If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(London Times) Obvious Headline: Wealthy men give women more orgasms. The important bulge in a man's pants is his wallet   (timesonline.co.uk) divider line 108
More: Obvious  
•       •       •

8730 clicks; posted to Main » on 18 Jan 2009 at 2:44 AM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!

108 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
sloppy shoes 2009-01-17 11:07:39 PM  
I know I keep all my financial statements in my wallet; that way, if I get robbed, the thief can take all my money instead of my spending cash!

 
Weaver95 [TotalFark] 2009-01-17 11:28:36 PM  
However, it fits into a wider body of research known as evolutionary psychology which suggests that both men and women are genetically predisposed to ruthlessly exploit each other to achieve the best chances of survival for their genes.

well that explains my last girlfriend....

 
Manta537 [TotalFark] 2009-01-17 11:51:21 PM  
*puts roll of silver dollars in my pants*

 
Pope George Ringo [TotalFark] 2009-01-17 11:53:22 PM  
cosmopup.com

 
now now plz git ur farks str8 2009-01-18 12:53:46 AM  
Headline: Wealthy men give women more orgasms.

Or wealthy men can afford better sex partners.

 
The Gunslinger Roland 2009-01-18 02:47:47 AM  
Is it that, or can they afford to supply them with more booze?

 
Dean Franz 2009-01-18 02:49:54 AM  
Here in America... first you get the MONEY. Then you get the POWER. Then you get the WOMEN

 
ignite ice 2009-01-18 02:50:40 AM  
However... is this saying that it's relative to the wealth of the woman? I mean, let's take a woman who is making $33k a year. The article would lead you to believe that she'll have more orgasms with a man who makes $300k than a man who makes $100k.

However, will she have more orgasms than the woman who makes $75k a year and is with the man who makes $150k?

In other words, is the wealth of the man relative to the wealth of the woman, or the wealth of other men?

 
strothgar 2009-01-18 02:54:05 AM  
Melinda Gates does always look tired....

 
jdog71 [TotalFark] 2009-01-18 02:57:23 AM  
i178.photobucket.com

That's right biatches, Mrs. Kangaroo was more satisfied than your woman.

 
ginger_fretelli 2009-01-18 02:58:29 AM  
It's called faking.

 
Marley 2009-01-18 02:59:51 AM  
ignite ice: However, will she have more orgasms than the woman who makes $75k a year and is with the man who makes $150k?

I'd have to guess that she'd have more orgasms with the woman who makes $500k.

 
snowcircle 2009-01-18 02:59:56 AM  
My ex pulls in 80K a yr. Sex actually got worse, the more money he made. The guy I'm choosing to romp with presently is usually poor ass broke. But the sex is phenomenal, multiples everytime.

/Maybe I just like the chocolate edition
//Moneys just numbers
///I was told there'd be no math.

 
Alpharadiation 2009-01-18 02:59:56 AM  
now now plz git ur farks str8: Headline: Wealthy men give women more orgasms.

Or wealthy men can afford better sex partners.


Headline could probably read "healthy women have more orgasms than landwhales"

 
CravenMorehead 2009-01-18 03:02:49 AM  
What if I have a wallet made of Panda penis leather? Will that work better too?

 
livingdread 2009-01-18 03:04:35 AM  
Women fake more orgasms for wealthy men.

 
cardex 2009-01-18 03:06:07 AM  
Women fake more orgasms for wealthy men.

came in to say that

 
wiredmaverick 2009-01-18 03:06:53 AM  
ignite ice: However... is this saying that it's relative to the wealth of the woman? I mean, let's take a woman who is making $33k a year. The article would lead you to believe that she'll have more orgasms with a man who makes $300k than a man who makes $100k.

However, will she have more orgasms than the woman who makes $75k a year and is with the man who makes $150k?

In other words, is the wealth of the man relative to the wealth of the woman, or the wealth of other men?


My head just exploded

 
Devilbody 2009-01-18 03:08:30 AM  
I'm neither ugly nor handsome, but this study is bothersome. I swear I read an article earlier that described women now being attracted to a man who can save his money. Orgasm and attraction aside, can you deliberately assume that there is no connection? Didn't someone's research tell me that drinking 8 glasses of water a day was a good idea? I'm not saying this is bad science, but my own research aside is making my bullshiat detector go off. Well, there's the man's idea of being rich and farking pounding the shiat out of a woman because he is full of money. What about the everyday man who does the same with someone within a reasonable income? I wish I was Brad Pitt and farking Angelina, don't mean she doesn't have the same verbal orgasm. There is no evolution behind it if you don't account for the different means of wealth and life. Just more scare mongering so you believe men's wealth is important to the means of life.

 
Mother's Bloody Sperm 2009-01-18 03:08:35 AM  

 
eff ewe 2009-01-18 03:10:15 AM  
livingdread: Women fake more orgasms for wealthy men.

or me

 
bostonowns 2009-01-18 03:10:40 AM  
in other words, it's all in our heads. money breeds confidence both attract women. if your a poor guy, the first time u bang a chick take viagra. youll screw like superman and be able to keep her around longer.

 
iollow 2009-01-18 03:22:32 AM  
The study is certain to prove controversial, suggesting that women are inherently programmed to be gold-diggers.

Where's the obvious tag when you need it?

 
aendeuryu 2009-01-18 03:25:17 AM  
Think for a second.

You're married, you've got a happy life, you're well taken care of.

Would you risk your meal ticket by letting on that your man isn't man enough for you?

 
jaxwally 2009-01-18 03:25:40 AM  
Women have orgasms?

 
temporarylikeachilles 2009-01-18 03:26:45 AM  
ginger_fretelli: It's called faking.

my thoughts exactly

 
the_chief 2009-01-18 03:33:47 AM  
Should I use a blade or electric to shave my penis?

 
ju66l3r [TotalFark] 2009-01-18 03:40:35 AM  
the_chief: Should I use a blade or electric to shave my penis?

