Norm is a slow learner.
He is going to need lotsa money to keep this crap up,
both the website and the campaign to steal back the unstole election.
Mayhaps the end is in sight.

you mean the election each guy has won once?

bradkanus: you mean the election each guy has won once?

Yeah, once when all the legal votes were not counted and once when they were.

pathetic tag needed

Deliberate deception or incompetence?

Not sure which way Coleman's people would prefer.

Bill_Wick's_Friend: Deliberate deception or incompetence?

Not sure which way Coleman's people would prefer.

as Bradk will surely testify, "conservatives" will gladly trumpet their incompetence for pretty much any occasion.

Bill_Wick's_Friend: Deliberate deception or incompetence?

From the description given and previous reporting about the Coleman campaign, I believe "both" would be the correct answer.

Heh, if you do a trace route on ColemanforSenate.com you can still see this in action.

DNS returns 1.1.1.1.

lol

I don't understand. Do they really think that nobody's paying attention?

C'mon, knuckleheads. I have things to do soon and I want to get a good laugh from the absurd explanations that are forthcoming.

Someone must be on now.

Cubist Robot Party: I don't understand. Do they really think that nobody's paying attention?

most republicans aren't too good at this internet thing.

More Republican lies and deception. I am not surprised in the least, nor am I surprised in how badly he carried it out. Only a Republican could fail at failing.

the fail tag just isn't enough for this hoser.

I know some "independents" are on, c'mon guys. Let's hear how stupid the libs are... you know you want to tell us all. Come on...

Just keep spending all that money you were going to use in the 2010 campaign, GOP...

Norm, Norm, Norm...

You're not good enough,
You're not smart enough,
And doggone it, people don't like you.

bradkanus: you mean the election each guy has won once?

No, the election Franken won. First one was too close to call.

He pulled a Lieberman?

Donald_McRonald: He pulled a Lieberman?

The internet just couldn't hold the mighty force of Joementum.

abb3w: Bill_Wick's_Friend: Deliberate deception or incompetence?

From the description given and previous reporting about the Coleman campaign, I believe "both" would be the correct answer.

Yes, "both" seems about right. The guy got beat by both Ventura and Franken. He just needs to get on with his life.

RemyDuron: Donald_McRonald: He pulled a Lieberman?

The internet just couldn't hold the mighty force of Joementum.

I remember my work email got spammed by the minnions of Joementum. They were very persistent adding new addresses as I blocked the old ones.

IXI Jim IXI: Just keep spending all that money you were going to use in the 2010 campaign, GOP...

THIS.

Seriously, Republicans have to see this guy as a lost cause, right? Between the outright duplicity after the election (being for recounts after he was against them), the legal flailing, and the fact that he lost to moonbat Jesse Ventura and now Franken, wouldn't the powers that be realize he's just not that, how you say, good?

I went cross-eyed with all the computer talk, but Daily Kos' reputation is as shady as the Freepers or World Nut Daily, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

Norm Coleman fakes a website crash so he can pretend people care about helping him steal his Senate seat back from Franken

It worked for Lieberman.

1.1.1.1?
Damn Roosevelt.com...


/better not be obscure

eddiesocket: I went cross-eyed with all the computer talk, but Daily Kos' reputation is as shady as the Freepers or World Nut Daily, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

So you know, there is a difference between "partisan" and "crazy".

Brad K. Anus: you mean the election each guy has won once?

No, I'm pretty sure subby means the election Al Franken won. You know, the one Coleman attempted to steal based on an incomplete tally of votes.

eddiesocket: I went cross-eyed with all the computer talk, but Daily Kos' reputation is as shady as the Freepers or World Nut Daily, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

So, you don't understand what they're saying, but you're going to distrust them?

eddiesocket: I went cross-eyed with all the computer talk, but Daily Kos' reputation is as shady as the Freepers or World Nut Daily, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

maybe one of these might be of some assistance to you

MNpublius (new window)

Minnesota Independent (new window)

Hey, Democraps. Just because the Supreme Court appointed Franken doesn't make him the real senator. Once we get a fair recount you'll all see how stupid you really are.

RemyDuron: eddiesocket: I went cross-eyed with all the computer talk, but Daily Kos' reputation is as shady as the Freepers or World Nut Daily, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

So, you don't understand what they're saying, but you're going to distrust them?

Pretty much sums them up as a person, doesn't it? "I don't understand what's going on, so I will defer to what other people think about this publication."

Bucky Katt: eddiesocket: I went cross-eyed with all the computer talk, but Daily Kos' reputation is as shady as the Freepers or World Nut Daily, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

maybe one of these might be of some assistance to you

MNpublius (new window)

Minnesota Independent (new window)

Don't you understand if Daily Kos has it it invalidates the argument everywhere it's made.

Haven't you been paying attention to the right wingers in these threads?

Falcc: Hey, Democraps. Just because the Supreme Court appointed Franken doesn't make him the real senator. Once we get a fair recount you'll all see how stupid you really are.

2000 redux ... the second time as farce you know

snocone: Norm is a slow learner.


He's an amateur. Now Joe Lieberman...that was a guy who could fake a server crash.

Falcc: Hey, Democraps. Just because the Supreme Court appointed Franken doesn't make him the real senator. Once we get a fair recount you'll all see how stupid you really are.

They had the fair recount. That's the one Franken one.

