Because providing objective information to sexually active students is so much worse than letting religious freaks in denial mode about teenagers is better.

eddyatwork: Because providing objective information to sexually active students is so much worse than letting religious freaks in denial mode about teenagers is better.

I can't for the life of me get through your syntax, but I think I agree with the point you're trying to make.

Do anal.

BJs don't count

I agree with them: 30% is far far too low a percentage. I'd complain too.

CygnusDarius

Do anal.

Anal = No Babies

/Brilliant.

FTFA: "If they want the morning-after pill, the school will sanction that and the parent will never know.

"We would say that this is the end of innocence."


I'd say the end of innocence came the night before.

Because if they have too many sexual health clinics, how are they going to catch up to America in the important demographics of unwed teenage mothers, STD's, AIDS, child abuse and other consequences of early sex?

I'm all for it. They say you're not supposed to drive right after an abortion, so she can take the bus home.

Danger Avoid Death: FTFA: "If they want the morning-after pill, the school will sanction that and the parent will never know.

"We would say that this is the end of innocence."


I'd say the end of innocence came the night before.


Or at least Innocence's boyfriend did.

bouchdogg: CygnusDarius

Do anal.

Anal = No Babies

/Brilliant.

newest educational video: "i said what-what? in the butt!"

I've got a big complaint: 70% of them don't have the clinics.

Moron parents: Letting kids have sex reasonably safely isn't going to make much difference as to whether they have sex!

mjk42: newest educational video: "i said what-what? in the butt!"

And because you made me remember that, here's the link (new window) so you can all cringe at it.

dahmers love zombie: Danger Avoid Death: FTFA: "If they want the morning-after pill, the school will sanction that and the parent will never know.

"We would say that this is the end of innocence."


I'd say the end of innocence came the night before.


Or at least Innocence's boyfriend did.

Somewhere out there is an unhappy Pope.

In the under 14s, abortions rose by 21% from 135 in 2006 to 163 last year. The number of abortions in all women rose by 2.5% to reach an all time high of almost 200,000.

Lucky aborted kids, at least they won't hate their parents for surrendering.

CygnusDarius: And because you made me remember that, here's the link (new window) so you can all cringe at it.

I like it.

/not in the butt, the video
//NOTHING goes in my butt
///ever.
\ever

Ear sex is the way forward, because if you have real sex your penis falls off and is eaten by wasps.

/"Once you go black, you go deaf".

EsteeFlwrPot: /not in the butt, the video
//NOTHING goes in my butt
///ever.
\ever

Ever ever?.

It doesn't sound like any of the concerned parents were saying that the kids shouldn't be getting contraceptives, just that they themselves would like to know about it so they could maybe talk to their kids and put an end to the risky behaviors?

It's a double-edged sword really. Either you're effectively denying the kids what they need because they won't seek it if their confidentiality is not protected OR you're leaving parents out of what is, in some cases, medical treatment of their children (plan B, chlamydia testing, contraceptive pills) when the parents really might be able to stop their kids from getting in this trouble to begin with.

I can't say I wouldn't be upset if my kids were getting all these things without me knowing about it even though I understand the importance of confidentiality.

There's just no way to please everyone involved.

CygnusDarius: Ever ever?.

Ever ever ever.



ever.

EsteeFlwrPot: CygnusDarius: Ever ever?.

Ever ever ever.



ever.

Oh, ok.

So Maybe later.

/I'm just yanking your chain now
//It's not dead, it's resting

bouchdogg: CygnusDarius

Do anal.

Anal = No Babies

/Brilliant.



Sure I walk a bit funny the next day, but my future's worth it.

CygnusDarius: Oh, ok.

So Maybe later.

/I'm just yanking your chain now
//It's not dead, it's resting

I hope not. This thread has potential.

/umm...
//yay sex ed!

EsteeFlwrPot: I hope not. This thread has potential.

/umm...
//yay sex ed!

Actually, it's just paining for the fjords (new window).

It's more fun if they let the kids figure it out themselves.

Sex ed just can't replace that feeling a young boy gets when he finds his grandpa's copy of Juggs & Ammo.

Batewoman: It doesn't sound like any of the concerned parents were saying that the kids shouldn't be getting contraceptives, just that they themselves would like to know about it so they could maybe talk to their kids and put an end to the risky behaviors?

It's a double-edged sword really. Either you're effectively denying the kids what they need because they won't seek it if their confidentiality is not protected OR you're leaving parents out of what is, in some cases, medical treatment of their children (plan B, chlamydia testing, contraceptive pills) when the parents really might be able to stop their kids from getting in this trouble to begin with.

I can't say I wouldn't be upset if my kids were getting all these things without me knowing about it even though I understand the importance of confidentiality.

There's just no way to please everyone involved.

Fark 'em.

/On second thought, no.
/That's how this all got started in the first place.

lol wut?

Let them learn the new American abstinence-only sex-ed method: Sex is bad if it can get you pregnant. Therefore, sex that cannot get you pregnant is OK.

Therefore...of the three kinds of sex a male can have with a female, two are still OK. One is kind of icky, especially if you're only 13, but, if you just gotta have sex, then...

"How did you manage to get gonorrhea?!???!!!??"
"But Mom, you said as long as I didn't get pregnant..."

Gyrfalcon: Let them learn the new American abstinence-only sex-ed method: Sex is bad if it can get you pregnant. Therefore, sex that cannot get you pregnant is OK.

