i think an "oh snap" is appropriate here.

"Hey Joe, is that my ass over there?"

"No, John. That's a hole in the ground."

Not very informative, Mike. How about some examples of what McCain has gotten "terribly wrong"?

SilentStrider: i think an "oh snap" is appropriate here.



Posted for your enjoyment.

Oh no he di-int

I'd rather listen to Micheal Yon instead of some CNN correspondent when it comes to Iraq issues.

Yeah, because CNN, the group that pandered to Saddam to stay in Iraq has such credibility. Leave the green zone for once douchebag.


Thank me for my time.

Dear Mr Ware... you've been there continuously for several years and still get the assessments wrong, don't talk out your ass.

The problem in Iraq isn't IN Bagdhad, it is the religious infidelity that most its citizens have in relation to ACTUAL Islam.

The can be lead about by pompus cock-dribbles who know all the words to the play but like to improvise the lines as they see fit.


BTW: The Onanist, the context in which that commercial USED "Oh, Snap!" was incorrect to begin with.

McCain is a douchebag's douchebag. He is the runny liquid that surrounds your dog's feces. He's maggot poop. John McCain is the pus in a zit.

How on god's green earth has this moran managed to get this close to being president?

Penis goes where?

DrillSergeantPoopyPants: Yeah, because CNN, the group that pandered to Saddam to stay in Iraq has such credibility. Leave the green zone for once douchebag.


Thank me for my time.

hehehehe

This 'article' is definitely not worthy of the main page.

skylabdown: McCain is a douchebag's douchebag. He is the runny liquid that surrounds your dog's feces. He's maggot poop. John McCain is the pus in a zit.

How on god's green earth has this moran managed to get this close to being president?

Yeah. I mean, in the U.S., only the best and brightest make it this far.

skylabdown: McCain is a douchebag's douchebag. He is the runny liquid that surrounds your dog's feces. He's maggot poop. John McCain is the pus in a zit.

How on god's green earth has this moran managed to get this close to being president?

seriously, don't hold back. tell us what you really think.

CNN was in Iraq for 12 years and got it wrong every single day, what with the payoffs to Saddam's henchmen and the deal they cut to shade coverage in Saddam's favor to curry favors and access and allowing Saddam's secret police minders veto power on their coverage.

Wow, an aussie commenting on U.S. policy. An aussie who narrated an insurgent's video of sniping at US troops. Splendifcus! This interview is obviously evidence of something....credible?


/How does it smell to you soldier? How does it feel?

//The horror. The horror....

McCain gets assessments in Iraq wrong.

Ok,... what, exactly?

JOHN RECKLESSLY DISHONEST MCCAIN:HOW DARE YOU QUESTION ME ON ANY THING! I WAS AFTER ALL I WAS A P.O.W.

Posted By: RENR­E­VA­R­D­OOHAY­COM | May 30, 2008 at 03:35 PM

This comment is AWESOME.
NOTE HOW HIS E-MAIL ADRESS IS ALSO ALL IN CAPS.

I can't understand why fark links to someone who's actually just linking to someone. This is retarded. Let me click ONCE for the story.
Actual Link

jjorsett: Not very informative, Mike. How about some examples of what McCain has gotten "terribly wrong"?

McCain said he and two Senate colleagues traveling with him continue to be concerned about Iranian operatives "taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back."

Link (new window)

RamblingKey: CNN was in Iraq for 12 years and got it wrong every single day, what with the payoffs to Saddam's henchmen and the deal they cut to shade coverage in Saddam's favor to curry favors and access and allowing Saddam's secret police minders veto power on their coverage.

Tinfoil hat, you has it?

/either that, or references?

Hmmmmm.... Trust newsie or trust Senator that has access to classified material, briefings, Generals and such.... Hmmmm....

Barry should have the same info, assuming he shows up and asks.

The LooseCannon: RamblingKey: CNN was in Iraq for 12 years and got it wrong every single day, what with the payoffs to Saddam's henchmen and the deal they cut to shade coverage in Saddam's favor to curry favors and access and allowing Saddam's secret police minders veto power on their coverage.

Tinfoil hat, you has it?

/either that, or references?

It's pretty obvious. CNN hired wolf blitzer. Wolves wear sheeps clothing. the word "sheep" sounds a lot like the word "sheik". Sheiks are muslim. Muslims are evil and corrupt. Therefor, CNN is evil and corrupt.

/I have know idea why I typed that, but now it's there, so I'm clicking [add comment]

Did someone get told?

I need to check the flow chart...

Zuel: Hmmmmm.... Trust newsie or trust Senator that has access to classified material, briefings, Generals and such.... Hmmmm....

What do you mean 'trust'? That makes no sense in this context.

seriously, a paragraph gets greenlighted/greenlit/mayan green on-lit??

And I'm a whopping 0-for-a-Brazilian?

No wonder I drink.

WARE: I'll issue a word of caution, too. I mean Senator McCain has been here, what, more than half a dozen times. And we've seen him get assessments of Iraq terribly wrong. So I wouldn't be hanging my hat on the fact that your opponent has only been here once.

Well, after reading that comprehensive and objective article...

/trying to figure how to vote McCain twice...

The LooseCannon: Tinfoil hat, you has it?.../either that, or references?

He is referring to this (new window). A moment or two with google (new window) and you can get the picture.

SilentStrider: i think an "oh snap" is appropriate here.