The blade is the only way to be sure it's completely gone.

 
Mitch Mitchell 2009-01-18 03:41:23 AM  
the_chief: Should I use a blade or electric to shave my penis?

That sounds like a trick question. Most electrics have blades.

 
Grey Street 2009-01-18 03:41:24 AM  
Dean Franz: Here in America... first you get the MONEY. Then you get the POWER. Then you get the WOMEN

Oh man! I thought you were supposed to get the sugar first?!?!

This does explain why I have no power and no women, though.

 
foil helmet guy 2009-01-18 03:41:25 AM  
She likes them bald, and 6 inches long.
i270.photobucket.com

 
Rustem 2009-01-18 03:47:57 AM  
aendeuryu: Think for a second.

You're married, you've got a happy life, you're well taken care of.

Would you risk your meal ticket by letting on that your man isn't man enough for you?


Oh I dunno, people will always find some way to fark up their sweet deals.

 
Radworld4 2009-01-18 03:48:05 AM  
Why should I care? Who has that kind of time?

/get his and goes to bed\

 
the_chief 2009-01-18 03:48:08 AM  
ju66l3r: the_chief: Should I use a blade or electric to shave my penis?

The blade is the only way to be sure it's completely gone.


Perhaps I should clarify. I wish to shave the hair from my penis -- not the penis from my body.

 
InferiousX [recently expired TotalFark] 2009-01-18 03:50:50 AM  
I think in between this article and the one from the other, we can determine that the MSM is completely clueless when it comes to how relationships work.

 
Lenny Wilkes Bruce 2009-01-18 03:56:09 AM  
Here's a vibrator made of gold. Now shut the fark up.

 
jdamaral 2009-01-18 04:01:41 AM  
CravenMorehead: Panda penis leather

You magnificent bastard.

www.roflcat.com

 
the_chief 2009-01-18 04:07:03 AM  
That's not thread. That's yarn.

 
alexanderino 2009-01-18 04:08:56 AM  
I ran into this, it seemed fitting:

b1.adbrite.com

 
Moonfisher [TotalFark] 2009-01-18 04:20:37 AM  
Brockway: FTFA:
The female orgasm is the focus of much research because it appears to have no reproductive purpose.

I figured it was bullshiat, but when I got to the above line, I knew for sure.


Yeah. Yes, a woman can get pregnant without orgasm, but having an orgasm pulls more semen up into the cervix and increases the likelihood. Not to mention they say they have headaches enough with orgasms, good luck ever getting one to say yes without them.

Is it the money, or are wealthier men simply more confident?

 
nicoffeine 2009-01-18 04:24:56 AM  
Moonfisher: Brockway: FTFA:
The female orgasm is the focus of much research because it appears to have no reproductive purpose.

I figured it was bullshiat, but when I got to the above line, I knew for sure.

Yeah. Yes, a woman can get pregnant without orgasm, but having an orgasm pulls more semen up into the cervix and increases the likelihood. Not to mention they say they have headaches enough with orgasms, good luck ever getting one to say yes without them.

Is it the money, or are wealthier men simply more confident?


Yes. It's the money AND wealthier men are more confident. It takes just a teency bit more than money to actually get TO the act that the buying power guarantees.

 
farknozzle 2009-01-18 04:29:46 AM  
You mean she only loves my 16 inch wallet?

 
phoenixreborn 2009-01-18 05:01:21 AM  
The key to this whole thing is this:

It's based on self-reported answers.

They have no way of really knowing, of course, but I gotta call bullshiat on this article.

I think it does probably increase the number of women who LIE to keep their rich men, whether to the men, the study, or both.

Money has nothing to do with whether or not the man is skilled enough to bring a woman to orgasm. NOTHING.

 
Dictatorial_Flair 2009-01-18 05:08:08 AM  
ginger_fretelli: It's called faking.

This.

 
Marley 2009-01-18 05:14:53 AM  
farknozzle: You mean she only loves my 16 inch wallet?

How YOU doin'?

 
WeenerGord 2009-01-18 05:15:23 AM  
jdog71: That's right biatches, Mrs. Kangaroo was more satisfied than your woman.

That's because she was bangin the shiat outta Mr. Greenjeans.

/Lean
//Green
///farkin
////Machine

 
Nobody You Know 2009-01-18 05:18:12 AM  
That's why it's called the "G" spot

 
NotThatGirl 2009-01-18 05:26:36 AM  
Hrrmmmm...

While my husband and I are (I feel) pretty much equally matched on an intellectual and potentially money earning basis, I have always respected him as my equal....

And yeah, I still enjoy engaging him in personal debates and interesting discussions.... Almost 18 years of couple-hood, there are still many quite interesting and intellectually stimulating and challenging discussions to enjoy! :-)

But yeah, aforementioned husband has brought me to ohhhhhh, ooooohhhhhh, ooooooooohhhhhhh, SOOOOOOOOOO many multiple oragsms over the years as to prove that wealth does not prove sexual prowess.

Article is Farked!!!

 
ThatGuyOverThere 2009-01-18 05:27:54 AM  
Ah... so if you can't make a woman orgasm, it's probably because you don't have money? That explains SOOO much!

For other people... not me...

 
Kahabut 2009-01-18 05:43:29 AM  
Hmmm...

The way I read that, if I became rich, women would die on my dick from sheer ecstasy.

Not so appealing.

/should try everything once though

 
Displayed 50 of 108 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


[Continue Farking]