nice spin.... let me know how the view is when you get off the merry-go-round.

hasn't failed at anything yet.

are you kidding ? he's single handedly destroyed the paradise on earth that the Glorious Lord Bush (Savior of all mankind) had created !!

Real conservatives know the truth and won't be fooled by your librul lies !!

real shaman: nice spin.... let me know how the view is when you get off the merry-go-round.


all the resentment in the world won't turn a lie into the truth.

oops.

Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?

EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?

The Post? That's a good one.

Mordant: hasn't failed at anything yet.

are you kidding ? he's single handedly destroyed the paradise on earth that the Glorious Lord Bush (Savior of all mankind) had created !!

Real conservatives know the truth and won't be fooled by your librul lies !!

I heard that he also killed Jon Benet Ramsey. Just because he could.

EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?

Yep. In the same reality where the Weekly World News has one several Pulitzers and a Nobel Peace Prize.

EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?


Yes, but by the same people who think Wikipedia is too liberal.

Actually, it is the Washington Times that's known for being the right-wing paper in D.C.

Uchiha_Cycliste: Mordant: hasn't failed at anything yet.

are you kidding ? he's single handedly destroyed the paradise on earth that the Glorious Lord Bush (Savior of all mankind) had created !!

Real conservatives know the truth and won't be fooled by your librul lies !!

I heard that he also killed Jon Benet Ramsey. Just because he could.

THAT MONSTER!!

he also killed an army of glorious zombie Reagans who were trying to put America back to Reaganomics

flavor of the month: EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?


Yes, but by the same people who think Wikipedia Snopes is too liberal.

FIFY :)

Uchiha_Cycliste: Mordant: hasn't failed at anything yet.

are you kidding ? he's single handedly destroyed the paradise on earth that the Glorious Lord Bush (Savior of all mankind) had created !!

Real conservatives know the truth and won't be fooled by your librul lies !!

I heard that he also killed Jon Benet Ramsey. Just because he could.

I heard he planted the glove to frame OJ just because he could.

Real Shaman


The view is that you are a douchebag....or at least the consensus.

heh republicans haven't been able to sleep at night lately, nothing sticks to the negro, is liked by the majority of the people and he is implementing every single democratic agenda he campaigned on. They were betting on a financial collapse (even though history dictates the market will eventually go up)and in the past week or so, the market is showing a pulse.

Meanwhile they are stuck with Steele, Palin, and Jindall...

/This isn't good news for a national regional party.

Hexenmeister
Actually, it is the Washington Times that's known for being the right-wing paper in D.C.

This. I think subby got them mixed up too.

epyonyx


Don't you know he also killed those white baby's, and he kiled jeezus too, when he was a Kenyen mulslin, just before he faked his Hawaii birth mom, and then they stole all the Whitemans hardearnded dollars, and gave it all aways to the welfare queeen what drives that gold plated cadillac and then he killed Shiavo and that congresmuns girlfriend what was drinking in the park, and they took all the guns away and my church too and then he put a devil voodoo hex on my penis and i had to take the viagra and then rush wwas telling me bout cooking up that Cotin abd shooting in his pee-hole and then I slipped on my pork rinds and had to use the medic alert bracelt that I got becuase Obama hate Amurica and ........................

epyonyx: Uchiha_Cycliste: Mordant: hasn't failed at anything yet.

are you kidding ? he's single handedly destroyed the paradise on earth that the Glorious Lord Bush (Savior of all mankind) had created !!

Real conservatives know the truth and won't be fooled by your librul lies !!

I heard that he also killed Jon Benet Ramsey. Just because he could.

I heard he planted the glove to frame OJ just because he could.

I heard that too! He did it to frame Mark Fuhrman and make it look like the LAPD was a whole bunch of racist white men, when in fact they were dedicated law enforcement professionals, sworn to fight for justice and protect the cities numerous minorities from danger.

epyonyx: Uchiha_Cycliste: Mordant: hasn't failed at anything yet.

are you kidding ? he's single handedly destroyed the paradise on earth that the Glorious Lord Bush (Savior of all mankind) had created !!

Real conservatives know the truth and won't be fooled by your librul lies !!

I heard that he also killed Jon Benet Ramsey. Just because he could.

I heard he planted the glove to frame OJ just because he could.

I heard he had a pocket full of horses, farked the shiat out of bears, threw a knife into heaven and could kill with a stare.

Pay no attention to those icebergs, we're still sailing just FINE!

I saw/heard this somewhere else too. ABC? I forget. Anyway, I was like "WTF? That was McCain that said no earmarks, you tools."

It's like there is a maximum intelligence limit for becoming a news reporter in this country, and an even lower one for being promoted to op-ed writer / cable news bloviator.

flavor of the month: EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?


Yes, but by the same people who think Wikipedia is too liberal.

I wouldn't be surprised if Conservapedia has been called too liberal.

I love how people on the right are so butt hurt they are attacking Obama for things McCain said.

