That first woman (Harri Krishna?) was mentally ill.

I have to question the sanity of ANY Clinton supporter. When you look at her track record from the Watergate days until now, you realize one thing: she will do anything to win.

Just look at what Jerry Zeifman had to say about her after he fired her for her conduct. "She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."

Now look at how she is trying to bend the rules she initially agreed to in order to take the nomination. Sickening.

On the other side, I'm not an Obama nut either. I just can not vote for McCain, and I refuse to vote for Hillary.

I also distrust all politicians. So there's that too.

"Those who seek power are not worthy of that power." - plato

An absolute disgrace. I can only hope they haven't bred.

I like the one that said she was going to vote for McCain if she didn't get her way. When did Hillary supporters devolve into "Do what I want or else?" Just how can you have such a selective memory to forget that Hillary discounted both these states, and her people at the DNC voted unanimously to strip these states of their delegates. These people are, in effect, protesting their own vote.

i was robbed!

that first woman is truly...

words fail me, they do.

Can you say Cognitive Dissonance? Do those people even listen to themselves when they talk?

Main Premise of all of these "supporters": Hillary is the best candidate to beat McCain, and it is important for the Democrats to win the Presidency.

So if Hillary does not win the nomination: They will vote for McCain... the Republican... because it is so important for a Democrat to win the Presidency.

Yeah... you know what Harriette Christian, and the rest of the ladies threatening to abandon the party if Hillary does get the nomination, don't let the door hit you on the way out.

We don't need you, we don't want you, and we are not going to entertain your histrionic panic du jour for your vote; good day!

Why the hell don't Hillary supporters vote for Nader or something? Why does it have to be McCain?

ks420: Why the hell don't Hillary supporters vote for Nader or something? Why does it have to be McCain?

Because vagina.

The party of inclusion has turned into Kali the Earth Mother Party eating her children.. Well, eating her white middle aged women children.

Buffet nonetheless... Good eatin' if you like grizzled former milfs.

Party Boy

I came here to say that....

Please, someone put some Midol in the water supply, the fluoride isn't working.

(Or perhaps it's 'Floridation" that's causing the problem?)

ks420: Why the hell don't Hillary supporters vote for Nader or something? Why does it have to be McCain?

Because the people who incite this shiat do it at the behest of big business. The two best characters for these disaster capitalists are McCain and Clinton. If you can pray on people's idiocy to get that done then, huzzah!

Occam's Chainsaw: ks420: Why the hell don't Hillary supporters vote for Nader or something? Why does it have to be McCain?

Because sandy vagina.

FTFY

SilentStrider: that first woman is truly...

words fail me, they do.

Probably for the best. Anything you came up with would, no doubt, be misogynist.

/props, heap

In other news, Cheesecake Factory outlets in and around D.C. went bone dry today.

Phil Moskowitz: ks420: Why the hell don't Hillary supporters vote for Nader or something? Why does it have to be McCain?

Because the people who incite this shiat do it at the behest of big business. The two best characters for these disaster capitalists are McCain and Clinton. If you can pray on people's idiocy to get that done then, huzzah!

No. Because voting for McCain is a giant middle finger to the Obama supports who took away "their election." It's no less childish than that. And it's pretty much human nature and is done out of spite in thousands of other situations every day.

In the end, they won't end up voting for McCain, but right now, when they're still angry, they'll say it.

First woman's bat shiat crazy.

That white black thin at the beginning doesn't even make sense.

I will confidently predict that if Barack Obama is not the Democratic nominee for President, the Democrats will lose the John McCain. Black voters will see this as the ultimate betrayal by the Clintons and the Democratic Party and stay home.

And I think they'd be right to do so. Both major parties have mostly given empty promises and symbolic gestures, at least when they haven't been working directly against African-Americans' interests. The loss of the nomination when it has been, by any reasonable measure, sewn up, will be the final straw. Democrats will lose. Republicans will win. Our country will be screwed for the foreseeable future.

Something about 2:30 AM makes me really cynical.

guilt by association: In other news, Cheesecake Factory outlets in and around D.C. went bone dry today.

Hahahahhaa.

