I GUESS GLBAL WAZRMING IS A LIE THEN!



That's quite a good bit of snow for Boise too.

And for those of you who may really start the glbal warming shiat, remember we are at solar min

Pfft. It only counts if you use a calendar. And no one who really knows whats going on does.

I blame global laming.

I don't blame anything. I put on boots and enjoy the construction materials falling from the sky.

I'm hoping for a big snowstorm here this year, just to see everyone freak the hell out. The last one here was '94 I think, and they happen ~10 years, so we're due.

Excellent

/have interest in Tamarack Resort
//GO SKIING PEOPLE

We are suppose to get snow tonight, so I am getting a kick out of these replies.

/actually true

We got a dusting in Big Bear, California. Didn't stick though.

Add on that Fairbanks just had a super-early first day below freezing, and it all adds up to "global warming".

Remember, per envirotards:

Getting colder = global warming

Getting warmer = global warming

Stays the same = global warming

Any combination of the above = global warming

LordZorch: Any combination of the above = global warming

Local variations =/= global variations you moron.

I'm not even going to TRY to explain it to you retarded monkeys.

"OH LOOK, MARFA! IT'S COLD! SO MUCH FOR DUH GLOBAL WARMING, HAHA!"

It's like teaching pigs to sing - wastes your time and annoys the pigs.

Besides, the planet will be much better off once all the humans are gone, so yeah - keep on keepin' on, you half-evolved pink sacs.

85 degrees and party sunny, sea temperature ~75 degrees here.

RawData: I'm not even going to TRY to explain it to you retarded monkeys.

"OH LOOK, MARFA! IT'S COLD! SO MUCH FOR DUH GLOBAL WARMING, HAHA!"

It's like teaching pigs to sing - wastes your time and annoys the pigs.

Besides, the planet will be much better off once all the humans are gone, so yeah - keep on keepin' on, you half-evolved pink sacs.


are you spewing at the one person to this point in the thread who (successfully) trolled you or are you just being "Sneering, Better Than You, Fiercely Outraged Man!!"

RawData: I'm not even going to TRY to explain it to you retarded monkeys.

"OH LOOK, MARFA! IT'S COLD! SO MUCH FOR DUH GLOBAL WARMING, HAHA!"

It's like teaching pigs to sing - wastes your time and annoys the pigs.

Besides, the planet will be much better off once all the humans are gone, so yeah - keep on keepin' on, you half-evolved pink sacs.ha

mmmmkaaayyyy. I looked at your profile. You seem to be a "half-evolved monkey" yourself. Are you a climatologist? Are you even a meteorologist? If you're convinced the planet is better off without us, you go first. I promise I'll follow.

Did Candlejack write the headli

johnny_vegas: RawData: I'm not even going to TRY to explain it to you retarded monkeys.

"OH LOOK, MARFA! IT'S COLD! SO MUCH FOR DUH GLOBAL WARMING, HAHA!"

It's like teaching pigs to sing - wastes your time and annoys the pigs.

Besides, the planet will be much better off once all the humans are gone, so yeah - keep on keepin' on, you half-evolved pink sacs.


are you spewing at the one person to this point in the thread who (successfully) trolled you or are you just being "Sneering, Better Than You, Fiercely Outraged Man!!"


I APPROVE OF THE SECOND OPTION.

just came to say GLOBAL WARMING IS MAKE BELIVE!

Get ready for the next ice age.

Bloody Somali Pirates!

GAT_00: Local variations =/= global variations you moron.

Except when there's a hot summer in Europe, in which case it's clearly a case of Global Warming.

I'm from Idaho so I'm getting a kick...

This is gonna be a looooong winter :(

Is it too late to steal Iraq's oil?

LordZorch: Add on that Fairbanks just had a super-early first day below freezing, and it all adds up to "global warming".

Remember, per envirotards:

Getting colder = global warming

Getting warmer = global warming

Stays the same = global warming

Any combination of the above = global warming

I'm sure referring to people as "envirotards" makes you and your buddy Rush feel vastly more intelligent and learned and all, but you know what? It pretty much just makes you look like a dismally ignorant dittohead.

Then again, is there any other kind of dittohead?

I eagerly await your "moonbat" retort.

cretinbob: I GUESS GLBAL WAZRMING IS A LIE THEN!



That's quite a good bit of snow for Boise too.

And for those of you who may really start the glbal warming shiat, remember we are at solar min

but the sun wasn't responsible for the warming, so it can't be responsible for the cooling, right?

Pacific decadal oscillation FTW!!

O

We got a dusting here yesterday.

/Tahoe

I just moved to this state, so it totally caught me off guard, and i'm only kind of getting a kick out of it.

/you jerks need to slow the fark down
//snow does not equal go 20 over!

RawData: I'm not even going to TRY to explain it to you retarded monkeys.


Monkey Piglett Is Unamused!

Lincey: I just moved to this state, so it totally caught me off guard, and i'm only kind of getting a kick out of it.

/you jerks need to slow the fark down
//snow does not equal go 20 over!

I've lived in Boise for 8 years (from Cali), and people here CANNOT drive, snow or not.

for the warmers:
http://icoads.cdc.noaa.gov/people/gilbert.p.compo/CompoSardeshmukh2007a.pdfLin k (new window)

The thing to watch for is the ENSO, that is, La Nina or El Nino.

main:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/ENSO/enso.current.html

weekly:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/sst/sst.anom.gif

a year in animation:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/clim/sst_olr/sst_anim.shtml

Right now it's "neutral", but in November-December of last year it went dark blue in the middle, which you see in the animation. If it stays neutral or warms up in November-December of this year, winter will be more temperate. But if it goes dark blue again, it means La Nina has returned, and we could freeze our buns off, with heavy snowfall and a hard winter that could last into April or even May.