And when Obama does screw up on something, no one will care/believe it since people have been playing 'The Boy Who Cried Wolf' so much in the past two months concerning Obama.

NYZooMan


"Pay no attention to those facts, they ruin my argument!"

Mordant: flavor of the month: EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?


Yes, but by the same people who think Wikipedia is too liberal.

I wouldn't be surprised if Conservapedia Fox News has been called too liberal.

The fastest way to show people that absolutely everything you say shouldn't be taken seriously ever again:

Claim that Fox News is liberal.

Corvus: I love how people on the right are so butt hurt they are attacking Obama for things McCain said.

That's cause McCain is a liberal, and I heard he and Obama conspired to have a Kenyan Muslim Communist take over the White House as they drank champagne from the control room where they set off the implosion of the WTC Towers.

/after killing Jonbenet, of course

Fox News is liberal..



/..for National Socialists...

Many Washington Post editorials are written by Fred Hiatt, who has a right wing slant that often borders on the absurd. The Post itself is liberal only by the standards of the Washington Times, the Moonie newspaper.

He's had a few failures so far.

- "I'm going line by line through the budget to find waste"
- The earmarks thing

And it will remain to be seen how the rest of his programs go.

NeverDrunk23: And when Obama does screw up on something, no one will care/believe it since people have been playing 'The Boy Who Cried Wolf' so much in the past two months concerning Obama.

No kidding. Story and venting time! I have a neighbor who is the modern day boy who cried wolf. Every time he cooks something it's the greatest meal he's ever made in his life. Every time something bad happens, it's the worst week he's ever had in his whole life. Everytime he picks up his guitar it's the best he's ever played it was just so amazing. Whenever he makes my piano scream out in pain It's the most spectacular song he's ever made, man did you hear it wasn't it awesome?
Everyweekend he tells me how proud he is of having not had anything to drink in so long; simultaneously he'll be bragging that he just shotgunned 6 beers and he's sooooooooo farked up. He uses absolutes so often nothing he says has any meaning. grrrrrr.......

Just how liberal is the mainstream media?

Well, if you do a highly contentious and hostile interview with a Republican political candidate that ends up assisting in that persons defeat at the polls you'll get an award from your colleagues.

Such was obviously the case when CBS "Evening News" anchor Katie Couric was given a "Special Achievement" award earlier this week for her highly-publicized September interviews with vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

NeverDrunk23: And when Obama does screw up on something, no one will care/believe it since people have been playing 'The Boy Who Cried Wolf' so much in the past two months concerning Obama.

I'm pretty sure we're scrutinizing his cabinet selections.

Opiate of the Lasses: Corvus: I love how people on the right are so butt hurt they are attacking Obama for things McCain said.

That's cause McCain is a liberal, and I heard he and Obama conspired to have a Kenyan Muslim Communist take over the White House as they drank champagne from the control room where they set off the implosion of the WTC Towers.

/after killing Jonbenet, of course


Boom, baby!

chipspastic: Boom, baby!

when I made the JonBenet revelation, was I quoting South Park? ...that'd piss me off. Though I was being clever.

Uchiha_Cycliste: chipspastic: Boom, baby!

when I made the JonBenet revelation, was I quoting South Park? ...that'd piss me off. Though I was being clever.

Nah - I was just referring to Opiate's McCain-Obama conspiracy

When did we make "earmarks" synonymous with "pork"? Earmarks just specify where specific money should go.

For example, "The Department of Defense gets $600 billion, of which $1 billion should be used for bullets" is an "earmark." Seems prudent, even.

There's nothing inherently wrong with a 7000 page budget having 9000 earmarks. Of course, that won't stop Hate Radio from pretending that those are 9000 earmarks giving money to save endangered leeches or something.

EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?

LOL!

bboy: leeches

heh

There were lies in a Washington Post editorial? This must be the first time in the history of man that a media outlet has lied.

I, for one, am shocked.

printboy: Just how liberal is the mainstream media?

Well, if you do a highly contentious and hostile interview with a Republican political candidate that ends up assisting in that persons defeat at the polls you'll get an award from your colleagues.

Such was obviously the case when CBS "Evening News" anchor Katie Couric was given a "Special Achievement" award earlier this week for her highly-publicized September interviews with vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

EverWatcher: Hasn't the Post often been accused of being too liberal with its editorials?

Not in about ten years. The Post WAS a left-of-center Paper with a fairly leftist editorial page for many years (though remember they are the ones who made George Will famous). Unfortunately when legendary editor Meg Greenfield and publisher Katherine Graham died Graham's daughter and famously pro-Israel neo-con Lally Weymouth started having an outsized influence over the post (and Newsweek's) editorial policies and the paper has become somewhere just to the left of the New York Post in recent years

printboy: Just how liberal is the mainstream media?

Well, if you do a highly contentious and hostile interview with a Republican political candidate that ends up assisting in that persons defeat at the polls you'll get an award from your colleagues.

