She's probably never had an O, some women have this problem.

Should should just stick with O.

absoluteparanoia: She's probably never had an O, some women have this problem.

Should should just stick with O.

I'm sure there's some guys who'd love to help her with this though.

absoluteparanoia: She's probably never had an O, some women have this problem.

Should should just stick with O.

man i feel bad for those ladies

/wont even service themselves

Well, with the First Dude off snowmobiling on the North Slope I'm sure she's alone a lot, so she's found other things to think about dontchaknow.

Darn.

MonkeyVegetables: absoluteparanoia: She's probably never had an O, some women have this problem.

Should should just stick with O.

man i feel bad for those ladies

/wont even service themselves

*Checks profile, sees picture of "Go it alone" kitty. Laughs.

It's a myth anyway.

Kinda like global warming.

This Big O?

real_headhoncho: This Big O?

In her vagina? It's more likely than you'd think.

/I mean she's had 5 clowns pop out of it already

This O?

FTA: "I said I would be happy to talk to Sarah Palin when the election was over... I went and tried to talk to Sarah Palin and instead she talked to Greta [Van Susteren]. She talked to Matt [Lauer]. She talked to Larry [King]. But she didn't talk to me. But maybe she'll talk to me now that she has a [multi-million dollar] book deal."

Good thing Gawker told me what type of book deal. It was way too ambiguous without the bracketed material.

Oprah and Palin both have big mouths and big voices and small minds. They're perfect for each other.

So...hold on, hold on hold on...

The 2008 Republican VP nominee doesn't want to go onto the show of a woman who gave her first public political endorsement ever to the Democratic Presidential nominee?

Shocker.

Not the good kind, either.

hienekenftw: Oprah and Palin both have big mouths and big voices and small minds. They're perfect for each other.

Um, no.
/Oprah can actually convey the human language and cognitive thoughts.
//And she can do this even if she is in front a a camera.
///Not an Oprah fan.

Anyone who gets manhandled by Katie Couric would be reduced to a blubbering mess by Oprah.

Die Polizei: hienekenftw: Oprah and Palin both have big mouths and big voices and small minds. They're perfect for each other.

Um, no.
/Oprah can actually convey the human language and cognitive thoughts.
//And she can do this even if she is in front a a camera.
///Not an Oprah fan.

Alright, Oprah is a bit smarter than Caribou Barbie.

/doesn't say much about Oprah though.

Palin knows she's an idiot. That's why she fears any real questions. She's fine as long as she's center of attention and can ramble on, but ask her any question requiring the slightest bit of processing or association, and she's a giant Fail.

/not that good lucking up close either.... unless you're into the layers and layers of Max Factor clinging to the crows feet

From a different article about this:

"There are not even words to talk about what this night means," Oprah said of Obama's inauguration. "Everybody keeps using the word historic - there's never been a night like this on the planet earth... Nothing can compare to this."

Sounds like big O's the one having a big O talking about the other big O.

Uh oh, Spaghetti-O's!

odinsposse: Anyone who gets manhandled by Katie Couric would be reduced to a blubbering mess by Oprah.

And though Palin may be dumb as a post, I think even she knows this. I also think she realizes that female interviewers nullify both her sexy flirtatiousness and fancy pageant-walkin' powers, as well as being insulated from being called sexist when Palin implodes before them.

*shakes fist at Lenny_da_Hog:*

OOooh oooh...

So if she goes on Oprah, she's an attention whore and we will all scream that she should go away, but if she doesn't go on, we will all say she's avoiding a tough interview.

Where have I heard this type of logic before?

hienekenftw: Oprah and Palin both have big mouths and big voices and small minds. They're perfect for each other.

I will not sit here while you badmouth Oprah Winfrey.

Actually, I'm still sitting here, so I guess I will. But I don't think she deserves it.

sarcastrophe:
Where have I heard this type of logic before?

Ted Bundy's dog?

sarcastrophe: OOooh oooh...

So if she goes on Oprah, she's an attention whore and we will all scream that she should go away, but if she doesn't go on, we will all say she's avoiding a tough interview.

Where have I heard this type of logic before?

Did she give a press conferance?
Did she get owned in every non-fox interview?
/go away freeper

Maybe she should do Ellen's show?

sarcastrophe: OOooh oooh...

So if she goes on Oprah, she's an attention whore and we will all scream that she should go away, but if she doesn't go on, we will all say she's avoiding a tough interview.

Where have I heard this type of logic before?

I want her on TV. I never thought I'd see a gaffe machine so big you could combine the powers of Joe Biden, Dan Quayle, George W. Bush, Al Sharpton, and Bill O'Reilly into Gaffe-Tron and watch them be out-gaffed by one unqualified bint.

She is comedy gold.

The really funny thing is that crude oil fell below $40/bbl. today.

If it stays like that, Sarah is gonna have her hands full keeping that approval rating up as the state is scrambling for funds.

sarcastrophe: OOooh oooh...

So if she goes on Oprah, she's an attention whore and we will all scream that she should go away, but if she doesn't go on, we will all say she's avoiding a tough interview.

Where have I heard this type of logic before?

When the conservatives were biatching and moaning about how Obama wouldn't go on O'Reilly.

Aarontology: sarcastrophe: OOooh oooh...

So if she goes on Oprah, she's an attention whore and we will all scream that she should go away, but if she doesn't go on, we will all say she's avoiding a tough interview.

Where have I heard this type of logic before?

When the conservatives were biatching and moaning about how Obama wouldn't go on O'Reilly.

Your comparing Oprah and O'reilly?
/Really?

sarcastrophe: OOooh oooh...

So if she goes on Oprah, she's an attention whore and we will all scream that she should go away, but if she doesn't go on, we will all say she's avoiding a tough interview.

