Good thing they don't have swimming pools in Illinois.

I'd like to test their definition of 'underwear.'

Excellent tag usage.

Commando is still ok.

i'm sure the police will be cracking down on this.

Cue the "Flabbergasted" pic in 5... 4.... 3... 2...

All the better reason to go commando.

1) Dragging your pants down is a stupid dumbass look. For that kind of money. you can look much sharper and hip.

2) Still don't think they should outlaw it, though. That's just as asinine.

It's a good thing all the other problems in the world have been resolved that we can move our world's police forces into a fashion police role.

The Detroit Free Press was kind enough to provide this graphic to explain the nuanced laws for people living in Flint-



/true

"Joe Klomes, say the new law infringes on their personal style. He says leaders should instead spend money on making the area look nicer."

Joe.. you retard, you can make the area as nice looking at you want, but if you thugs run around looking like you're trouble, no one is going to go visit the nice areas.

Also, in all my U.S and worldly travels, I have NEVER seen one person with boxers exposed, or overly saggy pants, or with a thug look that was a contributing member of society. These people were all blights and need to be culled via sniper fire from a high rise building.

approve of enforced dress codes

Churchill2004: The Detroit Free Press was kind enough to provide this graphic to explain the nuanced laws for people living in Flint-



/true

it looks like Dr Manhattan is farked

Bunch of punks need some discipline.

/Lawn. My. Get of.

Was it just me, or was the font of that article nearly unreadable?

while i am not a fan of "sagging"

i think this is complete BS, why does the government waste its time and our tax payer dollars on stupid crap like this?

I believe that, elsewhere, this sort of law has been successfully challenged when it was pointed out that wearing a bikini in public is legally acceptable, but showing your underwear which covers the exact same amount of skin is prohibited.

In other words, if the person (male or female) were wearing a swimsuit under their pants instead of underwear, which covered no more or less of the person's arse, the outfit would be perfectly legal.

Dressing like a moron should not be illegal.

So do when do we take "Land of the free" out of our anthem?

Does not approve.

tweek46420: why does the government waste its time and our tax payer dollars on stupid crap like this?

Dude, it's just Lynwood, not the entire country.

Um... Well, first, anyone who says "OMG body parts!" is just moronic. As for the claim that some form of clothing that covers the body is worse than another form of clothing that covers the body... do these people have brains? I mean, they breathe and shiat, but DAMN!

Hibno: Dressing like a moron should not be illegal.

Yes, it should. It's just unconstitutional.

It's legal racism....and I love it.

You're next, hippies. Pachouli law comin!

In direct violation.

/pic amuses me

I don't think it should be a law, but everytime i see some punkass kid with his pants sagging i just wanna smack him in the head. It's called a belt. They aren't that much, and they make it so you don't have to use a hand to hold your pants up.

Good. Now if we can just start shipping them off to an island where they can live in wigger goodness, throw gang signs at each other, talk smack, and have their own private drive-by shootings we would be better off.

carnifex2005

FTW

Churchill2004:
The Detroit Free Press was kind enough to provide this graphic to explain the nuanced laws for people living in Flint-
/true

That almost looks like an illustration from The Onion.
/unfortunately it's not

Churchill2004: The Detroit Free Press was kind enough to provide this graphic to explain the nuanced laws for people living in Flint-



/true

I thought that said "Buttsecks" at first.

/and lol'd
//3 months, wtf?!?
///thinks these jackasses should pull pants up, but this ordinance is bs

About time someone told these clowns to pull up their pants. They just don't seem to have any idea how stupid they look, or don't care.

snuff3r: It's a good thing all the other problems in the world have been resolved that we can move our world's police forces into a fashion police role.

Tell you what: You give us a prioritized list of all the problems that the police and governments should completely solve first, and we'll make sure the President deals with it in the proper order.

Dr.Knockboots: Also, in all my U.S and worldly travels, I have NEVER seen one person with boxers exposed, or overly saggy pants, or with a thug look that was a contributing member of society. These people were all blights and need to be culled via sniper fire from a high rise building.

You know, as stupid as I think that look is.. whatever, dude.

I'm sure you sat down and had a meaningful chat with all of those "thug look" people you encountered before making a determination about their value. I'm certain of it, because you wouldn't be the kind of person to pre-judge someone.

But any self respecting gangsta wears a big ass shirt over their sagging jeans, so how are they supposed to know?