RawData: Besides, the planet will be much better off once all the humans are gone, so yeah - keep on keepin' on, you half-evolved pink sacs.

you know, my problem isn't with you as much as it is with the idiot who built that pedestal for you.

IdahoPrime: My name is IdahoPrime, and I'm getting a kick out of these replies.

Oh, and how are you guys gonna spin this so that it's Palin's fault?

Just curious.

ALASKA'S INVADING IDAHO!

I, for one, am very concerned about this Y2K thing I keep hearing about.

Hey whammer, we're gonna get flamed, but thanks for posting that. Hopefully at least one curious and critically thinking farker will read it and see the alarmism for what it is.

Anyone find it funny that most people who bash others for looking at small sample sizes (e.g. 1 month, 1 season, 1 year) are looking at trends over 100 years or so, which is also pretty minuscule for earth's climate?

/Believes in global warming
//But it's mostly caused by earth's natural cycle, not humans
///Works in a department with some of the best earth scientists in the US

stirfrybry: for the warmers:
http://icoads.cdc.noaa.gov/people/gilbert.p.compo/CompoSardeshmukh2007a.pdfLink (new window)

From your link:

Abstract
Evidence is presented that the recent worldwide land warming has occurred largely in response to a worldwide warming of the oceans rather than as a direct response to increasing greenhouse gases (GHGs) over land.
Atmospheric model simulations of the last half-century with prescribed observed ocean temperature changes, but without prescribed GHG changes, account for most of the land warming. The oceanic influence has occurred through hydrodynamic-radiative teleconnections, primarily by moistening and warming the air over land and increasing the downward longwave radiation at the surface. The oceans may themselves have warmed from a combination of natural and anthropogenic influences.

Emphasis is mine.

In other words, the link you cite doesn't do a thing to discredit anthropogenic warning.

Mr Squirrel: I'm sure referring to people as "envirotards" makes you and your buddy Rush feel vastly more intelligent and learned and all, but you know what? It pretty much just makes you look like a dismally ignorant dittohead.

Then again, is there any other kind of dittohead?

I eagerly await your "moonbat" retort.

that's really cute. you managed to deflect the issue by name calling. i bet you're a hit at parties.

/anthropogenic global warming does not exist
//you're a gorebot. (hey, i can fling poo, too!!)
///critical thinking ftw^

That was some nasty shiat to get caught out in. I was fishing under the greenbelt bridge behind Les Bois when it hit. No luck either. Goddamned snow

deltabourne: Anyone find it funny that most people who bash others for looking at small sample sizes (e.g. 1 month, 1 season, 1 year) are looking at trends over 100 years or so, which is also pretty minuscule for earth's climate?

/Believes in global warming
//But it's mostly caused by earth's natural cycle, not humans
///Works in a department with some of the best earth scientists in the US

I know what you mean. James Hansen likes to do that. You can even find 10 year charts at his NASA site.

70s in Minnesota. I am guessing not for long.

It's only snowing early to get rid of the Bi-Cyclists (like in the pic) for the winter.

But for the ones that stay out......... Car slid on some ice officer...

Mr Squirrel: stirfrybry: for the warmers:
http://icoads.cdc.noaa.gov/people/gilbert.p.compo/CompoSardeshmukh2007a.pdfLink (new window)

From your link:

Abstract
Evidence is presented that the recent worldwide land warming has occurred largely in response to a worldwide warming of the oceans rather than as a direct response to increasing greenhouse gases (GHGs) over land.
Atmospheric model simulations of the last half-century with prescribed observed ocean temperature changes, but without prescribed GHG changes, account for most of the land warming. The oceanic influence has occurred through hydrodynamic-radiative teleconnections, primarily by moistening and warming the air over land and increasing the downward longwave radiation at the surface. The oceans may themselves have warmed from a combination of natural and anthropogenic influences.

Emphasis is mine.

In other words, the link you cite doesn't do a thing to discredit anthropogenic warning.

Hey buddy, it says that the warming is due to an increase in water vapor and not the increase in cO2 although some of the increase in water vapoer may be due to anthropogenic warming and natural ocean variation.

The point is that it's water vapor and not CO2 concentration which leads to increases in average temp.

yes, they are intertwined, but the mechanism is really the water vapor and not the CO2. Water vapor is much more effective than increases in CO2

So, anyone catch SARS yet? How about bird flu? And has George W. Bush destroyed the world yet? I heard all these things were going to be the end of mankind, so I'm eagerly waiting to see when that happens.

06Wahoo: So, anyone catch SARS yet? How about bird flu? And has George W. Bush destroyed the world yet? I heard all these things were going to be the end of mankind, so I'm eagerly waiting to see when that happens.

Don't forget how we're going to war with Iran.
/Wait was this post supposed to be in the avian flu thing?

Get Lost: It's only snowing early to get rid of the Bi-Cyclists (like in the pic) for the winter.

But for the ones that stay out......... Car slid on some ice officer...

The snow isn't getting rid of me. The only thing I lack for winter riding is the studded tires and they're getting ordered in about 3 weeks.

I blame Gore.