This will end well. Really.

Well... I'd never seen that album cover, and did a google search. Can I now be charged for viewing child porn? Can I countersue WND for enticing me to seek said child porn? Does it matter that that young lady is now 45 years old? How does Nirvana's Nevermind fit in? They didn't even have the decency to cover the infant's junk with a crack.

What's a Virigin?

As of this evening, the photo of the nude child was still available online.

The nude album cover is just one of many hard-core pornographic images displayed on Wikipedia, WND has revealed.

Wait. Nudity is now considered hard-core pornography?!

It's a dude.

Naked does not equal pornographic. What a load of BS.

Nestea Plunge: Recordings of women experiencing orgasms

Videos of nude men participating in "ejaculation educational demonstrations"

Detailed photographs of men and women masturbating
Images of mammary intercourse

Close-up images of topless women and male and female sexual anatomy

Large-scale photos of men performing oral sex on one another (and performing oral sex on themselves)

An illustrated list of sex positions

Threesomes

Photos of nude strippers


Looks like I have some researching to do.

I get all my porn from wikipedoia.

Nudity and pornography are the same thing in the United States of Jesusland.

FTA: As for children's access to the site, he said, "If a child is looking at an article about a penis, he should expect to see a penis."

Very nice...

{INSERT BLIND FAITH IMAGE]

{img src="House of the Holy Pic" /}

So, if you bought the album for the music and got 5-10 instead, what's your remedy against the record label?

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography

Why was I not informed of this?

KIA: So, if you bought the album for the music and got 5"-10" instead, what's your remedy against the record label?

FTFY

Wow, it's been a while since anything showed up here from Wing Nut Daily.

I'm listening to the Scorpions right now so I'm really getting a kick out of these replies.

/No.. really I am.

mediaho: "The nude album cover is just one of many hard-core pornographic images displayed on Wikipedia, WND has revealed."

Wait. Nudity is now considered hard-core pornography?!

Lots of people consider any image that might cause arousal hard core pornography, including images without any nudity. I guess it's because arousal can lead to masturbation and out of wedlock sex.

rocinante721: {INSERT BLIND FAITH IMAGE]

I always wished that chick was hotter.

They'd better not fark with Houses of the Holy.

have they nothing else to do?

talkertopc: Lots of people consider any image that might cause arousal hard core pornography, including images without any nudity. I guess it's because arousal can lead to masturbation and out of wedlock sex.

Yes. Those people are called the Taliban.

(burqa-wearing woman pic would go here if images were not disabled)

WOW, wait 'til they see Nirvana's Nevermind!

/Damn X-Tians

yep, art is porn people... we lost, lets all admit it. And we are farked as a nation

/next topic

You know I used to think it would be the liberals who would remake history to fit their ideals, but now I realize just how Authoritarian some of these conservatives are and it's farking scary.

The photo is also at Amazon.com on a listing of the import CD.

Here are the album covers, both the naked kid one and the one with the band.

Bad taste, yeah. Porn, I don't think so.

How about Van Halen's Balance cover?

I've always thought this one was charming...

ahhh I see images are disabled. Scorpions - Love Drive (pops, and rocks)

MediaWiki:Bad image list - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For your perusal. The page itself contains no NSFW images. Links to NSFW images.

Rinse your cache.

There is also a version of Love At First Sting that was sold only at Walmart. The original cover was replaced with a picture of the band. It's pretty rare. I found a sealed copy several years ago.

SurfaceTension: You know I used to think it would be the liberals who would remake history to fit their ideals, but now I realize just how Authoritarian some of these conservatives are and it's farking scary.

Oh, some on the left have the same sort of authoritarian streak. Seems more prevalent (or just more successful, lately) on the right, though. Both versions scare the fark out of me.

/hard core lefty

Hard-core, by definition requires penetration. P in Va-G. Or something along those lines. This guy is a joke. Kids should learn about sex somehow, Wikipedia beats looking up orgasm in the dictionary and giggling in the elementary school library like I did.

mediaho: Yes. Those people are called the Taliban.

