Liar liar pants on fire. This flatulent outrage, flatulent lies and flatulent tax plans (he has to get past Nancy's purse) are all just ...

GaryPDX: Liar liar pants on fire. This flatulent outrage, flatulent lies and flatulent tax plans (he has to get past Nancy's purse) are all just ...

Uh..what?

cameroncrazy1984: GaryPDX: Liar liar pants on fire. This flatulent outrage, flatulent lies and flatulent tax plans (he has to get past Nancy's purse) are all just ...

Uh..what?

Something about how Darth Pelosi's to blame for everything, you know him.

robsul82: Something about how Darth Pelosi's to blame for everything, you know him.

Not everything..hahaha.

GaryPDX: robsul82: Something about how Darth Pelosi's to blame for everything, you know him.

Not everything..hahaha.

Dude, c'mon, lol...I'm not sure if you think Booth was set up as a patsy by Pelosi, haha.

robsul82: GaryPDX: robsul82: Something about how Darth Pelosi's to blame for everything, you know him.

Not everything..hahaha.

Dude, c'mon, lol...I'm not sure if you think Booth was set up as a patsy by Pelosi, haha.

She is evil..I'm serious. I can't fathom Obama getting anywhere near what he wants out of her. Especially if it's anything that even smells like a tax cut/incentive, anywhere. She ain't giving any of that Bush tax/incentive expiration money back.

Darth Pelosi is actually Gary's father

Well, he can't attack his plan any other way. If he says what Obama is really going to do that turns into a pro-Obama ad.

And McCain can't really talk about his plans too much because his plans suck. So why not just make shiat up and hope for the best?

CravenMorehead: Well, he can't attack his plan any other way. If he says what Obama is really going to do that turns into a pro-Obama ad.

And McCain can't really talk about his plans too much because his plans suck. So why not just make shiat up and hope for the best?

This pretty much sums it up.

You should have your own CNN show. CravenMorehead, live at 2pm.

Mordant: Darth Pelosi is actually Gary's father

Well, Gary does want them both dead since he thinks it would impact his bank balance in a positive way.

Mordant: Darth Pelosi is actually Gary's father

That's not true! That's impossible!

GaryPDX: Liar liar pants on fire. This flatulent outrage, flatulent lies and flatulent tax plans (he has to get past Nancy's purse) are all just ...

I think by the end of this election Fark conservatives may be reduced to utterly incomprehensible babbling.

Obama is like Cthulhu for conservatives.

Bloody William: Mordant: Darth Pelosi is actually Gary's father

That's not true! That's impossible!

There is another PDX.

RemyDuron: Obama is like Cthulhu for conservatives.

Good think for them they sold their souls long ago.

RemyDuron: GaryPDX: Liar liar pants on fire. This flatulent outrage, flatulent lies and flatulent tax plans (he has to get past Nancy's purse) are all just ...

I think by the end of this election Fark conservatives may be reduced to utterly incomprehensible babbling.

Obama is like Cthulhu for conservatives.

Some of them are there already.

GaryPDX: robsul82: GaryPDX: robsul82: Something about how Darth Pelosi's to blame for everything, you know him.

Not everything..hahaha.

Dude, c'mon, lol...I'm not sure if you think Booth was set up as a patsy by Pelosi, haha.

She is evil..I'm serious. I can't fathom Obama getting anywhere near what he wants out of her. Especially if it's anything that even smells like a tax cut/incentive, anywhere. She ain't giving any of that Bush tax/incentive expiration money back.

Why is she evil?

Because she's stopping conservatives from drilling? It's been proven that drilling is the wrong thing to do, won't help for years and when it does it won't help as much as just inflating our tires. I think it's pretty brave of her to take the high road and avoid doing the popular thing in favor of the smart thing. Oh wait, to you, it's only brave and maverickish when republicans do it. My bad.

Besides, don't you think its hypocritical for Filibusterpublicans to whine about a party majority blocking legislation after the 90's fiascoes?

One F Jef: Why is she evil?

Myself, I'm pissed at her for blocking impeachment.

Tsk, tsk. So now it's "McCain is a liar". He shows an ad that's factually correct though it uses imagery that doesn't jive. K, fair enough. We can call that a minor distortion.

On the other hand...Let me hear more about 'tax cuts for the rich', Mr. Obama. Because I was under the impression that it was 'tax cuts for everyone'.

Though the two are hardly comparable, I'm sure...

poopalacarte: Meet GaryPDX - Small Business Owner, Fark Independent™.

/dude... just admit that mccain's a lying sack, would you?

McCains a lying sack...:)

Do you guys and gals realize that GaryPDX tried to switch the topic right off the bat and that most people following him fell for it?

WoodyHayes: Do you guys and gals realize that GaryPDX tried to switch the topic right off the bat and that most people following him fell for it?

Oh yeah..that's what I did. I thought it was mockery..my bad.

Alphax: One F Jef: Why is she evil?

Myself, I'm pissed at her for blocking impeachment.

I'll give you that.

