If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(Daily Mail) Obvious UK's food police - "a prime example of excessive Government nannying"   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 46
More: Obvious  
•       •       •

5795 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Jan 2009 at 6:59 PM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!

46 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
 
SchlingFocker [TotalFark] 2009-01-25 06:25:31 PM  
Food police?

img2.timeinc.net

 
digitaljim 2009-01-25 07:01:32 PM  
If only Diana were here!

 
Ironclad2 2009-01-25 07:04:55 PM  
Lipidleggin' (new window)

 
beerbaron 2009-01-25 07:05:15 PM  
i.dailymail.co.uk

WTF? The potatoes I recognize, but what is that stuff on the right?!?

/british food can be alarming

 
Semi-Sane 2009-01-25 07:08:17 PM  
It looks like a mangled piece of chicken.

 
LukeA 2009-01-25 07:09:13 PM  
cock-a-roaches

 
mungo 2009-01-25 07:10:31 PM  
Oh noes! The Mail is extrapolating from a small trial programme by a quango to a national food police state! It's inevitable! Just like every other Mail article! Believe it, Farkers, Belieeeeeeve iiittt!

/The Mail. Fear, xenophobia and Diana, daily.

 
beerbaron 2009-01-25 07:10:41 PM  
I was guessing some crustacean segment, but no...

 
kellythecat 2009-01-25 07:13:27 PM  
fta

By hitting people at home, rather than in supermarkets, we can get inside their lives', he said.

'It's only by knocking on doors you can find out what they are having for their tea and offer some healthy suggestions.'




I guess a tasteful poster or ad campaign wouldn't be good enough?

 
Iron Chef Scottish 2009-01-25 07:16:27 PM  
Re: Article - absolute f*cking nonsense
Re: Submitter - you got a greenlight, but you're a twat. The Lord giveth...
Re: Pictured food - looks like chicken & mushrooms. Terrifying.

 
nunia 2009-01-25 07:18:27 PM  
And remember kids: always wipe front-to-back.

/army training video
//no joke; you should have seen the STD videos

 
ramblin 2009-01-25 07:19:52 PM  
News of the 'food champions' scheme comes a fortnight after the Tories claimed taxpayers are footing a bill of more than £100million for the salaries of nearly 5,000 bureaucrats in Whitehall 'non-jobs', such as staff 'whose post or work is no longer being carried out'.

 
thereadlines [TotalFark] 2009-01-25 07:26:33 PM  
i384.photobucket.com

 
horonto [TotalFark] 2009-01-25 07:31:42 PM  
blogs.warwick.ac.uk

 
Barbecue Bob 2009-01-25 07:32:42 PM  
The food Police, they live inside of my head...

/got nuttin'

 
Corsair09 2009-01-25 07:33:16 PM  
Hey, If you don't want sgovernment peering into every aspect of your life, don't elect Socialists! Why, here in the U.S. We would NEVER elect someone who thinks he knows what is best for everyone...

Oh. Right. Nevermind.

 
1000Monkeys 2009-01-25 07:34:14 PM  
Food police? That article is full of shiat even by Daily Fail standards. This is what the Daily Wail's talking about. WRAP has partnered up with the Women's Institute to train volunteers and set up a grassroots anti-waste campaign. Apparently, this means that the food Gestapo will be calling soon.

http://www.wrap.org.uk/retail/case_studies_research/report_love_food.html

 
Tellurianix 2009-01-25 07:41:23 PM  
Jesus H Christ, does anyone on this site read any British newspapers OTHER than the bloody Mail? And which tard moderators keep greenlighting them?

 
Goddess of Atheism 2009-01-25 07:43:41 PM  
Just what we need to make the world a better place: do-gooder busybodies knocking on doors offering unsolicited advice to strangers. I'm guessing that any Brit who responds with "Piss off" and a door-slam will be put on one of their "anti-social" lists.

 
Corsair09 2009-01-25 07:47:03 PM  
Tellurianix: Jesus H Christ, does anyone on this site read any British newspapers OTHER than the bloody Mail?

Yeah.. What we need is more articles from the Daily Express!

/Troll

 
Badfysh 2009-01-25 07:48:34 PM  
beerbaron: WTF? The potatoes I recognize, but what is that stuff on the right?!?

When I first glanced at that pic I thought it was someone's hand..

 
ronaprhys 2009-01-25 07:59:09 PM  
Tellurianix: Jesus H Christ, does anyone on this site read any British newspapers OTHER than the bloody Mail? And which tard moderators keep greenlighting them?

Yes - we also read the Sun.

 
epoc_tnac 2009-01-25 08:02:50 PM  
The Daily Mail! Wharrgarbling on behalf of Britains finest bullshiatters!

I'm still waiting to see the weekly "funniest fark headlines" section in the Mail. Oh wait, they would probably find this site offensive and indecent to fictional middle class sensibilities.

