wow.

Remember the days when his inability to command the english language was the worst thing about Bush?

At least he didn't call himself a jelly donut.

Yanks_RSJ: At least he didn't call himself a jelly donut.

Ich bin ein dumbasser

Emogeek: Remember the days when his inability to command the english language was the worst thing about Bush?

Tell me about it.

Emogeek: Remember the days when his inability to command [of] the [E]nglish language was the worst thing about Bush?

Teehee.

It's a put-on!

what a surprise

Emogeek: Remember the days when his inability to command the english language was the worst thing about Bush?

Oh, how I wish that his butchering of our language was the wost thing he did. I miss those halcyon days.

your holiness, if i said you had a nice body would you hold it against me?

That's awesome...He's like Keanu Reeves in Bill & Ted's Excellent adventure...

cue wild stallions!

ElQue: Emogeek: Remember the days when his inability to command the english language was the worst thing about Bush?

Oh, how I wish that his butchering of our language was the wost thing he did. I miss those halcyon days.

That's a pre-9/11 mindset.

/had to be done

GAT_00: ElQue: Emogeek: Remember the days when his inability to command the english language was the worst thing about Bush?

Oh, how I wish that his butchering of our language was the wost thing he did. I miss those halcyon days.

That's a pre-9/11 mindset.

/had to be done

You are correct, sir. Since 9/11 Bush has been the epochal President. The blood of the non-believers has flowed, and shall flow more upon the election of the Prodigal McCain (bow to his name.)

OK, I could only make it about halfway through before I started laughing. I suck at trolling.

/G08AMA

He gets clumsier and more stupid by the month. How does he manage to dress himself?

Yanks_RSJ: At least he didn't call himself a jelly donut.

Neither did Kennedy. It's a silly urban legend.

World, we apologize profusely... again... for the buffoon in the White House. We promise that the next President will be very police and coherent.

The White House dutifully noted each mistake in the official transcript of Bush's remarks. There was an asterisk in the text next to each wrong word, and then an explanation at the bottom.

No one is busier than the Undersecretary in charge of Correcting Transcripts and Explaining Bushisms?


/betcha even they get stumped half the time.

He gets clumsier and more stupid by the month. How does he manage to dress himself?

If I were President, I'd have the Secretary of the Treasury do it because my ass is so money.

Actually, Bush is going to be remembered by history more fondly and accurately than the shameful media-driven debacle of the past eight years. For every collection of sound bites they tirelessly pounce on are remarks barely noticed by the Bush haters. Despite your hellbent destruction of this man's character, I believe that much to your chagrin he will be taught to your children as one of America's greatest Presidents, not one of its worst, as your annoyingly constant efforts would have us believe.

skookum: I believe that much to your chagrin he will be taught to your children as one of America's greatest Presidents

Holy shiat, is this guy serious? Surely, he's not serious.

I mean, really, are you serious?

/too heartfelt to be a troll-Are you REALLY serious?

BenderZone: skookum: I believe that much to your chagrin he will be taught to your children as one of America's greatest Presidents

Holy shiat, is this guy serious? Surely, he's not serious.

I mean, really, are you serious?

/too heartfelt to be a troll-Are you REALLY serious?

Yes, he's serious.

skookum

Actually, Bush is going to be remembered by history more fondly and accurately than the shameful media-driven debacle of the past eight years. For every collection of sound bites they tirelessly pounce on are remarks barely noticed by the Bush haters. Despite your hellbent destruction of this man's character, I believe that much to your chagrin he will be taught to your children as one of America's greatest Presidents, not one of its worst, as your annoyingly constant efforts would have us believe.

What are you smoking and where can I get some?

skookum: Actually, Bush is going to be remembered by history more fondly and accurately than the shameful media-driven debacle of the past eight years. For every collection of sound bites they tirelessly pounce on are remarks barely noticed by the Bush haters. Despite your hellbent destruction of this man's character, I believe that much to your chagrin he will be taught to your children as one of America's greatest Presidents, not one of its worst, as your annoyingly constant efforts would have us believe.

I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later. Each president has blood on his hands, it's all about how history sees it later. LBJ killed hundreds of thousands and JFK killed tens of thousands, but they are given a shiny make over in retrospect.

And your replies more than prove that America has an unhealthy obsession with the media-driven attacks on the Bush administration.

The truth is that no one has yet found any actual trace of wrongdoing either by Bush or his associates. The fervor to oust Bush was fueled by the 2000 election and the subsequent failure of the liberal movement to contest Bush's win. There is no doubt that this is the root reason for the attacks. Liberals who simply could not accept that their candidate, Al Gore, was soundly defeated.

Technically, you're supposed to call a cardinal Your Eminence.

And technically, Benedict is a cardinal. A really awesome cardinal who rules over and gives swirlies to all the other cardinals, but still a cardinal.

homerdrew415: cue wild stallions!

And that's Wyld Stallyns.