GaryPDX: WoodyHayes: Do you guys and gals realize that GaryPDX tried to switch the topic right off the bat and that most people following him fell for it?

Oh yeah..that's what I did. I thought it was mockery..my bad.

you were mocking someone that was not related in any way to the point of the article. that's called changing the subject. and you did it in the Boobies.

careful gary, your republican is showing.

WoodyHayes: Do you guys and gals realize that GaryPDX tried to switch the topic right off the bat and that most people following him fell for it?

Yeah he likes distraction but, still, we can have more than one discussion at the same time. Plus, it's fun to poke it and watch it writhe and thrash about and spew talking points and logical fallacies like an upside down lawnmower.

Screw those rich a-holes that make over $42K, tax them to death!

"mah taxes!!! He gonna raise mah taxes!"

"unless you make over 250k you'll pay LESS taxes"

"Oh....But...then we'll lose are jobs! Cause rich people provide jobs out of their personal income!"

Next thread.

"mah taxes!!! He gonna raise mah taxes!"

I want free stuff.

log_jammin: "mah taxes!!! He gonna raise mah taxes!"

"unless you make over 250k you'll pay LESS taxes"

"Oh....But...then we'll lose are jobs! Cause rich people provide jobs out of their personal income!"

Next thread.

"mah taxes!!! He gonna raise mah taxes!"



what's that son? you say he gonna raise mah taxes?

Shaggy_C: Tsk, tsk. So now it's "McCain is a liar". He shows an ad that's factually correct though it uses imagery that doesn't jive. K, fair enough. We can call that a minor distortion.

1. The difference between a single person with no dependents earning $42,000 and a family earning $42,000 is quite large.
2. It was voted on in part of a provisional budget that never got enacted.
3. It is in no way part of his proposed tax plan; his plan actually features significantly larger tax cuts than McCain's for all people making under $100,000.

Again, this needs to be posted in every single tax thread:


Can you honestly look at that and then say that McCain's claims that he's going to raise taxes on struggling lower to middle class families aren't complete bullshiat designed to obfuscate the fact that McCain's plan is worse for them and great for the wealthy?

Hey furious, you saying 19 dollars a year in tax relief isn't enough during this struggling economy? Come on, they can buy a whole carton of milk and half a box of cereal with that!

Bunch of whiners ...

Maybe they can afford to buy a pair of bootstraps with which to pull themselves up by.


//last sentence makes my brain hurt ...

GaryPDX: McCains a lying sack...:)

I've finally figured it out.

You're Rush_Limbaugh_Sent_Me! I wondered what happened to you.

FuriousGeorge945: Again, this needs to be posted in every single tax thread:

Nice one. I'd right click and save it, if I were at home.

God that +11% on 2.8 mil families gives me a MASSIVE BONER. GOBAMA

FuriousGeorge945: Again, this needs to be posted in every single tax thread:

I haven't seen that graph until just now. Thanks for posting it. Even more reason for me to vote for Obama: He'll save me almost $900.

GaryPDX: robsul82: GaryPDX: robsul82: Something about how Darth Pelosi's to blame for everything, you know him.

Not everything..hahaha.

Dude, c'mon, lol...I'm not sure if you think Booth was set up as a patsy by Pelosi, haha.

She is evil..I'm serious. I can't fathom Obama getting anywhere near what he wants out of her. Especially if it's anything that even smells like a tax cut/incentive, anywhere. She ain't giving any of that Bush tax/incentive expiration money back.

Why are "Conservatives" so afraid of women?

So Obama's tax plan is better simply because the majority of farkers will pay less taxes whereas McCain's tax cut cuts taxes for everyone? I don't see how the government is entitled to 1/3rd (roughly) more of the earning on those making 2.9 million. Granted they won't become destitute, but since when has the government ever shown it is better at deciding how one's income can be taxed?

FuriousGeorge945: Can you honestly look at that and then say that McCain's claims that he's going to raise taxes on struggling lower to middle class families aren't complete bullshiat designed to obfuscate the fact that McCain's plan is worse for them and great for the wealthy?

McCain said that Obama 'once voted for a provision that would have raised taxes', not that this was his current policy. Typical fearmongering, but can you blame McCain? Republicans have been vote-buying for 30 years and now a Dem is coming in undercutting their message. That's gotta suck!

MyRandomName: So Obama's tax plan is better simply because the majority of farkers will pay less taxes whereas McCain's tax cut cuts taxes for everyone? I don't see how the government is entitled to 1/3rd (roughly) more of the earning on those making 2.9 million. Granted they won't become destitute, but since when has the government ever shown it is better at deciding how one's income can be taxed?

The subject is how McCain blatantly lied about Obama's tax plan, why don't you talk about that? Oh wait, because it's unspinnable and makes McCain look like shiat.

IMO we should raise taxes. We've been spending money like a teenager with a stolen credit card over the past few years and we need to pay the bills. Sorry, you all voted for a dumbass who cut taxes without cutting spending, now you have to pay the price.

Shaggy isn't able to look at anything honestly.