Every arguement for why John McCain would make an awful President the Republicans already made for me in 2000... more than that all this "new stuff" or what I call 2000-2008 has pretty much sealed the deal on an Obama Presidency...

kilgorn: WARE: I'll issue a word of caution, too. I mean Senator McCain has been here, what, more than half a dozen times. And we've seen him get assessments of Iraq terribly wrong. So I wouldn't be hanging my hat on the fact that your opponent has only been here once.

Well, after reading that comprehensive and objective article...

/trying to figure how to vote McCain twice...

Why would you vote for McCain? Or anyone vote for McCain, for that matter?

Who in their right mind would trust a republican with war ever again?

The fact that the walking sarcophagus doesn't even understand the difference between a Shia and Sunni should send alarm bells to everyone.

Liberal Elite: jjorsett: Not very informative, Mike. How about some examples of what McCain has gotten "terribly wrong"?

McCain said he and two Senate colleagues traveling with him continue to be concerned about Iranian operatives "taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back."

Wait, al-Qaeda isn't Iranian?



/huffpost doesn't mind hotlinking, does it?

Yay! A Saturday night Freeper party!

Shaggy_C: McCain gets assessments in Iraq wrong.

Ok,... what, exactly?


"Saddam Hussein [is] developing weapons of mass destruction as quickly as he can," he informed Fox News in November 2001. By February 2003, McCain had upgraded Hussein's capabilities and was warning Americans that "Hussein has the ability to ... [turn] Iraq into a weapons assembly line for Al Qaeda's network."

"We're not going to get into house-to-house fighting," he scoffed to Wolf Blitzer in 2002. "We're not going to have a bloodletting." In fact, by March 2003, McCain was positively giddy with Rumsfeldian enthusiasm: "There's no doubt in my mind ... we will be welcomed as liberators."

"There's not a history of clashes that are violent between Sunnis and Shias," he explained confidently on MSNBC in April 2003, "so I think they can probably get along."

and there's lots of other quotes but you get the idea.
He really was playing with the truth the other day with his remarks about troop levels. they're only scheduled to be down to 140k after the draw down in July. no plans now on when the rest of the surge can go home. so his statement that we're already down to pre surge levels was false on both fronts.

dolphkhan: And I'm a whopping 0-for-a-Brazilian?

Face it, you're not very funny and you don't link to interesting things.

I always love seeing how fast the partisans come out on these political sites. The discussion in this one took what, three or four posts to turn into two sides screaming "NO U!" at one another.

Gotta love intelligent conversation over political issues...

Hobodeluxe: and there's lots of other quotes but you get the idea.

Those are all from before he went there.

jjorsett: Not very informative, Mike. How about some examples of what McCain has gotten "terribly wrong"?



Here ya go (new window)

Five Tails of Fury: Gotta love intelligent conversation over political issues...

Go back to your LOLCats, freak

What? No photo of McCain in body armor visiting the "safe" market in Iraq?

/cue actual soldiers laughing out loud at McCain's assertions of safety

Five Tails of Fury: Gotta love intelligent conversation over political issues

...to which you've contributed what, exactly?

Shaggy_C: Hobodeluxe: and there's lots of other quotes but you get the idea.

Those are all from before he went there.

"appearing on Fox News Sunday, the Arizona Republican stated that the recent flair up of violence in Basra was ended after Shiite cleric, Muqtada al-Sadr declared a ceasefire. This, he said, was proof that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government was gaining the upper hand, both militarily and politically.



"It was al-Sadr that declared the ceasefire, not Maliki," said McCain. "With respect, I don't think Sadr would have declared the ceasefire if he thought he was winning. Most times in history, military engagements, the winning side doesn't declare the ceasefire. The second point is, overall, the Iraqi military performed pretty well. ... The military is functioning very effectively."

It is a convenient interpretation for a candidate who later went on to tout the political successes of the American troop surge. But it seems to contradict almost all news accounts from last week. Indeed, it was the Iranian government and members of Maliki's government who brokered the ceasefire, not Sadr."

Link (new window)

Liberal Elite 2008-05-31 11:13:16 PM
jjorsett: Not very informative, Mike. How about some examples of what McCain has gotten "terribly wrong"?

McCain said he and two Senate colleagues traveling with him continue to be concerned about Iranian operatives "taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back."

That's it? He misidentifies extremists (which the Iranians are unquestionably supporting) as Al Qaeda and that destroys his credibility?

This thread has provided an unlimited source of drivel. Not one thoughtful sentence posted. Someone needs to limit entrance to third grade level or better. Out of here.

I always love seeing how fast the self righteous come out on these political sites. The discussion in this one took what, nine or ten posts for one guy to blast everyone else for their failure to achieve his approval.

Gotta love intelligent conversation over political issues...

The threads tonight are boring me. If we're not going to make fun of religions, lets talk about soccer:

skylabdown:

McCain is a douchebag's douchebag. He is the runny liquid that surrounds your dog's feces. He's maggot poop. John McCain is the pus in a zit.

How on god's green earth has this moran managed to get this close to being president?


Where have you been the last 7+ years? Your colorful hyperbole serves no purpose.

mark12A: I'd rather listen to Micheal Yon instead of some CNN correspondent when it comes to Iraq issues.

You're farking kidding me, right?

The guy who rides around with Captains and Lt. Colonels for three days and thinks he's not getting smoke blown up his ass just because he's a veteran?