On Friday, Mrs. Bush and Carla Sarkozy-Bruni slipped into a separate hall of the Elysee Palace for a private get-to-know-each-other session while the other guests were arriving.


That's hot.

homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

skookum: And your replies more than prove that America has an unhealthy obsession with the media-driven attacks on the Bush administration.

The truth is that no one has yet found any actual trace of wrongdoing either by Bush or his associates. The fervor to oust Bush was fueled by the 2000 election and the subsequent failure of the liberal movement to contest Bush's win. There is no doubt that this is the root reason for the attacks. Liberals who simply could not accept that their candidate, Al Gore, was soundly defeated.

Soundly defeated: No. BARELY defeated by the outdated Electoral College (and suspected cheating)? Yes. Also, are you denying that Bush started the UNWINNABLE War on Terrorism (Not the war against the people who attacked us on 9/11: Iraq has been shown to have had NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT), has apparently completely forgotten about Osama bin Laden, and has had a major hand in sending the economy into the shiatter?

If so, you have your head so far up your ass, you're in danger of choking on it.

andrewagill: Technically, you're supposed to call a cardinal Your Eminence.

And technically, Benedict is a cardinal. A really awesome cardinal who rules over and gives swirlies to all the other cardinals, but still a cardinal.

homerdrew415: cue wild stallions!

And that's Wyld Stallyns.

fine, draw attention to my shortcomings...

Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

skookum: The truth is that no one has yet found any actual trace of wrongdoing either by Bush or his associates.

Wow, skookum, you really are serious! I had no idea. I'm not gonna argue with you, cause what's the point, really? But I admire your steadfast belief in your favorite prez, and I guess you have that loyalty thing going for you.

homerdrew415: Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

Eisenhower was certainly better - despite the 1950s climate of fear

thisispete: homerdrew415: Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

Eisenhower was certainly better - despite the 1950s climate of fear

And I said he'd measure up with anyone after FDR, so yay! we both win!

homerdrew415: Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

I honestly believe that he's worse than Nixon. LBJ I don't enough about to have a real opinion (I wasn't alive for either, but I know more about Nixon).

Don't get me wrong, Nixon was a douchebag...but Bush attains a level of malice and incompetence that is truly hard to match. Every time that I think that he can get no worse, he raises the bar.

homerdrew415: Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

Admittedly, English is not my first language and I've wrapped myself around a few bottles of very good beer, but doesn't "measure with any president FDR or later" mean that GWB is expected to be on par with the best presidents since FDR?

I'm open to the idea that history may redeem the man to some degree, but I'm not sure I'm ready to accept the idea that he'll be as good as, say, Bush I.

homerdrew415: You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

Nixon had the common decency to resign. Call me when Bush does the same.

Saddam Hussein was a dictator that harbored Terror. Bush mentioned in his post-9/11 address that we would no longer tolerate countries that harbored terror and that's exactly what we've done.

And no, 2000 was a landslide election where the Democrats were defeated. But thank you for proving my point as to the birth of the attacks on this administration. Your man lost, and you just couldn't accept it, could you? Must be Bush's fault! Oo! Election Fraud! Even though you can't prove it.

Like I said, give history 10 or 20 years to breathe and these stupid enigmatic conspiracy-driven idiots will be all but forgotten.

skookum: Actually, Bush is going to be remembered by history more fondly and accurately than the shameful media-driven debacle of the past eight years. For every collection of sound bites they tirelessly pounce on are remarks barely noticed by the Bush haters. Despite your hellbent destruction of this man's character, I believe that much to your chagrin he will be taught to your children as one of America's greatest Presidents, not one of its worst, as your annoyingly constant efforts would have us believe.

Put down the bong and get some Funyuns.

Erik_Emune: ... but I'm not sure I'm ready to accept the idea that he'll be as good as, say, Bush I.

Oh, and let me state for the record that I don't consider Bush I a particularly good president. Competent, though.

skookum: Actually, Bush is going to be remembered by history more fondly and accurately than the shameful media-driven debacle of the past eight years. For every collection of sound bites they tirelessly pounce on are remarks barely noticed by the Bush haters. Despite your hellbent destruction of this man's character, I believe that much to your chagrin he will be taught to your children as one of America's greatest Presidents, not one of its worst, as your annoyingly constant efforts would have us believe.


Agrees?

skookum: Saddam Hussein was a dictator that harbored Terror. Bush mentioned in his post-9/11 address that we would no longer tolerate countries that harbored terror and that's exactly what we've done. Really? Then why are we ALLIES with Saudi Arabia?

And no, 2000 was a landslide election where the Democrats were defeated. But thank you for proving my point as to the birth of the attacks on this administration. Your man lost, and you just couldn't accept it, could you? Must be Bush's fault! Oo! Election Fraud! Even though you can't prove it. 271 electoral votes to 266 is a landslide?

Like I said, give history 10 or 20 years to breathe and these stupid enigmatic conspiracy-driven idiots will be all but forgotten.

Because they'll all be locked up in concentration re-education camps, right?