Corvus: Bucky Katt: eddiesocket: I went cross-eyed with all the computer talk, but Daily Kos' reputation is as shady as the Freepers or World Nut Daily, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

maybe one of these might be of some assistance to you

MNpublius (new window)

Minnesota Independent (new window)

Don't you understand if Daily Kos has it it invalidates the argument everywhere it's made.

Haven't you been paying attention to the right wingers in these threads?

Oh, you're right. I feel so ashamed.

Your Faith is Creepy: Brad K. Anus: you mean the election each guy has won once?

No, I'm pretty sure subby means the election Al Franken won. You know, the one Coleman attempted to steal based on an incomplete tally of votes.

No, Brad K. Anus is right. Each man did win. Coleman won it on election night, and kept winning it with each recount until the number of votes that were contested slid from himself to Franken -- at which point Franken won. Franken winning was the one which 'counted' in the end.

It's wrong to try to claim Coleman is the one who attempted to steal it, and keep it at that. That was not a clean election by any count.

For myself, I'm not quite sure Franken won -- but he was the most tenacious, and he did have the help of that box of ballots in the back of someone's car found waaaaaay after the fact.

Bucky Katt: 2000 redux ... the second time as farce you know

In 2000 they had them stop counting valid ballots.

In this election they counted all valid ballots and Franken won.

That is the difference.

Corvus: Bucky Katt: 2000 redux ... the second time as farce you know

In 2000 they had them stop counting valid ballots.

In this election they counted all valid ballots and Franken won.

That is the difference.

Oh, sniggity-iggity-APP!!!

// don't respond, you'll only get told again

Corvus: Falcc: Hey, Democraps. Just because the Supreme Court appointed Franken doesn't make him the real senator. Once we get a fair recount you'll all see how stupid you really are.

They had the fair recount. That's the one Franken one.

Hi, Falcc. I guess turnabout is fair play -- each party has things they have selective memory about the type of help they received. Franken will be one of those for Democrats. Neither side is pure.

ExperianScaresCthulhu: It's wrong to try to claim Coleman is the one who attempted to steal it, and keep it at that. That was not a clean election by any count.

For myself, I'm not quite sure Franken won -- but he was the most tenacious, and he did have the help of that box of ballots in the back of someone's car found waaaaaay after the fact.

Okay, the "Box of ballots in the back of a car thing", I'm pretty sure, never actually happened.

Unless, of course, you think the elections director is lying?

Link (new window)

Coleman won it on election night, and kept winning it with each recount until the number of votes that were contested slid from himself to Franken --

He stayed ahead during the recount with artificial challenges. For instance, challenging that someone who voted for McCain and Franken obviously did not mean to vote for Franken.

That kept obvious and legal Franken votes out of the count. His lead was gone once all those ballots were counted.

It's all PR, just like this fake server crash.

It must be nice to have a base full of idiots so you can pull that kind of thing off without people being offended that you think they are too retarded to notice.

Hell, the whole case is PR. He is arguing in favor now of including votes from people who admit, under oath on the stand as witnesses that HE called, that the signature on their ballot application was forged.

The entire recount process was broadcast online and was done with a panel with one Democrat, one Republican, and one independent.

God damn conservatives are dumb. I'm not sure why you guys are even allowed to vote anymore after Bush.

ExperianScaresCthulhu: and he did have the help of that box of ballots in the back of someone's car found waaaaaay after the fact.

Aw, not this again, do the many links showing that said claim was entirely false have to be posted yet one more time?

ExperianScaresCthulhu: Your Faith is Creepy: Brad K. Anus: you mean the election each guy has won once?

No, I'm pretty sure subby means the election Al Franken won. You know, the one Coleman attempted to steal based on an incomplete tally of votes.

No, Brad K. Anus is right. Each man did win. Coleman won it on election night, and kept winning it with each recount until the number of votes that were contested slid from himself to Franken -- at which point Franken won. Franken winning was the one which 'counted' in the end.

Well, technically nobody has "won" the election until it's been certified and the winner is seated in the senate. Since that hasn't happened yet, all we have is a presumptive winner, and that's Franken. Brad K. Anus may be using a different definition of 'win' - Republicans are known for that - but if we have to back one, I'm going to stick with the candidate who has received the most votes based on the most reliable count to date.

And yeah, my use of the word "steal" was hyperbolic. I hereby apologize to the Coleman campaign for impugning their integrity.

holiday_inn_in_cambodia: 1.1.1.1?
Damn Roosevelt.com...


/better not be obscure

That was excellent....

Won't ANY of our Fark Independents™ defend Norm? And I don't mean fringe loons like Brad K. Anus -- I mean real, principled conservatives.

...

Yeah, never mind. I read what I wrote and realized my mistake.

Yesdog: Won't ANY of our Fark Independents™ defend Norm? And I don't mean fringe loons like Brad K. Anus -- I mean real, principled conservatives.

...

Yeah, never mind. I read what I wrote and realized my mistake.

You mean the part where you implied that "Fark Independents™" are "real, principled conservatives"?

Falcc: Hey, Democraps. Just because the Supreme Court appointed Franken doesn't make him the real senator. Once we get a fair recount you'll all see how stupid you really are.

Hehehe excelent troll.

And the only people they could possibly blame it on it the ISP - who always demand authentication for any re-points.

A Republican gets caught lying and cheating?

But gets caught because the Bible doesn't contain any useful info about hacking and spoofing IP?

I'm shocked!