactics that the Republicans themselves invented. Does the term "Swift Boat-ed" mean anything to you?

(And yes, I know the article in question is about an Australian politician.)

Telling the truth about a lying politician?

How was your Christmas in Cambodia Mr Kerry? Nice enough of President Nixon to send you there in 1968, wasn't it?

/I hear he still has the magic hat!

so is it slander or libel that she can sue the paper for?

eddie van heinous: The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Dude. Was that necessary?

I agree, can we recon here and find a hot woman pic to cleanse our eyes with?

FormlessOne
I'm curious - is it me, or did this part just whiz by most folks?

The far-right Australian politician Pauline Hanson has received an apology over the publication of 30-year-old raunchy photographs of a near naked woman that local newspapers incorrectly claimed were her, a day after she lost a bid for re-election.

In other words, the pictures were published after she lost. The pictures had no bearing on her re-election bid. Not to excuse the sleaze factor here, but, c'mon.

No, I saw that too and came here to see how quickly it was pointed out. Surprised to see it took over 40 posts.

TimGuy: eddie van heinous: The Dreaded Rear Admiral: GIS for "i can't fap to this":

Dude. Was that necessary?

I agree, can we recon here and find a hot woman pic to cleanse our eyes with?

How's about the body-builder chick mayor?
/I'd hit it.

leperboy69: Saying the photos cost Hanson the election is an exaggeration ; she has none of the popularity she had in the mid-90's, and whilst I don't doubt the photos hurt her chances, she didn't have much of a chance in the first place.

I'm no fan of her politics at all, but the Sunday Telegraph did an incredibly irresponsible thing in publishing the photos in the first place, and not only because they were fake. Such private moments in people's lives - even public figures - have no public interest whatsoever.

Unless those very same political figures seek to regulate the behavior said photos exemplify. The second you want to regulate or mandate something, you had better be willing to let that part of your life be picked over with a fine tooth comb. After all, if its good for the goose, THEN its good for the gander.

/Faked photos for political gain are bad.
// Defending politicians as a protected class is also bad.