Trolls dont do that.

log_jammin: Shaggy isn't able to look at anything honestly.

?

I think I am trying to be as nonpartisan about this as I can be. I dislike both McCain and Obama's tax plans.

Ace Frehley's Ghost: GaryPDX: McCains a lying sack...:)

I've finally figured it out.

You're Rush_Limbaugh_Sent_Me! I wondered what happened to you.

He's not. He's nowhere near that bad. RLSM was bad enough to set all of you idiots off on every one of his comments.

MyRandomName: So Obama's tax plan is better simply because the majority of farkers will pay less taxes whereas McCain's tax cut cuts taxes for everyone? I don't see how the government is entitled to 1/3rd (roughly) more of the earning on those making 2.9 million. Granted they won't become destitute, but since when has the government ever shown it is better at deciding how one's income can be taxed?

"Cutting taxes for everyone" doesn't mean very much when a whole hell of a lot of people are getting $19 tax cuts. That's reason enough to start dealing drugs.

MyRandomName: So Obama's tax plan is better simply because the majority of farkers will pay less taxes whereas McCain's tax cut cuts taxes for everyone? I don't see how the government is entitled to 1/3rd (roughly) more of the earning on those making 2.9 million. Granted they won't become destitute, but since when has the government ever shown it is better at deciding how one's income can be taxed?

In a new sign of increasing inequality in the U.S., the richest 1% of Americans in 2006 garnered the highest share of the nation's adjusted gross income for two decades, and possibly the highest since 1929, according to Internal Revenue Service data.

/just ignore it, it's from that liberal rag the wall street journal

One F Jef: It's been proven that drilling is the wrong thing to do, won't help for years and when it does it won't help as much as just inflating our tires.

Really?

Please show us the proof.

"I dislike both McCain and Obama's tax plans."

Ah yes...what was it you said..."a family of 4 who makes 45k will only pay 300 in taxes and that's just not fair!"

burndtdan: In a new sign of increasing inequality in the U.S., the richest 1% of Americans in 2006 garnered the highest share of the nation's adjusted gross income for two decades, and possibly the highest since 1929, according to Internal Revenue Service data.

I'm still a little skeptical about the theory of relative poverty as opposed to absolute povery. If the bottom rung, worst-off people in society were living comfortably, why would it matter what the people at the top were making? The idea that there is a disparity in and of itself isn't a inherently a bad thing.

Shaggy_C: FuriousGeorge945: Can you honestly look at that and then say that McCain's claims that he's going to raise taxes on struggling lower to middle class families aren't complete bullshiat designed to obfuscate the fact that McCain's plan is worse for them and great for the wealthy?

McCain said that Obama 'once voted for a provision that would have raised taxes', not that this was his current policy. Typical fearmongering, but can you blame McCain? Republicans have been vote-buying for 30 years and now a Dem is coming in undercutting their message. That's gotta suck!

Yeah, he just mentioned that Obama voted for this provision, then falsely claimed that he promises to raise taxes on families, small businesses and seniors. That's not deceptive and lying and at all.

MyRandomName: So Obama's tax plan is better simply because the majority of farkers will pay less taxes whereas McCain's tax cut cuts taxes for everyone? I don't see how the government is entitled to 1/3rd (roughly) more of the earning on those making 2.9 million. Granted they won't become destitute, but since when has the government ever shown it is better at deciding how one's income can be taxed?

If McCain thinks that way then then, put that out there and let the people decide which they like better. But it is obvious that he realizes that the vast majority of the population isn't going to like the fact that the top 1% get a much larger tax decrease from his plan than the bottom 99% do, and that they actually get a larger decrease from Obama's plan, so he goes out there and misleads the public about Obama's plan instead of giving some straight talk about his own.

log_jammin: Ah yes...what was it you said..."a family of 4 who makes 45k will only pay 300 in taxes and that's just not fair!"

I said they'd pay $0 under Obama, which I think is a little unfair. Why should the single people and high income earners supply everything for the bottom 50%? I mean, that seems just a little, well, wrong.

And that doesn't even get into the whole deficits issues...

mud_shark: Really?

Please show us the proof.

You missed the number crunching in every other thread about that subject? Go read. This thread is about McCain's bogus commercials.

Shaggy_C: burndtdan: In a new sign of increasing inequality in the U.S., the richest 1% of Americans in 2006 garnered the highest share of the nation's adjusted gross income for two decades, and possibly the highest since 1929, according to Internal Revenue Service data.

I'm still a little skeptical about the theory of relative poverty as opposed to absolute povery. If the bottom rung, worst-off people in society were living comfortably, why would it matter what the people at the top were making? The idea that there is a disparity in and of itself isn't a inherently a bad thing.

If everyone were moving up then I don't think it would be much of a problem. The thing is, the top 1% have improved greatly, while the rest of the country has seen real wages remain stagnant, the price of food and gas go up, a wave of home forclosures and the unemployment rate increase. I don't think that even you can play devil's advocate here and say that things have gotten better for all of us.