Such was obviously the case when CBS "Evening News" anchor Katie Couric was given a "Special Achievement" award earlier this week for her highly-publicized September interviews with vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

Yeah, because it was the most talked about and telling interview of the year.

"Ohhhh, all of them."

County Fair Blog? Puhhhhlease

O has had failures so far, in the areas of earmarks, pork, failed appointments, appointing lobbyists he said he would not. Has failed to do anything but put the country in huge debt that generations to come will have to pay for. Possibly jeopardizing the already fragile SS system.

The debt, throwing money shotgun effect, was a fail.

The market will recover. Business will pick up....but out of 2 trillion BORROWED dollars of knee jerk un-targeted flinging....a lot is going to be wasted. Frittered away...that's the fail part.

And he has the media 99% looking out for his back. So I blow my nose in the general direction of the subtard.

printboy: Just how liberal is the mainstream media?

Well, if you do a highly contentious and hostile interview with a Republican political candidate that ends up assisting in that persons defeat at the polls you'll get an award from your colleagues.

Such was obviously the case when CBS "Evening News" anchor Katie Couric was given a "Special Achievement" award earlier this week for her highly-publicized September interviews with vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

yeah no kidding. couric using her "gotcha journalism" techniques like asking hard hitting questions as "which newspapers do you read?"

FTA : "As Media Matters has noted, the media's beloved meme that Obama promised to eliminate earmarks is pure fantasy. Not that that has stopped the press from peddling its favorite falsehood."

Heh.

Maybe not as Fantastical as all THAT.
Hannetty's radio show has been replaying audio of Obama saying (pre-election) he would eliminate all earmarks followed immediately by audio of him saying (post-election) he would only eliminate the "bad" earmarks and keep the "good" ones.

He's doing it to showcase a broken campaign promise, but in this instance it serves to showcase that Mediamatters isn't as much about "journalism" as they try to pretend they are.

//Media Matters has it's head so far up Obama's hindquarters it's like Obama has two heads.
//Seriously.

bmasso: FTA : "As Media Matters has noted, the media's beloved meme that Obama promised to eliminate earmarks is pure fantasy. Not that that has stopped the press from peddling its favorite falsehood."

Heh.

Maybe not as Fantastical as all THAT.
Hannetty's radio show has been replaying audio of Obama saying (pre-election) he would eliminate all earmarks followed immediately by audio of him saying (post-election) he would only eliminate the "bad" earmarks and keep the "good" ones.

He's doing it to showcase a broken campaign promise, but in this instance it serves to showcase that Mediamatters isn't as much about "journalism" as they try to pretend they are.

//Media Matters has it's head so far up Obama's hindquarters it's like Obama has two heads.
//Seriously.

Hannity aired a
number of clips from the 2008 presidential campaign in order to claim
that Obama was breaking his promise of "no earmarks," when, in fact,
in three of the clips, Obama was referring to reforming the earmark
process, and in a fourth, he was asserting that an opponent was being
hypocritical for taking earmarks and then advocating against them. In
the fifth clip, which was actually taken from a January 6 media
availability -- not during the presidential campaign as Hannity
suggested -- Obama stated: "We are gonna ban all earmarks -- the
process by which individual members insert pet projects without
review." However, Obama was referring to his desire to "ban all
earmarks" from his "recovery and reinvestment plan," which he
specifically distinguished from "the overall budget process."

robot monkey: bmasso: FTA : "As Media Matters has noted, the media's beloved meme that Obama promised to eliminate earmarks is pure fantasy. Not that that has stopped the press from peddling its favorite falsehood."

Heh.

Maybe not as Fantastical as all THAT.
Hannetty's radio show has been replaying audio of Obama saying (pre-election) he would eliminate all earmarks followed immediately by audio of him saying (post-election) he would only eliminate the "bad" earmarks and keep the "good" ones.

He's doing it to showcase a broken campaign promise, but in this instance it serves to showcase that Mediamatters isn't as much about "journalism" as they try to pretend they are.

//Media Matters has it's head so far up Obama's hindquarters it's like Obama has two heads.
//Seriously.

Hannity aired a
number of clips from the 2008 presidential campaign in order to claim
that Obama was breaking his promise of "no earmarks," when, in fact,
in three of the clips, Obama was referring to reforming the earmark
process, and in a fourth, he was asserting that an opponent was being
hypocritical for taking earmarks and then advocating against them. In
the fifth clip, which was actually taken from a January 6 media
availability -- not during the presidential campaign as Hannity
suggested -- Obama stated: "We are gonna ban all earmarks -- the
process by which individual members insert pet projects without
review." However, Obama was referring to his desire to "ban all
earmarks" from his "recovery and reinvestment plan," which he
specifically distinguished from "the overall budget process."

careful! facts are like kryptonite to republicans!

Uchiha_Cycliste: No kidding. Story and venting time! I have a neighbor who... says has any meaning. grrrrrr.......

What's his Fark name?

I think the firing of US Attorneys is a better scare article.