Do they oscillate?

The more I read of activists such as this the more I come to the conclusion that smut needs to be censored.

We need to keep smut out of the hands of activists and legislators; they are obviously unable to separate the idea of a hot secretary collating copies topless in a porn video from the middle-aged office managers collating copies for work.

So, for the benefit of those of us on the internet able to separate porn from reality I propose all websites currently requiring a useless age-verification drop-down menu to replace it with a drop-down containing a list of countries/provinces/states that you represent as a politician. If you submit ANYTHING you will be re-directed to zombo.com and immediately emailed a message that:

a) you need to lighten up.
b) you failed at the internet.

This should free-up politicians' time to do things for which they are more qualified, such as farking over the poor and sending sexually harassing messages to their employees.

Whatever. I can bring my own porn to Australia.

I read that article, was like "hey, I totally agree" and then got to the end and oh my god it was written by a woman.

maybe that shouldn't shock me, but it did.

Good thing SCOTUS said pr0n was free speech or we'd be farked.

Why is it that the men in Australian porn are universally not particularly well hung?

I understand that most men aren't hung like horses, but Australian men seem to be on the small side.

Dwight_Yeast: Why is it that the men in Australian porn are universally not particularly well hung?

I understand that most men aren't hung like horses, but Australian men seem to be on the small side.

Perhaps the national preference is to just have as small an amount of dick on screen as possible. Also, to any porn directors reading, I don't want to see the guys face as he ejaculates... thanks.

Slaxl: Dwight_Yeast: Why is it that the men in Australian porn are universally not particularly well hung?

I understand that most men aren't hung like horses, but Australian men seem to be on the small side.

Perhaps the national preference is to just have as small an amount of dick on screen as possible. Also, to any porn directors reading, I don't want to see the guys face as he ejaculates... thanks.

And seriously, what's up with the "let's have two dudes making small talk about cruising for chicks for about 20 minutes before we even see the woman" crap? Like, we know the whole thing it set up, it's not like they're fooling any of us viewers into thinking that they're actually just walking around the street and running into impossibly hot/slutty women.

Dirty Hot Linker: Good thing SCOTUS said pr0n was free speech or we'd be farked.

Bad thing that this is an Australian article.

FTA, genius Aussie Sen. Conroy"if you're opposed to the department's cyber-safety plan, you are opposed to the protection of children."

Flash back to the phrase that put George W. Bush in the history books: "If you're not with us, you're with the terrorists."

Do all politicians think there's only half a side to any issue?

ChewbaccaJones: The more I read of activists such as this the more I come to the conclusion that smut needs to be censored.

We need to keep smut out of the hands of activists and legislators; they are obviously unable to separate the idea of a hot secretary collating copies topless in a porn video from the middle-aged office managers collating copies for work.

So, for the benefit of those of us on the internet able to separate porn from reality I propose all websites currently requiring a useless age-verification drop-down menu to replace it with a drop-down containing a list of countries/provinces/states that you represent as a politician. If you submit ANYTHING you will be re-directed to zombo.com and immediately emailed a message that:

a) you need to lighten up.
b) you failed at the internet.

This should free-up politicians' time to do things for which they are more qualified, such as farking over the poor and sending sexually harassing messages to their employees.

what

You can have my porn when you pry it from my warm, sticky hands.

"Won't someone think of the porn fans?"

Uh no, I'd rather not.

Dwight_Yeast: I understand that most men aren't hung like horses, but Australian men seem to be on the small side.

You aren't looking at the right porn... I've seen quite a number of well endowed, toned, tanned Aussie hunks.

Slaxl: I don't want to see the guys face as he ejaculates...

tsk tsk tsk... that's HAWT!

Dwight_Yeast: Why is it that the men in Australian porn are universally not particularly well hung?

I understand that most men aren't hung like horses, but Australian men seem to be on the small side.



These lifeguards would like to speak with you.

Slaxl: to any porn directors reading, I don't want to see the guys face as he ejaculates... thanks.

