We're still waiting.

/tapping fingers

STILL waiting.

What a miserable crook.

8 Years ago, GWB promised honesty and integrity.

STILL WAITING BIATCHES!!!

Lionel Mandrake: 8 Years ago, GWB promised honesty and integrity.

Well, the first error is thinking politicians have such elements. The Founders knew they wouldn't, that's why they wanted government officials to no more relevant than transit workers. But NOOOooooooo, that didn't stay that way.

GaryPDX: Lionel Mandrake: 8 Years ago, GWB promised honesty and integrity.

Well, the first error is thinking politicians have such elements. The Founders knew they wouldn't, that's why they wanted government officials to no more relevant than transit workers. But NOOOooooooo, that didn't stay that way.

Any fkn excuse to let this dickhead off the hook...

HE FKNG SUCKED, AND YOU ASSWADS THAT MADE EXCUSES FOR HIM ALSO SUCKED.

Not that you'll ever admit it, you pussies.

He should, at the very least, be kicked off the Senate Banking Committee.

POS.

Why do you hate America hope and change?

NewportBarGuy: should, at the very least, be kicked off the Senate Banking

for what?

PascalsGhost: NewportBarGuy: should, at the very least, be kicked off the Senate Banking

for what?

*crickets*

TwistedFark: PascalsGhost: NewportBarGuy: should, at the very least, be kicked off the Senate Banking

for what?

*crickets*

No shiat. Cause the WSJ says so?

You dumb mutherfukkers. If there was evena remote law that he may have broken or bent the Republicans would be all over him.

The fukking WSJ makes American Thinker look like a goddamned elite rag.

STFU

PascalsGhost: TwistedFark: PascalsGhost: NewportBarGuy: should, at the very least, be kicked off the Senate Banking

for what?

*crickets*

No shiat. Cause the WSJ says so?

You dumb mutherfukkers. If there was evena remote law that he may have broken or bent the Republicans would be all over him.

The fukking WSJ makes American Thinker look like a goddamned elite rag.

STFU

Quit becoming so politically enraged...

Lionel Mandrake: GaryPDX: Lionel Mandrake: 8 Years ago, GWB promised honesty and integrity.

Well, the first error is thinking politicians have such elements. The Founders knew they wouldn't, that's why they wanted government officials to no more relevant than transit workers. But NOOOooooooo, that didn't stay that way.

Any fkn excuse to let this dickhead off the hook...

HE FKNG SUCKED, AND YOU ASSWADS THAT MADE EXCUSES FOR HIM ALSO SUCKED.

Not that you'll ever admit it, you pussies.

Why are you so politically enraged...

Well, we're WAITING!

/hotlinked

Brett Favre: PascalsGhost: TwistedFark: PascalsGhost: NewportBarGuy: should, at the very least, be kicked off the Senate Banking

for what?

*crickets*

No shiat. Cause the WSJ says so?

You dumb mutherfukkers. If there was evena remote law that he may have broken or bent the Republicans would be all over him.

The fukking WSJ makes American Thinker look like a goddamned elite rag.

STFU

Quit becoming so politically enraged...

Why don't you just retire dicksmoker?

Oh wait, he's a democrat? Then nevermind. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

DrillSergeantPoopyPants: Oh wait, he's a democrat? Then nevermind. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

What law did he break?

What ethics violation did he commit?

Don't be a dumbass who even listens to the WSJ dude.

The hate makes Fark Independents strong.

PascalsGhost: DrillSergeantPoopyPants: Oh wait, he's a democrat? Then nevermind. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

What law did he break?

What ethics violation did he commit?

Don't be a dumbass who even listens to the WSJ dude.

I would say getting preferable loans while overseeing committees that hold oversight is not that ethical.

...oh wait, wrong proof...

MyRandomName: I would say getting preferable loans while overseeing committees that hold oversight is not that ethical.

Can you cite the violation? Cause the WSJ, as usual, didn't.

See, I don't care what you think or say, I'm asking about the actual law or guidelines. Anything?

What?!?! This is outrageous! He needs to go! Oh wait... he's a Democrat? Oh... umm... nevermind.

/seriously, if you have nothing to hide, just present the documents and get this circus over with already.

FTFA:

All the more so because former Countrywide Financial loan officer Robert Feinberg told us last fall that Mr. Dodd knowingly saved thousands of dollars on his refinancing of two properties in 2003 as part of a special program for the influential. Mr. Feinberg also reported that he has internal company documents that prove Mr. Dodd knew he was getting preferential treatment as a friend of Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide's then-CEO, and Mr. Feinberg has offered to provide those documents to investigators.

Why not give them to the WSJ for this article?

NO. Completely fabricated. The WSJ used to be half-way respectable. In the pocket of the powerful sure, but at least respectable.

Its the fukking National Enquirer of the right wing these days.

Let's move on.