I can't understand why the modmins don't find it offensive to, y'know, common sense.

 
ronaprhys 2009-01-25 08:04:34 PM  
1000Monkeys: Food police? That article is full of shiat even by Daily Fail standards. This is what the Daily Wail's talking about. WRAP has partnered up with the Women's Institute to train volunteers and set up a grassroots anti-waste campaign. Apparently, this means that the food Gestapo will be calling soon.

http://www.wrap.org.uk/retail/case_studies_research/report_love_food.html


I do think the article mentioned something about 7-8.5lbs/hour, more on the weekends. That doesn't seem like volunteer work to me.

I do agree that the article is somewhat sensationalistic. Especially running the math out to show some eleventy-brazillion pound tag.

One very interesting quote FTA: She said: 'I'm all in favour of banning food waste but if the Government wanted to seriously tackle this problem they should ban buy-one-get-one-free offers - because they are what encourage people to buy food they do not need.'

Emphasis mine. Banning coupons, yep, that'll do it. Because people naturally buy two of everything and then throw the second one away rather than, IDK, farking storing it for later?!?

 
thereadlines [TotalFark] 2009-01-25 08:07:38 PM  
Tellurianix: Jesus H Christ, does anyone on this site read any British newspapers OTHER than the bloody Mail? And which tard moderators keep greenlighting them?

Well, I read the Guardian, but only the "Culture" section and only when the story is about attractive actresses.

The rest of the time I read the Mail, because I feel that they are the only paper in Britain of Quality that is keeping us Secure and Titillated.

 
scwewywabbit 2009-01-25 08:14:21 PM  
Won't this hurt the economy?

If people buy less food, it will cause a consumerist chain reaction, wouldn't it?

I say in desperate times like these, buy more ,moar, MOAR!

 
SlothB77 2009-01-25 08:24:44 PM  
subby didn't even mention the gratuitous pics of bad british food.

i.dailymail.co.uk

 
1000Monkeys 2009-01-25 08:25:10 PM  
ronaprhys: I do think the article mentioned something about 7-8.5lbs/hour, more on the weekends. That doesn't seem like volunteer work to me.

First of all it's £ not "lbs". Secondly, I have no idea where they got that from but I'm more inclined to believe the original sources than the Daily Mail. It wouldn't be the first time they outright fabricated part of their story.

ronaprhys: Emphasis mine. Banning coupons, yep, that'll do it. Because people naturally buy two of everything and then throw the second one away rather than, IDK, farking storing it for later?!?

That's the opinion of that particular individual and no-one else.

Though they're usually careful not to outright state it, they often present the opinion of some outraged or outrageous person as if it was the official policy or general opinion.

Though she might have a point. You should see my mother whenever she gets her hands on a fresh batch of Costco vouchers.

 
TheChemist 2009-01-25 08:29:13 PM  
Daily Fail needs its own tag.

 
ronaprhys 2009-01-25 08:54:01 PM  
1000Monkeys: First of all it's £ not "lbs". Secondly, I have no idea where they got that from but I'm more inclined to believe the original sources than the Daily Mail. It wouldn't be the first time they outright fabricated part of their story.

Yes. I know. However, since I don't have a "pounds" key on my keyboard, you get pounds/lbs. I absolutely know it's wrong but I'm not motivated in the slightest to actually figure out how to put said notation in there for a website like this.

I dunno where they got it, either. Just pointing out that it's there and there's a discrepancy between the two stories.

That's the opinion of that particular individual and no-one else.

Though they're usually careful not to outright state it, they often present the opinion of some outraged or outrageous person as if it was the official policy or general opinion.

Though she might have a point. You should see my mother whenever she gets her hands on a fresh batch of Costco vouchers.


I agree that it appears to be only her opinion and I didn't mean to imply that it was more than that. However, it's a very asinine, IMO. I realize that some people abuse it - but I get the feeling those folks would abuse something else (no implied comment about your mother - for that I'd use yo' mama jokes) if those weren't available. Collectors and all.

 
farkeruk 2009-01-25 08:58:27 PM  
This basically all comes from something that no-one likes to talk about: The EU Landfill Directive which states that councils have to pay an extra tax for landfilled waste over a certain amount.

Completely stupid, especially with food which rots down, but food counts in this, so if they can minimise it, then they can keep down the landfill taxes.

 
Purple_Gromit 2009-01-25 09:02:23 PM  
FTA 'If the Government has money sloshing around, it should give it back to the taxpayer, not spend it on schemes like this.'

Damn right, I demand my 0.05p back!

Then Im going to get 1000 people to use this money to buy a copy of the Mail.

 
ronaprhys 2009-01-25 09:17:05 PM  
Remove all Republicans: What's wrong with this? San Francisco is verifying that people actual recycle everything they are supposed to, and now England is working on the front end. We need to reduce our usage in this world and it's high time government made us do it.

And we need to reduce violence, so everyone should become Xtians* - and we'll have the gov't enforce that. We can bring back Bush and he'll help us enforce that. Once we've got the violence due to religion kicked, that'll give us a lot more money to use to combat waste and all.