Therefore...of the three kinds of sex a male can have with a female, two are still OK. One is kind of icky, especially if you're only 13, but, if you just gotta have sex, then...
oh come on, swallowing can't be that bad

Are those the only two choices?

eddyatwork: Because providing objective information to sexually active students is so much worse than letting religious freaks in denial mode about teenagers is better.

To an atheist hammer everything looks like religion that needs nailed to a cross

mjk42: oh come on, swallowing can't be that bad

Aparently, there's a small chance it might (new window).

The true STDs you kinda have to fear are the ones that have no cure: HIV and Herpes.

HIV either kills you or weakens you, but Herpes is just annoying and comes and goes at any moment's notice.

/But then again, you may get herpes even if you don't have sex
//Mouth sores and such
///Sex-ed in Jr. high

CygnusDarius: but Herpes is just annoying and comes and goes at any moment's notice.

Kind of like teenagers.

What what? (new window)

They were very very very justified to complain.

There is absolutely positively no reason for it to not be 100%.

CygnusDarius: Do anal.

Obligatory:


/Hotlinked.
//For a bonus read the hosting blog.

amanogowa: CygnusDarius: Do anal.

Obligatory:


/Hotlinked.
//For a bonus read the hosting blog.

Uhh, aren't you afraid of the banhammer?.

/Not that I don't mind
//I'll fap the concerns away

This thread has potential.

CygnusDarius: amanogowa: CygnusDarius: Do anal.

Obligatory:


/Hotlinked.
//For a bonus read the hosting blog.

Uhh, aren't you afraid of the banhammer?.

/Not that I don't mind
//I'll fap the concerns away

I would mind a banhammer -- but I would rather live 'Old Fark' style. I have seen this posted numerous times ( I got it from fark, actually ) and have never seen a ban come of it.

/It's a NSFW thread, stay out if you you are at work, and your work would care.

bouchdogg: This thread has potential.

Potential for buttsecks (new window, NSFW)?.

CygnusDarius

LOL, that pic delivered just what the URL said it would!

CygnusDarius [TotalFark]

Oooh, this could get out of hand. Good thing I don't know how to hotlink. I think photobucket would ban me for playing.

We would say that this is the end of innocence
Andy Hibberd
Parent Organisation


I'd say this is the end of ignorance. Is a parent being unaware of a child's sexuality really worse than a child denying him/herself help out of shame, or a child being denied help by an ignorant parent?

Batewoman: It doesn't sound like any of the concerned parents were saying that the kids shouldn't be getting contraceptives, just that they themselves would like to know about it so they could maybe talk to their kids and put an end to the risky behaviors?

Except in most cases you won't succeed.

It's a double-edged sword really. Either you're effectively denying the kids what they need because they won't seek it if their confidentiality is not protected OR you're leaving parents out of what is, in some cases, medical treatment of their children (plan B, chlamydia testing, contraceptive pills) when the parents really might be able to stop their kids from getting in this trouble to begin with.

I can't say I wouldn't be upset if my kids were getting all these things without me knowing about it even though I understand the importance of confidentiality.

There's just no way to please everyone involved.

The thing is the choice isn't between the kids getting the stuff and telling the parents or the kids getting it and not telling the parents, but rather between getting/not telling and not going in the first place.

Gyrfalcon: Let them learn the new American abstinence-only sex-ed method: Sex is bad if it can get you pregnant. Therefore, sex that cannot get you pregnant is OK.

Therefore...of the three kinds of sex a male can have with a female, two are still OK. One is kind of icky, especially if you're only 13, but, if you just gotta have sex, then...

"How did you manage to get gonorrhea?!???!!!??"
"But Mom, you said as long as I didn't get pregnant..."

Actually, you can get pregnant from anal. A properly-used condom in the vagina is actually safer than no condom in the back door. The thing is, the semen can leak out and if she's lying face down where is it going to leak onto...

Onager: I'd say this is the end of ignorance. Is a parent being unaware of a child's sexuality really worse than a child denying him/herself help out of shame, or a child being denied help by an ignorant parent?

because we always should tell abusive parents that their little snowflake is sexually active. That way, they can properly beat the shiat out of the little slut when she gets home from school.

There is usually a reason why the kid doesn't want mummy and daddy to find out. Maybe that reason isn't based in reality, but perception is huge. If the child perceives that her parents will get violent/reject her etc, if they find out she has had sex, then the last people she will want to know about her activities is her parents.

If these parents want to be told, maybe they should spend more time talking to their kids, instead of demanding that they always get the news second hand from school.

There are only 1 reason for disagreeing with these clinics: because you want your kid to walk down the aisle as a virgin. There is no other justification I can think of. And for that, people will throw the dice of them not respecting your sky fairy views and risk pregnancy or disease.

If your kid wants to talk to you about sex, they will, in which case these clinics are there, but unused. If not, there's a very good chance that they won't respect your wishes and will go ahead anyway, in which case you'd want this fallback.

Unless you want your kids locked up in a convent or under a burqua, you just have to accept this.

I'd like to think my kids could talk to me at this time, and have an open and honest conversation, but I'd also rather that if they couldn't, that they'd protect themselves.

farkeruk:
There are only 1 reason for disagreeing with these clinics: because you want your kid to walk down the aisle as a virgin sterile, chlamydia-riddled sexual basket case.

As was said above, sometimes the parents ARE the problem, and kids need another source of advice and information. It's in everyone's best interest for them to have it available, too. Otherwise they won't go to their parents, they'll try to sort it out on their own. and we all know how well THAT usually works.

As someone who regularly navigates a gauntlet of rosary stroking finger waggers to get to work, I'm getting a kick out of blah blah...