Ankles are hot.

I remember one FARK thread where some idiot decided to post the "Virgin Killers" cover in question, and for no real reason, offering only the most tenuous of explanations as to why it was relevant to the thread.

Is all child nudity porn? No. Is the United States particularly reactionary when it comes to instances of child nudity? Yes. Is the "Virgin Killers" cover porn? I would assert that it is not porn, but it is sexually suggestive. She's got a starburst emanating from her vagina, for crying out loud.

Would I defend the "Virgin Killers" cover as an artistic statement? I'd give that a tenuous "yes," but that's a real tenuous "yes."

FTCCCITFA (From the crazy christian coon in the farking article.)

"It could appeal to the prurient interests of pedophiles around the world."

Using that "logic" what's to stop these folks from going after everything from Renaissance era painting of nude cherubim and seraphim's to photos of girls in their undies in Sunday circulars from J.C. Penny and the like?

Because something might appeal to folks who are sexually attracted to little girls that's reason enough to ban them?

And P.S. What's up with the fact that they keep "moving the goal posts" with regards to what constitutes a "child."

A 16 year old can gang bang the entire football team and half the cheer-leading squad and that's fin and good but if she gives her English teacher a taste she was a "victim?"

Also, why does the law regard her as a "child" is she sleeps with and older man but an "adult" if she murders him?

Do we officially view sex as worse than murder now?

P.S.

Why do these "Concerned women" types never rail against the teen and pre-teen girls who take and post photos of themselves online?

Up next...Blind Faith!

RoyBatty: MediaWiki:Bad image list - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For your perusal. The page itself contains no NSFW images. Links to NSFW images.

Rinse your cache.

notice that out of all those body parts, etc. there's one called "jello biafra mooning?"

Lastly, why do these folks never raise a fuss about the hundreds (thousands) of over-18 web porn starlets who barely look 15 let alone 18 and accentuate that with braces, bedrooms filled with dolls and toys, etc?

(You know who they are . . .)

If they knew about them would they?

Even though they're legal.

The "war on child porn" (meaning the war on teen-aged sexuality and the men who admire/fap to such not actual disgusting abuse of CHILDREN type porn" is about as useful and successful and has about the same (or less) of an interdiction rate than the war on drugs.

One more failed social policy based not on reason or logic but on outmoded and artificial puritanism.

Oh_Enough_Already: Using that "logic" what's to stop these folks from going after everything from Renaissance era painting of nude cherubim and seraphim's to photos of girls in their undies in Sunday circulars from J.C. Penny and the like?

Actually, this thread is now giving me wood.

What, no one's mentioned the several nude child images on Led Zep albums yet?

Whamdangler: What, no one's mentioned the several nude child images on Led Zep albums yet?

No one except bizzle_macizzle and jerry2a

What's wrong with being sexy?

Welcome to the USA, where the nude in art is porn and should be abolished, and REAL art is a plywood cube smeared with the blood of a dozen miscarriages.

The Scorpions cover is pretty dark (and just cheesy and tasteless all-around) but I wouldn't call it pornographic. If this is considered kiddie porn, next they'll go after Blind Faith, Houses of the Holy, Nevermind, Van Halen's "Balance", and Venetian Snares' "Horse and Goat". Don't know that last one? GIS it, I dare ya. Is Cannibal Corpse the next to go? The point is that if we ban everything that could conceivably arouse the interests of sexual deviants, we will have nothing left. Except the Bible, because everyone knows there's no objectionable material there.

That album is 32 years old? Thanks for making me feel really old subby.

Was the ASININE tag broken from overuse in the Politics tab?

Images of mammary intercourse

mmmmm...mammary intercourse

CravenMorehead: That album is 32 years old? Thanks for making me feel really old subby.

If that makes you feel old, this should do worse.. Judas Priest was on Sirius last night and Halford pointed out that the name was created and put into use in 1969.

That IS a pretty sleazy cover... and I'm all about hentai.

The album cover in question (new window)