Think of this... Porn movies are edited just like other movies (if not as adeptly). That reaction shot is likely not even shot during the sex scene. He's probably just standing there afterward with a limp dick, making an O-face, while the girl cleans up and gets a coffee. Or maybe a few days before/after the rest of the filming.

LOL, sexaaaaay

Porn is the reason for the accelerated growth and bandwidth in the internet, it is the reason so many awesome technologies have been developed to deliver more and more porn faster and faster. It makes everyday web use more enjoyable.

We all benefit from porn.

What about the action movie fans?

/"Family's just another word for censorship!"
//somebody here has to get that.

No Such Agency: Slaxl: to any porn directors reading, I don't want to see the guys face as he ejaculates... thanks.

Think of this... Porn movies are edited just like other movies (if not as adeptly). That reaction shot is likely not even shot during the sex scene. He's probably just standing there afterward with a limp dick, making an O-face, while the girl cleans up and gets a coffee. Or maybe a few days before/after the rest of the filming.

LOL, sexaaaaay

Okay, take 47, this time with feeling!

If it weren't for porn, I would have spent a lot of money last night in bars breathing second hand smoke and spending lots of money giving semi-attractive women substances known to cause cancer and liver problems in order to solve what is essentially a very simple problem.

I think relationships everywhere would improve if women understood the discomfort of having full balls. (I assume gay men are already aware). (Gay for pay men too, in case someone gets offended).

Xenu's Giant Pink Replicock:
If it weren't for porn, I would have spent a lot of money last night in bars breathing second hand smoke and spending lots of money giving semi-attractive women substances known to cause cancer and liver problems in order to solve what is essentially a very simple problem.

I would not recommend using Agent Orange as a club drug.

I thought PM Kevin Rudd was supposed to be the great liberal hope after John Howard? Guess that doesn't extend to this issue...

I'm not clear on the details of what they are trying to do, but trying to filter the net like this never works.

NarrMaster: What about the action movie fans?

/"Family's just a dirty word for censorship!"
//somebody here has to get that.

"Hey, hey MPAA, how many movies have you censored today?"

I read that article, was like "hey, I totally agree" and then got to the end and oh my god it was written by a woman.



/hot
//the link, that is

With all the Australians I know (as a New Zealander, even more so as a New Zealander living in London), I just can't see where this national fear of porn came from. Either Johnny Howard annoyed Australians enough with his relentless Bush-fellation that they voted in Rudd, a nose-picking porn-hater, or ... or I don't know.
But it seems like the days where NZ is referred to as Australias Canada is more apt, and more a think to be lauded than mocked.

There's only 24 posts in this thread?

crazy.

brainiac-dumdum: There's only 24 posts in this thread?

crazy.

You're crazy. There are 25 posts in this thread.

mcmnky: brainiac-dumdum: There's only 24 posts in this thread?

crazy.

You're crazy. There are 25 posts in this thread.

my mistake, sorry

Xenu's Giant Pink Replicock: If it weren't for porn, I would have spent a lot of money last night in bars breathing second hand smoke and spending lots of money giving semi-attractive women substances known to cause cancer and liver problems in order to solve what is essentially a very simple problem.

I think relationships everywhere would improve if women understood the discomfort of having full balls. (I assume gay men are already aware). (Gay for pay men too, in case someone gets offended).

I'm 34, male, and have never experienced this "full balls" sensation. I might go see a practitioner about it.

Wasilla Hillbilly:
I'm 34, male, and have never experienced this "full balls" sensation. I might go see a practitioner about it.

No, you generally go to a practitioner if you are suffering from it...

+1 to Razer for writing it...

tycho47: I read that article, was like "hey, I totally agree" and then got to the end and oh my god it was written by a woman.

I never considered this idiots gender before as I try and blank it out. Aside from participating in the downfall of a great radio station I think the only thing it has done lately is get the sack for trying and failing to talk to a human that actually has talent.

It should get moran tattooed on it's forehead.