I'm glad this carries the Obvious. At last the truth of gay Obama's murdering, Islamic extremist, white-hating, fundie Christian ways has seen the light of Fark.

FitzShivering: In the end, they won't end up voting for McCain, but right now, when they're still angry, they'll say it.

They'll do the "lesser of two evils" puss-out, I'm sure. Like their candidate, they have no principles or backbones.

FitzShivering: Phil Moskowitz: ks420: Why the hell don't Hillary supporters vote for Nader or something? Why does it have to be McCain?

Because the people who incite this shiat do it at the behest of big business. The two best characters for these disaster capitalists are McCain and Clinton. If you can pray on people's idiocy to get that done then, huzzah!

No. Because voting for McCain is a giant middle finger to the Obama supports who took away "their election." It's no less childish than that. And it's pretty much human nature and is done out of spite in thousands of other situations every day.

In the end, they won't end up voting for McCain, but right now, when they're still angry, they'll say it.

That's the level of dialog the proles understand. That's not what's really happening. As with everything else political, there's the infantile nonsense they distract Americans with, and there's the professional agenda.

Until today, I thought hillaryis44 was made up almost entirely of trolls, I didn't think people could possibly be like that in real life. Harriet Christian proved that wrong. Unless she's the best IRL troll who ever lived, in which case nothing 4chan has ever pulled or ever will pull could ever come close to that magnificent piece of IRL trolling.

Phil Moskowitz: That's the level of dialog the proles understand.

How droll.

The proletariat is sooooo last century. do we still let the little people vote? If so...why?

rynthetyn: Until today, I thought hillaryis44 was made up almost entirely of trolls, I didn't think people could possibly be like that in real life. Harriet Christian proved that wrong. Unless she's the best IRL troll who ever lived, in which case nothing 4chan has ever pulled or ever will pull could ever come close to that magnificent piece of IRL trolling.

By trolls, I think you actually meant people who act tough and stuff on the internet, but are quiet docile citizens off of the internet. Internet Tough Gals.

ajlull: I have to question the sanity of ANY Clinton supporter. When you look at her track record from the Watergate days until now, you realize one thing: she will do anything to win.

"Anthing to win" IS who supports her.

It's the bastardization of feminism. Taking "Women can do anything" from meaning 'you shouldn't stop a women from being herself' to ANYTHING at ALL a woman wants to do, refusing any constraint, moral, ethical, human... which is just a tool of 'oppression' to keep the wymnz DOWN!

You people need to get your heads around this. The Karl Rove's of the world sit around thinking of how to give people the nudge in the direction of acting like children, to lose their faculties and run around indulging all of their infantile urges. Then they engineer a website, a "movement", an sound bite, a notion that makes people do just that. Nearly everything modern politics is engineered by Edward Bernays natural successors.

God, I can't stand this! Why are her supporters so damn DUMB!? They have no right to vote in the primaries. The parties don't have to even hold the primaries, they could choose the nominee by drawing a name out of a hat. There is no constitutional amendment, no civic duty to vote in the primary.

/Of course, if Obama was behind, I might be singing a different tune. I'll admit that much.

Phil Moskowitz: You people need to get your heads around this. The Karl Rove's of the world sit around thinking of how to give people the nudge in the direction of acting like children, to lose their faculties and run around indulging all of their infantile urges. Then they engineer a website, a "movement", an sound bite, a notion that makes people do just that. Nearly everything modern politics is engineered by Edward Bernays natural successors.

develop this further. Ill read it

Phil Moskowitz: You people need to get your heads around this. The Karl Rove's of the world sit around thinking of how to give people the nudge in the direction of acting like children, to lose their faculties and run around indulging all of their infantile urges. Then they engineer a website, a "movement", an sound bite, a notion that makes people do just that. Nearly everything modern politics is engineered by Edward Bernays natural successors.

Infantile urges? You mean like posting to a forum drunk, captioning pictures of cats, and bizarre photoshops?

Phil Moskowitz: You people need to get your heads around this. The Karl Rove's of the world sit around thinking of how to give people the nudge in the direction of acting like children, to lose their faculties and run around indulging all of their infantile urges. Then they engineer a website, a "movement", an sound bite, a notion that makes people do just that. Nearly everything modern politics is engineered by Edward Bernays natural successors.

