Give it up, losers. You got killed, and your political ideology is dead. Accept it.

Since this is from NRO I'm going to pretty much assume the opposite.

Obvious. Even John Galt and Hitler have donated (new window)

no, it doesn't really work that way. processors don't just let you get away with fraud so long as you're okay with it.

Wait, lemme guess, this is what the McCain campaign actually did but they want to make everyone think that Obama is the one that is doing it.

why disable the default security checks in the first place?

inebriated brain: why disable the default security checks in the first place?

Is it even POSSIBLE to disable them in the first place?

Wait I thought Obama agreed to public campaign financing like John McCain?

CravenMorehead: Wait, lemme guess, this is what the McCain campaign actually did but they want to make everyone think that Obama is the one that is doing it.

Pretty much this ^, it ends up always being this ^

Thank you subby for identifying the source as the NRO instead of 'some guy' so I wasn't tempted to click.

CravenMorehead: Wait, lemme guess, this is what the McCain campaign actually did but they want to make everyone think that Obama is the one that is doing it.

It usually turns out that way. Sort of like McCain claiming Obama will say anything to get elected the other day which caused every ironic tag to explode in unison.

JimmyCarter'sSecondTerm: Wait I thought Obama agreed to public campaign financing like John McCain?

I honestly don't think John McCain could've raised as much as public financing would offer him.

FishyFred: Is it even POSSIBLE to disable them in the first place?

Someone probably made a Visual Basic GUI that disabled default security checks.

10 PRINT "Disable Security Check"
20 GOTO 10

bronyaur1: Give it up, losers. You got killed, and your political ideology is dead. Accept it.

This.

Haven't we learned anything from 'Hunt for Red October'?

NEVER override the security checks.
/"You fool...you have killed US!"

The gentleman who started the ball rolling made four donations under the names "John Galt", "Saddam Hussein", "Osama bin Laden", and "William Ayers", all using the same credit card number.

Comedy gold.
/Well, silver.

JimmyCarter'sSecondTerm: Wait I thought Obama agreed to public campaign financing like John McCain?

It's amusing that conservatives are up in arms about Obama's campaign being funded by small, private donations rather than the taxpayers.

the only time Repugs whine about money is when someone else is getting it. that offends their sensibilities.

"In order read to default card credit Obama multiple security checks merchant card bank default order in."

Did I translate that gobblydegook correctly?

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
Abraham Lincoln, (attributed)
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)

Wait a darn minute here - by not taking public financing, Obama saved the taxpayers 85 million dollars. And he's not even President yet!

Meanwhile McCain soaked those same taxpayers for 85 mil and what do they have to show for it? Zip. Okay, maybe some used clothing donations afterward. But otherwise zip.

I thought conservatism was all about not taking government money for things that individuals and the free market should be handling. Sheesh, make up yer minds already, GOP

JimmyCarter'sSecondTerm: Wait I thought Obama agreed to public campaign financing like John McCain?

By using the public financing, isn't that a form of socialism, whereas getting public donations a form of the free market. John McCain looks to be the socialist by using taxpayer funds to support his campaign, while the "socialist" Obama used the free market to raise his funds.

To all of the libretardarians, is that constitutional to give our tax dollars to support candidates that we don't agree with and will not vote for? Why is McCains campaign spending $150K of my hard earned money to buy Ms. Moose a wardrobe? Can't she just go out and shoot herself one, field dress it, then throw it on for a stump speech or press conference? Oh wait, she doesn't do those.

quahog_clam: FishyFred: Is it even POSSIBLE to disable them in the first place?

Someone probably made a Visual Basic GUI that disabled default security checks.

10 PRINT "Disable Security Check"
20 GOTO 10

Video evidence of the dastardly deed.

Fark Infested Waters: Why is McCains campaign spending $150K of my hard earned money to buy Ms. Moose a wardrobe?

I think that was the RNC's money, so it's a little different.

joegekko:Video evidence of the dastardly deed.

I'm so glad that the people who wrote Hackers are still alive and kicking.

Chicken Little politics for brain dead, easily frightened idiots

JimmyCarter'sSecondTerm: Wait I thought Obama agreed to public campaign financing like John McCain?

And McCain agreed to an honest campaign.

Once McCain broke his end of the agreement all bet's where off.