PsyLord: What?!?! This is outrageous! He needs to go! Oh wait... he's a Democrat? Oh... umm... nevermind.

/seriously, if you have nothing to hide, just present the documents and get this circus over with already..

Hide from what? What law was broken? What ethics violation? Why release personal docs if they have no relevance?

Cite a law or violation. Please.

While I'm looking for info on Dodd, you can look up the statute that Trent Lott violated.

Then you can thank me for my time.

"See, I don't care what you think or say, I'm asking about the actual law or guidelines. Anything?"

Here's what I think, for what it's worth. I think he did nothing wrong. I think he had no idea whatsoever he got special treatment; that he reasonably thought that borrowers with his amount of equity normally got better rates because that's the economically sensible thing for mortgage companies to do - even though they weren't at the time.

But the fact remains that Mozillo. a contributor and a guy with business before the committee, told his people to give Dodd the 'gold treatment' or whatever the phrase was.

I also think a guy with Dodd's seniority should know that covering up non-misdeeds has been the downfall of more politicians than any actual misdeeds (a lesson the Bushies, pere and fis, never learned).

He should do what he said he'd do, take the week's bad press, get cleared and, as they say, move on.

Orange Crush: Most liberals/ Obama supporters probably don't know who Chris Dodd is. That's why this thread is DOA...Dead on Arrival.

Certainly not because there's nothing here other than unfounded accusations that not even Chris Dodds Republican political enemies would jump on.

Nope, not at all. I mean, when you can't even count on your political enemies to go after you when it's clear that you have "blood on your hands" (metaphorically speaking) then it's obvious that ...

Ah hell, crap I can't even keep up the sarcasm on this one.

If he's guilty of something, anything than you must believe one of the following things:

1) He has naked photos of every single Republican politician sodomizing a 17 year old male page.

or

2) The Illuminati are preventing "The Truth" from coming out in order to protect one of their own.

So... which one is it?

DrillSergeantPoopyPants: While I'm looking for info on Dodd, you can look up the statute that Trent Lott violated.

Then you can thank me for my time.

PascalsGhost: PsyLord: What?!?! This is outrageous! He needs to go! Oh wait... he's a Democrat? Oh... umm... nevermind.

/seriously, if you have nothing to hide, just present the documents and get this circus over with already..

Hide from what? What law was broken? What ethics violation? Why release personal docs if they have no relevance?

Cite a law or violation. Please.

Speaking as a government regulator, if I got a special deal with any of the companies I regulate for no good reason other than I was a friend of the executives, I'd be shown the door with no two weeks notice and no severance.

He's got nothing to hide? Then open the books.

3) Congresscritters of both parties get schweet schweet deals on everything all the time, from mortgages to dry cleaning discounts, and not a single person in the political class wants to overturn that particular cart.

NewportBarGuy: He should, at the very least, be kicked off the Senate Banking Committee.

Fixed for my amusement.

Orange Crush: If Dodd was...let's say, Palin...do you think this thread would have so few posts? Would the leftwingers that dominate this forum think Palin was innocent?

Wow, aren't you the butt hurt little neocon.

*yaaaaaawn*

Orange Crush: gothelder: Orange Crush: If Dodd was...let's say, Palin...do you think this thread would have so few posts? Would the leftwingers that dominate this forum think Palin was innocent?

Wow, aren't you the butt hurt little neocon.

Ad hominem, much, my little Daily WOrker friend?

I easily exposed the hypocrisy on this forum by observing that if Dodd was Palin or any Republican, this thread would have 400 posts by now. Instead it's probably not going to hit 50. Dodd or Democrat caught in something that appears illegal or unethical...yawn...no big deal. Another thread smearing Palin, Ann Coulter, Limbaugh, etc please.

People have heard of Palin, Coulter, and Rush. Most people have never heard of Chris Dodd. It's not a huge conspiracy.

PascalsGhost: MyRandomName: I would say getting preferable loans while overseeing committees that hold oversight is not that ethical.

Can you cite the violation? Cause the WSJ, as usual, didn't.

See, I don't care what you think or say, I'm asking about the actual law or guidelines. Anything?

You do realize ethics covers more than laws and regulations right?

You can follow the law and be unethical.

Orange Crush: gothelder: Orange Crush: If Dodd was...let's say, Palin...do you think this thread would have so few posts? Would the leftwingers that dominate this forum think Palin was innocent?

Wow, aren't you the butt hurt little neocon.

Ad hominem, much, my little Daily WOrker friend?

I easily exposed the hypocrisy on this forum by observing that if Dodd was Palin or any Republican, this thread would have 400 posts by now. Instead it's probably not going to hit 50. Dodd or Democrat caught in something that appears illegal or unethical...yawn...no big deal. Another thread smearing Palin, Ann Coulter, Limbaugh, etc please.

Cite the law or ethic violation.