*Here's why:
-since religion is the primary driver of violence throughout history, let's pick one.
-we can't do atheism because it doesn't allow for the social control
-muslim types are inherently violent, so that's out.
-jews are pretty much okay, but it's really way too much work to convert.
-them people from india would be another good choice, but they seem to fight a lot, too. Maybe it's because there's too many gods there.
-mormons are out because they're weird.
-asians eat dogs, so we've got to knock them out as well.


/is it wrong to troll a troll?

 
Bohemian 2009-01-25 09:19:40 PM  
I wouldn't be too happy about someone banging on my door offering unsolicited advice. But there are still people out there who find things like turning down your thermostat to save on your energy bill to be earth shattering great advice.

/The Daily Fail seems to be the UK's answer to Faux News.

 
BarryJV 2009-01-25 09:22:21 PM  
ronaprhys: Emphasis mine. Banning coupons, yep, that'll do it. Because people naturally buy two of everything and then throw the second one away rather than, IDK, farking storing it for later?!?

1000Monkeys: That's the opinion of that particular individual and no-one else.

That's not entirely true. A few months ago the BBC news was reporting unskeptically that 2 for 1 offers were a major cause of food waste and were aggressive in confronting supermarket managers who defended the practice. It's one of the many food/environmentalist fads that middle class liberals get their knickers in a twist about. Politicians pay lip service to the idea and after a while it goes away.

Unfortunately, once in a blue moon the fad lasts long enough that legislation is actually passed or stores are forced to change their policies. The freak out about plastic grocery bags that was fuelled by a misinterpretation of the effects of plastic waste has caused almost all shops to withdraw free bags from the checkouts.

I don't think it's going to stop 2 for 1 offers, but this is rather more than just the opinion of one individual.

 
ramblin 2009-01-25 09:28:36 PM  
Remove all Republicans Quote 2009-01-25 09:05:47 PM
What's wrong with this? San Francisco is verifying that people actual recycle everything they are supposed to, and now England is working on the front end. We need to reduce our usage in this world and it's high time government made us do it.


Individual computers are a waste of resources and everyone must turn them in for recycling. In return, each family will be issued a 30" TV that gets one channel GOVTV. It has no off switch and tampering with the switch will be prosecuted severely.

 
Xeno's_Paradox 2009-01-25 09:42:58 PM  
B-b-but whay if you recycle your leftovers by baking them in delicious puff pastry the next day?

They take your kids away, that's what.

/Probably.

 
Frank N Stein 2009-01-25 10:02:31 PM  
Iron Chef Scottish: Article - absolute f*cking nonsense

How so?

 
sparkeyjames 2009-01-25 10:30:38 PM  
Remember citizen it is your duty to think what we tell you to think, say what we tell you to say, do what we tell you to do and eat all that you are given. We are watching.

 
sparkeyjames 2009-01-25 10:34:18 PM  
Wow thats sounds vaguely like the military. Go figure.

 
sparkeyjames 2009-01-25 10:35:52 PM  
ramblin: Remove all Republicans Quote 2009-01-25 09:05:47 PM
What's wrong with this? San Francisco is verifying that people actual recycle everything they are supposed to, and now England is working on the front end. We need to reduce our usage in this world and it's high time government made us do it.

Individual computers are a waste of resources and everyone must turn them in for recycling. In return, each family will be issued a 30" TV that gets one channel GOVTV. It has no off switch and tampering with the switch will be prosecuted severely.


Don't forget the camera pointed at you from the top bezel.

 
YouPeopleAreCrazy 2009-01-25 11:09:53 PM  
visit an estimated 24,500 homes dispensing dietary advice and tips

They will call at homes throughout the day, including lunchtimes and in the early evening, when many people will be busy preparing dinner.


So...as I am busy preparing dinner (which is an artful dance of bringing together several dishes to the proper level all at the same time) they will interrupt the natural flow of my household mealtime preparation, to tell me how to do it.

Ingenious!

So, on the next morning...can I complain to the local council that their idiot official (which I pay for!!!) caused me to burn parts of our meal because I had to take time out of actually cooking dinner to deal with some random idiot at the front door?

No?

Well then. I shall engage a telephone campaign, whereby I and several of my neighbors interrupt you at home, my local council idiot, precisely at dinnertime. Every day.

/i don't live in england, but I used to
//I would do the same here

 
NickBush24 [TotalFark] 2009-01-26 01:32:46 AM  
Eat your beets! Recycle! Recycle!

/shouldn't be obscure

 
NeauxFear [TotalFark] 2009-01-26 05:34:13 AM  
NickBush24: Eat your beets! Recycle! Recycle!

/shouldn't be obscure


How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your beets?

/sooo sorry

 
leonel 2009-01-26 11:10:19 AM  
NOPE! NOT A NANNY STATE! LALALALALALALA I'M NOT LISTENING LALALALALALALALA STOP CALLING IT A NANNY STATE OR I'LL BEAT YOU UP!

 
painendstheass 2009-01-26 11:13:49 AM  
Fark.com, a prime example of impotent internet whining.

 
Displayed 46 of 46 comments


[Continue Farking]