but does it have any crunchy frog?

/right

The world would be a better place if people just thought twice about what they're shoving into their Maw.

Is it really that hard to think for ourselves these days?!

They can put the CONTAINS MILK warning right next to the big warning that now says MANUFACTURED IN A FACILITY WHICH ALSO PROCESSES NUTS, WHEAT, STRAWBERRIES, AND SHELLFISH, to warn off the people who are so farking allergic to stuff that they really, really should be sterilized when they're identified.

dahmers love zombie: They can put the CONTAINS MILK warning right next to the big warning that now says MANUFACTURED IN A FACILITY WHICH ALSO PROCESSES NUTS, WHEAT, STRAWBERRIES, AND SHELLFISH, to warn off the people who are so farking allergic to stuff that they really, really should be sterilized when they're identified.

I think they look for those for a good time. Most people with these allergies are also in to Auto-erotic Asphyxiation.

/awesome, babe now gimmie my eppie.

At a restaurant yesterday, I noted that on the side of a small carton of milk the warning 'CONTAINS MILK'

*facepalm*

No "CONTAINS MELAMINE" warning?

Actually, it's a miracle Cadbury chocolate actually contains milk, and not some non-dairy extender crap.

Guess the people who are allergic to chocolate are shiat outta luck.

Cadburys newest entry.
/You'd want put your C*ck in it
//the new Cad

The latest Dairy Milk wrappers feature a logo showing a glass and a half of milk being poured into a chocolate chunk, put milk first in a list of ingredients and explains that there is "The equivalent of three quarters of a pint of milk of fresh liquid milk in every half pound of milk chocolate".

Yet when I come to work drunk, they threaten to fire me!

CanisNoir: The world would be a better place if people just thought twice about what they're shoving into their Maw.

You've obviously never eaten at Denny's Beer Barrel Pub. That is one tasty burger.

What about those of us who are allergic to chocolate? does Cadbury not care to put a simple warning on their chocolate bars? They'll be hearing from my lawyers!

This is sue-happy america and bullshiat like this HAS to be done to protect against lawsuits.

Although, the lawsuits don't piss me off as much as the fact people WIN them.

We have to make special treats for school for my son, who is milk allergic. The one "Milk Chocolate" frosting we use for all his cupcakes contains no milk. Go figure.

I'm allergic to wrappers. They'll be hearing from my attorney as well.

Cadbury Cream Eggs are the most awesome confection ever devised by man.

CanisNoir: The world would be a better place if people just thought twice about what they're shoving into their Maw.


?

FAIL tag at church today?

jake3988: This is sue-happy america and bullshiat like this HAS to be done to protect against lawsuits.

Although, the lawsuits don't piss me off as much as the fact people WIN them.

It's the judges/juries who award these decisions that piss me off. I want to be a judge just so I can tell the morans to get the fark our of my Courtroom.

CanisNoir: The world would be a better place if people just thought twice about what they're shoving into their Maw.

Is it really that hard to think for ourselves these days?!

I've always wanted to either eat a giant burger or one of those huge steaks, but now I want to do it wearing a helmet!

Why are we saving these people? Shouldn't we let the really stupid ones kill themselves?

Why warn people with milk allergies that milk chocolate has milk?

If we let them kill themselves:

a) It cleanses the gene pool

b) It makes for funny headlines.

WIN-WIN!

Their MILK chocolate bars?

Like those HAMburgers?

Or how about a nice EGG CREAM?

So they're going to warn there may be milk and nuts in a product called "DAIRY MILK WHOLE NUT"?

What the fark have we come to?

/oddly does not contain milk

People won't expect there to be milk in there. They're bound to think it's some form of mock milk.



/Crunchy Frog?

I got called to jury duty. My cow-irkers all offered advice on how to get out of serving. I ponder, if everyone who has a job, who earns a living gets out of jury duty, then who is left? Jobless bums with no where better to be. Thats where these silly lawsuit judgements come from.

Hey, anything to keep people from having to THINK about stuff.

/some of the warnings on the stuff at my store are so obvious they're funny/stupid

steklo:

started to look good, but as I scrolled down the image, the bubbles made it seem not so good. :|

Paul Allen: /oddly does not contain milk

Barely contains chocolate.

/loves it anyway.

RoyBatty: No "CONTAINS MELAMINE" warning?

/thread

DrRatchet: People won't expect there to be milk in there. They're bound to think it's some form of mock milk.


?

NYZooMan: Their MILK chocolate bars?

Like those HAMburgers?

Or how about a nice EGG CREAM?

