Can we get a source icon for WND that just says "wharrgbl"?

They are?

robmilmel: Can we get a source icon for WND that just says "wharrgbl"?

we just need a "wharrgarbl" tag. and a corresponding left-wing one, to be fair.

/cant think of what it would be.

Man On Fire: we just need a "wharrgarbl" tag. and a corresponding left-wing one, to be fair.

"Moonbat"

Or possibly the State of Hawaii is, since they issued the CoLB.

Wharrgarbl and libtard. Or maybe "Suck it"

I'm pretty sure its policy at WND that you have to snort a fat rail of meth before writing an article.

cameroncrazy1984: Or possibly the State of Hawaii is, since they issued the CoLB.

Everyone is in on the conspiracy, except for a handful of brave patriots blogging furiously in their pajamas, through a haze of Cheeto dust, flop-sweat, fear, and delusion.

Snoeps is left-wing now? It seems usually apolitical, and when it does offer a political opinion, it generally seems to be somewhat right-of-center, even by American standards. Not exactly CPAC-esque, but hardly Kos-like, either.

But I suppose these days anything that doesn't slavishly recite the official wharrgarbl cant lovingly ladeled out to the world by Limbaugh Coulter Malkin LLC is considered outright communist.

SusanIvanova:

But I suppose these days anything that doesn't slavishly recite the official wharrgarbl cant lovingly ladeled out to the world by Limbaugh Coulter Malkin LLC is considered outright communist.

Yes. Keep in mind that WND's definition of reality is:

Reality (noun) - A leftist bastardization of God's original plan, which no longer conforms with our expectations due to evildoers like Satanists, gays, George Soros, and the Teletubbies.

First Pelosi makes me agree with Pence (re: Fairness Doctrine) and now WND is making me agree with Kyl. And they are two of my most despised Republicans.

Will you people stop making me agree with these scumbags?

# Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

Pretty sure that ship has already sailed

They consider it "left wing" because it debunks the hundreds of idiotic, duplicitous, and/or patently lying e-mail forwards you get every day, 99.9999% of which are pro-Republican and/or anti-"liberal" in substance.

Hender: Man On Fire: we just need a "wharrgarbl" tag. and a corresponding left-wing one, to be fair.

"Moonbat"

we have a winner!

Oh great, now that a source of unbiased information has been declared liberal we can look forward to the fair and balanced conservative version.

Conservasnopes.com

Top Stories:

1. JFK fought in WWII. - FALSE.
2. George W. Bush saved the country from sewer mutants via hand to hand combat. - TRUE.
3. Cheese is a secret liberal media plot to destroy America. - TRUE.

kronicfeld: They consider it "left wing" because it debunks the hundreds of idiotic, duplicitous, and/or patently lying e-mail forwards you get every day, 99.9999% of which are pro-Republican and/or anti-"liberal" in substance.

We have a winner! un-American socialist hippy terrorist.

Snopes is left-wing?

...the f*ck?

TwistedIvory: Snopes is left-wing?

...the f*ck?

Reality has an obvious Liberal bias.

2wolves: Reality has an obvious Liberal bias.

It must, since they needed to make Conservapedia to back up their twisted view of reality.

eddie van heinous: I'm pretty sure its policy at WND that you have to snort a fat rail of meth before writing an article.

I misread that as a "rat fail of meth" which still made sense and created an interesting visual as well.

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

kronicfeld: They consider it "left wing" because it debunks the hundreds of idiotic, duplicitous, and/or patently lying e-mail forwards you get every day, 99.9999% of which are pro-Republican and/or anti-"liberal" in substance.

I have it on good authority that Mayor McCheese personally spit on the soldiers who captured Saddam in Afghanistan, when they came in to McDonald's for a hot apple pie.

/FORWARD THIS TO ALL "TRUE PATRIOTS!!!" BECAUSE THE MAINSTREAM MSM MEDIA IS TOO BUSY TELLING US OBAMBI WASN'T SECRETLY BORN IN KENYA TO MALCOLM X TO PRINT THIS!!!!!

WND = Weapons of News Destruction?

They're actually becoming a living stereotype of the worst imaginable wingnut. This is hilarious.

It's official, reality has a left wing bias.

Diogenes: First Pelosi makes me agree with Pence (re: Fairness Doctrine) and now WND is making me agree with Kyl. And they are two of my most despised Republicans.

Uh, what Pelosi did was nothing like the fairness doctrine. Nice try though.