I decided to look at the NRO link...for once...and I notice something that all DailyKos (and many right wing websites) lack:

Attribution.

Except straight to the piece that directly refutes their claims. They, of course, dismiss it as "excuses" without proof or attribution for their lies, other than from "a reader". And when they're once again proven liars, they'll either denounce the vetting as "excuses", or, like the NY Post did with the Michelle Obama/Waldorf-Astoria story, blame the source.

Manipulation, deceit and trickery are established Obama tactics.

NROll'd again! When will the hilarity cease? =D

Whatsleft: THIS STORY WILL TURN THE TIDES I CAN FEEL IT

That's just the Taco Bell you ate last night.

aselene: There's no "fraud" here, as "fraud" would involve the deprivation of property or a legal right by deceit.

No one has to be deprived of anything for it to be fraud.

The other issue, that the Obama campaign has absolutely nothing to do with it, is the more important issue. (Who wants to bet that the "donor" is a Republican?)

FYI, my business uses a merchant account through Bank of America for credit card purchases. And yes, you can change the settings for some of the security checks (address, zip code, etc.), but not all of course.

Ok donated $15 as "Test Test" on "Test Dr"


(hopefully they will notice)
Lets see how long it takes to hit my bank)

NYZooMan: Manipulation, deceit and trickery are established Obama tactics.

A compilation of extreme right wing propaganda, lies, racism, bigotry and farktardery is your expertise.

/How the hell do you keep getting off my ignore list?

JimmyCarter'sSecondTerm: Wait I thought Obama agreed to public campaign financing like John McCain?

Either you're completely dumb or just disingenuous. McCain not only got $80 million free money from the tax payers, but the RNC is helping him with the campaign as well. Until both the candidate AND the party both agree to public funding, then public funding will never be fair (unless the party isn't allowed to fund the candidate).

This usually works in the past for the Republicans, but this year Obama has been able to outraise both the nominee and the RNC.

Is it me or has the NRO staff inhaled some sort of brain-eating nematodes.

RobertBruce: Obvious. Even John Galt and Hitler have donated (new window)

Who is John Galt?

obzerver: NYZooMan: Manipulation, deceit and trickery are established Obama tactics.

A compilation of extreme right wing propaganda, lies, racism, bigotry and farktardery is your expertise.

/How the hell do you keep getting off my ignore list?

Manipulation, deceit and trickery are established NYZooMan tactics.

I love these assholes.

"Some guy told me. . . but you'll never hear the liberal media report what some guy told me."

FTA:

This reader tried donating under "John Galt" and "Saddam Hussein" to the McCain campaign and they rejected it.

Doesn't the fact that McCain took public financing mean that nobody can donate to his campaign at this point?

August11: Is it me or has the NRO staff inhaled some sort of brain-eating nematodes.

The only nematodes these buttery socialists exchange are between tossing each other's salad.

Forty-Three: FTA:

This reader tried donating under "John Galt" and "Saddam Hussein" to the McCain campaign and they rejected it.

Doesn't the fact that McCain took public financing mean that nobody can donate to his campaign at this point?

Try to donate on the website and you will be redirected to the McCain-Palin Compliance fund. Previously I think it was the McCain victory Fund. He has setup shell organizations so that can can raise more and spend more... Yay..

It could be a story if it pans out.

MindStalker: Forty-Three: FTA:

This reader tried donating under "John Galt" and "Saddam Hussein" to the McCain campaign and they rejected it.

Doesn't the fact that McCain took public financing mean that nobody can donate to his campaign at this point?

Try to donate on the website and you will be redirected to the McCain-Palin Compliance fund. Previously I think it was the McCain victory Fund. He has setup shell organizations so that can can raise more and spend more... Yay..


BTW this in on their donation page

* For Individuals- The first $28,500 will go to the RNC, the next portion will be divided evenly between the Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania state parties' federal accounts up to a maximum of $9,250 for each Committee, and the final $2,300 will go to the Compliance Fund.
* For Federal Multicandidate PACs- The first $15,000 will go to the RNC, the next portion will be divided evenly between the Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania state parties' federal accounts up to a maximum of $5,000 for each Committee, and the final $5,000 will go to the Compliance Fund.


WTF!! $28,000 max?

Fraud? American Elections? Stop being redundant.

I love the smell of NeoCon Artists' tears in the early evening.

It's ok, it's just Democrats doing this.