Too true.

If not for my superior tinfoil hat making skills I too would have fallen into their nefarious traps.

starsrift: Phil Moskowitz: You people need to get your heads around this. The Karl Rove's of the world sit around thinking of how to give people the nudge in the direction of acting like children, to lose their faculties and run around indulging all of their infantile urges. Then they engineer a website, a "movement", an sound bite, a notion that makes people do just that. Nearly everything modern politics is engineered by Edward Bernays natural successors.

Infantile urges? You mean like posting to a forum drunk, captioning pictures of cats, and bizarre photoshops?

Poopyhead!

silly pics thread not complete without

Didn't watch any of the videos, but the whine level from BHO supporters in here is very high.

Step One: Hold elections properly so everyone gets to consider every candidate and then vote.

Step Two: ???? (something about chads and dimples probably)

Step Three: Count all votes.

It's frankly disgusting that these people are politicizing what is indeed an unjust breakdown of the system, instead of actually being concerned about why and where it truly broke.

Speaker2Animals: Didn't watch any of the videos, but the whine level from BHO supporters in here is very high.

Tell me about it. They're acting like Hillary supporters.

Party Boy: /props, heap

That. Is a work of art.

I suddenly craze link sausage.

rynthetyn: Until today, I thought hillaryis44 was made up almost entirely of trolls, I didn't think people could possibly be like that in real life. Harriet Christian proved that wrong. Unless she's the best IRL troll who ever lived, in which case nothing 4chan has ever pulled or ever will pull could ever come close to that magnificent piece of IRL trolling.

She, and potentially all of the other video subjects, are Republicans flown to and paid to attend this event. Actual Hillary supporters know they lost.

/Edwards '04

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Party Boy: /props, heap

That. Is a work of art.

the image size limit is pretty small, constraining lulz

Speaker2Animals: Didn't watch any of the videos, but the whine level from BHO supporters in here is very high.

You should watch the videos and understand what they're wining about.

Every time someone calls him BHO I think "BTO."

Yeah, that's Obama. Takin' Care of Business.

rynthetyn: Harriet Christian

Code_Archeologist: Harriette Christian


Somehow, Im thinking thats not her real name.

If this is how the Democrats get along with eachother now that Obama is in the driver's seat I wonder how they will be able to get along with the Republicans at all should he be elected president?

Although there are some thoughtful and intelligent Clinton supporters, her most rabid fans tend to be dumb as rocks. You literally cannot engage them in debate, since their grasp of logic is so tenuous. They appear, as we say in the psych biz, to lack "differentiation"--that is, they have difficulty distinguishing thoughts from feelings. Thus, if they feel it, it must be true. If seeing Obama on TV makes them feel scared and angry, it must be because he is a bad man. The idea that they might be simply projecting these feelings onto him is vigorously rejected. This is, I think, why they always accuse him of being a racist. They project their own racism onto him.

I know I'm oversimplifying this, but not by much.

Phil Moskowitz: FitzShivering: Phil Moskowitz: ks420: Why the hell don't Hillary supporters vote for Nader or something? Why does it have to be McCain?

Because the people who incite this shiat do it at the behest of big business. The two best characters for these disaster capitalists are McCain and Clinton. If you can pray on people's idiocy to get that done then, huzzah!

No. Because voting for McCain is a giant middle finger to the Obama supports who took away "their election." It's no less childish than that. And it's pretty much human nature and is done out of spite in thousands of other situations every day.

In the end, they won't end up voting for McCain, but right now, when they're still angry, they'll say it.

That's the level of dialog the proles understand. That's not what's really happening. As with everything else political, there's the infantile nonsense they distract Americans with, and there's the professional agenda.

There aren't enough people outside of the "proletariat" who will be voting to matter what a hidden cabal of power brokers think. The simple fact is there are some very pissed off feminists who are experiencing a batch of rotten grapes. They will not, in the end, vote for the person who most represents everything they stand against. Peoples' anger just isn't that long lasting.