Actually during the 2004 election I noticed that Snopes had a definite tilt to the right. There were several articles about John Kerry that were obvious bullshiat to anyone with a passing knowledge of them. Snopes always classified the authenticity of these as "undetermined". Any negative article about George W. Bush was intantly debunked and given the "false" tag.

Snopes is a left wing site? Why because the lady doesn't believe the birfers?

How do I speak with parentheses?

steverockson: Actually during the 2004 election I noticed that Snopes had a definite tilt to the right. There were several articles about John Kerry that were obvious bullshiat to anyone with a passing knowledge of them. Snopes always classified the authenticity of these as "undetermined". Any negative article about George W. Bush was intantly debunked and given the "false" tag.

Yeah, I always got the impression it leaned right. But nothing over the top.

Just change the E to a U in the World Net Daily tag.

I always got the impression that snopes leaned toward debunking whatever ridiculous urban legends were most prominent regardless of their political orientation.

Separating truths from falsehoods is now, officially, a left-wing activity.

Glad that was finally settled. Why are any Republicans still in office, at all?

Snopes has a political bias?

robmilmel: Can we get a source icon for WND that just says "wharrgbl"?

Then we'll get it confused with the NY Post, LGF, Right-wing News, NRO, Malkin, Coulter, Newsmax, Fox News, and WSJ submissions.

robmilmel: Can we get a source icon for WND that just says "wharrgbl"? we just need a "wharrgarbl" tag. and a corresponding left-wing one, to be fair. /cant think of what it would be.
==========================

(Rod) Blagovich? :)

I'm telling you, Clinton stuck the gun right into Vince Foster's mouth and pulled the trigger himself.

Hender: Man On Fire: we just need a "wharrgarbl" tag. and a corresponding left-wing one, to be fair.

"Moonbat"

THIS and THAT

Gosling: Snopes has a political bias?

See the comments above. The truth and logic really suck for conservatives, therefore they don't like Snopes.

Gosling: Snopes has a political bias?

...blah blah reality blah blah liberal bias blah blah....

I'm just going to echo the rest of the thread and say:

Snopes has a political bias?

sonnyboy11: Gosling: Snopes has a political bias?

See the comments above. The truth and logic really suck for conservatives, therefore they don't like Snopes.

As I explained above Snopes does have a political bias, to the right! They bent over backwards to debunk every Bush story during the 2004 election, but couldn't be bothered to debunk the Swift Boat Liars.

steverockson: sonnyboy11: Gosling: Snopes has a political bias?

See the comments above. The truth and logic really suck for conservatives, therefore they don't like Snopes.

As I explained above Snopes does have a political bias, to the right! They bent over backwards to debunk every Bush story during the 2004 election, but couldn't be bothered to debunk the Swift Boat Liars.

And if Fox News ever congratulates Obama on doing a good job, the same nuts will consider Fox News to be part of the liberal media.

And then the farking world explodes.

Torgo_of_Manos: # Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

Pretty sure that ship has already sailed

Jesus Christ is there no end to the states that Alan Keyes will claim residence in for attention? How in the hell does he have standing to take a piss in California, let alone sue with respect to the Electoral College?

A right-wing website attacking a republican senator for defending a democratic president.

That should make some heads asplode.

Torgo_of_Manos: # Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

Pretty sure that ship has already sailed

And who gets to pay for Obomas lawers while they fight to keep the papers locked up and hidden from the public ??

kronicfeld: They consider it "left wing" because it debunks the hundreds of idiotic, duplicitous, and/or patently lying e-mail forwards you get every day, 99.9999% of which are pro-Republican and/or anti-"liberal" in substance.

Bingo. Think about all the ultra-retarded emails you have received over the years that were forwarded by the dumbest coworkers or members of your family. I can't think of a single one that could be fairly characterized as liberal or left-leaning in any way. Instead, it has been experience that there are only two kinds: (1) Obviously conservative; or (2) Completely unrelated to politics (like the dumb emails saying Microsoft will donate a million dollars to medical research if the email gets forwarded a million times). In either case, someone has to waste a lot of time debunking them, and that someone is usually snopes. So of course they end up with a lot of pages on their web site devoted to debunking all the lies that conservatives are constantly spreading.

One by one, every site will fall to the left-wing -- that is, acknowledge facts -- until the only "trustworthy" sites remaining will be Free Republic, World Net Daily and Conservapedia.

They'll eat themselves.