How can you observe something that hasn't happend? How can you "prove" hypocrisy with a "what if"?

Do you put up this much of a fight when someone accuses Bush of war crimes PascalsGhost?

MyRandomName: PascalsGhost: MyRandomName: I would say getting preferable loans while overseeing committees that hold oversight is not that ethical.

Can you cite the violation? Cause the WSJ, as usual, didn't.

See, I don't care what you think or say, I'm asking about the actual law or guidelines. Anything?

You do realize ethics covers more than laws and regulations right?

You can follow the law and be unethical.

There isn't an ethical politician.

What rule or law did he break. Just cite it and I'll help you bash him.

PascalsGhost: MyRandomName: PascalsGhost: MyRandomName: I would say getting preferable loans while overseeing committees that hold oversight is not that ethical.

Can you cite the violation? Cause the WSJ, as usual, didn't.

See, I don't care what you think or say, I'm asking about the actual law or guidelines. Anything?

You do realize ethics covers more than laws and regulations right?

You can follow the law and be unethical.

There isn't an ethical politician.

What rule or law did he break. Just cite it and I'll help you bash him.

I simply stated I think what he gained from Countrywide is unethical as to the office he holds. I never once claimed he did anything illegal.

Orange Crush: gothelder: Orange Crush: If Dodd was...let's say, Palin...do you think this thread would have so few posts? Would the leftwingers that dominate this forum think Palin was innocent?

Wow, aren't you the butt hurt little neocon.

Ad hominem, much, my little Daily WOrker friend?

I easily exposed the hypocrisy on this forum by observing that if Dodd was Palin or any Republican, this thread would have 400 posts by now. Instead it's probably not going to hit 50. Dodd or Democrat caught in something that appears illegal or unethical...yawn...no big deal. Another thread smearing Palin, Ann Coulter, Limbaugh, etc please.

Well considering the last Palin thread has less than 300 comments and "any republican" will certainly encompass the Abraham Lincoln thread with less than 60 your prediction sort of sucks. Limbaugh has not even had a thread in a week. Where Coulter is concerned you may have a point.

So far the only thing you have exposed is your ability to not predict crap, nice try sparky


What is a "Daily WOrker friend"? Typo?

I also seem to remember the epic 200+ post threads on John McCain when there was mention he used his wife's private plane. That too was not against regulations, but brought up the question of ethics.

// Just Saying.

Poor Orange Crush.

It was not bornOrange Crush: Ann Coulter is a tranny? What is a tranny?

Orange Crush a tranny is the person your father met with every week he was away from you and your mom.

And you did not come from your mom, not even a pissy ass like you could be spat out of a vagina.

No you were dropped off on a front porch by an upset Mary Kay saleperson.

Poor Orange Crush.

It was not bornOrange Crush: Ann Coulter is a tranny? What is a tranny?

Orange Crush Ask your Dad dumbass.

And you did not come from a mom, not an ass like you could be spat out of a vagina.

No you were dropped off on a front porch by an upset Mary Kay saleperson.

log_jammin: How can you observe something that hasn't happend? How can you "prove" hypocrisy with a "what if"?

You don't need a "what if" illustration. There are years of evidence of rabid partisan hypocrisy led by a regular group of pa-Trolling tools acting like liberal fascists on Fark already.

Fark political forums act like a living petri dish of partisan douche-bag hypocrisy and mindless hacks biatching about Republicans, calling anyone who points out their obvious biased hate rhetoric a neocon while screaming "b-bb-bbbut Bush!" or some similar claptrap.

The same stupid farktard trolls hang around having a partisan hate fest circle-jerk daily like a gange of retarded "Liberal Freepers".

PascalsGhost: DrillSergeantPoopyPants: Oh wait, he's a democrat? Then nevermind. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

What law did he break?

What ethics violation did he commit?

Don't be a dumbass who even listens to the WSJ dude.

I don't know, uh ... everybody?

kerpal32: "Liberal Freepers".

I don't really consider myself "liberal" yet I've managed to stay on fark for a long long time now without felling persecuted or butthurt when people ask me to back up arguments with facts instead of "well if it was so-and-so you guys would be different..."

It's hard for alcoholics to find anything. So let's cut the guy some slack.

/still waiting for kerry to release his military records

Brett Favre: Lionel Mandrake: GaryPDX: Lionel Mandrake: 8 Years ago, GWB promised honesty and integrity.

Well, the first error is thinking politicians have such elements. The Founders knew they wouldn't, that's why they wanted government officials to no more relevant than transit workers. But NOOOooooooo, that didn't stay that way.

Any fkn excuse to let this dickhead off the hook...

HE FKNG SUCKED, AND YOU ASSWADS THAT MADE EXCUSES FOR HIM ALSO SUCKED.

Not that you'll ever admit it, you pussies.

Why are you so politically enraged...

Why the hell AREN'T you?