I, for one, feel bad for Mick. Dude had hip replacement surgery at only 53 years old, due to a "degenerative rheumatic disease which causes ligaments and tendons to attach to the bone"

Rrrraaawrr. What a biatch.

/met Vince, cool guy
//his solo album was better than anything the Crue did since
///oh fark off, you Cobain worshipers, the Crue rocked

ekdikeo4: I, for one, feel bad for Mick. Dude had hip replacement surgery at only 53 years old, due to a "degenerative rheumatic disease which causes ligaments and tendons to attach to the bone"

aka osteonecrosis due to previous bone infections secondary to Intavenous drug abuse.

NuttierThanEver: ekdikeo4: I, for one, feel bad for Mick. Dude had hip replacement surgery at only 53 years old, due to a "degenerative rheumatic disease which causes ligaments and tendons to attach to the bone"

aka osteonecrosis due to previous bone infections secondary to Intavenous drug abuse.

Here's the real scoop. Ankylosing spondylitis (new window)

They were always a good bet for money well spent on a ticket 20 years ago, but you gotta wonder now.... why bother. Some bands just don't age well.


/saw Rush this summer, they were amazingly tight and prolific.

Ouch. That hurt. Not that the Crue didn't have it coming...

Caak Raak. Give it up.

But how was the rest of the state fair?

Is it just me, or does the music critic who wrote that article come across as a pompous, elitist asshole?

/went to Crue Fest when it came to his state, and thought Motley Crue put on a pretty damn good show.

pfft. The only Papa Roach could blow away Motley Crue would be if they actually blew them.

FTFA: "Same Old Situation",and an accompanying video that spliced together shots of Alex from A Clockwork Orange with girl-on-girl porn, dead Iraqi children, pictures of the Bush clan

Et tu, Crue?

Don't make me put you in the unemployment line with Metallica.

Just. Don't.

Read the article. Was the reviewer expecting Chopin at the Met?
I couldn't decide if this was a recent review or one written 20 years ago.

Mick Mars looks like death...check
Loud and sloppy playing....check
Tommy running around with a handcam getting chicks to flash boobs...check

Did I miss anything?

/Saw Crue 20 years ago. Great show

If the writer thought the crue were ever any good, maybe I could take this article seriously.

That fact is this person detests everything about the crue, their catalogue and music.

Does it matter what the writer has to say...? fark NO!

They're like KISS, they should have kept the makeup on. Most of these guys look like The Cryptkeeper at this point.

Yeah, but what about how much Sarah Palin sucks?

I saw their Carnival of Sin tour at Red Rocks.

Naked chicks on stilts breathing fire? What's not to like?

Mick Mars kicks ass, and this critic has no clue.

What a wonderful example of totally unbiased journalism...

News flash some people like different types of music.

Meh, Motley Cures bunch of farking poseurs, soulless hacks.

Now these guys, Musical innovators, played with some actual hart and soul.

Did it first, and did it better.

darkjezter: Is it just me, or does the music critic who wrote that article come across as a pompous, elitist asshole?

/went to Crue Fest when it came to his state, and thought Motley Crue put on a pretty damn good show.

I know the guy, and he is a pompous, elitist asshole... but in this case, he's right. The Crue smokes the bone these days.


/your favourite band sucks