And what's the deal with Grape Nuts?

guytoronto: Why are we saving these people? Shouldn't we let the really stupid ones kill themselves?

Why warn people with milk allergies crack addictions that milk chocolate crack has milk teh coronary failure?

If we let them kill themselves:

a) It cleanses the gene pool

b) It makes for funny headlines.

WIN-WIN!

And don't forget massive tax windfall, a greatly unclogged criminal justice system, and all of the other benefits.

Just sayin'

/t-jack, sorry

How long are we going to milk this headline?

But does it contain chocolate?

Paul Allen: /oddly does not contain milk

/Or Chocolate.

I'm surprised no one has caught the obvious.

"Their MILK chocolate bars"

Their = possessive form of They
They're = They are

They ARE milk chocolate bars.

/Tag might be appropriate for submitter

My Cadbury Dairy Milk Fine Milk Chocolate bar has a picture of 2 glasses of milk being poured on a piece of chocolate. I suspect it contains Milk. Sure enough the first ingredient is Milk Chocolate which contains Sugar, Milk, and Chocolate. It does note that it is manufactured on the same equipment that processes tree nuts. When did the Milk allergy lobby get more powerful (and dumber) than the Tree Nut allergy lobby?

When they start putting "Contains Gluten" on bread, our failure will be complete.

rhyx: I'm surprised no one has caught the obvious.

"Their MILK chocolate bars"

Their = possessive form of They
They're = They are

They ARE milk chocolate bars.

/Tag might be appropriate for submitter

I'm not seeing the problem. The chocolate bars they sell are possessed by them.

rhyx: I'm surprised no one has caught the obvious.

"Their MILK chocolate bars"

Their = possessive form of They
They're = They are

They ARE milk chocolate bars.

/Tag might be appropriate for submitter

Oh, nevermind, I just got it. The second expression is a fragment, not a full sentence as you have interpreted it. Sorry for the double post.

fotodevil: jake3988: This is sue-happy america and bullshiat like this HAS to be done to protect against lawsuits.

Although, the lawsuits don't piss me off as much as the fact people WIN them.

It's the judges/juries who award these decisions that piss me off. I want to be a judge just so I can tell the morans to get the fark our of my Courtroom.

This should not be an issue. The packaging already says it contains milk. How should this protect them any further?

I say let the stupid be stupid. If they kill themselves in the process, the entire human race wins.

Oddly enough in the United States the "contains milk" would not an attempt to prevent lawsuit, it is simply complying with the law. Such an allegen warning is required (new window) by the FDA. The regulation does not say "unless it is obvious" it simply requires it in all cases. Do we really want "unless otherwise obvious" exception. I sure hope not since that would make it a lawyers wet dream.

I am not sure I believe the article about the labeling not being some sort of requirement in the UK especially since regulations there are usually harsher than in the United States.

What is next? People posting that a bag of ice says "Ingredients: water" (it does)? Or maybe container of salt (without iodine variety) listing its ingredients as "salt"?

If you make rules for labeling of nutrition facts, ingredients, and potential allergens there will be cases of the obvious being stated.

We went to this seafood restaurant once and one of the guys on the booth next to us was allergic to shellfish!!

He asked to speak to the manager beforehand to make sure he ordered something that didn't have traces of shellfish. The manager told him the only thing he could guarantee was the house salad.

I can't believe he didn't just flat-out ask the guy to leave in order to avoid the inevitable allergic reaction and lawsuit.

AlwaysRightBoy: Cadburys newest entry.



/You'd want put your C*ck in it
//the new Cad


Is that supposed to be Cadbury's version of the Hersey Kiss?

It looks more like a brown-eye.

// ATM?

thereadlines: rhyx: I'm surprised no one has caught the obvious.

"Their MILK chocolate bars"

Their = possessive form of They
They're = They are

They ARE milk chocolate bars.

/Tag might be appropriate for submitter

I'm not seeing the problem. The chocolate bars they sell are possessed by them.

It is ONE company and their wouldn't work either.

Cadburys will now be putting large "CONTAINS MILK" warnings on theirits chocolate bars.

Benjimin_Dover: thereadlines: rhyx: I'm surprised no one has caught the obvious.

"Their MILK chocolate bars"

Their = possessive form of They
They're = They are

They ARE milk chocolate bars.

/Tag might be appropriate for submitter

I'm not seeing the problem. The chocolate bars they sell are possessed by them.

It is ONE company and their wouldn't work either.

Cadburys will now be putting large "CONTAINS MILK" warnings on its chocolate bars.

Yeah, that is technically correct, the best kind of correct, but really? (new window)