Where have I heard this type of logic before?

You seem to know, so how's about some links?

can you blame her? fark oprah---she's no longer a journalist, when she takes sides.

Lenny_da_Hog: The really funny thing is that crude oil fell below $40/bbl. today.

If it stays like that, Sarah is gonna have her hands full keeping that approval rating up as the state is scrambling for funds.

Since she governs as a centrist populist libertarian moderate conservative, she will have no problems. You betcha.

Lenny_da_Hog: The really funny thing is that crude oil fell below $40/bbl. today.

And now I've got all this gas that I bought at 4 bucks a gallon sitting around my house. It was looking like such a great investment two months ago...

As for Sarah, if you watch the turkey slaughter interview, I think she talks about knowing that oil would bottom out. That must be why she slashed the Special Olympics budget and other things. The rest of the state government will grind to a halt, but the 3000 dollar checks will keep flowing.

mitchcumstein1: Well, with the First Dude off snowmobiling on the North Slope I'm sure she's alone a lot, so she's found other things to think about dontchaknow.

like farking his best friend or his hunting buddy?
/would the natl enq lie?
//of course it would
///or would it?

thalidomide new and improved: can you blame her? fark oprah---she's no longer a journalist, when she takes sides.

Oprah's a journalist?

LOL!

Oprah? Who cares?

Palin got better publicity on SNL than she would on Oprah, anyway. So unless Oprah is going to give her $150,000 in clothes or a new car, why bother?

To all of the above that responded to me:

Paraphrased: "So if he picks lefties he's too liberal but if he picks moderates he's not for change. Got it."

You seriously can't see that you're doing the same thing as the political party you despise? Really?

Damn you,real_headhoncho you beat me to it.



The O anyone ?

Die Polizei: Your comparing Oprah and O'reilly?
/Really?

Not in terms of their interview style, the questions they ask, or their reputation. Just the logic outlined by sarcastrophe struck me a similar.

sarcastrophe: OOooh oooh...

So if she goes on Oprah, she's an attention whore and we will all scream that she should go away, but if she doesn't go on, we will all say she's avoiding a tough interview.

Where have I heard this type of logic before?

I don't know about anybody else, but I'd LOVE to see her go on Oprah - I'd even watch. It would be like tossing a watermelon into a wood chipper.

67 Beetle: Oprah? Who cares?

Palin got better publicity on SNL than she would on Oprah, anyway. So unless Oprah is going to give her $150,000 in clothes or a new car, why bother?

Uh if Oprah says she doesn't eat meat the Cattlemen's Assoc. has to sue her b/c their profits go down. She makes James Frey into a best seller. She had her personal dog trainer on years ago saying "You shouldn't get a dog over 6 months of age b/c all of its behavior problems it has for life" and I almost go to jail due to my insistent and angry letter writing campaign. Oprah wields more media power than Rupert Murdoch.

jso2897: I don't know about anybody else, but I'd LOVE to see her go on Oprah - I'd even watch. It would be like tossing a watermelon into a wood chipper.

I was more commenting on the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" mentality. She's an idiot, to be sure, but she can't win with either choice.

sarcastrophe: jso2897: I don't know about anybody else, but I'd LOVE to see her go on Oprah - I'd even watch. It would be like tossing a watermelon into a wood chipper.

I was more commenting on the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" mentality. She's an idiot, to be sure, but she can't win with either choice.

Ummm, yeah. That's sort of the main distinguishing characteristic of idiots. I would be more inclined to state it as "She's an idiot, to be sure, AND, consequently, she makes choices she can't win with". The "idiot" and "loser" thing are kind of a package deal.

She should go on, be interviewed, and have it shown to the world via Pay-Per-View, with the proceeds going to help us out in these tough economic times!

So long, economic crisis!

Bukharin ha ha that's the only time a German accent has made me question my sexuality!
/I'm German, I can taunt the fark out of the fatherland

jso2897: Ummm, yeah. That's sort of the main distinguishing characteristic of idiots. I would be more inclined to state it as "She's an idiot, to be sure, AND, consequently, she makes choices she can't win with". The "idiot" and "loser" thing are kind of a package deal.

So then you feel the same way about Obama saying the problem with Washington is all the Washington insiders, followed by Obama appointing a bunch of Washington insiders. At the same time, he'd be called naive if he appointed a bunch of guys that were Washington outsiders.

If only an idiot would put themselves in such a situation, then you are calling Obama an idiot as well. The fact of the matter is that it's all partisan douchebags on both sides making these types of claims (in both situations) and those claims from either side have zero merit.

I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy of calling out Palin on this issue. The counter-arguments against such tactics can be found in any thread that has the words "obama," "appoint" and "change" in the headline.

schubie: 67 Beetle: Oprah? Who cares?

Palin got better publicity on SNL than she would on Oprah, anyway. So unless Oprah is going to give her $150,000 in clothes or a new car, why bother?

Uh if Oprah says she doesn't eat meat the Cattlemen's Assoc. has to sue her b/c their profits go down. She makes James Frey into a best seller. She had her personal dog trainer on years ago saying "You shouldn't get a dog over 6 months of age b/c all of its behavior problems it has for life" and I almost go to jail due to my insistent and angry letter writing campaign. Oprah wields more media power than Rupert Murdoch.

Which would be fine if Oprah had any intention of helping Palin to sell books (which she doesn't) or intended to wage a negative campaign against Palin in absentia (she doesn't seem to want to do that either). Since it will neither help to go on the show nor hurt to avoid it, why give a potential ratings boost to someone who is going to support your political enemies?

Besides, if Palin wants to shed her image as a political lightweight, she needs to get schooled up and do interviews on 60 Minutes or something similar.