Step 1: Cop cites person for this.
Step 2: ACLU takes up person's case.
Step 3: Lynwood spends $5 million defending lawsuit
Step 4: Profit?

subby: [ASININE]

Having grown up near Lynwood, this is probably the best thing that could possibly happen to that hole. Bunch of ghetto wannabe thugs living in McMansions. Pull yer damn pants up.

Relatively Obscure: Dr.Knockboots: Also, in all my U.S and worldly travels, I have NEVER seen one person with boxers exposed, or overly saggy pants, or with a thug look that was a contributing member of society. These people were all blights and need to be culled via sniper fire from a high rise building.

You know, as stupid as I think that look is.. whatever, dude.

I'm sure you sat down and had a meaningful chat with all of those "thug look" people you encountered before making a determination about their value. I'm certain of it, because you wouldn't be the kind of person to pre-judge someone.

I live in an area where I see it everywhere. I can confidently say that, yes, people sporting the "thug look" are worthless.

If you're thinking that you can walk up to one of them and have a conversation about Robert Frost, I'd give a hundred bucks to see it.

El_Dan: Step 1: Cop cites person for this.
Step 2: ACLU takes up person's case.
Step 3: Lynwood spends $5 million defending lawsuit
Step 4: Profit?

//thinking the 'unthought'
///i'd like to read about it.

Tyrosine: I'm fine if they want to outlaw this:
or this:
But I'm not cool with outlawing this:

You have a thing for "Dumpster Sluts"?

o kay...

Fact Man: I live in an area where I see it everywhere. I can confidently say that, yes, people sporting the "thug look" are worthless.

You can say whatever you like "confidently." Being confident doesn't make you more correct.

Fact Man: If you're thinking that you can walk up to one of them and have a conversation about Robert Frost, I'd give a hundred bucks to see it.

Whatever, man. If you want to assign "worth" to people based on nothing other than what clothes you saw as you drove past someone one time with your car doors locked, I guess you can.

Bit'O'Gristle: Good. Now if we can just start shipping them off to an island where they can live in wigger goodness, throw gang signs at each other, talk smack, and have their own private drive-by shootings we would be better off.

I sag my jeans on occasion, depending on what the outfit, and Im far from a "wigger." As a rule though its only about a inch from the top of the boxers. Your hair is fuzzy and a bright shade of pink or green, reminiscent of a famous boxing promoter.

If you're thinking that you can walk up to one of them and have a conversation about Robert Frost, I'd give a hundred bucks to see it.

If you can walk up to them and not get shot or mugged I would be suprised. Conversation on any type of higer level is right out.

carnifex2005

Meh

http://galleries.lowrisejeanfetish.com/7/new.htm?randtour.php?pps=matbiatch (NSFW).

I'm sure some politician in this mess thinks this will make Jesus happy.

lolmadillo: Churchill2004: The Detroit Free Press was kind enough to provide this graphic to explain the nuanced laws for people living in Flint-



/true

it looks like Dr Manhattan is farked

i lol'd

/Remembers all the citys who tried this
//and where shot down
///Its racist
////Believe it or not...
//Also its comfy as hell
//is a Pakeha

gimmeabreak: About time someone told these clowns to pull up their pants cut their hair. They just don't seem to have any idea how stupid they look, or don't care.



//should be illegal, too.

Does this include three inches of bra straps?
What about underwear visible through white pants?
What about t-shirts?

What a pointless, stupid, horrible law.

//What a horrible 'fashion'.

Relatively Obscure: Fact Man: I live in an area where I see it everywhere. I can confidently say that, yes, people sporting the "thug look" are worthless.

You can say whatever you like "confidently." Being confident doesn't make you more correct.

Fact Man: If you're thinking that you can walk up to one of them and have a conversation about Robert Frost, I'd give a hundred bucks to see it.

Whatever, man. If you want to assign "worth" to people based on nothing other than what clothes you saw as you drove past someone one time with your car doors locked, I guess you can.

No, I'm assigning "worth" based on my brother who works in an "inner city" public school with high hopes of changing these kids' lives, only to be beaten down psychologically by a bunch of thugs who wouldn't let him care about them, and from growing up in an area near "thug look" neighborhoods and having my bike stolen twice (and all my friends, too) by said nearby "thug look" residents when we were kids, and being jumped twice, and today watching local news where the criminals coincidentally always sport the "thug look" and never once in my life seeing anybody who could be considered intelligent sporting the "thug look."

What are you basing your contention on?

I was at a company picnic recently and a soccer game started with the kids.

It was hilarious watching the 14-16 year old kid trying to play soccer while constantly pulling up his pants.

You should never ban stuff like this ... it doesn't hurt anyone and it is an easy way to identify morons!!