Abner Doon: homerdrew415: Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

I honestly believe that he's worse than Nixon. LBJ I don't enough about to have a real opinion (I wasn't alive for either, but I know more about Nixon).

Don't get me wrong, Nixon was a douchebag...but Bush attains a level of malice and incompetence that is truly hard to match. Every time that I think that he can get no worse, he raises the bar.

Bush has only recently passed the death toll of JFK, and but there's no way he's going to pass up LBJ. For a point of reference, LBJ escalated Vietnam after JFK was murdered. Remember, LBJ killed hundreds of thousands in Asia and as a bonus he did a number on South America...

Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: Erik_Emune: homerdrew415: I dont know about one of the greatest, but I'd like to think he'd measure with any president FDR or later.

I'd like to think Brooke Shields will show up in my bedroom wearing nothing but heels, black lace and an impish smile. So it goes.

You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

Admittedly, English is not my first language and I've wrapped myself around a few bottles of very good beer, but doesn't "measure with any president FDR or later" mean that GWB is expected to be on par with the best presidents since FDR?

I'm open to the idea that history may redeem the man to some degree, but I'm not sure I'm ready to accept the idea that he'll be as good as, say, Bush I.

What I meant is that he's no worse than any president since FDR, and that he's only slightly worse than JFK, and better than LBJ in terms of body count.

Occam's Chainsaw: homerdrew415: You think that he's worse than LBJ or Nixon?

Nixon had the common decency to resign. Call me when Bush does the same.

Let me guess, you'd prefer Bush would commit suicide right?

From Worst to First:

Worst Since FDR: George W Bush
Next to Worst: Nixon
Carter
Ford
LBJ
George HW Bush
Eisenhower
Bill Clinton
Ronald Reagan
JFK
Truman---the best since FDR

skookum: And your replies more than prove that America has an unhealthy obsession with the media-driven attacks on the Bush administration.

The truth is that no one has yet found any actual trace of wrongdoing either by Bush or his associates. The fervor to oust Bush was fueled by the 2000 election and the subsequent failure of the liberal movement to contest Bush's win. There is no doubt that this is the root reason for the attacks. Liberals who simply could not accept that their candidate, Al Gore, was soundly defeated.

Ummm... the various press organizations teamed up and actually counted every vote cast in Florida a bunch of times using the different standards. Every single time, Gore won by at least a hundred votes. Unfortunately, by the time they finished their counting, it was October 2001, and we were in a "post-9/11" mindset. THe New York Times buried the story out of respect.

And it's a farkin' surprise that the lockstep-Republican Congress didn't find anything wrong that King George did? Puh-leeze. If you don't look, you don't find anything!

There's a REASON that Harriet Meirs and Karl Rove won't appear before Congress to answer questions, and a reason that the US Attorney General won't convene a grand jury if Congress files a lawsuit to force them to testify.

How about outing Valarie Plame and her CIA anti-nuclear-proliferation front organization Brewster Jennings? You know, the one that was trying to figure out Iran's nuclear program? I get the impression that the Bushies think the Iranian nuke program is significant somehow. So why would they out them, unless they were finding information that didn't jibe with Bush's thirst for an Iranian strike?

How about politizing the Justice Department (Attorneygate) to the point that 90% of all investigations of politicians are of Democrats, even though most arrests and convictions are of Republicans? How about warrantless wiretapping? How about those mutli-million missing emails? How about using non-partisan government agencies like the General Services Administration to help get Republicans elected? How about torture? How about denial of due process or habeas corpus? How about abusing executive priviledge and national security to try to hide all of the crimes?

Christ, if Clinton had tried a hundrenth of what Bush is pulling his impeachment would have been successfull, and rightfully so!

The guy at the end of the thread: Leave Chester A Arthur alone!

skookum: The truth is that no one has yet found any actual trace of wrongdoing either by Bush or his associates.

No, there has been lots and lots of wrongdoing. Just no one has actually managed to get him jailed because of it yet. See also, 35 articles of impeachment.

homerdrew415: Let me guess, you'd prefer Bush would commit suicide right?

The correct response to bringing such shame upon your house would be seppuku, yes. Seeing as how Bush isn't Japanese, though, I'll settle for confession and inprisonment.

skookumSaddam Hussein was a dictator that harbored Terror. Bush mentioned in his post-9/11 address that we would no longer tolerate countries that harbored terror and that's exactly what we've done.

in pre-invasion 2003, Bush consciously harbored Al Qaeda and ricin/cyanide labs in the US-patrolled no-fly zone, which he repeatedly blocked the Pentagon from launching air strikes at, because it would make Saddam look good for being the one who actually DIDN'T let terrorists walk around in HIS controlled areas of Iraq. Plus he failed to tell Congress or the US public about it.

Bush willingly let terrorists live and put us in harm's way, and he kept it all a secret just because he thought he would redeem himself by killing Saddam. Don't fellate him dude. You're supporting the terrorists by doing that.